Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label NMDAR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NMDAR. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Blood Protein Linked to Lower Risk of Depression and PTSD After Traumatic Brain Injury

 Your incompetent? doctor and hospital won't get stroke testing going, will they? 

And all this earlier research should have created protocols;
  • NMDAR (8 posts to November 2012)

Blood Protein Linked to Lower Risk of Depression and PTSD After Traumatic Brain Injury

Summary: Individuals with high baseline circulating levels of naturally occurring anti-NMDAR1 antibodies had a 25% lower risk of developing post-deployment depressive symptoms and a 22% lower risk of PTSD symptoms following a lifetime history of TBI.

Mechanistic mouse models revealed that antibody isotype size drives functional divergence: while small IgG isotypes penetrate synaptic clefts and impair memory (as seen in anti-NMDAR encephalitis), large, naturally occurring IgM isotypes selectively block extrasynaptic NMDA receptors that mediate excitotoxic injury after TBI, providing long-lasting neuroprotection.

Key Facts:

  • Psychiatric Resilience Biomarker: Active-duty Marines in the highest quartile for circulating anti-NMDAR1 antibodies exhibited 25% lower depression scores and 22% lower PTSD symptom scores following TBI compared to those in the lowest quartile.
  • Symptom-Specific Protection: Higher antibody levels protected against moderate-to-severe depression and PTSD and correlated with lower post-deployment psychiatric medication use, but showed no association with generalized anxiety symptoms.
  • Long-Term Serum Stability: Anti-NMDAR1 antibodies remained detectable in serum for over 12 months, indicating that elevated expression functions as an enduring biological trait rather than a transient acute-phase reaction.
  • Isotype Size Determines Pathology vs. Protection: Preclinical experiments showed that small IgG antibodies enter the synaptic cleft, driving cognitive dysfunction similar to autoimmune encephalitis. In contrast, larger IgM isotypes cannot fit into the synapse and instead bind to outer, extrasynaptic NMDA receptors.
  • Inhibition of Excitotoxic Injury: Traumatic brain injury triggers pathological glutamate release that hyperactivates extrasynaptic NMDA receptors, causing secondary neuronal injury. By shielding these extrasynaptic sites, large IgM antibodies blunt excitotoxic cascades in a manner analogous to long-acting ketamine.

Source: UCSD

Every year, an estimated 20 million people worldwide sustain a concussion or other traumatic brain injury (TBI), which leads to a two- to four-fold increase in the risk of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet not everyone who experiences a TBI goes on to develop psychiatric symptoms.

Now, researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System have identified an antibody (immune system protein) that could make people more resilient to these conditions.

They found that active-duty U.S. Marines with higher levels of the naturally-occurring anti-NMDAR1 antibody had a significantly lower risk of developing depression and PTSD symptoms following a TBI than those with lower levels of the antibody.

Anti-NMDAR1 targets NMDA receptors, key proteins responsible for storing new information and forming memories in the brain. The antibody is known to be involved in a rare brain disease called anti-NMDAR encephalitis, leading to memory deficits and neurological distress among other symptoms.

However, the study, published in Molecular Psychiatry, provides evidence that natural anti-NMDAR1 may act differently and serve a protective role in the brain.

The researchers analyzed blood samples and clinical psychiatric assessments collected from 1,025 Marines before and after a seven-month combat deployment to Afghanistan between 2011 and 2013. They found:

  • Among participants with a lifetime history of TBI, those in the top quarter for natural anti-NMDAR1 antibody levels had about 25% lower depression symptom scores and 22% lower PTSD symptom scores after deployment than those with lower levels.
  • These participants were also significantly less likely to report moderate-to-severe depression and they used fewer psychiatric medications after returning from deployment.
  • These antibodies were detectable in blood for more than one year, suggesting that having high levels of these antibodies could be a relatively long-term trait.
  • No association was found between anti-NMDAR1 levels and anxiety, suggesting these antibodies are associated with specific kinds of psychiatric symptoms.

