Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label memory test. Show all posts
Showing posts with label memory test. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

Simple memory test may identify people most likely to develop cognitive impairment

 With your already higher risk of dementia/MCI post stroke, is your doctor testing for this to create a baseline for you? And what EXACTLY is your doctor's protocol for preventing dementia? Doesn't have one! You don't have a functioning stroke doctor! Why are you seeing them if they are that incompetent?

Your risk of dementia, has your doctor told you of this?

1. A documented 33% dementia chance post-stroke from an Australian study?   May 2012.

2. Then this study came out and seems to have a range from 17-66%. December 2013.`    

3. A 20% chance in this research.   July 2013.

4. Dementia Risk Doubled in Patients Following Stroke September 2018

The latest here:

Simple memory test may identify people most likely to develop cognitive impairment

In people with no thinking and memory problems, a simple test may predict the risk of developing cognitive impairment years later, according to a study published in the April 19, 2023, online issue of Neurology®, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.

There is increasing evidence that some people with no thinking and memory problems may actually have very subtle signs of early cognitive impairment. In our study, a sensitive and simple memory test predicted the risk of developing cognitive impairment in people who were otherwise considered to have normal cognition."

Ellen Grober, PhD, Study Author, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

The study involved 969 people with an average age of 69 with no thinking or memory problems at the start of the study. They were given a simple memory test and were followed for up to 10 years.

The test includes two phases. For the study phase, people are shown four cards, each with drawings of four items. They are asked to identify the item belonging to a particular category. For example, participants would name the item "grapes" after being asked to identify a "fruit." For the test phase, participants are first asked to recall the items. This measures their ability to retrieve information. Then, for items they did not remember, they are given category cues. This phase measures memory storage.

The participants were divided into five groups, or stages zero through four, based on their test scores, as part of the Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) system. Stage zero represents no memory problems. Stages one and two reflect increasing difficulty with retrieving memories which can precede dementia by five to eight years. These participants continue to be able to remember items when given cues. In the third and fourth stages, people cannot remember all the items even after they are given cues. These stages precede dementia by one to three years.

A total of 47% of the participants were in stage zero, 35% in stage one, 13% in stage two and 5% in stages three and four combined.

Of the participants, 234 people developed cognitive impairment.

After adjusting for age, sex, education and a gene that affects a person's risk of Alzheimer's disease, APOE4, researchers found when compared to people who were at SOMI stage zero, people at stages one and two were twice as likely to develop cognitive impairment. People who were at stages three and four were three times as likely to develop cognitive impairment.

After adjusting for biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease including brain amyloid plaques and tau tangles, the SOMI system continued to predict an increased risk of cognitive impairment.

Researchers estimated that after 10 years about 72% of those in the third and fourth stages would have developed cognitive impairment, compared to about 57% of those in the second stage, 35% in the first stage and 21% of those in stage zero.

"Our results support the use of the SOMI system to identify people most likely to develop cognitive impairment," said Grober. "Detecting cognitive impairment at its earliest stages is beneficial to researchers investigating treatments. It also could benefit those people who are found to be at increased risk by consulting with their physician and implementing interventions to promote healthy brain aging."

A limitation of the study was that most participants were white and well educated. Grober said more research is needed in larger and more diverse populations.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, Alzheimer's Association, Cure Alzheimer Fund and the Leonard and Sylvia Marx Foundation.

Source:
Journal reference:

Grober, E., et al. (2023). Association of Stages of Objective Memory Impairment With Incident Symptomatic Cognitive Impairment in Cognitively Normal Individuals. Neurology. doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207276.

Be the first to rate this article

Posted in: Medical Science News | Medical Research News | Medical Condition News

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of cognitive abilities

If this is the best out there in the world, is your doctor/stroke department using it to determine your cognitive problems post-stroke? Or are they using cheap, just good enough testing? Or any testing at all? I was tested and even though I passed the hardest section of a memory test asking you to sort letters and numbers low to high the doctor refused to consider me normal.

The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of cognitive abilities

The Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities represents the most accurate and psychometrically validated understanding of the structure of human cognitive abilities currently available (Alfonso, Flanagan, & Radwan, 2005; James, Jacobs, & Roodenburg, 2015). The theory is grounded in more than fifty years of factor analytic research, and developmental studies of cognitive abilities, genetic heritability research, and neurocognitive analyses have all contributed to its validity base (Evans, Floyd, McGrew, & Leforgee, 2002).
CHC theory consists of two components; a taxonomy of cognitive abilities, and a set of theoretical explanations as to how and why people differ in terms of their various cognitive abilities, which is embedded within the taxonomy (Schneider & McGrew, 2012). It combines the Cattell-Horn Fluid-Crystallised (Gf-Gc) and Carroll three-stratum models to provide a broad taxonomic umbrella for  testing hypotheses regarding various aspects of human cognitive abilities and understanding the structure of human intelligence (McGrew, 2009; Newton & McGrew, 2010). The current model of CHC theory includes 16 broad cognitive abilities, which are subsumed by over 80 narrow abilities, with the broad abilities described as follows (Flanagan & Dixon, 2013; McGrew 2009; Newton & McGrew, 2010; Schneider & McGrew, 2012):
- See more at: http://www.cinglevue.com/blog/cattell-horn-carroll-model-cognitive-abilities#sthash.egJfwwlx.dpuf
 The Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities represents the most accurate and psychometrically validated understanding of the structure of human cognitive abilities currently available (Alfonso, Flanagan, & Radwan, 2005; James, Jacobs, & Roodenburg, 2015). The theory is grounded in more than fifty years of factor analytic research, and developmental studies of cognitive abilities, genetic heritability research, and neurocognitive analyses have all contributed to its validity base (Evans, Floyd, McGrew, & Leforgee, 2002).

CHC theory consists of two components; a taxonomy of cognitive abilities, and a set of theoretical explanations as to how and why people differ in terms of their various cognitive abilities, which is embedded within the taxonomy (Schneider & McGrew, 2012). It combines the Cattell-Horn Fluid-Crystallised (Gf-Gc) and Carroll three-stratum models to provide a broad taxonomic umbrella for  testing hypotheses regarding various aspects of human cognitive abilities and understanding the structure of human intelligence (McGrew, 2009; Newton & McGrew, 2010). The current model of CHC theory includes 16 broad cognitive abilities, which are subsumed by over 80 narrow abilities, with the broad abilities described as follows (Flanagan & Dixon, 2013; McGrew 2009; Newton & McGrew, 2010; Schneider & McGrew, 2012):

More at link.
The Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities represents the most accurate and psychometrically validated understanding of the structure of human cognitive abilities currently available (Alfonso, Flanagan, & Radwan, 2005; James, Jacobs, & Roodenburg, 2015). The theory is grounded in more than fifty years of factor analytic research, and developmental studies of cognitive abilities, genetic heritability research, and neurocognitive analyses have all contributed to its validity base (Evans, Floyd, McGrew, & Leforgee, 2002).
CHC theory consists of two components; a taxonomy of cognitive abilities, and a set of theoretical explanations as to how and why people differ in terms of their various cognitive abilities, which is embedded within the taxonomy (Schneider & McGrew, 2012). It combines the Cattell-Horn Fluid-Crystallised (Gf-Gc) and Carroll three-stratum models to provide a broad taxonomic umbrella for  testing hypotheses regarding various aspects of human cognitive abilities and understanding the structure of human intelligence (McGrew, 2009; Newton & McGrew, 2010). The current model of CHC theory includes 16 broad cognitive abilities, which are subsumed by over 80 narrow abilities, with the broad abilities described as follows (Flanagan & Dixon, 2013; McGrew 2009; Newton & McGrew, 2010; Schneider & McGrew, 2012):
- See more at: http://www.cinglevue.com/blog/cattell-horn-carroll-model-cognitive-abilities#sthash.egJfwwlx.dpuf

Saturday, December 27, 2014

Baycrest memory experts launch 'thermometer' for the mind

I haven't had time yet to do this test to see if I am well or not.
http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/1361493/baycrest-memory-experts-launch-thermometer-for-the-mind
If you are in the 50 to 79 age bracket, worried about your memory changes and whether you need to see a doctor, there is a free online brain health test developed by the memory experts at Baycrest Health Sciences that will help you with that decision.
The test – co-developed by the brain health solutions company Cogniciti Inc. (owned by Baycrest and partner MaRS Discovery District) – takes about 20 minutes to complete and is available to the public at www.cogniciti.com.
The game-like tests tap into functions such as memory and attention, which are affected by aging and brain disease. You can take the test on a desktop or laptop computer at home (with internet access), and receive an overall score of your cognitive health immediately after you finish.
According to the test's creators, the majority of people will score in the normal, healthy range for their age – which will help reassure the "worried well".  For the small percentage (approximately 2 - 3%) that scores below average for their age and education, those adults will be encouraged to re-test after a week. If their score again falls below the normal threshold for their age, they will be provided with a personalized report to help them start the conversation about their brain health with a doctor.
Designed by a team of clinical neuropsychologists and cognitive scientists at Baycrest Health Sciences and its world-renowned Rotman Research Institute – and lab tested with 300 adults aged 50 to 79 recruited from various sources including CARP Canada's subscriber base – the brain health assessment hammers a stake in the ground in an increasingly crowded field of online brain fitness products.
"Our aim with the brain health test is to reassure the worried well and nudge that small percentage of people who do have serious memory issues to discuss their concerns with a doctor," said Dr. Angela Troyer, program director of Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health at Baycrest, and a lead member of the research team that developed the test. 
"Given the growing consumer demand for quality brain health self-assessments, this new online test can help address the concerns of millions among the worried well," said Alvaro Fernandez, CEO and co-founder of SharpBrains.com, an inde­pen­dent mar­ket research firm tracking health and performance applications of neuroscience. SharpBrains has 100,000 monthly readers for its popular brain blog and 45,000 eNewsletter subscribers.

Good luck, more at link