Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label doctor guess. Show all posts
Showing posts with label doctor guess. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Arterial widening emerges as key driver of small vessel stroke

 How will this change your competent? doctors' protocols on treating stroke? Oh, nothing will happen because there are NO protocols, since your doctor is guessing every step of the way, Hope the guesses are correct because your doctor gets paid regardless!

Arterial widening emerges as key driver of small vessel stroke

A prospective study of 229 patients with lacunar or mild non-lacunar stroke found that large-artery stenosis was not associated with cerebral small-vessel disease (cSVD) or incident infarcts, whereas arterial widening and basilar artery dolichoectasia were strongly linked to lacunar stroke, higher cSVD burden, and progression of brain lesions over 1 year.

The findings, published in Circulation, challenge traditional atherosclerotic paradigms and suggest that intrinsic microvascular pathology plays a central role in cSVD, underscoring the need for mechanism-specific diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in stroke care.

“This study provides strong evidence that lacunar stroke is not caused by fatty blockage of larger arteries, but by disease of the small vessels within the brain itself,” said Joanna Wardlaw, University of Edinburgh’s Institute for Neuroscience and Cardiovascular Disease, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. “Recognising this distinction is crucial, because it explains why conventional treatments like antiplatelet drugs are not as effective for this type of stroke and highlights the urgent need to develop new therapies that target the underlying microvascular damage.”

For the study, the researchers followed 229 patients (mean age, 65.9 years; 57% with lacunar stroke) with serial clinical and MRI assessments over 1 year to evaluate the impact of large-artery stenosis and arterial widening on stroke subtype and cSVD. Large-artery stenosis (≥50%) was present in 20.5% of patients and basilar artery dolichoectasia in 15.7%, with multivariable analyses adjusting for demographic and vascular risk factors.

Results showed that large-artery stenosis was not associated with cSVD markers or incident infarcts and was instead linked to lower odds of lacunar versus non-lacunar stroke (odds ratio [OR] = 0.49), whereas basilar artery dolichoectasia was strongly associated with lacunar stroke (OR = 4.67), higher small-vessel disease burden (OR = 2.57), increased risk of incident infarcts (OR = 2.29; 75% subcortical), and greater progression of white matter hyperintensities over 1 year (β 0.15 per log10 volume increase).

The researchers said that future treatments should target the underlying small vessel damage. Trials such as LACI-3 are now testing whether existing drugs, including cilostazol and isosorbide mononitrate, can protect the brain, reduce further strokes, and help prevent problems with memory, mobility, and dementia after lacunar stroke.

Reference: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.079493

SOURCE: University of Edinburgh

Friday, May 8, 2026

One Blood Marker Is Tied to Cognition and Mortality in People Who Live Past 100

 Is this one of the common tests post stroke so your doctor can identify the EXACT REHAB PROTOCOLS  to fix this? Oh NO, your competent? doctor has no protocols at all for anything in stroke! S/he prefers guessing on what needs to be done for your recovery! Good luck with that!

One Blood Marker Is Tied to Cognition and Mortality in People Who Live Past 100

Elevated NfL levels tracked with poorer cognitive scores and higher death risk in centenarians

Key Takeaways

  • Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a measure of neuronal injury.
  • Higher blood NfL levels in centenarians correlated with lower cognitive scores and increased mortality rates.
  • NfL may reflect complex systemic interactions that influence mortality, researchers suggested.

Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a measure of neuronal injury, emerged as a key blood-based biomarker associated with both cognitive function and survival in centenarians, a Japanese cohort study showed.

Higher plasma NfL levels correlated with lower cognitive scores on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) after adjusting for potential confounders (β = -0.92, 95% CI -1.62 to -0.23), reported Yasumichi Arai, MD, PhD, of Keio University School of Medicine in Tokyo, and co-authors.

Elevated NfL was also tied to increased mortality (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17-1.57), the researchers wrote in JAMA Network Open. Meanwhile, a lower level of plasma amyloid-beta 42/40, an Alzheimer's disease biomarker, was linked to worse cognitive scores (β = 0.99, 95% CI 0.46-1.52). However, neither that measure, nor plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181), had a significant relationship with mortality after adjustment. Unlike amyloid and tau biomarkers, "NfL appeared to be a more generalizable marker of neurodegeneration that reflected the complex interactions between the nervous system and physiological systems such as immunity and vascular function," Arai and colleagues wrote. "These findings suggest that NfL could serve as a valuable biomarker for assessing the health trajectory of extremely old adults and provide critical insights into the mechanisms underlying cognitive aging at the limits of human life," they added. NfL is a structural component of nerve cells; when damaged, it is released in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The biomarker is assessed in a number of disorders, including vascular brain injurymultiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), traumatic brain injury, and Huntington's disease. Higher blood or CSF levels of NfL are considered markers of neurodegeneration.

The Japanese study results mirror a key finding from earlier research that showed plasma NfL was associated with mortality in the oldest old.

"I'm delighted that our findings from the Danish nonagenarian and centenarian cohorts have now been replicated in a Japanese cohort," noted Mathias Jucker, PhD, of the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Tübingen. "This independent validation across distinct populations strongly supports the robustness of the findings," he told MedPage Today.

Other population-based studies have reported that NfL blood levels also may predict mortality in younger cohorts, Jucker added.

"In light of the growing interest in NfL as a biomarker for human neurological health and mortality, we have recently extended our analysis to include animals," he said. "Our findings suggest that NfL may serve as a cross-species blood biomarker for assessing aging interventions and predicting mortality."

Arai and colleagues studied a cohort of 495 Japanese centenarians recruited from 2000 to 2021 with a mean baseline age of 104.1 years; most (80.4%) were women. Participants had baseline cognitive tests and blood sampling, and were followed up to 17 years for mortality.

The MMSE evaluated cognitive function; scores can range from 30, indicating normal cognition, to 0, indicating severe impairment. The researchers assessed dementia severity with the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, which ranges from 0 for no impairment to 3 for severe dementia.

Overall, 419 participants took the MMSE; the mean score was 13.7. Among 436 participants with a CDR assessment, 83 people had a score of 0; 59 people had a score of 0.5; and 129 people had a score of 1.

The mean NfL level was 114.6 pg/mL, but values ranged widely from 12.5 to 1,239.5 pg/mL. During the follow-up period, 466 participants (95.5%) died.

"While amyloid-beta deposition has long been considered a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease, and p-tau181 is a related protein to amyloid-beta, they appear to be less strongly associated with mortality in centenarians compared with neurodegeneration-associated biomarkers such as NfL," Arai and co-authors observed.

"This suggests that nonamyloid-beta pathology or systemic pathology affecting neurodegeneration rather than amyloid-beta pathology itself may play a more significant role in the morbidity and mortality of centenarians, which is compatible with recent findings showing a distinct pattern of cognitive decline in centenarians compared with patients with Alzheimer's disease," the researchers pointed out.

"The role of physical system decline in chronic inflammation, worsening nutritional status, and declining kidney function as reflected in NfL levels underscores the complex systemic interactions that likely influence mortality in this population," they added.

The study had several limitations, Arai and co-authors noted. It did not account for a formal diagnosis of dementia or incorporate imaging measures like cerebrovascular lesions. The cohort was also limited to a Japanese population.

"Replication in other ethnic groups and regions will be essential to evaluate the generalizability of these findings and to examine potential cultural or genetic influences on NfL as a biomarker of aging," the researchers wrote.

Judy George covers neurology and neuroscience news for MedPage Today, writing about brain aging, Alzheimer’s, dementia, MS, rare diseases, epilepsy, autism, headache, stroke, Parkinson’s, ALS, concussion, CTE, sleep, pain, and more. Connect:
Disclosures

This study was supported by a grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labour for the Scientific Research Project for Longevity; a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; and the Program for Initiative Research Projects from Keio University and the Keio University Global Research Institute.

Arai reported receiving grants from Ezaki Glico, Johnson & Johnson, and Tuning Fork Bio. Co-authors reported relationships with Eisai, Otsuka, Kowa, K Pharma, and SanBio.

Jucker had no conflicts of interest.

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Persistent Beta‐Blocker Therapy Reduces Long‐Term Mortality in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Elevated Heart Rates

 Does your competent? doctor have an EXACT PROTOCOL for this issue? Protocol; NOT a fly by the seat of your pants guess!

Persistent Beta‐Blocker Therapy Reduces Long‐Term Mortality in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Elevated Heart Rates

Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Abstract

    Background

    Elevated heart rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke is associated with increased risk of mortality. Beta‐blocker therapy is well known to reduce heart rate.

    Methods and Results

    This study was a post hoc analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke with maximum heart rates ≥100 bpm. Beta‐blocker use, assessed on the eighth day after the index stroke, was categorized as persistent or nonpersistent based on usage up to 39 months. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction, and mortality within the first year. Long‐term mortality, a secondary outcome, was tracked for up to 10 years. Among 5049 patients (women, 38%; mean age, 68.5 years), 32.1% were prescribed beta blockers by the eighth day after stroke, and 99% had prior beta‐blocker use. One‐year cumulative incidences of the primary outcome, stroke recurrence, and death were 27.8%, 3.5%, and 25.8%, respectively. Persistent beta‐blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.68–0.97]) and mortality (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69–0.94]) from 2 months to 1 year. Extended analysis of mortality for up to 10 years showed long‐term benefits of beta‐blocker use. Analyses subdividing patients into persistent users, discontinuers, and never‐users suggested higher early mortality risk among discontinuers and potential late survival benefits for persistent users. Subgroup analyses demonstrated greater benefits in patients <75 years, and those with atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, and higher mean heart rates.

    Conclusions

    Our study shows that continuation of beta‐blocker therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with tachycardia significantly reduces long‐term mortality.

    Tuesday, March 18, 2025

    Spurs rumors: Gregg Popovich's rehab from stroke well ahead of schedule

     Was he given EXACT 100% REHAB PROTOCOLS such that he can count the reps needed and determine his percentage of recovery so far? Without that there is NO WAY TO DETERMINE HIS RECOVERY! It's just useless doctor guesswork!

    Spurs rumors: Gregg Popovich's rehab from stroke well ahead of schedule

    Spurs head coach Gregg Popovich has been recovering since suffering a stroke earlier in the 2024-25 season and is ahead of schedule.

    Brett SiegelMar 18, 2025 at 11:03 AM ET

    San Antonio Spurs legendary head coach Gregg Popovich suffered a mild stroke on Nov. 2 before the team's sixth game of the season against the Minnesota Timberwolves. With Popovich away from the team to focus on his health, lead assistant Mitch Johnson has stepped up as the interim head coach of the Spurs.

    You can't tell the story of this franchise in San Antonio without Popovich, as he helped shape them into one of the most successful organizations in league history. His influence across the league runs deep with several current head coaches and assistants, which is why Popovich has received nothing but support from every single NBA franchise during his recovery.

    While he missed basically all of the 2024-25 season, the league's all-time winningest coach continues to rehab from this scary medical episode. Although it took several months for him to build up the strength to walk again and stand in front of the team to address them, Popovich still has one goal in mind — returning to the sidelines for his 30th NBA season next year.

    All signs currently point in the direction of Popovich being able to do so, as the 76-year-old head coach has progressed in five months of rehab to the point where many who suffered a stroke are after nine months, according to Ramona Shelburne and Michael C. Wright of ESPN. Veteran forward Harrison Barnes added that the Spurs head coach is “ahead of schedule” in his long recovery process to regain normalcy in his life.

    Even so, whether Popovich can return for the 2025-26 NBA season remains unclear.

    Wednesday, March 12, 2025

    Intensive Versus Conservative Blood Pressure Target After Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

     Still no blood pressure management protocol. Hope your doctor GUESSES CORRECTLY after your stroke. 

    Intensive Versus Conservative Blood Pressure Target After Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
  • INTRODUCTION

    The optimal blood pressure (BP) management following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke remains unclear. The balance between maintaining adequate cerebral blood flow and preventing reperfusion injury requires the need of an evidence‐based decision. Recently, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on post‐EVT BP goals were published, showing significantly lower functional independence in the intensive BP target groups. However, 2 of these trials were prematurely terminated, which may have limited the assessment of important secondary outcomes. Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis of RCTs comparing intensive versus conservative BP target for patients following EVT after acute ischemic stroke.

    METHODS

    We conducted a meta‐analysis according to the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis Statement (Supplemental Methods 1). This meta‐analysis protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023473691). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to October 2023. Studies were eligible if they (1) were RCTs; (2) enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing EVT; and (3) compared intensive versus conservative BP target. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of each study are detailed in Supplemental Methods 2. Our end points were (1) a modified Rankin scale score (0–2); (2) 24‐hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; (3) 3‐month EuroQoL (Quality of Life)‐5‐Dimension‐3‐Level score; (4) all‐cause mortality; and (5) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours. We evaluated the risk of bias of included RCTs with the Risk of Bias Tool. We conducted a trial sequential analysis for all‐cause mortality.
    We used restricted maximum likelihood random‐effects model with risk ratios and 95% CIs for binary end points and mean differences or standardized mean difference for continuous end points. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q statistic and Higgins and Thompson's I2 statistic. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used R version 4.3.1 and trial sequential analysis version 0.9.5.10 beta for statistical analysis.

    RESULTS

    Our systematic search yielded 1249 potential articles, of which 4 RCTs met inclusion criteria.1, 2, 3, 4 A total of 1565 patients were included, of whom 764 (48.8%) were randomized to intensive BP target. The mean 24‐hour SBP after EVT varied from 120.8 to 129.2 mmHg in the intensive BP target group, and from 129.5 to 139 mmHg in the conservative BP target group.
    Functional independence after 90 days was significantly less frequent with intensive BP target compared with the conservative group (risk ratio 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71–0.90]; I2 = 10%; P<0.01; Figure 1A). An intensive BP target resulted in a lower 3‐month EuroQoL (quality of life)‐5‐Dimension 3‐Level scores (standardized mean difference −0.24 [95% CI, −0.37 to −0.12]; I2 = 0%; P<0.01; Figure 1B). There were no significant differences in 24‐hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (mean difference 0.93 [95% CI, −0.36 to 2.22]; I2 = 48%; P = 0.16; Figure 1C), all‐cause mortality (risk ratio 1.15 [95% CI, 0.90–1.48]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.26; Figure 1D), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours (risk ratio 1.13 [95% CI, 0.78–1.63]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.52; Figure 1E). Risk of Bias Tool 2 identified all studies as low risk of bias. The z‐curve did not cross the required information size, conventional, and monitoring boundaries. In addition, the inner wedge is not reached. These findings suggest that more studies are needed to confirm our results (Supplemental Figure 3).
    image
    Figure 1. Meta‐analysis of intensive versus conservative blood pressure target after thrombectomy. Intensive blood pressure (BP) target is associated with (A) a reduced likelihood of achieving mRS 0–2 at 90 days and (B) lower 3‐month EQ‐5D‐3L scores, as compared with conservative BP target. However, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of (C) 24‐hour NIHSS scores, (D) all‐cause mortality, and (E) sICH within 36 hours. BEST‐II indicates Blood Pressure After Endovascular Stroke Therapy‐II; BP‐TARGET, Safety and Efficacy of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering After Successful Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke; ENCHANTED 2/MT, Second Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombectomy Stroke Study/Mechanical Thrombectomy; EQ‐5D‐3L, EuroQuality of Life‐5‐Dimension 3‐Level; IV, inverse variance; MH, Mantel‐Haenszel; mRS, modified Rankin scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OPTIMAL‐BP, Outcome in Patients Treated With Intraarterial Thrombectomy–Optimal Blood Pressure Control; RR, risk ratio; and sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

    DISCUSSION

    Our study found no differences in either all‐cause mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between groups. This is consistent with the individual results of the 4 included RCTs, suggesting a high probability of neutrality between both strategies in these outcomes. However, functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0–2) was 23% more frequent in the conservative as compared to the intensive group. Furthermore, the SBP <140 mm Hg goal was associated with reduced quality of life score.