The analysis was part of the Marine Resiliency Study II, a long-term research project investigating the factors that contribute to heightened risk for — or resilience to — PTSD.

“We were excited to find that a naturally-occurring immune marker could act almost like a built-in protective factor against some of the most disabling consequences of brain injury,” said co-senior author Victoria B. Risbrough, PhD, professor and vice chair of academic affairs in the Department of Psychiatry at UC San Diego School of Medicine and VA Research Career Scientist at VA San Diego Healthcare System. “If we can understand how these antibodies work, it may open a new path toward identifying who is most at risk after a TBI, and eventually, toward new ways to intervene.”

One hypothesis for the antibody’s protective effect is that natural anti-NMDAR1 antibodies found in Marines are of a type called IgM, which are too large to fit into synapses — the tiny gaps between brain cells where chemical signals are transmitted. Instead, this version may only latch on to receptors outside of that gap. Because these outer receptors are primary drivers of brain damage after a TBI, being blocked by IgM anti-NMDAR1 may shield the brain from further injury.

In a previous study, the research team tried to mimic psychiatric symptoms of human anti-NMDAR encephalitis in mice. They found that the mice carrying anti-NMDAR1 antibodies in their blood exhibited impaired cognitive function. However, their antibodies were of a much smaller “IgG” version than the naturally-occurring IgM antibodies found in Marines — small enough, in fact, to fit into the synaptic gaps. There is evidence that the smaller IgG version of anti-NMDAR1 may cause memory deficits in humans.

“We suspected that size difference determines whether an antibody reaches the receptors involved in brain injury versus the ones needed for everyday brain function,” said co-senior author Xianjin Zhou, associate professor of psychiatry at UC San Diego School of Medicine and faculty member at VA Mental Illness Research and Clinical Center. “When we tested that idea directly in mice, it held up: the smaller IgG antibodies impaired memory, while the larger IgM antibodies appeared to protect it.”

Ketamine, an FDA-approved treatment for depression and PTSD, is thought to work by blocking the same type of receptor, But unlike ketamine’s short-lived effects, naturally-occurring anti-NMDAR1 appears to persist in the blood for a year or longer.

However, the authors caution that these findings are correlational, and more research needs to be done to determine if natural anti-NMDAR1 antibodies truly play a protective role following TBI.

Additional co-authors on the study include: Melonie N. Vaughn, Jenna M. DeWit and Dewleen Baker at  UC San Diego; Dean T. Acheson, Susan B. Powell, Caroline M. Nievergelt at UC San Diego and VA San Diego Healthcare System; and Kate A. Yurgil at Loyola University. Disclosures: Zhou is the inventor on a provisional patent filing by the University of California San Diego.

Funding: The study was funded, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01NS135620) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Friday, October 27, 2017

The Indirect NMDAR Antagonist Acamprosate Induces Postischemic Neurologic Recovery Associated with Sustained Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration

My god, helps with stroke recovery even given up to 12 hours after stroke. Well two years old and I bet nothing has been done, ask your doctor what happened to this. Followup needed immediately, which of course won't occur with our fucking failures of stroke associations.

The Indirect NMDAR Antagonist Acamprosate Induces Postischemic Neurologic Recovery Associated with Sustained Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration

First Published July 29, 2015 Research Article


Cerebral ischemia stimulates N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) resulting in increased calcium concentration and excitotoxicity. Yet, deactivation of NMDAR failed in clinical studies due to poor preclinical study designs or toxicity of NMDAR antagonists. Acamprosate is an indirect NMDAR antagonist used for patients with chronic alcohol dependence. We herein analyzed the therapeutic potential of acamprosate on brain injury, neurologic recovery and their underlying mechanisms. Mice were exposed to cerebral ischemia, treated with intraperitoneal injections of acamprosate or saline (controls), and allowed to survive until 3 months. Acamprosate yielded sustained neuroprotection and increased neurologic recovery when given no later than 12 hours after stroke. The latter was associated with increased postischemic angioneurogenesis, albeit acamprosate did not stimulate angioneurogenesis itself. Rather, increased angioneurogenesis was due to inhibition of calpain-mediated pro-injurious signaling cascades. As such, acamprosate-mediated reduction of calpain activity resulted in decreased degradation of p35, increased abundance of the pro-survival factor STAT6, and reduced N-terminal-Jun-kinase activation. Inhibition of calpain was associated with enhanced stability of the blood–brain barrier, reduction of oxidative stress and cerebral leukocyte infiltration. Taken into account its excellent tolerability, its sustained effects on neurologic recovery, brain tissue survival, and neural remodeling, acamprosate is an intriguing candidate for adjuvant future stroke treatment.


Thursday, December 29, 2016

The late effects of stress: New insights into how the brain responds to trauma

My stroke was probably the most stressful event in my life. What protocol needs to be created to stop these damaging stress effects from the stroke? It looks like we might have days to treat this so possibly no need to get this done in the first hours. But never mind, NOTHING will get done on this because we have NO strategy to update and NO leadership to execute that strategy. 

The late effects of stress: New insights into how the brain responds to trauma


Mrs. M would never forget that day. She was walking along a busy road next to the vegetable market when two goons zipped past on a bike. One man's hand shot out and grabbed the chain around her neck. The next instant, she had stumbled to her knees, and was dragged along in the wake of the bike. Thankfully, the chain snapped, and she got away with a mildly bruised neck. Though dazed by the incident, Mrs. M was fine until a week after the incident.
Then, the nightmares began.
She would struggle and yell and fight in her sleep every night with phantom chain snatchers. Every bout left her charged with anger and often left her depressed. The episodes continued for several months until they finally stopped. How could a single stressful event have such extended consequences?
A new study by Indian scientists has gained insights into how a single instance of severe stress can lead to delayed and long-term psychological trauma. The work pinpoints key molecular and physiological processes that could be driving changes in brain architecture.
The team, led by Sumantra Chattarji from the National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS, India) and the Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India, has shown that a single stressful incident can lead to increased electrical activity in the brain's amygdala. This activity sets in late, occurring ten days after a single stressful episode, and is dependent on a molecule known as the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R), an ion channel protein on nerve cells known to be crucial for memory functions.
The amygdala, a small, almond-shaped groups of nerve cells, is located deep within the temporal lobe of the brain where it is known to play key roles in emotional reactions, memory and making decisions. Changes in the amygdala are linked to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a mental condition that develops in a delayed fashion after a harrowing experience.
Previously, Chattarji's group had shown that a single instance of acute stress had no immediate effects on the amygdala of rats. But ten days later, these animals began to show increased anxiety, and delayed changes in the architecture of their brains, especially the amygdala. "We showed that our study system is applicable to PTSD. This delayed effect after a single episode of stress was reminiscent of what happens in PTSD patients," says Chattarji. "We know that the amygdala is hyperactive in PTSD patients. But no one knows as of now, what is going on in there," he adds.
Investigations revealed major changes in the microscopic structure of the nerve cells in the amygdala. Stress seems to have caused the formation of new synapse connections in this region of the brain. However, until now, the physiological effects of these new connections were unknown.

