http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/25
1
Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems
IRIS, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
4 Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
4 Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:25
doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-25
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/25
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/25
Received: | 1 February 2013 |
Accepted: | 8 February 2014 |
Published: | 4 March 2014 |
© 2014 Marchal-Crespo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background
Robotic haptic guidance is the most commonly used robotic training strategy to reduce
performance errors while training. However, research on motor learning has emphasized
that errors are a fundamental neural signal that drive motor adaptation. Thus, researchers
have proposed robotic therapy algorithms that amplify movement errors rather than
decrease them. However, to date, no study has analyzed with precision which training
strategy is the most appropriate to learn an especially simple task.
Methods
In this study, the impact of robotic training strategies that amplify or reduce errors
on muscle activation and motor learning of a simple locomotor task was investigated
in twenty two healthy subjects. The experiment was conducted with the MAgnetic Resonance
COmpatible Stepper (MARCOS) a special robotic device developed for investigations
in the MR scanner. The robot moved the dominant leg passively and the subject was
requested to actively synchronize the non-dominant leg to achieve an alternating stepping-like
movement. Learning with four different training strategies that reduce or amplify
errors was evaluated: (i) Haptic guidance: errors were eliminated by passively moving
the limbs, (ii) No guidance: no robot disturbances were presented, (iii) Error amplification:
existing errors were amplified with repulsive forces, (iv) Noise disturbance: errors
were evoked intentionally with a randomly-varying force disturbance on top of the
no guidance strategy. Additionally, the activation of four lower limb muscles was
measured by the means of surface electromyography (EMG).
Results
Strategies that reduce or do not amplify errors limit muscle activation during training
and result in poor learning gains. Adding random disturbing forces during training
seems to increase attention, and therefore improve motor learning. Error amplification
seems to be the most suitable strategy for initially less skilled subjects, perhaps
because subjects could better detect their errors and correct them.
Conclusions
Error strategies have a great potential to evoke higher muscle activation and provoke
better motor learning of simple tasks. Neuroimaging evaluation of brain regions involved
in learning can provide valuable information on observed behavioral outcomes related
to learning processes. The impacts of these strategies on neurological patients need
further investigations.
Figure 1 pictures here; looks like supine walking.
No comments:
Post a Comment