A review of it mentions this: Researchers analyzed blood samples from 42 people over age 40 who had taken part in a 12-week trial. Using six different protein-based “aging clocks,” they found that all six showed reductions in predicted biological age among participants receiving rentosertib.
Integration of proteomic aging clocks in a phase 2a clinical trial supports simultaneous geroprotective assessment
Nature Biotechnology (2026)
Abstract
Drugs for aging-related diseases may modulate aging itself, but standard clinical trial designs cannot detect such effects. Aging clocks could close this gap, but epigenetic models often yield inconsistent, hard-to-interpret results. In contrast, proteomic clocks, by tracking the immediate effectors of biological change, may excel in providing aging biomarkers or mechanistic insight. Here we compare six proteomic clocks (ProtAge, OrganAgemortality, OrganAgechrono, PAC, ipfP3GPT and PAOPAC) on serum proteomes from a published 12-week phase 2a trial of the candidate anti-fibrotic drug rentosertib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We measure the variance between the clocks and find that all six clocks consistently predicted lower biological age in treated arms. However, proteomic clocks alone cannot deconvolute aging- and disease-specific effects. We addressed this issue indirectly through pathway analyses that identified potential anti-aging shifts in senescence and metabolic processes alongside the anti-fibrotic activity of rentosertib. This work supports the goal of dual-purpose clinical trial designs that integrate aging endpoints into studies for specific disease indications.
No comments:
Post a Comment