Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label bilateral arm training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bilateral arm training. Show all posts

Monday, January 6, 2025

A functional study on the effectiveness of unilateral versus bilateral upper limb motor recovery and functions in Adults with Chronic Stroke

 Did your competent? doctor get a protocol created in the past 2.5 years? NO? So, you DON'T have a functioning stroke doctor, do you?

A functional study on the effectiveness of unilateral versus bilateral upper limb motor recovery and functions in Adults with Chronic Stroke

NeuroQuantology | May 2022 | Volume 20 | Issue 5 | Page 4085-4092 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2022.20.5.NQ22699
Rajesh Kumar Sahu1*, Anchit Gugnani2, Rahul Ahluwalia3

Abstract

Background: 

Stroke is a sudden neurological illness that results in various abnormalities in the brain
region. Paresis, spasticity, and alterations in the muscular activation sequence are all symptoms of a
stroke, resulting in impairment. These immediate effects of stroke impact activity and may limit a
person's engagement.
Aim: 

The behavioural and neuro physiological alterations associated with two such rehabilitation
procedures, bilateral and unilateral movement therapy, were compared in this research. This
research aimed to see how functional unilateral vs. bilateral motor recovery and training affected
upper limb function.

Method: 

Scores on the FMSA Fugl-Meyer Scale Assessment (separated into distal and proximal
subscales) before and after therapy scales are used to measure involvement, activity, and motor
function, respectively, before and after treatment. Thirty chronic stroke patients were allocated to
control and two training procedures, including six months of daily practice sessions.

Result: 

At the baseline, there was a significant distinction between the two groups. Compared to the
control group, the bilateral treatment group demonstrated substantial improvements in FMA test
after the training sessions. Compared to people who received unilateral instruction, those who
received bilateral training demonstrated a reduction in movement time of the damaged arm and an
improvement in capacity of upper limb function.

Conclusion: 

Overall, our data imply that a short-term bilateral hand training intervention might help(WHOM will do the research that changes this to WILL RECOVER?)
chronic stroke patients regain upper limb motor function. Unilateral and bilateral, both motor
training may aid in this endeavor.

Saturday, November 2, 2024

The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

 Yeah, we've known of bilateral therapy a long time . This review was fucking worthless! You needed to write up a protocol on its' use and since you didn't; YOU'RE FIRED!

  • bilateral (29 posts to January 2012)
  • bilateral arm training (18 posts to December 2020)
  • bilateral therapy (4 posts to July 2023)
  • bilateral training (4 posts to February 2021)
  • bilateral upper limb training (4 posts to July 2021)
  • The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

    Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Accepted November 2009 Abstract Purpose. To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function in adults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke. 

    Method. 

    Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles were evaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Data relating to study design and functional outcome were extracted. 

    Results. 

    Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eight studies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRAC studies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reported significant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27. 

    Conclusion. 

    There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however more quality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence. Keywords: Bilateral therapy, upper limb, stroke Introduction Stroke is the third most common cause of mortality and the leading cause of adult disability in the developed world [1]. The current incidence of stroke in western countries is high; approximately 1 million Europeans [2], more than 795,000 Americans [1], and over 60,000 Australians [3] experience a stroke each year. The ongoing social and economic cost of stroke causes additional pressure on health care funding and rehabilitation services. In the United States alone this equates to around $68.9 billion dollars annually [1]. Population growth combined with the ageing population, declining mortality rates and rising stroke incidence suggests that this financial burden will continue to rise [2,4]. As a result, research is focused on the development of cost-effective and efficient approaches to stroke rehabilitation. One of the most important aspects of stroke rehabilitation is the regaining of function in the affected upper limb (UL) as this relates directly to functional independence [5]. A systematic review reported that functional task orientated training appears to have positive effects on functional out- comes, compared with impairment focused interventions [6]. Constraint induced therapy (CIT) is a functional task orientated intervention that has been shown to significantly improve UL function after stroke [7,8]. CIT restricts the use of the non-paretic limb to promote functional movement of the affected UL. The proposed physiological basis underpinning CIT is the reactivation of dormant neuromuscular pathways [9–11]. This notion was first proposed by Taub in 1980 [12], who suggested that encouraging use of the affected limb led to a corresponding increase in cortical representation, which he believed provided the neurological basis for permanent functional gains of the affected extremity. However, a number of limitations regarding the use of CIT exist. For example, CIT requires patients to meet strict inclusion criteria, such as being able to voluntarily achieve at least 108 of wrist extension and thumb abduction of the paretic side, to participate in this type of therapy [13]. In a clinical setting CIT is very personnel and resource intensive, while in the community there are issues of patient safety and reduced functional independence due to constraint of the non-paretic limb [14]. This decreased functional independence may result in reduced patient compliance [14]. Furthermore, many activities of daily living (ADLs) are bimanual in nature and require complimentary and coordi- nated movement of the UL [15,16]. These realisations have prompted the development of a variety of bimanual interventions for UL stroke rehabilitation [16]. Although the concept of bimanual training is not new, the first investigation into the use of bilateral therapy in UL rehabilitation in people with hemi- plegic stroke was conducted by Mudie and Matyas in 1996 [17], with positive results. Bilateral therapy involves the use of both ULs either simultaneously or sequentially [18], whereby the intact UL facilitates relearning of the spatial and temporal parameters required for motor recovery in the paretic UL [19,20]. Importantly, the principles of forced use and task specificity underlying CIT are retained with bilateral therapy without the need to constrain the unaffected UL [5,21]. In addition, it is believed that the performance of bilateral movements may enable activation of the damaged hemisphere by way of inter-hemispheric connections [22–24]. Following stroke it has been shown that using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques the normal symmetrical transcallosal inhibition is disrupted and an imbalance occurs resulting in over-excitation of the contralesional hemisphere and excessive inhibition of the ipsilesional hemisphere. It is suggested that synchronous bilateral UL movements are a motor- based priming strategy that facilitate a re-balance of these systems. In a sample of 32 adults with chronic stroke, synchronous bilateral UL movements re- sulted in significant increase in ipsilesional hemi- sphere excitability, in transcallosal inhibition from ipsilesional to contralesional hemispheres and in intracortical inhibition within the contralesional hemisphere in the experimental group. Additionally, the experimental group had significant and sustained improvement in UL function [23]. Since the original publication by Mudie and Matyas (1996) [17], there have been numerous studies addressing the effect of bilateral interventions on patients with hemiplegic stroke. Although many studies report positive outcomes using bilateral interventions, some studies failed to demonstrate any functional gains [15]. Rose and Winstein (2004) [25] have suggested that this may be due to the variety of bimanual interventions currently employed in the literature. In this systematic review, we aimed to determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving UL function in adults with chronic stroke resulting in a range of UL activity limitations. Previous systematic reviews of bilateral therapy effectiveness have primarily focused on kinematic variables, cortical mapping and patients at various stages of stroke recovery, and not on functional outcome [20,25–27]. As most functional recovery up to six months post-stroke is postulated to occur as a result of spontaneous recovery [28–31], we concen- trated on studies reporting outcome of participants with chronic stroke (more than 6 months post- stroke). 

