Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Stroke Rounds: Light Therapy Flopped in Acute Stroke

This is why negative results are rarely published. We need a stroke association to follow up on all stroke research and report on them. But they won't, it is too much like work.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Strokes/48074?
Details of the failed pivotal NEST 3 trial outline just how little impact transcranial laser therapy had on ischemic stroke.
The rate of good functional outcome at 90 days came out similar with application of the near-infrared frequency laser soon after stroke compared with a sham treatment (49.6% versus 49.3% modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), Werner Hacke, MD, PhD, of Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Germany, and colleagues found.
The adjusted odds ratio was 1.024 after inclusion of all 630 randomized patients (95% confidence interval 0.705-1.488), the group reported in the November issue of Stroke.
"We conclude that transcranial laser therapy does not have a measurable neuroprotective effect in patients with acute ischemic stroke when applied within 24 hours after stroke onset," they concluded.
The initial phase II results had looked promising, but the phase IIb trial, dubbed NEST-2, failed.
The NEST 3 trial was stopped in October 2012 after the interim analysis suggested futility.
MedPage Today reported dim prospects for release of the trial data earlier this year, as all financial support for the trial was immediately withdrawn and the company dissolved after the futility determination.
"Proper termination of the trial was difficult but was finally achieved through special efforts by former employees of PhotoThera, the clinical research organization Parexel, and members of the steering and the safety committees," Hacke's group explained.
NEST 3 had been intended to randomize 1,000 patients with acute ischemic stroke not treated with thrombolytic therapy to either active or sham transcranial laser treatment within 24 hours after stroke onset.
There are near-infrared light therapy devices FDA approved for musculoskeletal pain indications, although in these indications these may simply act as a heat source.
The technology has also been investigated for use in traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and some other neurological conditions.

No comments:

Post a Comment