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Metabotropic NMDA receptor signaling couples Src family kinases to pannexin-1 during excitotoxicity - hyperacute saving of neurons

Stopping one of the causes of neuronal death.
Video TV report on this here: 

Metabotropic NMDA receptor signaling couples Src family kinases to pannexin-1 during excitotoxicity - hyperacute saving of neurons



The research here:
http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nn.4236.html
Nature Neuroscience
doi:10.1038/nn.4236
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

Overactivation of neuronal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) causes excitotoxicity and is necessary for neuronal death. In the classical view, these ligand-gated Ca2+-permeable ionotropic receptors require co-agonists and membrane depolarization for activation. We report that NMDARs signal during ligand binding without activation of their ion conduction pore. Pharmacological pore block with MK-801, physiological pore block with Mg2+ or a Ca2+-impermeable NMDAR variant prevented NMDAR currents, but did not block excitotoxic dendritic blebbing and secondary currents induced by exogenous NMDA. NMDARs, Src kinase and Panx1 form a signaling complex, and activation of Panx1 required phosphorylation at Y308. Disruption of this NMDAR-Src-Panx1 signaling complex in vitro or in vivo by administration of an interfering peptide either before or 2 h after ischemia or stroke was neuroprotective. Our observations provide insights into a new signaling modality of NMDARs that has broad-reaching implications for brain physiology and pathology.

At a glance

Figures

left
  1. NMDA-induced dendritic blebbing is differentially blocked by noncompetitive and competitive antagonists.
    Figure 1
  2. Disrupting NMDA ligand binding blocks the secondary current.
    Figure 2
  3. NMDA-induced ionic dysregulation occurs during pore block by physiological Mg2+.
    Figure 3
  4. NMDAR-Src-Panx1 colocalize in a metabotropic signaling complex.
    Figure 4
  5. Activation of NMDAR-Src-Panx1 signaling during excitotoxicity requires phosphorylation of Src and Panx1.
    Figure 5
  6. Disrupting metabotropic NMDAR signaling prevented Panx1-mediated Ca2+ dysregulation, MPT and neuronal death during in vitro ischemia.
    Figure 6
  7. Blocking the NMDAR metabotropic signalsome reduces lesion size and sensorimotor deficits induced by stroke in vivo.
    Figure 7
  8. Acute Block of Panx1 does not inhibit NMDAR currents.
    Supplementary Fig. 1
  9. Activation of Excitotoxic Panx1 currents requires both ligand binding sites of NMDARs.
    Supplementary Fig. 2
  10. Pre-blocked NMDARs signal metabotropically to Panx1 during excitotoxicity.
    Supplementary Fig. 3
  11. GluN1 N616R pore mutation renders NMDARs Ca2+-impermeable.
    Supplementary Fig. 4
  12. NMDAR activation induces Panx1 phosphorylation at tyrosine 308.
    Supplementary Fig. 5
  13. Src mediated phosphorylation of Panx1 is Ca2+-independent.
    Supplementary Fig. 6
  14. TAT-Panx308 is a specific inhibitor of Src-mediated activation of Panx1.
    Supplementary Fig. 7
  15. Panx1 opening in the plasma membrane induces mitochondrial dysfunction during ischemia.
    Supplementary Fig. 8
  16. TAT-Panx308 does not alter cerebral blood flow under physiological conditions.
    Supplementary Fig. 9
  17. Full length blots cropped for representative figures.
    Supplementary Fig. 10
right

Friday, January 1, 2016

Augmenting NMDA receptor signaling boosts experience-dependent neuroplasticity in the adult human brain

You'll have to ask your doctor how much this boosts neuroplasticity and how they are going to test d-cycloserine (DCS) in a stroke protocol to prove it works. When is it going to be available in their clinic?
  1. Robert F. Asarnowa,e,1
  1. Edited by Karin Foerde, New York University, New York, NY, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 28, 2015 (received for review May 12, 2015)

Significance

Experience-dependent plasticity is the capacity of the brain to undergo changes following environmental input and use, and is a primary means through which the adult brain enables new behavior. In the current study, we provide evidence that enhancing signaling at the glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) can enhance the mechanism underlying many forms of experience-dependent plasticity (i.e., long-term potentiation of synaptic currents) and also enhance experience-dependent learning in healthy adult humans. This suggests exciting possibilities for manipulating plasticity in adults and has implications for treating neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders in which experience-dependent plasticity is impaired.

