If you are in Toronto you need to get yourself involved in this. They need a disabled stroke person perspective. Looking at the pie chart it is obvious they are missing a critical piece of knowledge, actual disabled persons.
http://robohub.org/its-not-only-engineers-who-work-in-robotics/
Robotics has always been an interdisciplinary field – one that
integrates knowledge from computer science, mechanical, electrical,
controls, and other areas of engineering. But as robots move out of
factories and research labs, and into our homes and workplaces, another
breed of robotics expert is emerging – and an engineering or computer
science degree is not necessarily part of their resume.
From occupational therapy to rehab robotics
Rosalie Wang is Assistant Professor at the Intelligent Assistive Technology and Systems Lab (IATSL),
a multi-disciplinary research group at the University of Toronto made
up of engineers, computer scientists, rehabilitation and medical
researchers who leverage artificial intelligence and robotics to develop
intelligent assistive and therapeutic devices. IATSL research runs the
gamut, including obstacle avoidance and guidance systems for powered
wheelchairs, fall detection solutions, intelligent haptic systems for
stroke rehabilitation, personal robots to assist aging-in-place,
assistive robots for people with dementia, and much more.
But Wang started her career working as an Occupational Therapist,
supporting clients in long-term care. Her passion was helping seniors,
and it was while working at a nursing home that she found herself
tinkering with her clients’ wheelchairs. “I would come home with grease
in my fingernails, having taken apart and put back together a wheelchair
so that it would better fit my client’s needs.” One thing led to
another, and soon she found herself doing a PhD on collision-avoidance
technology for powered wheelchairs.
Translating tech into practice
Finding technical solutions to ‘people problems’ is a special skill
that requires deep knowledge of both the end-user and their context, and
an ability to work closely with engineers and computer scientists to
understand the possibilities and limitations of the technology.
A common problem with powered wheelchairs, says Wang, is that they
can be hard for someone who has physical and/or cognitive impairments to
control; and because they are powered, they can also be more dangerous
than manual wheelchairs, especially to someone who is already in a
fragile state of health – one reason why some nursing homes have banned
the use of powered wheelchairs altogether. And then there are the
ethical aspects: “It’s hard to take a powered wheelchair away from
someone once you’ve given them one. We want to enable mobility, and we
want to keep people safe, and we want to do it in a way that respects
the client,” says Wang.
Wang also points out that simply having technology that works under
certain conditions doesn’t mean it will be taken up in practice; many
contextual factors that lie outside the technology itself can get in the
way. For example, most fall detection monitoring services tend to use a
subscription-based business model, similar to home monitoring. But Wang
has found that many clients prefer to have their personal care
monitoring service trigger warning calls to a family member rather than a
call center – even though this solution is less likely to be taken up
by industry partners. “As you’re designing the system, you have to look
at the whole picture. Clients feel there is a stigma attached to
disrupting a call centre.”
Developing technology into systems and products that can actually be
deployed into real world scenarios is a challenge, and it’s important to
understand clients’ personal preferences and their physical and
cognitive abilities, as well as contextual factors, such as nursing home
architecture, routines and regulations, family and caregiver needs,
ethics and more. This is why a critical part of the research at IATSL is
also to develop frameworks, guidelines and methodologies for applying
intelligent assistive technologies in nursing homes and at home.
For Wang, the benefits of being an Occupational Therapist in the
field of robotics and AI cut both ways: she can bring a user-centered
perspective to designing the technology, but “Robotics and AI can also
help to augment the work of the Occupational Therapist and advance the
field as a whole,” she says. Wang’s research also includes clinically
evaluating robots for upper limb stroke rehabilitation and assistive
robots to help older adults with dementia. Her latest paper, just
published last month, examines how older adults with Alzheimer’s and their caregivers feel about using robots to help them complete tasks at home, and is one of the few studies to give an in-depth perspective on the issue.
From an Occupational Therapist’s perspective, one of the key benefits
of employing robotics and AI is that it can yield data for
evidence-based therapy. “It used to be that we could only measure
therapy results with very coarse snapshots … a client either could
complete a task or they could not complete it. This kind of feedback is
potentially very demoralizing to the client, and makes it harder for the
therapist to perceive and record small changes in progress Now we can
collect continuous data, which lets us design more refined therapies,
and gives clients a better sense of progress. A therapy robot can give
you continuous clinical data, even when you can’t perceive it.”
When asked if she ever imagined she would be working in robotics one
day, Wang gave a resounding answer: “No.” And she is reluctant to
describe herself as a roboticist. Still, given the wide range of projects being undertaken at the Intelligent Assistive Technology and Systems Lab,
it’s clear that it takes an interdisciplinary team with all kinds of
expertise to translate robotics and AI into practical healthcare
solutions.
Team members at IATSL have backgrounds that include occupational
therapy, neuroscience, industrial design, biology, clinical psychology,
experimental psychology, rehabilitation science, and nursing.
Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,294 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment