Hope you have a gram scale, I just dump about a half cup into my NutriBullit.
But we want to know which nut is the best(almonds, walnuts, pistachios, peanuts). Where is the study pointing that out? This is where a great stroke association would step in, run research and create protocols. BUT NO, WE HAVE FUCKING FAILURES OF STROKE ASSOCIATIONS INSTEAD. Hope you don't mind dying early because of their incompetence.
Maybe your doctor can find something in here.
-
nuts
(17 posts to May 2015)
Daily almond consumption in cardiovascular disease prevention via LDL-C change in the US population: A cost-effectiveness analysis
BMC Public Health — Wang J, Bravatti MAL, Johnson EJ, et al. | April 28, 2020
From the US healthcare sector perspective, the cost-effectiveness
of almond intake (42.5 g) in cardiovascular disease primary prevention
was evaluated in this study. Researchers constructed a decision model
for 42.5 g of almond per day vs no almond intake and cardiovascular
disease in the US population, for which they derived parameters from the
literature. The cost of almonds was based on the current price in the
US market. In the base-case model, $363 lower cost and 0.02 higher
quality-adjusted life years gain were evident for the almond strategy vs
the non-almond strategy. Almond consumption vs no almond consumption
afforded $1421 higher annual net monetary benefit per person, when the
willingness to pay threshold was set at $50,000 for annual health care
cost. In all the sensitivity analyses, a greater cost-effectiveness of
almond in cardiovascular disease prevention was evident, compared with
non-almond. Overall, consuming 42.5 g of almonds per day was concluded
as a cost-effective strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention in
the short term as well as potentially in the long term.
Read the full article on BMC Public Health
No comments:
Post a Comment