Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label expert?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label expert?. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Stroke Prevention Best Path to Dementia Reduction, Experts Say

These people can't be experts, they aren't leading anything. So rather than actually creating protocols post stroke that prevent dementia these goddamn lazy fuckers just threw their hands up in the air  and left the 10 million yearly stroke survivors  with no help. Are you going to individually tell each of those 10 million  that they are screwed because you don't know how to do your job? Since I'm not medically trained I'm not qualified to criticize medical 'professionals'.

Stroke Prevention Best Path to Dementia Reduction, Experts Say

A global group of neurology experts has issued a call to action for a coordinated effort reduce the incidence of dementia via stroke prevention.
Worldwide, neurologic disorders account for the largest number of disease-adjusted life years (DALYs). More than half of DALYs from neurologic disorders result from stroke and dementia.
Both conditions arise from similar treatable risk and protective factors, and growing evidence suggests preventing stroke can also prevent some dementias. About 90% of strokes are potentially preventable, as are some dementias.
Dr Vladimir Hachinski
"The evidence by now is overwhelming and incontestable" that stroke doubles the chances of developing dementia, Vladimir Hachinski, MD, professor of neurology and epidemiology at Western University in Canada and Vice President of the World Stroke Organization, told Medscape Medical News.
Hachinski, who coined the term "brain attack" and devised the Hachinski Ischemic Score that remains the standard for identifying a vascular component of cognitive impairment, is among 26 experts who met in Berlin, Germany to hammer out a plan of action.
These experts are authors of an article outlining their proposed strategy. The article was published online July 18 in Alzheimer's & Dementia.

Recommendations

The article reviews the epidemiology and pathophysiology related to stroke and dementia and includes recommendations for prevention.
The public, and even the medical profession, is largely unaware that the most common outcome of cerebrovascular disease is not stroke but cognitive impairment, said Hachinski.
He cited one study showing that for each identified clinical stroke, there are about five "silent" strokes where the patient has no symptoms and may not even be aware of the event's occurrence.
"But if you test these people, they have decreased processing speed, impairment in working memory, and impairment in executive function," Hachinski said.
In Canada, Hachinski's research group found that about 64% of those over age 65 who have a stroke will have some cognitive impairment, although not necessarily dementia.
There are two ways to try to prevent dementia, said Hachinski. The first is what he refers to as a "silver bullet approach," which involves searching for a drug to stop the accumulation of amyloid.
"We're a long way away from that because nothing has worked so far, and even if you find something today, it will probably be 5 or 10 years before it's implemented."

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

David Sackett, the father of evidence-based medicine, dies at 80

If there is ANY evidence based medicine in stroke I have NO fucking clue where it is. Guidelines do not count, they are just lazy ways to evade the issue.  Protocols people, protocols. He also is of the opinion that experts in the field need to get out of the way for new thinking.  This is more colloquially known as killing off of the dead wood experts.

Does Science Advance One Funeral at a Time?  Dec. 2015

David Sackett, the father of evidence-based medicine, dies at 80


The key thing that differentiates modern medicine from the healing arts of the past is its embrace of science. And few people did more to advance that cause than David Sackett.
Sackett, who died on Wednesday at the age of 80, was widely known as the father of the "evidence-based medicine" movement — arguably one of the most important recent advances in medical practice.




sackett

David Sackett. McMaster University.
Many people might wonder, "Wasn't medicine always evidence-based?" Not necessarily. Until researchers like Sackett started to push the profession in a more scientific direction in the 1990s, a surprising amount of medical practice was simply rooted in expert opinion and whatever doctors learned in medical school — not the best or most up-to-date knowledge.
But then came "evidence-based medicine." Here's how Sackett describes the movement in a 1997 paper:
Evidence-based medicine, whose philosophical origins extend back to mid-19th century Paris and earlier, is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research.
One of the key insights here was that doctors needed accessible and trustworthy research to inform their decisions. As McMaster University professor Brian Haynes explained, Sackett paved the way by founding "clinical epidemiology," which uses research methods — from epidemiology, biostatistics, and other scientific disciplines — to answer questions about health care.
"This became the basis for evidence-based medicine, which is transforming health care, greatly enhancing its benefits," Haynes said. Haynes and others, including his McMaster colleague Gordon Guyatt, helped develop methods for synthesizing research and getting the best-available evidence into the hands of clinicians.

The evidence-based approach laid out in medicine trickled into other domains, including social policy. "Millions benefited from the seeds they planted," said the Mayo Clinic's Victor Montori. "Randomized trials are contributing to identify policies that are more likely to do more good than harm, and clinical practice has become more scientific."
In recent years, evidence-based medicine has had its moments of crisis and there have been many conversations about whether it lost its way. Some have wondered if the approach over-values certain types of evidence (i.e., randomized control trials) at the expense of clinical experience or individual patients' needs.

Other critics have pointed out that industry has "misappropriated and distorted" evidence based medicine, so that "[the movement] has not resolved the problems it set out to address (especially evidence biases and the hidden hand of vested interests), which have become subtler and harder to detect."
Still, the original intention — to be more exacting at the bedside — was a notable one. Sackett's death and his contributions should remind us that, especially when it comes to health, scientific thinking should always trump magical thinking. As this tribute to Sackett in the BMJ nicely illustrates, this isn't only an approach to medicine; it's an approach to life:
...[Sackett] is perhaps most appreciated by doctors for repeating his residency in medicine some 20 years after first training because, although a professor in the medical school, he "wasn’t a good enough doctor." This was an act of great courage and shows how Sackett, although at one time a professor in Oxford, had no pomposity whatsoever. Of Oxford he said, "They have 20 ways of saying ‘interesting,’ all of them negative." ...
Sackett was well known for arguing that after 10 years of being an expert you should stop — because your views are given too much weight and get in the way of new thinking. He was an expert on compliance, but in 1980 stopped all his work on compliance, and in 1999 he gave his last lecture on evidence based medicine, in Krakow, Poland.

Friday, July 14, 2017

‘Experts can help stroke patients rehab’

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. There is only a 10% chance of full recovery and almost none of that is due to 'experts'. It is luck of the size and location of the lesion and the work ethic of the survivor.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/ludhiana/-experts-can-help-stroke-patients-rehab/429502.html
Stroke or brain attack is the leading cause of death and disability in the world. After medical treatment, patients need rehabilitation. In India due to lack of therapists (physiotherapists, speech and occupational therapists) patients do not receive rehabilitation adequately. Relatives carry out some rehabilitation at home. However, whether this form of rehabilitation is effective or not has not been scientifically studied. Hence family members were trained to carry out rehabilitation at home in the recently concluded ATTEND trial. It was one of the largest stroke rehabilitation trials ever undertaken. It revealed that family-led rehabilitation was ineffective. According to the research published in the medical journal “Lancet” this week there was no reduction in disability for patients on the trial, compared to those, who received no extra care. Prof Jeyaraj D Pandian, the lead Investigator from India, who is head of neurology at Christian Medical College, said, “We found that despite extensive training in hospital and during follow up visits in homes, there was no difference in the degree of recovery or quality of life of people, who received this extra treatment.” He said, “We are confident that training sessions were completed correctly, and patients and care takers accepted the training. Our results suggest that effective rehabilitation may need to be provided by professionals, who have undergone years of training and are specialists in their own field.” The George Institute researchers along with international and Indian stroke experts followed 1,250 patients from 14 stroke centres over six months in India. Stroke affects much younger working age people in India than those in high-income countries (an average of 15 years younger). Half were provided access to professionals, including physiotherapists, who taught family techniques such as mobility training and communication practice. Each patient was also visited at his/her home to ensure that rehabilitation was carried out correctly by their care taker. Dr Pandian added that, “In many parts of the world, people who have a stroke, receive little to no medical treatment at all. In India, there are only 35 stroke units across the whole country, and most are in the cities. In response to the rising rates of stroke there needs to be much greater investment in facilities for people affected by stroke.” He said it was that hoped the family led care – also known as task shifting (the training of non-physician healthcare workers to perform tasks traditionally undertaken by physicians) – would help address the limited healthcare access for those with stroke in low and middle income countries. The disappointing results of the trial provides evidence that task shifting rehabilitation may not be effective. Dr Dorcas Gandhi, Dr Cynthia Felix, Dr Shweta Jain and Mr Alim were the national coordinators of the trial.

Participants of the ATTEND trial
  • The centres, which participated in ATTEND trial in India, are Christian Medical College, Ludhiana; PGIMER, Chandigarh (Dr Dheeraj Khurana); St Stephen’s Hospital, New Delhi (Dr Suresh Babu); AIIMS, New Delhi (Dr V Padma); Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata (Dr Jayanta Roy); Guwahati Neurological Research Centre, Guwahati (Dr NC Borah); Baptist Hospital, Tezpur (Dr Lydia John); NIMS, Hyderabad (Dr Subash Kaul); Lalitha Superspeciality Hospital, Guntur (Dr P Vijaya); Christian Medical College, Vellore (Dr Sanjith Aaron); Global Hospital, Chennai (Dr Halprashanth); BGS Global Hospitals, Bangalore (Dr Madhusudhanan); AIMS, Kochi (Dr V Nambiar) and SCTIMST, Trivandrum (Dr PN Sylaja). 
  • The ATTEND trial is an international collaboration involving Christian Medical College, Ludhiana (National Coordinating Centre); The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney and Hyderabad; Universities of Nottingham, Leeds and Glasgow in the UK; Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad. 
  • The project was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
Stroke facts
  • Out of the 17 million people, who suffer from a stroke each year, nearly 2 million cases are reported in India.
  • The incidence of stroke are rising in low and middle-income countries (like India and China). 
  • The increase in stroke-related cases is due to the reduction of infectious diseases, rising living standards and the soaring of chronic ailments.
  • Stroke affects younger people in India as compared to those in high income countries including Australia, the United States or the United Kingdom.

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

'Experts' meet at Hyderabad for four-day World Stroke Congress

From what I've seem so far there are no 'experts' at the World Stroke Congress, only blithering idiots doing the 'happy talk'. I'd have everyone at the WSO fired for incompetence! They're DOING NOTHING FOR SURVIVORS!

'Experts' meet at Hyderabad for four-day World Stroke Congress

Stroke is devastating. Everyone can have a stroke.  For many people, the stroke happens suddenly and without warning. According to Stroke Association, when it happens, there is a little time to prepare. It can affect how one moves, feels and thinks.
Hyderabad is the host to World Stoke Congress.  Nearly 2200 stroke experts descended on the city to participate in a four-day conference.  The meeting begins just a few days before World Stroke Day, to be observed on October 29 every year.
What is a stroke? According to Dr. Jeyaraj Pandian, Co-Chair of the World Stoke Congress and a top stroke neurologist in India, a stroke is a brain attack.  It happens when the blood supply to part of the brain cuts off.
Blood carries essential nutrients and oxygen to the brain.  Without blood, brain cells can't work because of the damage.  They won't be able to perform their tasks.
The brain is a critical part of the body. It controls the entire body. A stroke can affect the way body functions.
The brain also controls how one thinks, learns, feels and communicates.
The blood flow to the brain can be cut off by two ways—due to Blockage or a Bleeding.  Because of which strokes occur, which are of two types—01. Blockage and 02. Bleeding.
In 85 per cent cases stroke happens by a Blockage and reaming 15 per cent cases by Bleeding.
According to Stroke Association, some of the things that increase the risk of stroke cannot be changed are Gender(in people under 75, Men have more strokes than women); Age(you are more likely to have a stroke if you are over the age of 65). Family History (If a close relative has had an attack, risk is likely to be higher) and Ethnic Background(South Asian or African-Caribbean origin are at an increased risk).
BP, High Cholesterol, Type 2 Diabetes, Atrial Fibrillation(irregular beating of the heart), Heart disease, Smoking are some of the medical problems that can increase a risk of having a stroke.
Smokers are twice as likely to have a stroke, and this risk will increase more with more smoking. Stopping smoking will reduce the danger of a stroke.
Drinking too much alcohol raises blood pressure, which in turn causes a stoke.
The common effects of stroke are weakness or paralysis; speech and language problems, unsteadiness, difficulty with swallowing, suffer from extreme tiredness, may have a problem with sensation and much more such problems.
According to experts at the ongoing World Stroke Congress, many strokes can be prevented.
The food that will help you save from stroke are fresh fruits, vegetables, and dried fruits and avoid junk food. But you don't give us a diet protocol you lazy fucking idiots.
Choose low-fat proteins.  Eat plenty of fiber such as cereals, porridge, brown rice, whole wheat bread and pasta or grains such as couscous.  Cut down on the intake of salt. Watch your weight.
Keep active.  Do exercises. Warm up before and after exercise.  Find someone to exercise with you.
Stroke is the leading cause of disability and the second leading cause of death globally.
Stroke devastates lives around the world.  Over 17 million people around the world suffer a stroke every year and 6.5 million deaths happen.  5 million are permanently disabled.  Nearly 26 million inhabitants survive a stroke??? every year. Doesn't anyone vet your statistics?
In India alone, 1.7 million new stroke cases occur every year. Stroke affects young people in India during their productive period of life.  The reasons for this are due to unorganized lifestyles and poor food habits. After stroke care significantly reduces the risk of death.
According to Dr, Jayaraj Pandian, the prevalence of the problem is 350 to 400 people per lakh population in India.
In Ludhiana, more youth are getting the stroke. Nearly 23 percent of the youth population is suffering from a stroke. That is due to unhealthy eating habits, stressful life.  Also, it is because today we have more youth population.
Stroke care infrastructure is developed mainly in private hospitals, but the vast majority of public hospitals are ill-equipped to treat stroke patients. The treatment expenses are borne by the patients and relatives and hence there is a huge economic burden on the family. The neighboring countries in South Asia also face a similar problem of a huge burden of stroke with an inadequate infrastructure to tackle the situation stated Dr. Jeyaraj Pandian the Congress Co-Chair from India.
Dr. C. Laxma Reddy, Minister for Health, Government of Telangana, while addressing the inauguration of World Stoke Congress, said TS Govt has established ICUs exclusively for stroke patients in all govt hospitals across Telangana state. We want government hospitals in the state to be stroke-ready hospitals he said.
The right care makes a difference, but many people are not getting the stroke treatment they need. According to World Stroke Campaign by the World Stroke Organisation, there are six key facts about stroke treatment
1.Early recognition makes a big difference.  Knowing the signs of stroke and getting treatment saves lives and improves recovery.
2.  1 in 10 people makes an excellent recovery when cared for in a specialized stroke unit.
90% failure of full recovery is totally appalling, and nothing about the 10% has anything to do with the specialized stroke unit.
3. Clot-busting drugs (tPA or thrombolysis) increase the chance of a good outcome by  30%.
But tPA only fully works 12% of the time. Don't promote that as a good outcome, that is complete failure. Clot-busting drugs break up blood clots. This treatment can be administered up to 4.5 hours of symptom onset in many patients with ischaemic stroke. The earlier it is given, the greater the effect.
4. Clot retrieval treatment increases the chance of a good outcome by more than 50%.  Clot retrieval treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) involves removing a blood clot  and can improve survival rates and reduce disability
5. Recovery is a critical step in the treatment process. Rehabilitation starts in the hospital as soon as possible following a stroke.
6. One in four survivors will have another stroke. Treatments that prevent another stroke include drugs to lower blood pressure and cholesterol, antiplatelet therapies, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, surgery or stenting for selected patients with severe carotid artery narrowing.
Lifestyle changes can also substantially reduce the risk of another stroke. Changes include eating well, being physically active, being tobacco-free, managing stress, and limiting alcohol consumption.
Stroke is treatable(Bullshit, quit lying!).  One must gain more awareness to save from devastating stroke effect.