    More at link.

    Wednesday, October 23, 2024

    Thammasat invents affordable device for stroke patients’ rehab

     Ask your competent? doctor how this compares to other bilateral arm training for getting recovered. Your doctor better have statistics on these already, 

    Thammasat invents affordable device for stroke patients’ rehab

    WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2024
    Thammasat invents affordable device for stroke patients’ rehab
    The locally produced ‘Arm Booster’ is 10 times cheaper and can be used to rehabilitate stroke patients in remote areas, says professor

    Thammasat University has developed a device to help stroke patients restore strength in their arms at a price that is 10 times lower than the imported ones.

    The product, called the “Arm Booster”, was developed by Thammasat’s Centre of Excellence in Creative Engineering Design and Development (CED2).

    The innovation won a gold medal in technology at the i-CREATe 2022 (International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology) in Hong Kong.

    CED2 chief Assoc Prof Dr Banyong Rungruangduayboon said the Arm Booster costs about 400,000 baht compared to the imported versions that can cost up to 4 million baht.

    Thammasat invents affordable device for stroke patients’ rehab

    He said the public and private hospitals, and even medical schools, can easily afford to buy the imported machines.

    However, he said, health clinics and tambon hospitals can opt for the locally made versions, which can be used to provide physical therapy to stroke patients in remote areas. This way, he said, they will not have to travel to large hospitals in main cities often.

    The Arm Booster has been installed in Tambon Tambon Yitho Hospital in Pathum Thani’s Thanyaburi district, Tambon Nong Sida Hospital in Saraburi’s Nong Saeng district and the health promotion centre of Tambon Saeng Suk Municipality in Chonburi’s Muang district.

    Thammasat invents affordable device for stroke patients’ rehab

    According to Banyong, the CED2 Arm Booster allows stroke patients to develop muscle strength in both arms, not just the arm that is weakened by the stroke. The machine works on the principle of the patient using the stronger arm to help the weak one regain strength.

    The machine is installed with a monitor and games to keep the patients entertained so they exercise longer.

    Both handles have sensors to measure pressure from both hands, and this data is sent to the machine to process and report the results and progress of the exercise on the display screen.

    Banyong said the Arm Booster will benefit Thailand as it is transforming into a super-aged society.

    He said on average, Thailand sees some 250,000 stroke patients per year and many of them end up with paralysed arms.

    Hence, he said, he wanted to see more Arm Booster machines installed in tambon hospitals nationwide, so fewer people are paralysed.

    Tuesday, April 2, 2024

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

    Where is the EXACT PROTOCOL located so survivors can find it and bring it to their stroke medical 'professionals' attention?  With no location, you did fucking useless research!

     Here is all the bilateral arm training posts to see if anything useful was ever done with it that survivors can find and benefit from.  Or you can just ask your competent? doctor for the EXACT PROTOCOL on this!

    The latest here:

     

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

    CHRISTOPHER PAUL LATIMER, JUSTINE KEELING, BRODERICK LIN, MEREDITH HENDERSON & LEIGH ANNE HALE Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Accepted November 2009  

    Abstract  

    Purpose.  
     
    To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function in adults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke.  
     
    Method.  
     
    Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles were evaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Data relating to study design and functional outcome were extracted.  
     
    Results.  
     
    Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eight studies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRAC studies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reported significant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27. 
     
    Conclusion. 
     There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however more quality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence.

    EFFICACY OF BILATERAL ARM TRAINING ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR FUNCTION IN STROKE PATIENTS

    Where is the EXACT PROTOCOL located so survivors can find it and bring it to their stroke medical 'professionals' attention?  With no location, you did fucking useless research!

     Here is all the bilateral arm training posts to see if anything useful was ever done with it that survivors can find and benefit from.  Or you can just ask your competent? doctor for the EXACT PROTOCOL on this!

    The latest here:

     EFFICACY OF BILATERAL ARM TRAINING ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR FUNCTION IN STROKE PATIENTS

    Dr. Senthil Kumar*, Dr. Franklin Shaju M.K**, Dr. Vijaya Senthil Kumar*** & Dr. A. Velmurugan**** *Research Scholar, Himalayan University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India. **Professor, RVS College of Physiotherapy, Tamil Nadu, India. ***Research Scholar, Himalayan University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India. ****Professor, St. John’s College of Nursing, Kattappana, Kerala, India. DOI: http://doi.org/10.47211/tg.2020.v07i04.003  

    ABSTRACT  

    Background of the study:  
    Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability. Stroke patients experience a significant change in motor function. Perceived loss of hand function has been reported as a major problem in approximately 65% of patients with stroke. Motor dysfunction of upper extremity which indeed affects functional performance of daily life is an outcome of stroke. So restriction of motor function is highly relevant for stroke patients to make them functionally independent. Stroke rehabilitation needs to concentrate on retraining techniques which are simple, affordable and effective.  
     
    Objectives of the study:  
    The objective of the study is to find the effects of bilateral arm training in the management of upper limb motor function in stroke patients. 
     
     Method:  
     
    An experimental Research design, thirty clinically diagnosed middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke patients were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into two groups, A and B consisting of 15 subjects each. Group-A received conventional physical therapy and group-B received bilateral arm training techniques along with conventional physical therapy. The intervention lasted for fifteen days and one hour per day. Upper limb motor function was measured before and after fifteen days of intervention by motor assessment scale.  
     
    Conclusion:  
     
    Both the groups receiving conventional physical therapy and bilateral arm training, among middle cerebral artery stroke patients, significantly experienced improvement in upper limb motor functions. While comparing the two groups of subjects, the group receiving bilateral arm training showed more effective improvement in upper limb motor function than the one receiving only conventional physical therapy.

    Tuesday, March 26, 2024

    Effectiveness of Bilateral Arm Training on Upper Extremity Function in Sub-Acute Stroke Patients: Pilot Study

    Where is the EXACT PROTOCOL located so survivors can find it and bring it to their stroke medical 'professionals' attention?  With no location, you did fucking useless research!

    Effectiveness of Bilateral Arm Training on Upper Extremity Function in Sub-Acute Stroke Patients: Pilot Study

    Heena Parmar 1 , Nensi Gandhi 2 1 Parul Institute of Physiotherapy, Parul University, Gujarat, India parmarheena277254[at]gmail.com 2 Parul Institute of Physiotherapy, Parul University, Gujarat, India nensi.modi[at]paruluniversity.ac.in

     Abstract:

    Objective: 
    To see the effect of bilateral arm training on the upper limb function. 
     
    Subject and Method: 
     
    30 subjects diagnosed with sub-acute stroke were assigned to study. 
     
    Intervention 
     
    In form of Conventional & Bilateral arm training were given for 5 Days per week for four weeks. Upper extremity function test was evaluated by Fugl Meyer Assessment, Motor activity log scale and action research arm test pre-& post treatment. Relationship and responsiveness of all clinical test were performed by Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Mann-Whitney test respectively. 
     
    Result: 
     
    All correlations were significant at 95% C.I. at baseline as well as four-week time. There is increasing bilateral arm training function on upper limb while comparing to conventional therapy in four-week protocol. 
     
    Conclusion: 
     
    On the basis of present study, it can be concluded that Bilateral arm training can be beneficial in improving upper limb function in sub-acute stroke patient when it compares to the Conventional therapy by using the Fugl Meyer assessment scale, Motor activity log scale and action research arm test.

    Monday, March 4, 2024

    Efficacy of Bilateral Arm Training on Upper Limb Motor Function in Stroke Patients

    Where is the protocol on this located so survivors can bring it to their therapists attention? No protocol, you did completely fucking useless research!

    Efficacy of Bilateral Arm Training on Upper Limb Motor Function in Stroke Patients

    Dr. Senthil Kumar*, Dr. Franklin Shaju M.K**, Dr. Vijaya Senthil Kumar*** & Dr. A. Velmurugan****
    *Research Scholar, Himalayan University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
    **Professor, RVS College of Physiotherapy, Tamil Nadu, India.***Research Scholar, Himalayan University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
    ****Professor, St. John’s College of Nursing, Kattappana, Kerala, India.
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.47211/tg.2020.v07i04.003

    ABSTRACT

    Background of the study: 
    Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability. Stroke patients experience a significant change in motor function. Perceived loss of hand function has been reported as a major problem in approximately 65% of patients with stroke. Motor dysfunction of upper extremity which indeed affects functional performance of daily life is an outcome of stroke. So restriction of motor function is highly relevant for stroke patients to make them functionally independent. Stroke rehabilitation needs to concentrate on retraining techniques which are simple, affordable and effective. Objectives of the study: The objective of the study is to find the effects of bilateral arm training in the management of upper limb motor function in stroke patients. 
    Method: 
    An experimental Research design, thirty clinically diagnosed middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke patients were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into two groups, A and B consisting of 15 subjects each. Group-A received conventional physical therapy and group-B received bilateral arm training techniques along with conventional physical therapy. The intervention lasted for fifteen days and one hour per day. Upper limb motorfunction was measured before and after fifteen days of intervention by motor assessment scale. 
    Conclusion: 
    Both the groups receiving conventional physical therapy and bilateral arm training, among middle cerebral artery stroke patients, significantly experienced improvement in upper limb motor functions. While comparing the two groups of subjects, the group receiving bilateral arm training showed more effective improvement in upper limb motor function than the one receiving only conventional physical therapy.
    Key Words: Stroke, Bilateral arm training technique, conventional physiotherapy, upper limb motor function

    Saturday, March 2, 2024

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

     Your competent? doctor has had over a decade to put together a protocol on this to help you recover. WAS ANYTHING DONE?  NO? Then you don't have a functioning stroke doctor, hospital or therapists!

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

    CHRISTOPHER PAUL LATIMER, JUSTINE KEELING, BRODERICK LIN,MEREDITH HENDERSON & LEIGH ANNE HALE
    Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Accepted November 2009
    Abstract
    Purpose.
     To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function inadults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke.
     Method.
     Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles wereevaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Datarelating to study design and functional outcome were extracted.
    Results.
     Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eightstudies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing(BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRACstudies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reported significant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27.
    Conclusion.
     There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however morequality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence.

    Wednesday, February 14, 2024

    Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders Part Two: Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

    Hopefully your doctor is well versed in everything here. Nothing here tells you the effectiveness of these treatments so I can only assume they barely work!  If they worked they would be shouting it from the rooftops!

    Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders Part Two: Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

    Disease/disorder

    See Cerebrovascular Disorders Part 1.

    Essentials of Assessment

    See Cerebrovascular Disorders Part 1.

    Cutting Edge/emerging and Unique Concepts and Practice

    Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT)1,2

    Traditional CIMT involves restraint of the unaffected limb for 90% of the waking hours for 14 days while intensively training the use of the affected arm during 4-6 hour sessions. A modified version exists (mCIMT) during which the unaffected arm is only restrained for 5-6 hours per day; it is less time consuming and a more appealing option for patients and therapy team members. A number of studies have shown that CIMT induces a use-dependent increase in cortical reorganization of the areas of the brain controlling the more affected limb.3,4 Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in motor and functional outcomes, although there have been mixed results. CIMT is shown to be effective in patients who have active wrist extension (at least 20 degrees), active finger extension (at least 10 degrees), good cognition, limited spasticity, and preserved balance. CIMT has shown effectiveness in improving motor function in both the acute and chronic phases of stroke recovery, but studies have been limited by small sample sizes.  High volume CIMT combined with electrical stimulation with task-specific training and strength training have been shown to be the most effective interventions in improving upper limb motor function in individuals with stroke. 5

    Bilateral upper extremity training

    This training is a stroke rehabilitation technique that has been applied to patients in both acute and chronic post-stroke phases. Investigators have recommended that patients in the chronic phase poststroke who retain at least a minimal degree of corticospinal integrity (as reflected by, e.g., active finger movements) should receive unilateral training, and those with little or no distal movement might benefit more from bilateral training. For those stroke patients without corticospinal tract integrity, targeting the contralesional hemisphere using bilateral training is expected to be more appropriate, although the functional gains are expected to be small.6

    Body-weight-supported (BWS) therapy7

    This modality allows stroke patients to safely participate in task-specific gait training. A harness provides support of body weight over a treadmill or other surface, while a therapist can observe and correct any unwanted gait pattern. BWS treadmill training can be done with or without visual feedback however no significant difference in functional improvements have been found with the presence or absence of visual biofeedback.8 BWS gait training has been shown to improve ambulation in hemiparetic stroke patients producing a more symmetric, efficient hemiparetic gait pattern. However, superiority of BWS therapy over conventional post-stroke gait training therapies has not been established.

    Robotics9

    Robotic devices are ideal for the repetitive exercises that are often used to facilitate motor relearning and strengthening after stroke. Used for both upper and lower limb rehabilitation, newer robotic software makes previously tedious and repetitive tasks more engaging by incorporating gaming and other challenges. Many newer robotic devices have the added benefit of being able to collect data for the rehabilitation team. Similar to most emerging therapies, there are barriers to use which include limited studies supporting benefit, high cost, and limited knowledge of using the technology.

    Brain-computer interface (BCI)10–12

    BCI’s have evolved from assistive technologies allowing those with severe motor impairments (e.g., locked-in syndrome, stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) avenues to control devices for mobility and communication to newer neurorehabilitation tools allowing patients with severe motor deficits to participate in the rehabilitation process. BCI involves developing neuroprosthetic devices and technologies to bypass damaged brain tissue via adaptive neuroplasticity of uninvolved distal brain areas. Parts of the nervous system not involved in specific tasks can be harnessed to reconstruct the neural substrate that interacts with a BCI-driven devices. A brain-machine interface uses brain signals to drive external devices without the use of peripheral physiologic activities. Barriers to use are high cost and unreliable technology.

    Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) – Transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation13-15

    This therapy involves applying mild magnetic or electric stimulation to the scalp. The benefit is thought to be achieved by neuromodulation of plasticity and cortical excitability. A growing number of studies support its therapeutic potential and safety in stroke rehabilitation and have shown to improve motor function, gait, language (aphasia) and cognitive (neglect) deficits, and mood. A meta-analysis reported that even though there are gait, balance, and lower limb function improvements across NIBS, the results vary based on the type of stimulation technique, the location of stimulated area, as well as the protocol used, warranting further in-depth research.15

    Mental Practice (MP)/Motor Imagery13

    This refers to mental rehearsal of a movement. Imaging studies have shown that this motor imagery stimulates overlapping cortical areas as the actual movements. Most studies have shown a positive effect on upper extremity function. A recent Cochrane Review found MP in combination with routine rehabilitation is more effective in restoring arm function compared to rehabilitation alone.17 A recent systematic review concluded that MP/MI used on its own is not effective, but it is shown to be effective in recovering upper limb motor movements, speed and coordination of such movements when used in conjunction with conventional and non-conventional therapies. There is still further research needed to establish assessment tools to analyze the efficacy of this therapy as well as to quantify the progress being made when used on its own.18

    Mirror Therapy13,19

    Initially applied to amputation patients, this therapy involves placing a mirror in the mid-sagittal plane, allowing the patient to visualize the reflection of the non-paretic limb as if it were the paretic limb. The underlying theory is that there is cortical activation of the injured region of the brain from the perception of movement via interhemispheric communication.  Though there are studies have showing gains in motor function, there is limited evidence in the stroke population prompting routine use.16

    Virtual reality (VR)20

    Virtual environments and objects provide the user with visual feedback and repetitive skills practice. The interface may be through a head-mounted device, projection systems, or involving sensations of hearing, touch, movement, balance, or smell. The user interacts with the environment by devices, such as a mouse or joystick, or more complex systems using cameras, sensors, or haptic feedback devices. A 2017 Cochrane review20 found evidence that VR and interactive video gaming may be beneficial in improving upper limb function and ADL function as an adjunctive therapy or when compared with the same amount of standard therapy. There was insufficient evidence to make conclusions about the effect on grip strength, gait speed or global motor function. A randomized control trial observed a significant improvement in cognitive flexibility and shifting skills, selective attention/visual research, and quality of life with regard to perception of mental and physical state in stroke patients when VR and robotic exoskeleton were used in combination.21

    Rehabilitation Management and Treatments

    Current treatment guidelines(Survivors don't want useless guidelines! They want EXACT PROTOCOLS THAT DELIVER 100% RECOVERY! GET THERE!)

    The American Heart Association (AHA) & American Stroke Association have published guidelines for the management and rehabilitation of stroke.22–25

    Acute stroke management

    • Emergency noncontrast computerized tomography (CT) scan of the head is performed to differentiate between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
    • Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) is indicated for adults with diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the absence of contraindications, provided it can be administered within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.23,26
    • Endovascular techniques (e.g., thrombectomy or intra-arterial fibrinolysis) are recommended for selected patients within 16-24 hours for those with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation > 6 hours.13,23,26 rTPA should still be administered in eligible patients.1,7 Intracranial vascular imaging (CT angiogram or MR angiogram) is recommended if endovascular therapy is contemplated.27
    • Initiation of aspirin within 24-48 hours is indicated for ischemic strokes.23 Patients with acute ischemic stroke who are allergic to or intolerant of aspirin should be given an alternative antiplatelet agent (e.g. clopidogrel).
    • Initial management of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) includes reversal of any identified coagulopathy and monitoring/lowering of intracranial pressure, if increased. Surgical evacuation is generally not indicated for supratentorial hemorrhage but is recommended for cerebellar ICH with brainstem compression or hydrocephalus.26
    • Comprehensive stroke centers and stroke systems of care(NOT RESULTS OR RECOVERY! So useless!) improve(NOT GOOD ENOUGH!) outcomes through prevention and treatment of stroke, as well as post-stroke rehabilitation.23,24,26

    Acute and post-acute stroke management and rehabilitation16,24

    Early initiation of rehabilitation after acute stroke is associated with shorter rehabilitation length of stays and improved functional outcomes.24

    The goals of rehabilitation include prevention of complications, minimizing functional impairments, and maximizing function recovery. Initial rehabilitation efforts should start as soon as possible in the acute care setting then transition to the inpatient rehabilitation setting. Other levels of post-acute care include sub-acute inpatient rehabilitation, day rehabilitation programs, outpatient programs, and home therapy programs.

    Rehabilitation involves a multidisciplinary team that is often led by a rehabilitation physician. Depending on functional impairments and patient needs, the team often includes:

    • Physical therapy: evaluation and rehabilitation of mobility including stretching, range of motion, strengthening, balance, endurance, transfers, standing, and ambulation
    • Occupational therapy: evaluation and rehabilitation of self-care skills including treatment of impairments related to activities of daily living and upper extremity impairments
    • Speech and language pathology: evaluation and rehabilitation of cognitive, language, and swallowing impairments
    • Neuropsychology: Psychological support and cognitive assessment and interventions
    • Nursing: Assistance with bed mobility and positioning, bowel and bladder management, skin care, education
    • Recreational therapy: community integration, functional cognitive tasks (games, music, social interaction, etc.)
    • Social work/Case management: Discharge planning, resource and benefits counseling, and guidance/education
    • Other disciplines: vocational rehabilitation specialist, dietician, pharmacist

    The rehabilitation physician and team play a significant role in minimizing complications

