Useless, even though it didn't work the protocols are not available for the next researcher to avoid.
Is anyone ever going to put together a protocol on using tDCS and which type? Otherwise all this fucking research and reviews are totally worthless. This is why we need strong stroke leadership, to actually help stroke survivors.
HD-tDCS (3)
cathodal tDCS (6)
anodal tDCS (9)
tDCS (61)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Skill Learning but Not Generalization in Chronic Stroke
Show all authors
Manuela Hamoudi1
, Heidi M. Schambra, MD23
, Brita Fritsch, MD1
,
1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
2New York University, NY, USA3National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
Annika Schoechlin-Marx, MD1
, Cornelius Weiller, MD1
, Leonardo G. Cohen, MD3
, Janine Reis, MD13
...
1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
3National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany3National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
Article Information
Article first published online: April 22, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318769164
Manuela Hamoudi1, Heidi M. Schambra, MD2, 3, Brita Fritsch, MD1, Annika Schoechlin-Marx, MD1, Cornelius Weiller, MD1, Leonardo G. Cohen, MD3, Janine Reis, MD1, 3
1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
2New York University, NY, USA
3National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
Corresponding Author: Janine Reis, MD, Department of Neurology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Breisacher Str 64, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Email: janine. reis@uniklinik-freiburg. de
Abstract
Background. Motor training alone or combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) positioned over the motor cortex (M1) improves motor function in chronic stroke. Currently, understanding of how tDCS influences the process of motor skill learning after stroke is lacking. Objective. To assess the effects of tDCS on the stages of motor skill learning and on generalization to untrained motor function.
Methods. In this randomized, sham-controlled, blinded study of 56 mildly impaired chronic stroke patients, tDCS (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode on the contralesional forehead) was applied during 5 days of training on an unfamiliar, challenging fine motor skill task (sequential visual isometric pinch force task). We assessed online and offline learning during the training period and retention over the following 4 months. We additionally assessed the generalization to untrained tasks. Results. With training alone (sham tDCS group), patients acquired a novel motor skill. This skill improved online, remained stable during the offline periods and was largely retained at follow-up. When tDCS was added to training (real tDCS group), motor skill significantly increased relative to sham, mostly in the online stage. Long-term retention was not affected by tDCS. Training effects generalized to untrained tasks, but those performance gains were not enhanced further by tDCS. Conclusions. Training of an unfamiliar skill task represents a strategy to improve fine motor function in chronic stroke. tDCS augments motor skill learning, but its additive effect is restricted to the trained skill.
Methods. In this randomized, sham-controlled, blinded study of 56 mildly impaired chronic stroke patients, tDCS (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode on the contralesional forehead) was applied during 5 days of training on an unfamiliar, challenging fine motor skill task (sequential visual isometric pinch force task). We assessed online and offline learning during the training period and retention over the following 4 months. We additionally assessed the generalization to untrained tasks. Results. With training alone (sham tDCS group), patients acquired a novel motor skill. This skill improved online, remained stable during the offline periods and was largely retained at follow-up. When tDCS was added to training (real tDCS group), motor skill significantly increased relative to sham, mostly in the online stage. Long-term retention was not affected by tDCS. Training effects generalized to untrained tasks, but those performance gains were not enhanced further by tDCS. Conclusions. Training of an unfamiliar skill task represents a strategy to improve fine motor function in chronic stroke. tDCS augments motor skill learning, but its additive effect is restricted to the trained skill.
No comments:
Post a Comment