Stroke lesions are frequently followed by cognitive
impairments. Cognitive training is a non-pharmacological intervention
that can promote neural compensation mechanisms and strategies to
remediate cognitive impairments. The aims of this study were: (1) To
investigate the cognitive performance, generalization effects, and
neural correlates of semantic organization strategy training (SOST) in
patients with chronic left frontoparietal stroke and healthy controls
(HC); and (2) to compare the behavioral effects and neural correlates of
SOST with an active control psychoeducation intervention (PI). In this
randomized controlled study, all participants were randomly allocated
into two groups, one group received SOST, and the other received PI
intervention. Participants underwent two fMRI sessions, one prior and
the other, after intervention. In each fMRI session, images were
obtained during memory encoding task using a list of semantically
related words. We found improved post-intervention memory performance in
participants that received SOST (both patients and controls), indicated
by number of words recalled, word clustering scores, and performance in
a generalization task. The fMRI analysis revealed negative correlation
between task performance and regions of the default-mode network. These
results suggest that cognitive training using semantic organization
strategy can improve episodic memory performance and promote potential
functional neuroplasticity in patients with ischemic stroke lesions.
Introduction
Cognitive impairment occurs in more than one third of
patients with stroke and persists in many individuals for years,
producing long-term disabilities (1, 2). Up to half of patients with cognitive deficits following stroke show significant impairment in episodic memory (3, 4). Episodic memory is a system implicated in the capacity to learn and recall past information or events (5).
Cognitive rehabilitation is a traditional non-pharmacological treatment
approach directed at the restoration of cognitive activity or the
acquisition of efficient strategies to compensate for impaired cognitive
function, particularly episodic memory (6, 7).
In patients with memory impairments due to vascular and traumatic brain
lesions, cognitive interventions have been recommended as a practice
standard, including the use of internalized strategies (e.g., verbal
association, visual imagery, etc.) and external memory compensation
(e.g., cellphones, notebooks, diaries) (6–8).
Recent studies demonstrated that patients with vascular lesions can
benefit from different cognitive interventions including face-name
training to remember people's names and repetition-lag memory training,
developed to increase recollection as opposed to familiarity in
recognition memory tasks (9, 10).
There is also recent evidence of memory and attention improvement after
computerized cognitive training and telehealth options for remote
delivery of compensatory memory skills training after stroke (11, 12).
Semantic organization strategy training (SOST) is a
cognitive intervention designed to recruit executive functions, semantic
categorization, working memory, engaging regions of frontoparietal
network, particularly in the left hemisphere due to verbal stimuli
processing (13–15).
This cognitive training (CT) intervention is based on the application
of semantic organization strategy to word-lists in order to improve free
verbal episodic memory recall and to enhance encoding by grouping words
together that belong to the same category. Previous studies using SOST
showed improvement in episodic memory in healthy adult individuals,
patients with left frontal glioma excisions and mild cognitive
impairment (14–16).
Nevertheless, the underlying brain mechanisms related to cognitive
interventions in patients with stroke remain largely unknown. In
particular, no study has investigated, as yet, the effects of CT using
SOST in patients with stroke in the left frontoparietal hemisphere.
Neuroimaging methods, particularly functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI), have been used to investigate the neural
substrates underlying cerebral plasticity after cognitive training in a
limited number of studies in patients with traumatic brain injury (17–20).
In patients with vascular lesions or stroke, one study demonstrated
changes in activation after training in default-mode network regions,
such as the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and angular gyrus, as
well as in lateral occipital and temporal regions in parallel to
behavior improvements (9).
Another study found memory and executive function
improvement and increased resting-state functional connectivity of the
hippocampus with the frontal lobe (right inferior, right middle, left
middle, left inferior, and left superior frontal gyrus) and the left
parietal lobe in a small sample of patients with heterogeneous stroke
lesions after computerized cognitive training using the RehaCom software
package (21).
The authors associated these findings with mechanisms of brain
compensation and cognitive recovery in patients who received cognitive
training.
The investigation of the impact of individual CT
interventions, such as SOST, visual imagery, etc., outside the context
of multi-domain cognitive and holistic rehabilitation programs is highly
relevant to understand the effectiveness of each specific approach and
its brain mechanisms to plan cognitive rehabilitation programs in a more
effective way. Yet, no study has explored the behavioral effects and
neural correlates of SOST intervention in patients with stroke,
particularly, involving the left frontoparietal brain regions known to
affect episodic memory encoding due to reduced strategy and efficient
executive processes application (13–15).
As described above, SOST intervention is thought to recruit left
frontoparietal network regions due to its verbal stimuli word-list
presentation and semantic strategy application in order to improve
encoding and verbal episodic memory recall. Previous studies using SOST
were carried in patients with left frontal tumors and MCI people (15, 16).
Nevertheless, no investigation has, so far, been conducted in stroke
patients, especially with lesions in those areas of the left
frontoparietal network thought to be involved in this strategy. To
pursue this investigation, a sample of healthy control participants
would be necessary in order to investigate specific cerebral metabolic
changes and extent of improvement in behavior in patients with left
frontoparietal stroke lesions in comparison to what is seen healthy
subjects.
Therefore, the aims of the current study were: (1) to
investigate the cognitive performance changes, generalization effects
and neural correlates of SOST intervention in patients with left
frontoparietal stroke and healthy controls; and (2) to compare the
behavioral and transfer or generalization effects and neural correlates
of SOST with an active control psychoeducation intervention (PI). We
hypothesized that all participants, particularly the stroke patients
(SP), would benefit from SOST in comparison to the control intervention,
and that different neuronal brain mechanisms would be involved in
patients with ischemic stroke lesions in relation to healthy controls.