    • Early mobilization: Minimizing deconditioning and its associated effects on fatigue, orthostatic hypotension, and endurance.
    • Evaluation and treatment of dysphagia: Dysphagia is common and increases risk of pneumonia. A formal swallowing assessment is standard of care for determination of the safest diet consistency/texture to minimize risk of aspiration; aspiration is missed on bedside swallow study in 40-60% of patients. Screening should be performed before any oral intake. Dynamic instrumental assessment with a videofluoroscopy swallowing study (VFSS) or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) can help guide rehabilitative techniques.
    • Nutrition status: Adequate nutritional status, including adequate hydration, should be ensured by monitoring intake (consider formal calorie counts), body weight, and laboratory tests (e.g., albumin or prealbumin).
    • Blood glucose levels: Monitor for at least 72 hours post-stroke. Hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia should be treated adequately. Blood glucose should be maintained between 140-180 mg/dl.
    • Blood pressure management:25,26,29–31 There is controversy about optimal blood pressure levels in the acute stage and concern about adverse effect on collateral circulation in the brain with rapid lowering of blood pressure. It is reasonable to restart or initiate antihypertensives during acute hospitalization with pressures greater than 140/90mmg HG once neurologically stable and it is suggested that lowering blood pressure no more than 15% during the first 24 hours is reasonable when values are significantly elevated (greater than or equal to 220/120mmHG).
    • Spasticity: Prevention and early detection are important. Prevention measures include early mobilization, range of motion, proper positioning, and use of braces, if needed. Medications include tizanidine, dantrolene, and baclofen.  Botulinum toxin or intrathecal baclofen should be considered for selected patients. Contractures can be treated using splinting, serial casting, or surgical correction. Diazepam and other benzodiazepines should be avoided during the stroke recovery period because they may delay recovery. Those who have spasticity in their upper or lower limbs after stroke should not be treated with electrical stimulation to reduce spasticity unless after botulinum toxin injection to wrist or fingers as an adjunct to splinting.32
    • Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis: Preventative measures include early mobilization, pharmacological prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin or low molecular weight heparin (unless contraindicated), and pneumatic compression devices or graduated compression stockings. An inferior vena cava filter may be considered in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism if anticoagulation is contraindicated.
    • Shoulder pain: Prevention of post-stroke shoulder pain and subluxation is done through careful monitoring, proper positioning, hemiplegic limb support including use of wheelchair arm trough, shoulder harness/sling or taping, trauma prevention, avoidance of uncontrolled abduction and overhead pulley use, and precautions during transfers. Shoulder subluxation and pain may be treated with oral medications, intra-articular steroid injections, shoulder support, arm trough or lap tray, stretching, thermal modalities, functional electrical stimulus, spasticity management, or referral for suprascapular nerve block.33
    • Bladder management: Urinary incontinence is a common post-stroke complication but often resolves over time. Urinary retention can be assessed with use of a bladder scanner or an in-and-out catheterization. Timed voids and temporary use of external or intermittent catheterization may be helpful. Indwelling catheters increase risk of urinary infection and prolonged use should be avoided whenever feasible.
    • Bowel management: Incontinence is less common than constipation or fecal impaction. Discussion regarding improved diet, fluid intake and exercise as well as medication review for constipating medications is encouraged. A bowel regimen involving the use of laxatives, stool softeners, and bowel training should be initiated.
    • Skin: Skin integrity should be assessed on admission and monitored daily. Skin breakdown risk may be assessed with standardized tools, such as the Braden Scale. Preventative interventions include special mattresses, frequent turning, proper positioning, transfers, lubricants, barrier sprays and ointments, spasticity management when appropriate and protective dressings.
    • Medication considerations: Central nervous system (CNS) depressants, such as neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, and barbiturates, may be associated with poorer outcomes and should be avoided whenever feasible.
    • Post-stroke depression: Up to 1/3rd of all stroke patients will experience depression during their recovery process. Early diagnosis and treatment is recommended as stroke outcomes have been shown to be negatively affected and may even increase risk of recurrent stroke.31 Depression may be related to neurotransmitter depletion from stroke lesions and/or psychological response to physical/personal losses associated with stroke. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the preferred medication when appropriate and should not be given routinely for prevention of depression without evidence of increased risk due to increased potential of adverse effects.34 Several studies suggest neural mechanisms of recovery may be facilitated by certain antidepressants.28 Other emerging treatment approaches include electroconvulsive therapy, acupuncture, music therapy, and nutraceuticals.29 Further studies are needed in these emerging areas.
    • Fall risk: Fall risk should be assessed using established tools and prevention strategies utilized. Strategies include low beds, bed alarms, wheelchair belts, and patient/caregiver education.
    • Infection: Fever should be reduced promptly. Pneumonia and urinary tract infections should be prevented and promptly identified and treated if they occur.
    • Specific rehabilitation interventions: Rehabilitation interventions are based on comprehensive, standardized assessments for impairments (motor, sensory, cognitive, communication, swallowing, psychological, and safety awareness) and prior/current functional status.
      • Motor assessment should be at both the impairment and functional level. Components should include strength, active and passive range of motion, tone, gross and fine motor coordination, balance, apraxia, and mobility. Motor function is addressed with strengthening, balance and gait training, orthoses, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), robot-assisted movement therapy, constraint-induced movement therapy, and body-weight-supported treadmill training, and upper extremity interventions in order to improve activities of daily living.6 Functional electrical stimulation may help facilitate movement or compensate for lack of voluntary movement.
      • Sensory assessment should include an evaluation of different sensations (sharp/dull, temperature, light touch, vibratory and position), a vision exam, and a hearing exam if hearing impairment is suspected. Compensatory techniques for sensory impairments should be included in the stroke patient’s individualized rehabilitation program.
      • Cognitive assessment should address arousal, attention, visual neglect, learning, memory, executive function, and problem solving.
      • Psychosocial assessments should be made of psychological factors (e.g., pre-morbid personality, level of insight, loss of identity concerns, sexuality), psychiatric illnesses, available resources, social support, patient goals, life situation, and social roles. A home assessment may be needed.
      • Management of dysphagia includes postural changes, increased sensory input, modified swallowing maneuvers, active exercise programs, and diet modifications. Non-oral feeding may be required in some instances, including consideration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding.
      • Aphasia management includes early recognition and development of a multidisciplinary focused treatment plan to increase gains during spontaneous recovery and use of compensatory techniques for persistent communication problems. Dysarthria treatments include interventions to improve articulation, fluency, resonance, and phonation, compensatory techniques, and use of alternate/augmentative communication (AAC) devices. Personalized, telerehabilitation programs as supplementation to in person rehabilitation as shown to be beneficial for those limited by insurance, transportation or limited providers.35
      • Cognitive deficits are common and can include impaired memory, concentration and executive function. Deficits can be managed through patient, family, and staff education of deficits, teaching compensatory strategies and structured feedback.
      • Measures to address visual and spatial neglect should be integrated with other therapies, and may include prism glasses, increased awareness of deficits, and compensatory techniques.
      • Neuropsychiatric sequalae should be identified and treated. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or the NMDA receptor inhibitor, Memantine, can be considered for patients with vascular dementia or vascular cognitive impairment.27 Amphetamines are not recommended to enhance motor recovery.27
      • Patient, family, and caregiver education is an integral part of rehabilitation, as are appropriate advocacy and identification and help with securing of available support and resources. Assessment findings and expected outcomes should be discussed with the patient and family/caregivers.

    Chronic stroke management

    • Rehabilitation team members should provide adequate support as the patient transitions from inpatient rehabilitation to home. Team can provide assistance with ordering appropriate durable medical equipment (DME), instructions for home rehabilitation programs, arranging for home health or outpatient therapy services, scheduling follow up medical appointments, and providing information on local stroke support groups.
    • Ongoing management may include a regular exercise program, walking aids and/or wheelchair, adaptive devices for activities of daily living, home modifications, addressing return to work, driving, management of sexual dysfunction, and ongoing evaluation and management of stroke risk factors and comorbid conditions. Appropriate safety measures (e.g., fall prevention) should be instituted.4
    • Secondary prevention of stroke:30 Appropriate treatment of hypertension, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation thrombo-embolic prophylaxis, use of antiplatelet therapy in cerebral ischemia, prevention of coronary heart disease, lipid lowering therapy, exercise, and smoking cessation are all important. Blood sugar maintenance of near-normoglycemic levels (80-140 mg/dl) is recommended for long-term prevention of microvascular and macrovascular complications.

    Coordination of care

    Coordination of treatment care plans should include all involved medical specialists-including the primary care physician, home care services, outpatient therapists, and the patient and their care givers. A multidisciplinary team is essential for success.

    Patient & family education

    Education must focus on management of risk factors, maintenance of rehabilitation gains, preventing complications, community support and resources, home modifications, and community reintegration.

    Key topics for stroke prevention education (also see “Secondary prevention of stroke” section above):

    • Modifiable risk factors include hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, obesity or being overweight.
    • Recommend: smoking cessation, avoiding excess alcohol consumption, having a balanced diet, and exercise participation.

    Key topics for post stroke complication education and prevention

    • Maintain regular follow up with a primary care physician to prevent and monitor for complications.
    • Monitor for signs and symptoms of post stroke complications: depression, spasticity or contractures, shoulder pain/subluxation, DVTs, pressure ulcers, pneumonias, seizures, osteoporosis, UTIs and/or bladder control.
    • The following treatment or preventative techniques may be employed:
      • Counseling, psychotherapy, local stroke support groups, and antidepressant medications may be utilized for depression.
      • Range of motion exercises and physical therapies can help prevent limb contractures and shoulder pain.
      • Good nutrition and frequent pressure relief, including turning while in bed, will help prevent pressure ulcers.
      • Swallowing exercises and precautions, deep breathing exercises, and respiratory therapy can minimize risk of pneumonia.
      • Bladder training programs may be helpful for poor bladder function control.

    Outcome measures

    Functional status, discharge disposition (i.e., home versus facility), hospital readmissions, and mortality are important indicators to measure in the post-discharge period.

    Common scales

    • Functional Independence Measure Scale (FIM): Assesses physical and cognitive function focusing on burden of care. There are a total of 13 motor items and 5 social-cognitive items. Each item is scored from 1-7, with 7 indicating complete independence.
    • Modified Rankin Scale: A global outcome scale that runs from 0-6, with 0 being perfect health without symptoms, and 6 being death. It is commonly used for measuring the degree of disability, or dependence, and has become a widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials.

    Gaps in the Evidence-Based Knowledge

    • Although several different forms of rehabilitation techniques have been proven effective, these studies often involve small and highly selective populations and are not generalizable to the stroke population.
    • Further studies are needed to develop optimal treatment protocols evaluating for ideal patient population(No survivor should be left behind, they all want 100% recovery! Why the hell isn't that your goal?), ease of treatment program, and combined modalities for many of the therapies, including constraint-induced movement therapy, indirect brain stimulation, and mirror therapy.
    • Blood pressure management during early stroke management continues to be an area of conflict. Larger trials with well-defined criteria are needed and appear to be forthcoming. Current guidelines should be followed until such time.25
    • The most recent AHA guidelines suggest further study is needed in specific areas of early acute ischemic stroke management, including in intravenous fibrinolysis, endovascular interventions, anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and induced hypertension.26
    • The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cardiovascular disease and stroke patients has gained in popularity over recent years and appears common. These include biological therapies such as dietary supplements, herbal medicine, and aromatherapy; mind-body therapies such as deep breathing, meditation, yoga, tai chi, and praying; manipulative and body-based therapies such acupressure, chiropractic manipulation, massage, osteopathic manipulation, and reflexology; whole medical systems which include acupuncture, Ayurveda, homeopathy, and naturopathy; and finally energy medicine which includes healing touch, light therapy, magnetic therapy, Reiki, and sound energy therapy. Biologic, mind-body therapies, and acupuncture (especially among stroke patients) are the most commonly used. Potential interactions and adverse effects may exist for biological CAM therapies. Further studies are needed, especially in regard to effects of CAM therapies on clinical outcomes and safety, particularly in stroke patients.31,36
    References at link.

    Thursday, November 30, 2023

    Three ways to improve arm function in the chronic phase after stroke by robotic priming combined with mirror therapy, arm training, and movement-oriented therapy

    Good luck mimicking this for your recovery with no protocol provided.

     Three ways to improve arm function in the chronic phase after stroke by robotic priming combined with mirror therapy, arm training, and movement-oriented therapy

    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Volume 104(8), Pgs. 1195-1202.

    NARIC Accession Number: J92709. What's this?
    Author(s): Li, Yi-chun, Lin, Keh-chung, Chen, Chia-ling, Yao, Grace, Chang, Ya-ju, Lee, Ya-yun, Liu, Chien-ting, Chen, Wen-Shiang.
    Publication Year: 2023.
    Abstract: Study examined the effects of bilateral robotic priming combined with mirror therapy (R-mirr) vs bilateral robotic priming combined with bilateral arm training (R-bilat), relative to the control approach of bilateral robotic priming combined with movement-oriented training (R-mov)(What's this?) in patients with stroke. In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, 63 outpatients with stroke and mild-to-moderate motor impairment received 6 weeks of clinic-based R-mirr, R-bilat, or R-mov for 90 minutes a day, 3 days a week, plus a transfer package at home for 5 days a week. Outcomes included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale (FMA-UE), ABILHAND, and Stroke Impact Scale v3.0 scores obtained before, immediately after, and 3 months after treatment as well as lateral pinch strength and accelerometry before and immediately after treatment. The posttest results favored R-mirr over R-bilat and R-mov on the FMA-UE score. Follow-up analysis revealed that significant improvement in FMA-UE score was retained at the 3-month follow-up in the R-mirr over R-bilat or R-mov. Significant improvements were not observed in the R-mirr over R-bilat and R-mov on other outcomes. Between-group differences were only detected for the primary outcome, FMA-UE. R-mirr was more effective at enhancing upper-limb motor improvement, and the effect has the potential to be maintained at 3 months of follow-up.
    Descriptor Terms: EXERCISE, LIMBS, MOTOR SKILLS, PHYSICAL THERAPY, REHABILITATION TECHNOLOGY, ROBOTICS, STROKE, THERAPEUTIC TRAINING.


    Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Request Information.

    Citation: Li, Yi-chun, Lin, Keh-chung, Chen, Chia-ling, Yao, Grace, Chang, Ya-ju, Lee, Ya-yun, Liu, Chien-ting, Chen, Wen-Shiang. (2023.) Three ways to improve arm function in the chronic phase after stroke by robotic priming combined with mirror therapy, arm training, and movement-oriented therapy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation., 104(8), Pgs. 1195-1202. Retrieved 11/30/2023, from REHABDATA database.

    Friday, September 8, 2023

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

    It's only 13 years old. What did your incompetent doctor use as an excuse not to get this implemented for your recovery? Yeah, it's for chronic but I bet it would work even better for acute.

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

     Disability and Rehabilitation, 2010; 32(15): 1221–1231
     Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Accepted November 2009

    Abstract

    Purpose.
     
    To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function inadults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke.
     
    Method.
     
    Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles were evaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Data relating to study design and functional outcome were extracted.
     
    Results.
     
    Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eight studies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing(BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRAC studies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reported significant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27.
     
    Conclusion.
     
     There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however more quality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence.

    Thursday, March 30, 2023

    The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

    In 13 years have your doctors and stroke hospital done one damn thing with this? NO? Then you don't have a functioning stroke doctor or hospital.

     The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

     CHRISTOPHER PAUL LATIMER, JUSTINE KEELING, BRODERICK LIN,MEREDITH HENDERSON & LEIGH ANNE HALE
    Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Accepted November 2009

    Abstract

    Purpose.
     To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function inadults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke.
     Method.
     Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles wereevaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Datarelating to study design and functional outcome were extracted.
    Results.
     Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eightstudies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing(BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRACstudies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reportedsignificant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27.
    Conclusion.
     There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however morequality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence.

    Tuesday, November 29, 2022

    Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke

     Further research required since this only is for moderately impaired chronic stroke survivors. Did your stroke hospital implement this from 13 years ago or was their rehab already so successful they didn't need anything newer?

    Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke

    2009, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

    Abstract

    Background. 
    Upper extremity hemiparesis is the most common poststroke disability. Longitudinal studies have indicated that 30% to 66% of stroke survivors do not have full arm function 6 months poststroke. One promising treatment approach is bilateral training. To date, no randomized, blinded study of efficacy comparing 2 groups (bilateral training vs unilateral training) using analogous tasks has been performed in chronic stroke survivors with moderate upper extremity impairment. 
    Objective
    To compare the effectiveness of bilateral training with unilateral training for individuals with moderate upper limb hemiparesis. The authors hypothesized that bilateral training would be superior to unilateral training in the proximal extremity but not the distal one.  
    Methods
    Twenty-four subjects participated in a randomized, single-blind training study. Subjects in the bilateral group (n = 12) practiced bilateral symmetrical activities, whereas the unilateral group (n = 12) performed the same activity with the affected arm only. The activities consisted of reaching-based tasks that were both rhythmic and discrete. The Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Motor Status Scale (MSS), and muscle strength were used as outcome measures. Assessments were administered at baseline and posttraining by a rater blinded to group assignment.  
    Results
    Both groups had significant improvements on the MSS and measures of strength. The bilateral group had significantly greater improvement on the Upper Arm Function scale (a subscale of the MAS-Upper Limb Items).  
    Conclusion
    Both bilateral and unilateral training are efficacious for moderately impaired chronic stroke survivors. Bilateral training may be more advantageous for proximal arm function.