What is your doctor doing about this to help your recovery? ANYTHING AT ALL?
http://www.medicaldaily.com/pretty-women-handsome-men-mental-improvement-375557
Are pretty faces a distraction or motivation to improve your memory? According to a new study published in the journal Evolutionary Psychology, it's the latter — attractive people ignite a motivational impulse that makes others work harder to impress them.
"Although
intuition might suggest that exposure to highly attractive people would
be distracting and would impair cognitive performance," said the
study’s lead researcher Michael Baker, a psychologist at East Carolina
University, in a press release,
"mating goals might lead people to display desirable mental traits." To
test the theory, Baker and a team of researchers from East Carolina
University conducted two experiments: First, they recruited 58
heterosexual college students and assigned half of them to view the
opposite sex's face for seven seconds straight. Half of the participants
were randomly designated to look at highly-attractive faces, while the others had to stare at average-looking faces.
More at link, men seem to do better.
Abstract
Background:
Since its discovery in 1894 cross-education of strength — a bilateral
adaptation after unilateral training – has been shown to be effective in
the rehabilitation after one-sided orthopedic injuries. Limited
knowledge exists on its application within the rehabilitation after
stroke. This review examined the evidence regarding the implication of
cross-education in the rehabilitation of the post-stroke hemiplegic
patient and its role in motor function recovery.
Methods: Electronic databases were searched by two independent assessors. Studies were included if they described interventions which examined the phenomenon of cross-education of strength from the less-affected to the more-affected side in stroke survivors. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.
Results: Only two controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. The results of both studies show a clear trend towards cross-educational strength transfer in post-stroke hemiplegic patinets with 31.4% and 45.5% strength increase in the untrained, more-affected dorsiflexor muscle. Results also suggest a possible translation of strength gains towards functional task improvements and motor recovery.
Conclusion: Based on best evidence synthesis guidelines the combination of the results included in this review suggest at least a moderate level of evidence for the application of cross-education of strength in stroke rehabilitation. Following this review it is recommended that additional high quality randomized controlled trials are conducted to further support the findings.
Methods: Electronic databases were searched by two independent assessors. Studies were included if they described interventions which examined the phenomenon of cross-education of strength from the less-affected to the more-affected side in stroke survivors. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.
Results: Only two controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. The results of both studies show a clear trend towards cross-educational strength transfer in post-stroke hemiplegic patinets with 31.4% and 45.5% strength increase in the untrained, more-affected dorsiflexor muscle. Results also suggest a possible translation of strength gains towards functional task improvements and motor recovery.
Conclusion: Based on best evidence synthesis guidelines the combination of the results included in this review suggest at least a moderate level of evidence for the application of cross-education of strength in stroke rehabilitation. Following this review it is recommended that additional high quality randomized controlled trials are conducted to further support the findings.