Deans' stroke musings

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain!Just think of all the trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 493 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
My back ground story is here:

Friday, April 7, 2017

Experts welcome stroke classification as neurological disease

What a pile of lazy fucking shit. As a direct quote on this, 'Bureaucratic stuff, paper shuffling'  means this does nothing for helping stroke survivors recover.
The medical rationale for stroke being a neurological condition has always been compelling. We therefore welcome the latest decision by the Department of Statistics at the WHO to move the thematic block of cerebrovascular diseases from the circulatory diseases chapter to diseases of the nervous system," noted Prof Raad Shakir, head of the WHO Neurology Topic Advisory Group and President of the World Federation of Neurology (WFN).
Public support for the latest WHO move on the issue of stroke follows a period of expert discussions and major concern in the neurological community. Last October, leading international and stroke specialists publicly expressed their concern in an editorial in The Lancet about the classification of stroke in the draft revision of the "International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems" (ICD). This step was in response to an unexpected change in the classification system by which the newly created group of was moved from neurological to circulatory diseases.
The ICD-10 currently in place is based on outdated medical knowledge and concepts from the 1950s. The new ICD-11, which has been under discussion since 2009, is aimed at reflecting the changes in science and practice and is slated for release in 2018. Although it has taken 62 years to make the change, it is now a reality and a benefit to patients, treating doctors and researchers, and the public at large.
Prof Shakir: "There are very good reasons why the WHO Neurology Topic Advisory Group advocated all throughout this process that all types of stroke should form a single block in the new classification and be part of the nervous system chapter. All manifestations of cerebrovascular disease are related to brain dysfunction. We are relieved and fully support the prudent and farsighted changes implemented by the WHO team."
According to the WFN President the latest classification decision with respect to serves the interests of patients' needs. Prof Shakir: "It also ensures that health care provision and funding will be based on correct figures, which has not been the case thus far."
More information: The current beta draft of the new ICD-11 can be viewed here:
Provided by: World Federation of Neurology

No comments:

Post a Comment