Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation Strategies in Acute Stroke: A Pilot Study of Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes

Your results are bogus since the FT and ST groups got an extra 20 hours of therapy. And your mentors and senior researchers were so INCOMPETENT THEY ALLOWED THE RESEARCH TO GO ON LIKE THAT?  

 A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation Strategies in Acute Stroke: A Pilot Study of Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes

Carolee J. Winstein, PhD, Dorian K. Rose, MS, Sylvia M. Tan, MS, Rebecca Lewthwaite, PhD, Helena C. Chui, MD, Stanley P. Azen, PhD.  Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. 
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:620-8.

ABSTRACT


 Objective: 

To evaluate the immediate and long-term effects of 2 upper-extremity rehabilitation approaches for stroke com- pared with standard care in participants stratified by stroke severity. Design: Nonblinded, randomized controlled trial (baseline, postintervention, 9mo) design. 

Setting: 

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital and outpatient clinic. 

Participants: 

Sixty-four patients with recent stroke admitted for inpatient rehabilitation were randomized within severity strata (Orpington Prognostic Scale) into 1 of 3 intervention groups. Forty-four patients completed the 9-month follow-up. 

Interventions: 

Standard care (SC), functional task practice (FT), and strength training (ST). The FT and ST groups re- ceived 20 additional hours of upper-extremity therapy beyond standard care distributed over a 4- to 6-week period. 

Main Outcome Measures: 

Performance measures of impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment), strength (isometric torque), and function (Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity [FTHUE]). 

Results: 

Compared with SC participants, those in the FT and ST groups had significantly greater increases in Fugl-Meyer motor scores (P=.04) and isometric torque (P=.02) posttreatment. Treatment benefit was primarily in the less severe participants, where improvement in FT and ST group Fugl-Meyer motor scores more than doubled that of the SC group. Similar results were found for the FTHEU and isometric torque. Dur- ing the long term, at 9 months, the less severe FT group continued to make gains in isometric muscle torque, signifi- cantly exceeding those of the ST group (P.05). 

Conclusions: 

Task specificity and stroke severity are important factors for rehabilitation of arm use in acute stroke. Twenty hours of upper extremity–specific therapy over 4 to 6 weeks significantly affected functional outcomes. The immediate benefits of a functional task approach were similar to those of a resistance-strength approach, however, the former was more beneficial in the long-term. 

No comments:

Post a Comment