Abstract

Experience-dependent plasticity is a fundamental property of the brain. It is critical for everyday function, is impaired in a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders, and frequently depends on long-term potentiation (LTP). Preclinical studies suggest that augmenting N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) signaling may promote experience-dependent plasticity; however, a lack of noninvasive methods has limited our ability to test this idea in humans until recently. We examined the effects of enhancing NMDAR signaling using d-cycloserine (DCS) on a recently developed LTP EEG paradigm that uses high-frequency visual stimulation (HFvS) to induce neural potentiation in visual cortex neurons, as well as on three cognitive tasks: a weather prediction task (WPT), an information integration task (IIT), and a n-back task. The WPT and IIT are learning tasks that require practice with feedback to reach optimal performance. The n-back assesses working memory. Healthy adults were randomized to receive DCS (100 mg; n = 32) or placebo (n = 33); groups were similar in IQ and demographic characteristics. Participants who received DCS showed enhanced potentiation of neural responses following repetitive HFvS, as well as enhanced performance on the WPT and IIT. Groups did not differ on the n-back. Augmenting NMDAR signaling using DCS therefore enhanced activity-dependent plasticity in human adults, as demonstrated by lasting enhancement of neural potentiation following repetitive HFvS and accelerated acquisition of two learning tasks. Results highlight the utility of considering cellular mechanisms underlying distinct cognitive functions when investigating potential cognitive enhancers.
o get
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/50/15331.abstract
  1. Robert F. Asarnowa,e,1
  1. Edited by Karin Foerde, New York University, New York, NY, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 28, 2015 (received for review May 12, 2015)

Significance

Experience-dependent plasticity is the capacity of the brain to undergo changes following environmental input and use, and is a primary means through which the adult brain enables new behavior. In the current study, we provide evidence that enhancing signaling at the glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) can enhance the mechanism underlying many forms of experience-dependent plasticity (i.e., long-term potentiation of synaptic currents) and also enhance experience-dependent learning in healthy adult humans. This suggests exciting possibilities for manipulating plasticity in adults and has implications for treating neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders in which experience-dependent plasticity is impaired.

Abstract

Experience-dependent plasticity is a fundamental property of the brain. It is critical for everyday function, is impaired in a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders, and frequently depends on long-term potentiation (LTP). Preclinical studies suggest that augmenting N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) signaling may promote experience-dependent plasticity; however, a lack of noninvasive methods has limited our ability to test this idea in humans until recently. We examined the effects of enhancing NMDAR signaling using d-cycloserine (DCS) on a recently developed LTP EEG paradigm that uses high-frequency visual stimulation (HFvS) to induce neural potentiation in visual cortex neurons, as well as on three cognitive tasks: a weather prediction task (WPT), an information integration task (IIT), and a n-back task. The WPT and IIT are learning tasks that require practice with feedback to reach optimal performance. The n-back assesses working memory. Healthy adults were randomized to receive DCS (100 mg; n = 32) or placebo (n = 33); groups were similar in IQ and demographic characteristics. Participants who received DCS showed enhanced potentiation of neural responses following repetitive HFvS, as well as enhanced performance on the WPT and IIT. Groups did not differ on the n-back. Augmenting NMDAR signaling using DCS therefore enhanced activity-dependent plasticity in human adults, as demonstrated by lasting enhancement of neural potentiation following repetitive HFvS and accelerated acquisition of two learning tasks. Results highlight the utility of considering cellular mechanisms underlying distinct cognitive functions when investigating potential cognitive enhancers.

Friday, July 17, 2015

Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptor in Excitotoxicity Function Revisited

How will your doctor use this information to stop the neuronal cascade of death from the excitotoxity cause? 

Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptor in Excitotoxicity Function Revisited


  1. Xianju Zhou1
  2. Zhuoyou Chen1
  3. Wenwei Yun1
  4. Jianhua Ren2
  5. Chengwei Li3
  6. Hongbing Wang4
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Translational Neuroscience, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou China
  3. 3College of Life Science and Agronomy, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou China
  4. 4Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  1. Xianju Zhou, Department of Neurology, Changzhou No.2 People’s Hospital, the affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 29 Xinglong Alley, Changzhou, 21003, China. E-mail: hippocampus2007@gmail.com and Hongbing Wang, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Road, Room 2201 BPS Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Email: wangho@msu.edu

Abstract

It is generally accepted that proper activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) promotes neuronal survival and supports neuroplasticity, and excessive NMDAR activation leads to pathological outcomes and neurodegeneration. As NMDARs are found at both synaptic and extrasynaptic sites, there is significant interest in determining how NMDARs at different subcellular locations differentially regulate physiological as well as pathological functions. Better understanding of this issue may support the development of therapeutic strategies to attenuate neuronal death or promote normal brain function. Although the current prevailing theory emphasizes the major role of extrasynaptic NMDARs in neurodegeneration, there is growing evidence indicating the involvement of synaptic receptors. It is also evident that physiological functions of the brain also involve extrasynaptic NMDARs. Our recent studies demonstrate that the degree of cell death following neuronal insults depends on the magnitude and duration of synaptic and extrasynaptic receptor co-activation. These new results underscore the importance of revisiting the function of extrasynaptic NMDARs in cell fate. Furthermore, the development of antagonists that preferentially inhibit synaptic or extrasynaptic receptors may better clarify the role of NMDARs in neurodegeneration.

Friday, March 14, 2014

New Mexico startup looks to bring to market a drug to stop brain injury during stroke

Well it's about time, with the efficacy rate of tPA at only 12%  for full recovery!

Who is looking into the other causes of neuronal death? Does your doctor even know about them?
1.  Excitotoxicity
2.  Glutamate poisoning
3.  Capillaries that don't open due to pericytes
4.  Inflammatory action leaking through the blood brain barrier
5. Lysosomal Membrane Permeabilization as a Key Player in Brain Ischemic Cell Death.
6.   Reperfusion injury
New drug here: 

New Mexico startup looks to bring to market a drug to stop brain injury during stroke  


One of the most challenging things about the gold standard for stroke treatment, the drug tPA, is that to most effectively prevent long-term brain damage, it has to be given within three hours of stroke onset.
A New Mexico drug startup called Zocere isn’t trying to replace tPA, but rather to act as a protector to neurons in the brain during stroke.
“We see an opportunity for a vial of our product to sit on an ambulance or in an emergency room to protect he neurons until treatment can be given,” said Wayne Laslie, president and CEO of Zocere.
Between 80 and 90 percent of strokes are caused by blood clots that interrupt blood flow to the brain. tPA, the only FDA-approved drug for stroke, dissolves that clot and restores bloodflow to the brain. But it’s used cautiously by medical professionals, as breaking down clots can cause damaging bleeding into the brain.

Zocere’s goal is to protect neurons from both potential sources of injury – from oxygen and glucose deprivation caused by the clot and from rapid reperfusion when that clot breaks up.
The injectable ­drug it’s developing is a derivative of a naturally occurring enzyme in the brain called tyrosine phosphatase and acts on a pathway called NMDAR. Overactivation of NMDA receptors is known to be a key contributor of brain damage following a stroke.
While many other researchers in the past have attempted to block the pathway, none have been able to do so effectively and without significant side effects, Laslie said.
“Our drug works far downstream in that pathway, and we speculate there should be fewer side effects,” he said.
In rodent models of ischemic stroke, it’s demonstrated the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and reduce brain damage, according to Laslie.
Laslie has spent time in various leadership roles at Myriad Pharmaceuticals (now Myrexis) and Pfizer, and was brought in to Zocere, formerly known as Tyrosine Pharma, to put a pre-clinical development plan in place. Now that that’s complete and the company has secured rights to develop the drug from the University of New Mexico, the company is moving toward IND-enabling studies.
Founded in early 2013, Zocere is developing a peptide discovered by Dr. Surojit Paul at UNM. Paul scored a $1.6 million NIH grant, and Zocere later added funding by raising $500,000 from the New Mexico Angels. Laslie said he’ll be reaching out to other funding groups and potential partners to help the company get through preclinical studies.
In the spectrum of technologies in the pipeline for stroke diagnosis and treatment, Zocere’s falls at the early treatment stage. Other approaches to treatment being developed right now include devices to get tPA to the brain quicker and stem cell techniques to repair or replace damaged cells.
Stroke is the second-leading cause of death worldwide and a common cause of long-term disability.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Role of NMDA receptors in adult neurogenesis: an ontogenetic (re)view on activity-dependent development

Your neurologist will be able to summarize all these v207 posts on neurogenesis and be able to tell you exactly how to use them to recover. I know, fantasyland, but if you don't demand an answer now we won't have that answer in  30 years when your children will need it.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23397131

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that neurogenesis continues throughout life. Accumulating evidence suggests that neurotransmitters are essential signaling molecules that control the different steps of neurogenesis. Nevertheless, we are only beginning to understand the precise role of neurotransmitter receptors and in particular excitatory glutamatergic transmission in the differentiation of adult-born neurons. Recent technical advances allow single-cell gene deletion to study cell-autonomous effects during the maturation of adult-born neurons. Single-cell gene deletion overcomes some of the difficulties in interpreting global gene deletion effects on entire brain areas or systemic pharmacological approaches that might result in compensatory circuit effects. The aim of this review is to summarize recent advances in the understanding of the role of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) during the differentiation of adult-born neurons and put them in perspective with previous findings on cortical development.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Bidirectional influence of sodium channel activation on NMDA receptor–dependent cerebrocortical neuron structural plasticity

Ask your doctor what the hell this means, it sounds very important to us. And if we had decent stroke associations we could go to them for answers. But no, its every survivor and doctor for themselves.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/11/09/1212584109.short

Abstract

Neuronal activity regulates brain development and synaptic plasticity through N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and calcium-dependent signaling pathways. Intracellular sodium ([Na+]i) also exerts a regulatory influence on NMDAR channel activity, and [Na+]i may, therefore, function as a signaling molecule. In an attempt to mimic the influence of neuronal activity on synaptic plasticity, we used brevetoxin-2 (PbTx-2), a voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gating modifier, to manipulate [Na+]i in cerebrocortical neurons. The acute application of PbTx-2 produced concentration-dependent increments in both intracellular [Na+] and [Ca2+]. Pharmacological evaluation showed that PbTx-2–induced Ca2+ influx primarily involved VGSC activation and NMDAR-mediated entry. Additionally, PbTx-2 robustly potentiated NMDA-induced Ca2+ influx. PbTx-2–exposed neurons showed enhanced neurite outgrowth, increased dendritic arbor complexity, and increased dendritic filopodia density. The appearance of spontaneous calcium oscillations, reflecting synchronous neuronal activity, was accelerated by PbTx-2 treatment. Parallel to this response, PbTx-2 increased cerebrocortical neuron synaptic density. PbTx-2 stimulation of neurite outgrowth, dendritic arborization, and synaptogenesis all exhibited bidirectional concentration–response profiles. This profile paralleled that of NMDA, which also produced bidirectional concentration–response profiles for neurite outgrowth and synaptogenesis. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that PbTx-2–enhanced neuronal plasticity involves NMDAR-dependent signaling. Our results demonstrate that PbTx-2 mimics activity-dependent neuronal structural plasticity in cerebrocortical neurons through an increase in [Na+]i, up-regulation of NMDAR function, and engagement of downstream Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways. These data suggest that VGSC gating modifiers may represent a pharmacologic strategy to regulate neuronal plasticity through NMDAR-dependent mechanisms.