Friday, August 26, 2016

The Big Dirty Secret Every Doctor Knows

This paragraph from there is instructive: Not being allowed to question the process. In stroke that leads to disaster where survivors haven't been progressing in decades because no one tells the emperor that he has no clothes. No one challenges the 'experts'. 

The Big Dirty Secret Every Doctor Knows



But the responsibility for eminence-based medicine goes well beyond the elite coterie of experts. The real problem is the culture of medicine, which rewards the hubris of eminence and actively punishes or offers subtle disincentives to anyone who question this process.

Monday, May 23, 2016

Well-being, sense of coherence, and burnout in stroke victims and spouses during the first few months after stroke

This is so dammed easy to explain. Your doctors have no clue how to get you to 100% recovery. In fact they know nothing about stroke recovery at all. Ask them what their prescriptions to OT, PT, and ST say. I bet it says E.T. - Evaluate and Treat. I'd be burned out also when my supposed experts in stroke know nothing and do nothing.  

Well-being, sense of coherence, and burnout in stroke victims and spouses during the first few months after stroke


Abstract

Ten stroke victims, who had recently suffered their first manifest stroke with lasting neurological symptoms, participated, together with their spouses, in a study aimed at elucidating the well-being, sense of coherence (SOC), and burnout during the first few months after discharge. The stroke victims had no substantial speech disturbances, and showed no evidence of significant cognitive impairment, signifying they were mildly to moderately impaired by their stroke. All subjects were investigated at 1 and 3 months after homecoming. The methods used in this study were open-ended interviews with all research participants, performed at two different appointments, and three self-reporting questionnaires: the well-being measure (WM), the SOC scale, and the burnout measure (BM). The instruments suit each other well, broaden the picture of living with stroke and give an attuned comprehensive understanding. The most striking finding was the substantial differences in the results, both regarding the stroke victims and their spouses, clearly indicating the limited value current generalizations have. The results also pointed to considerable distress both in stroke victims and spouses, although individuals with a weak SOC clearly displayed more difficulties in coping with the situation and risk of burnout, than did those with a strong SOC.
PMID:
11564227
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Sunday, March 13, 2016

The 4 Rituals That Will Make You An Expert At Anything

And YOU are going to have to become the expert survivor because your doctor and therapists know almost nothing about how to get you 100% recovered. Ask them and they will lie or quote you this craptastic statement; 'All strokes are different, all stroke recoveries are different'. Good luck.  Has your doctor or therapists seen 10,000 survivors or reviewed that many case studies?


http://www.bakadesuyo.com/2016/03/expert/
We hear a lot about “10,000 hours” being what it takes to become an expert. But the majority of people totally misunderstand the idea.
So I decided to go to the source and talk to the guy who actually created the theory.
Anders Ericsson is a professor of psychology at Florida State University. His wonderful new book is Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise.
So what does everybody get wrong? 2 things.
First, the “10,000 hour rule” is not a rule and it’s not an exact number. The amount of time varies from field to field. It’s an average. But it’s always a lot and more is better. Here’s Anders:
In most domains it’s remarkable how much time even the most “talented” individuals need in order to reach the highest levels of performance. The 10,000 hour number just gives you a sense that we’re talking years of 10 to 20 hours a week which those who some people would argue are the most innately talented individuals still need to get to the highest level.
What’s the second mistake? Becoming an expert is not merely doing something over and over for 10,000 hours. There’s a right way — and an awful lot of wrong ways — to spend that time.
Let’s learn the right way…

1) Find A Mentor

2) It’s Not “Try Harder”, It’s “Try Different”

3) It’s About Doing, Not Knowing

4) Study The Past To Have A Better Future

Sum Up

Here’s what Anders says can make you an expert:
  • Get Help: Find a mentor who can help you develop that image in your head of the best way to do something.
  • It’s Not “Try Harder”, It’s “Try Different”: Design specific activities to address your weak points.
  • It’s About Doing, Not Knowing: Remember the three F’s: Focus, Feedback, Fix it.
  • Study The Past To Have A Better Future: Find examples that have been judged and quiz yourself.
Don’t worry; you do not have to be a genius to become an expert at most things. In fact, Anders says it might be an advantage not to be a genius.
When elite chess players were studied, the ones with lower IQ’s often worked harder and then did better because they felt they were at a disadvantage.

Well we as stroke survivors are all screwed, we have NO mentors to follow 
I most assuredly am not a mentor; my hand is non-functional, I swing my leg like a log, can't get my arm above my shoulder, biceps and triceps barely work, dorsiflexion works most of the time.

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Estimated loss of key nerve tissue in a typical large artery hemisphere acute ischemic stroke

The diagram came from here: A CME course on Opening the Window of Time in Stroke Therapy: New Evidence for the Emergency Department

http://eval.opencme.org/wix/p489321294.aspx








A large part of the problem here is these supposed experts in the stroke field don't even have a table showing the loss of neurons during the first week when the neuronal cascade of death is occurring. With no idea there is even a problem we will never even look for a solution. 
Failure on a grand scale and survivors are the ones who are damaged by this failure.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Recovering from a Stroke: The Role of Exercise

So rather than preventing neuron death and damage by stopping the neuronal cascade of death this 'expert' focuses on maybe making your recovery a little better. That way only you have to do something, your doctor needs to do nothing.  These people need to be slapped upside the head.
I need some stroke expert to tell me exactly why I am wrong about this, because I don't understand how everyone in the stroke world can be so stupid.
http://my.americanheart.org/professional/ScienceNews/Recovering-from-a-Stroke-The-Role-of-Exercise_UCM_463546_Article.jsp
Disclosure:Dr. Chantler has a significant research grant funded by the American Heart Association.
Pub Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2014
Authors:Paul D. Chantler, PhD
Affiliation: West Virginia University School of Medicine, Division of Exercise Physiology

Citation

Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, MacKay-Lyons M, Macko RF, Mead GE, Roth EJ, Shaughnessy M, Tang A; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [published online ahead of print May 20, 2014]. Stroke. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1161/STR.0000000000000022

Article Text

An estimated 7 million American adults are living with a stroke.1 It is projected that an additional 4 million will have a stroke by 2030, which is almost a 25% increase in prevalence from 2010.2 Unfortunately, stroke remains a leading cause of long-term disability in the United States.1 Consequently, stroke survivors are often deconditioned and predisposed to a sedentary lifestyle that adversely impacts performance of activities of daily living, increases the risk for falls, and may contribute to a heightened risk for recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular (CV) diseases. These staggering statistics highlight the critical need to identify effective approaches to improve the quality of life of stroke patients. In particular, regular exercise (defined as physical activity that is planned, structured, and repetitive for the purpose of conditioning any part of the body) or physical activity (defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure beyond resting expenditure) is one such approach, reflected by the inverse relationship between CV health and physical activity.3 Unfortunately, most healthcare professionals have limited experience and guidance in exercise programming for this diverse and escalating patient population.
In this paper, Billinger and colleagues provide an up-to-date guide for practitioners to gain a better understanding of the benefits of physical activity, including recommendations for prescribing exercise for stroke survivors across all stages of recovery.4 Initially, the committee describes in detail the functional and physiological consequences of a stroke. Notably there is a reduced ability to perform daily tasks and self-care, and after 6-12 months post-stroke there is a substantial decrease in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle wasting, and an increase in intramuscular fat. There is also a switch from slow twitch towards fast twitch “fatigable” muscle fibers, increase in pro-inflammatory markers, abnormal glucose and insulin metabolism, impaired autonomic control, and respiratory dysfunction. Ultimately this increases the energy costs of walking and premature fatigue. Unfortunately, these post-stroke---related co-conditions likely reflect a response to the chronic sedentary lifestyle that is evident in stroke patients. Importantly, despite the physical limitations, many of these stroke survivors have the ability to undertake higher levels of physical activity but choose not to do so.5 The writing group indicates that the likely reasons for limited exercise participation by stroke patients include a lack of 1) awareness that exercise is feasible or desirable, 2) access to resources to support exercise, and 3) structured exercise sessions whereby exercises could be demonstrated by a rehabilitation specialist or exercise leader.4,6
Importantly, from the point of view of the stroke patients, and their healthcare providers, implementation of exercise after a stroke can improve CV fitness, walking ability, upper extremity muscle strength, symptoms of depression, some aspects of executive functioning and memory, and health-related quality of life. Integrating exercise into a comprehensive plan of care including diet modification, taking cholesterol-lowering medications, antihypertensive medications, and aspirin could lower the risk of a second stroke by 80%.7 Yet, future research should directly address this and identify whether regular physical activity and exercise in stroke survivors translate into a reduced risk for recurrent stroke and cardiac events.
Although the primary objectives of comprehensive care following stroke are to 1) reverse the deficits caused by the stroke and minimize their impact; 2) prevent, recognize, and manage secondary medical conditions, including recurrent stroke; 3) maximize independence in ability to perform activities of daily living; 4) facilitate psychological and social adaptation and coping by the patient and family; 5) optimize the resumption of prior life-roles and reintegration into the community; and 6) enhance quality of life.8 Prevention of secondary conditions such as subsequent stroke and other CV events also constitutes important functions for stroke care professionals. The question is how can practitioners incorporate exercise into the stroke patient’s rehabilitation? The authors provide excellent evidence that exercise can be implemented even in the acute-stroke phase. Importantly, the physical activity goals and exercise prescription for the stroke patient need to be customized to the tolerance of the patient, stage of recovery, environment, available social support, physical activity preferences, as well as their specific impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. As highlighted by the committee, the first goals during the acute post-stroke rehabilitation phase are to implement physical activity/exercise aimed at preventing complications of prolonged inactivity, regaining voluntary movement, and recovering basic activities of daily living (ADLs). Thus, during acute and inpatient rehabilitation, minimizing bed rest is critical. Simple exposure to orthostatic or gravitational stress (i.e., intermittent sitting or standing) has been shown to obviate much of the deterioration in exercise tolerance that normally follows an acute hospital stay.
Once the patient is medically stable, the authors suggest that the next goal is to initiate an exercise training regimen designed to regain (or exceed) pre-stroke levels of activity as early and as much as possible. Physical and occupational therapy are initiated to improve motor recovery (i.e., gait, upper extremity, balance, and muscle strength), motor skills, efficiency in self-care, and occupational and leisure-time activities. Emphasis is on progressive task difficulty, repetition, and functional practice. It is recommended that interventions for motor recovery include CV and strengthening exercises. It is in this supportive environment that patients (with their families and caregivers) can also learn to self-monitor their exertion and track physical activity in hospital, home, or community settings. It is critical for the patient to develop the skills and confidence for eventual self-management of physical activity and an exercise training program.
The third set of goals after stroke rehabilitation is to facilitate the stroke survivor to develop and maintain an active lifestyle that meets recommended stroke physical activity and exercise guidelines for prevention of recurrent stroke and cardiac events, and to maintain or improve physical function. The type of physical activity prescribed must take into account the stroke patient’s functional limitations and co-morbidities, as well as the patient’s personal preferences, environment, and resources, and could range from an exercise program at home to an appropriate community or sport program.
The authors emphasize that before embarking on a physical conditioning regimen after stroke, all participants should undergo a complete medical history evaluation and a physical examination aimed at the identification of neurological complications, medical co-morbidities that require special consideration or constitute a contraindication to exercise, which may include a graded exercise testing with electrocardiograph. Generally, graded exercise testing after stroke should be conducted in accordance with contemporary guidelines as detailed elsewhere.9
When should physical activity begin after stroke? The consensus view is that physical activity should begin early after stroke. However, how early remains controversial, and there are no specific protocols to guide the frequency, intensity, time, or type of physical activity in this time frame. Results from a pilot study (AVERT) assessing the feasibility and safety of a frequent mobilization program commencing within 24 hours post-stroke show no significant difference in the amount of deaths or secondary safety measures (falls and early neurological deterioration) between the standard of care versus a very early mobilization group.10 Further evidence from the AVERT trial indicates that earlier and more intensive mobilization after stroke may fast-track return to unassisted walking and improve functional recovery.11 This would suggest that early mobilization within 24 hours of acute stroke appears to be safe and feasible, and would improve functional recovery.
Specific post-stroke exercise goals outlined by the committee are shown below:
Immediately after an acute stroke
 
  • Low-level walking, self-care activities, intermittent sitting or standing, seated activities, range of motion activities, motor challenges. At intensities that are ~ 10-20 beats/min increases in resting heart rate; rating of perceived exertion ≤11 (6-20 scale); frequency and duration as tolerated, using an interval or work:rest approach. Such activities are aimed at preventing deconditioning, hypostatic pneumonia, orthostatic intolerance, depression, and stimulating balance and coordination.
In- and Outpatient Exercise Therapy OR “Rehabilitation”
 
  • Aerobic exercises that include large-muscle activities (e.g., walking, graded walking, stationary cycle ergometry, arm ergometry, arm-leg ergometry, functional activities seated exercises) if appropriate. At intensities that are ~40-70% oxygen uptake reserve or heart rate reserve; 55-80% heart rate max; rating of perceived exertion 11-14 (6-20 scale), for 3-5 days/week, 20-60 min/session (or multiple 10-min sessions), that includes a 5-10 min of warm-up and cool-down activities. Such activities are aimed at increasing walking speed and efficiency, improving exercise tolerance (functional capacity), increasing independence in activities of daily living, reducing motor impairment and improving cognition, and improving vascular health and inducing other cardio-protective benefits.
  • Muscular Strength/Endurance activities include resistance training of upper and lower extremities, trunk using free weights, weight-bearing or partial weight-bearing activities, elastic bands, spring coils, pulleys, circuit training, and functional mobility. At intensities that correspond to 1 to 3 sets of 10-15 repetitions of 8-10 exercises involving the major muscle groups at 50-80% of 1 repetition max, for 2-3 days/week, with gradually increasing resistance over time as tolerance permits. Such activities are aimed at increasing muscle strength and endurance, increasing ability to perform leisure-time and occupational activities and activities of daily living, and reducing cardiac demands during lifting or carrying objects by increasing muscular strength.
  • Flexibility should also be a focus that involves static stretching of the trunk and upper- and lower extremities. Holding each stretch for 10-30 seconds, with the stretches performed 2-3 days/week (before or after aerobic or strength training). These activities increase range of motion of involved segments, help to prevent contractures, decrease risk of injury, and increase activities of daily living.
  • Neuromuscular activities such as balance and coordination activities, Tai Chi, Yoga, recreational activities (paddles/sport balls to challenge hand-eye coordination), and active-play video gaming and interactive computer games. Employ 2-3 days/week as a complement to aerobic, muscular strength/endurance training, and stretching activities. These activities improve balance, skill reacquisition, quality of life, and mobility; decrease fear of falling; and improve level of safety during activities of daily living.
Future Directions
Although the authors provided an excellent review of the current evidence supporting the incorporation of physical activity/exercise into post-stroke recovery programs,4 a considerable amount of gaps in the literature need to be addressed. As highlighted by the authors, the critical elements (i.e., number of sessions, mode of delivery, and type of follow-up and monitoring) of a successful physical activity counseling intervention have not been definitively identified. Well-designed trials are needed to clarify optimal exercise programming and long-term outcomes of physical conditioning in this patient population, including morbidity, mortality, dependence, and disability. Whether initiating exercise early after stroke can prevent the loss of bone mineral density and deterioration of bone structure commonly seen after stroke, or reduce fracture risk, is currently unknown. Another important future direction lies with the ability to translate the exercise/physical activity findings from carefully-controlled efficacy-focused trials to real world settings. Unfortunately, although physical activity is clearly recognized as a means to reduce the risk of stroke and other CV diseases, sedentary behaviors remain a persistent and significant problem, and even more so for chronic disease populations including stroke. As suggested by the authors, healthcare professionals should understand the barriers and motivators to physical activity post-stroke, and consider ways of educating stroke survivors and caregivers on the importance of CV risk reduction and helping set goals for continued participation in physical activity and exercise.
In summary, the committee provides data that clearly support the use of exercise training (both aerobic and strength training) for stroke survivors. Exercise training improves functional capacity, improves the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living and quality of life, and reduces the risk for subsequent CV events. Healthcare professionals should develop exercise/physical activity programs to help improve the outcome of their stroke patients.


Friday, April 11, 2014

Hot Topics: Stroke in Younger Patients - 35-65

They still didn't address anything other than the generic prevention crap.
If these are our experts we are totally f*cking screwed. They are still going down the route of just prevention. Nothing on preventing the neuronal cascade of death.  Most youngsters are in fairly good physical shape so why not specifically address those causes? I think these 11 Stroke risk reduction ideas should be considered. But don't listen to me because I obviously know less about stroke than these 'prominent stroke experts'.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/HOTTOPICSNeurology/Neurology-Videos/450
Recommendations for prevention in ages 35 to 65.
Are the causes of stroke different in younger patients than in those over 65, and should prevention measures be any different? Three prominent stroke experts address these questions: Donna Arnett, PhD, MSPH, of the UAB School of Public Health in Birmingham, Ala.; Kenneth Gaines, MD, MBA, of Ochsner Health System in New Orleans; and Helmi Lutsep, MD, of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland. They called the rise in strokes among younger patients an "alarming trend" and suggested preventions for this group.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Stroke: Helping patients regain cognitive function?

These guys have no clue that after the fact rehabilitation has at best 10% recovery, but they go down the route and blithely state that this is the best we can do. Shit, you stop the neuronal cascade of death and vastly less disability will result. Maybe then the existing stroke rehab will be good enough. I would not go to these places for rehab.  Any patients there are already screwed because the first week of rehab has passed.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/HOTTOPICSNeurology/Neurology-Videos/448
What works best for recovery after stroke-induced impairment? We asked three experts in stroke rehabilitation: Howard S. Kirshner, MD, professor and vice-chairman of neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville; Samir Belagaje, MD, director of stroke rehabilitation at Emory University's Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center in Atlanta; and Larry B. Goldstein, MD, director of Duke University's stroke center. They emphasized the value of team-based treatment approaches and therapies that harness neuroplasticity.

If you know any of these three ask why they know so little about stroke recovery. They should have been apologizing for the complete failed state of stroke rehab.

That great stroke association would be calling these guys on the carpet and reaming them out.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Hot Topics: Advances in Stroke

If these three guys are supposed to be experts, we are totally screwed. Not one of them mentioned any of the prevention ideas I've written about and whats worse is no mention of the neuronal cascade of death. All it was about is status quo stuff. That is nowhere close to being able to handle the upcoming tsunami of stroke. They should be hanging their heads in shame. If I was a real bastard I'd be writing to their institutions demanding to know when someone intelligent and innovative takes over.
Only 3min 13 seconds of blah.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/HOTTOPICSWhatWorksWhatDoesnt/special-reports/SpecialReports-Videos/408
What works and what doesn't work in stroke? We asked three experts in the field for their take: Joseph Broderick, MD, director of the UC Neuroscience Institute at the University of Cincinnati and UC Health, James C. Grotta, MD, director of stroke research in the Center for Innovation & Research at Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center, and Thomas G. Brott, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla. In this video, they discuss stents, tPA, and artery bypass. What's not working includes clot removal and some recent devices.
F*CK it all - There is absolutely nothing working in stroke. If you don't know that get the hell out and let some intelligent people solve the stroke problems.