Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 33,991 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Showing posts with label reocclusion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reocclusion. Show all posts
Monday, April 12, 2021
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Consequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction
And what is your doctor doing to prevent reocclusion of the artery that was blocked and cleared by tPA use? Anything at all? This is for heart attacks so our great stroke association needs to research this for stroke.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2394002
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2394002
Ohman EM, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Candela R, Abbottsmith C, Ellis S, Sigmon KN, Kereiakes D, George B, Stack R.
Source
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.Abstract
To
determine the clinical consequences of reocclusion of an
infarct-related artery after reperfusion therapy, we evaluated 810
patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients were admitted into
four sequential studies with similar entry criteria in which patency of
the infarct-related artery was assessed by coronary arteriography 90
minutes after onset of thrombolytic therapy. Successful reperfusion was
established acutely in 733 patients. Thrombolytic therapy included
tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) in 517, urokinase in 87, and a
combination of t-PA and urokinase in 129 patients. All patients received
aspirin, intravenous heparin and nitroglycerin, and diltiazem during
the recovery phase. A repeat coronary arteriogram was performed in 88%
of patients at a median of 7 days after the onset of symptoms.
Reocclusion of the infarct-related artery occurred in 91 patients
(12.4%), and 58% of these were symptomatic. Angiographic characteristics
at 90 minutes after thrombolytic therapy that were associated with
reocclusion compared with sustained coronary artery patency were right
coronary infarct-related artery (65% versus 44%, respectively) and
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0 or 1 (21% versus
10%, respectively) before further intervention. Median (interquartile
value) degree of stenosis in the infarct-related artery at 90 minutes
was similar between groups: 99% for reoccluded (value, 90/100%) compared
with 95% for patent (value, 80/99%). Patients with reocclusion had
similar left ventricular ejection fractions compared with patients with
sustained patency at follow-up. However, patients with reocclusion at
follow-up had worse infarct-zone function at -2.7 (value, -3.2/-1.8)
versus -2.4 (SD/chord) (value, -3.1/-1.3) (p = 0.016). The recovery of
both global and infarct-zone function was impaired by reocclusion of the
infarct-related artery compared with maintained patency; median delta
ejection fraction was -2 compared with 1 (p = 0.006) and median delta
infarct-zone wall motion was -0.10 compared with 0.34 SD/chord (p =
0.011), respectively. In addition, patients with reocclusion had more
complicated hospital courses and higher in-hospital mortality rates
(11.0% versus 4.5%, respectively; p = 0.01). We conclude that
reocclusion of the infarct-related artery after successful reperfusion
is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rates.
Reocclusion is also detrimental to the functional recovery of both
global and infarct-zone regional left ventricular function. Thus, new
strategies in the postinfarction period need to be developed to prevent
reocclusion of the infarct-related artery.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

