If Dr. Sacco being president of the ASA at one time produced anything useful for survivors it is not commonly known.
https://medlineplus.gov/news/fullstory_160087.html
The odds of surviving a stroke are slightly better
for patients treated at hospitals with a specialized stroke department,
known as primary stroke centers, a new study finds.
But that benefit was only seen if stroke patients got to a stroke center in less than 90 minutes, the study authors said.
"Treatment of stroke is very time sensitive. As the saying goes, time is brain," said lead researcher Dr. Kimon Bekelis.
"So the faster you intervene, the faster the patient recovers," he said.
Bekelis is an instructor at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy
and Clinical Practice at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon,
N.H.
Primary stroke centers provide integrated care, including timely
administration of medications, such as the clot-busting drug tPA (tissue
plasminogen activator, also known as alteplase). They also offer
special procedures to reduce the effects of a stroke, Bekelis said.
Many of these treatments are only available at stroke centers or are
delivered faster there, which may account for the difference in
survival, compared with treatment at a community hospital, he said.
Most Americans live within 90 minutes of a stroke center, but in
rural areas the travel time can be longer, Bekelis said. He suggested
that to fill this gap, speeding travel time using helicopters might be
one way of improving survival.
Dr. Ralph Sacco is chairman of neurology at the University of Miami
Miller School of Medicine. He said, "This analysis provides further
evidence of the importance of being treated for stroke at a certified
primary stroke center, even if it takes up to 90 minutes to get there."
The study only looked at differences in death rates for stroke
centers compared to standard hospitals. But, it's likely there are
other potential benefits -- such as reduced disability -- for patients
treated in certified stroke centers, Sacco suggested.
"Longer delays in getting to a stroke center might lead to decreases
in the utilization of acute stroke treatments," he explained.
"We need to consider other approaches, such as the use of telestroke
[which puts doctors who are treating a stroke patient in direct contact
with a stroke specialist using technology], and increasing the number of
stroke-ready hospitals to increase the access of patients to timely
stroke care," Sacco said.
For the study, the researchers collected data on nearly 866,000
Medicare patients, average age 79. All had a stroke between 2010 and
2013.
Almost 54 percent of these patients were treated at a stroke center.
There are 976 stroke centers in the United States, the report noted.
Twenty-four percent of those in the study lived closer to a stroke center than to another hospital, the investigators found.
The study showed that patients who can get to a stroke center within
90 minutes had a nearly 2 percent higher chance of surviving a stroke
after seven and 30 days, compared with patients treated at hospitals
without such centers.
Bekelis and his colleagues also found that patients treated at a
stroke center were twice as likely to receive tPA -- 6 percent versus
nearly 3 percent -- than people treated at a standard hospital.
The report was published online July 25 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
At least one stroke expert expressed concern about sending patients
who may not have had a stroke to stroke centers, potentially
overwhelming the system.
"It is important to balance the benefit you get by going directly to a
stroke center against whether that patient is actually having a stroke,
or having a stroke that could be treated as effectively in a community
hospital," said Dr. Lee Schwamm. He's vice chairman of the department of
neurology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
It can be difficult to diagnose a stroke in the field, said Schwamm, who wrote an accompanying editorial in the journal. (Well then you solve for having
fast, accurate cheap and objective diagnosis in the ambulance. Don't
just fucking explain why you can't do it today, explain how you will do
it in the future.)
"We need an understanding of how to improve pre-hospital diagnosis so
that EMTs [emergency medical technicians] have the guidance they need
to make the right choice," he said. "This might include telephone
conferencing with a stroke specialist or a smartphone app." (No, you eliminate the need for a neurology specialist.)
SOURCES: Kimon Bekelis, M.D., instructor, Dartmouth Institute for
Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical
Center, Lebanon, N.H.; Lee Schwamm, M.D., vice chairman, department of
neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Ralph Sacco, M.D.,
chairman of neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami;
July 25, 2016, JAMA Internal Medicine, online
Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,116 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke.DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER, BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment