Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts

Monday, May 5, 2025

Does the Implementation of Safety Huddles Reduce Falls With Injury on an Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Unit?

 The correct way to prevent falls is 100% recovery! AND YOUR PROFESSORS DON'T KNOW THAT! More dead wood that needs to be fired!

Does the Implementation of Safety Huddles Reduce Falls With Injury on an Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Unit?

1
Does the implementation of safety huddles reduce falls with injury on an inpatient stroke
rehabilitation unit?
Martha Rafferty, DNP, MSN, RN
Dr. Debra Blyth-Wilk, DNP, JD, RN
Dr. Emily Sheff, PhD, RN, FNP-BC
April 6, 2025
Abstract
Problem Statement: In post-stroke patients admitted to the stroke rehabilitation unit, do daily
shift safety huddles reduce the number of patient falls when compared to no intervention?
Aim: To enhance the quality of care provided for post-stroke patients and to minimize their risk
of harm through implementing daily shift safety huddles, improving team communication and
alerting care providers to those patients at risk for falls using the Morse Fall Risk Assessment as
the guide.
Background: The implementation of daily safety huddles was borne out of the 1999 Institute of
Medicine’s (IOM) report, To err is human, where it is identified that nearly 98,000 patients die
per year from medical errors which could likely be prevented (Donaldson, et al, 2000). “Huddles
increase individual and collective accountability for patient safety, designate a fixed time during
the workday or shift to focus on care coordination, facilitate immediate face-to-face clarification
of issues, result in fewer interruptions during the rest of the workday, and foster a culture of
empowerment and collaboration in healthcare teams” (Shaikh, 2020).
Design: Exploratory descriptive interventional pilot study.
Data Sources: Patient identified inclusion criteria (admitting diagnosis of post-stroke, and
Morse fall risk assessment score of 55 or greater); safety huddle attendance sheets, falls with
injury data reported to National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI).
Method: Falls with injury data was assessed pre-implementation of safety huddles and during
implementation of safety huddles. Both occurrence and attendance at safety huddle was
analyzed using a Pearson Chi-Square Test, a Pearson Correlation Coefficient Chi-Square Test,
and a multiple regression three-way ANOVA test. These tests were conducted using IBM SPSS
Version 23.
6
Results: There was no statistically significant association between huddles and falls. There was
a significantly significant difference demonstrated in RN attendance at huddles and PCA
attendance at huddles with a correlation showing that PCA attendance at huddles was higher than
RN attendance at huddle.

Saturday, June 27, 2020

Hyperbaric Oxygen and Focused Rehabilitation Program: A Feasibility Study in Improving Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke

Oh, come on. Do some research that is feasible and within the price range of most patients.  Did you account for the participants using the Hawthorne effect to please the researchers since they would know which group they were in?  Yes there are 5 within 90 minutes of me, I have never considered going to one.

 

What is the typical cost of the treatment? Hard HBOT in a hyperbaric clinic typically costs $250 per session, or $10,000 for 40 sessions. Thus, the standard HBOT protocol costs $20,000 for 80 sessions. Since many people go on to do hundreds of sessions over a period of years, the costs can be very high.

Hyperbaric Oxygen and Focused Rehabilitation Program: A Feasibility Study in Improving Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke

Simone Schiavo, Denyse Richardson, Daniel Santa Mina; ; , Stephanie Buryk-Iggers, Julie Uehling, Jo Carroll, Hance Clarke, Carine Djaiani, Maxim Gershinsky, Rita Katznelson
Published on the web 23 June 2020.
Received February 23, 2020.

Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-0124

Abstract

Neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke can be enhanced by a rehabilitation program pertinent to upper limb motor function exercise and mental imagery (EMI) as well as hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). We assessed the feasibility and safety of the combined approach utilizing both HBOT and EMI, and derived preliminary estimates of its efficacy. In this randomized controlled trial, twenty-seven patients with upper extremity hemiparesis 3-48 months after stroke were randomized to receive either a complementary rehabilitation program HBOT-EMI (intervention group), or EMI alone (control group). Feasibility and safety were assessed as total session attendance, duration of sessions, attrition rates, missing data, and intervention-related adverse events. Secondary clinical outcomes were assessed with both objective tools and self-reported measures at baseline, 8 weeks (end of treatment), and 12-weeks follow-up. Session attendance, duration and attrition rate did not differ between the groups; there were no serious adverse events. Compared to baseline, there were significant sustained improvements of objective and subjective outcomes’ measures in the intervention group, and a single improvement in an objective measure in the control group. Between-group outcome comparisons were not statistically significant. This study demonstrated that the combination HBOT-EMI was a safe and feasible approach in patients recovering from chronic stroke. There were also trends for improved motor function of the affected upper limb after the treatments. Registration-URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.com NCT02666469. NOVELTY: - HBOT combined with an upper limb exercise and mental imagery rehabilitation program is feasible and safe in chronic stroke patients. - This combined approach showed trends for improved functional recovery.

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Live from ISC: Brain stents are safe and effective for reducing recurrent stroke risk, study suggests

Your definition of safe and effective is vastly different than mine, I would consider this a failure.   But then a 12% tPA full recovery rate is considered a success, and 10% full recovery from rehab is considered a success. All of which are epic failures in my opinion.

Live from ISC: Brain stents are safe and effective for reducing recurrent stroke risk, study suggests

A brain stent appears safe and effective for reducing the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with cholesterol-clogged brain arteries, according to late-breaking data presented at the International Stroke Conference (ISC; 19–21 February, Los Angeles, USA).
Discussing the one-year results of the Woven study, Michael J Alexander, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA, told delegates: “The stroke and death rates were substantially lower than the one-year rate of 20% in the stenting arm of the SAMMPRIS trial and slightly better than the 12.2% stroke and death rate in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS.”
He enthused that the trial is unique because prior studies only included off-label patients. “It is the largest intracranial stent trial for atherosclerotic disease performed according to the US FDA [Food and Drug Administration] indication for the Wingspan stent,” Alexander confirmed.
A previous study, the WEAVE trial, showed a low 2.6% stroke and death rate within the first few days of the procedure in patients who received the Wingspan stent for intracranial atherosclerotic disease. The current study yielded a long-term 8.5% total one-year stroke and death rate.
According to Alexander, the Woven (Wingspan one-year vascular Imaging, events and neurologic outcomes) trial was conducted at 16 US centres. The investigators followed 152 patients who were treated with the Wingspan stent from the WEAVE trial, and subsequently collected data on strokes and deaths, while follow-up imaging assessed possible reclogging of the stent.
“The long-term results of the WOVEN study are important to determine if safer stenting practices and lower complication rates from the treatment itself resulted in improved patient outcomes at one-year,” Alexander said. “Intracranial stenting could provide an alternative when medical therapy and other treatments have been unsuccessful,” he added.
He concluded by suggesting that the current data will likely lead to a randomised clinical trial comparing intracranial stenting to medical therapy alone.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Safety last

Don't follow my ideas. Three weeks ago I fell on my left butt twice while trying to move a couple of long branches off the trails. Last night I finally saw the results, a 1x4 inch bruise on the upper butt and a 8x10 inch purple and green bruise from the butt down the left rear of the thigh. No selfies will be provided. This is pushing boundaries way beyond what Scott has in his blog post 'Safety First'.
But I'm good, I didn't cut off an arm with the chainsaw.


And my balance was good enough not to land on the 6-8 inch logs lying on the ground.
This pretty much matches my Epic failure at bike stroke therapy.