Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Effect of discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment in elderly people on cognitive functioning—the DANTE study Leiden: a randomized clinical trial

Have your doctor analyze this result as compared to this:

High blood pressure linked to reduced Alzheimer's risk, meds may be reason

Well your doctor should know this stuff otherwise why the hell are you seeing them? I expect my doctors to know more than I do and so far that is not the case.

Effect of discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment in elderly people on cognitive functioning—the DANTE study Leiden: a randomized clinical trial

Observational studies indicate that lower blood pressure (BP) increases risk for cognitive decline in elderly individuals. Older persons are at risk for impaired cerebral autoregulation; lowering their BP may compromise cerebral blood flow and cognitive function. To assess whether discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment in older persons with mild cognitive deficits improves cognitive, psychological, and general daily functioning. In older persons with mild cognitive deficits, discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment did not improve cognitive, psychological, or general daily functioning at the 16–week follow–up.

Methods

  • A community–based randomized clinical trial with a blinded outcome assessment at the 16–week follow–up was performed at 128 general practices in the Netherlands.
  • A total of 385 participants 75 years or older with mild cognitive deficits (Mini–Mental State Examination score, 21–27) without serious cardiovascular disease who received antihypertensive treatment were enrolled in the Discontinuation of Antihypertensive Treatment in Elderly People (DANTE) Study Leiden from June 26, 2011, through August 23, 2013 (follow–up, December 16, 2013).
  • Intention–to–treat analyses were performed from January 20 through April 11, 2014.
  • Discontinuation (n=199) vs continuation (n=186) of antihypertensive treatment (allocation ratio, 1:1).
  • Change in the overall cognition compound score.
  • Secondary outcomes included changes in scores on cognitive domains, the Geriatric Depression Scale–15, Apathy Scale, Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (functional status), and Cantril Ladder (quality of life).

Results

  • Compared with 176 participants undergoing analysis in the control (continuation) group, 180 in the intervention (discontinuation) group had a greater increase (95% CI) in systolic BP (difference, 7.36 [3.02 to 11.69] mm Hg; P=.001) and diastolic BP (difference, 2.63 [0.34 to 4.93] mm Hg; P=.03).
  • The intervention group did not differ from the control group in change (95% CI) in overall cognition compound score (0.01 [-0.14 to 0.16] vs -0.01 [-0.16 to 0.14]; difference, 0.02 [-0.19 to 0.23]; P=.84).
  • The intervention and control groups did not differ significantly in secondary outcomes, including differences (95% CIs) in change in compound scores of the 3 cognitive domains (executive function, -0.07 [-0.29 to 0.15; P=.52], memory, 0.08 [-0.12 to 0.29; P=.43], and psychomotor speed, -0.85 [-1.72 to 0.02; P=.06]), symptoms of apathy (0.17 [-0.65 to 0.99; P=.68]) and depression (0.14 [-0.20 to 0.48; P=.41]), functional status (-0.72 [-1.52 to 0.09; P=.08]), and quality–of–life score (-0.09 [-0.34 to 0.16; P=.46]).
  • Adverse events were equally distributed.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment