Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label bolus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bolus. Show all posts

Monday, November 14, 2016

Tiny Super Magnets Could Be The Future of Drug Delivery

Just when the hell will we get researchers to work with this to deliver tPA directly to the blood clot, with a much smaller and less dangerous bolus? I'm guessing never since no one in the stroke medical world has two functioning neurons that can put 2+ 2 together to come up with this solution.
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2016/11/tiny-super-magnets-could-be-future-drug-delivery?et_cid=5675688&
Microscopic crystals could soon be zipping drugs around your body, taking them to diseased organs. In the past, this was thought to be impossible - the crystals, which have special magnetic properties, were so small that scientists could not control their movement. But now a team of Chinese researchers has found the solution, and their discovery has opened new applications that could use these crystals to improve - and perhaps even save - many lives.
Kezheng Chen and Ji Ma from Quingdou University of Science and Technology, Quingdou, China have published a method of producing superparamagnetic crystals that are much larger than any that have been made before. They recently published their findings in Physics Letters A.
If some magnetic materials, such as iron oxides, are small enough - perhaps a few millionths of a millimeter across, smaller than most viruses - they have an unusual property: their magnetization randomly flips as the temperature changes.
By applying a magnetic field to these crystals, scientists can make them almost as strongly magnetic as ordinary fridge magnets. It might seem odd, but this is the strongest type of magnetism known. This phenomenon is called superparamagnetism.
In theory, superparamagnetic particles could be ideal for drug delivery, as they can be directed to a tumor simply by using a magnetic field. Their tiny size, however, has made them difficult to guide precisely - until now.
"The largest superparamagnetic materials that we have been able to make before now were clusters of nanocrystals that were together about a thousand times smaller than these," commented Dr. Chen. "These larger crystals are easier to control using external magnetic fields, and they will not aggregate when those fields are removed, which will make them much more useful in practical applications, including drug delivery."
Chen and Ma explained that the high temperature and pressure under which the crystals form made tiny meteorite-like 'micro-particles' of magnetite escape from their surface. This caused the unusual pock-marked appearance of the crystal surfaces and induced a high degree of stress and strain into the lattice of the growing crystals.
Crystals that grow under such high stresses and strains form with irregularities and defects in their crystal lattice, and it is these irregularities that are responsible for the unusual magnetic properties of Chen's crystals.
Magnetite crystals of a similar size that are grown at a lower temperature and under normal pressure are only very weakly magnetic.
This method of making larger superparamagnetic crystals paves the way for the development of superparamagnetic bulk materials that can be reliably controlled by moderate external magnetic forces, revolutionizing drug delivery to tumors and other sites in the body that need to be targeted precisely.
And this is just the beginning. Chen's crystals might, for example, be useful in the many engineering projects that need "smart fluids" that change their properties when a magnetic field is applied. These can already be used to make vehicle suspension systems that automatically adjust as road conditions change, increasing comfort and safety, and to build more comfortable and realistic prosthetic limbs.
Now that superparamagnetism is no longer restricted to minute particles that are difficult to handle, researchers can start exploring in which ways this can contribute to improving our lives.

Thursday, April 21, 2016

High Burden of Brain Microbleed May Up tPA Bleeding Risk

I would think the solution to this is reduce the size of the bolus substantially and direct the tPA directly to the clot. I could see no solution that was presented to fix this problem. Don't just tell me there is a problem, suggest a solution. What a waste of research dollars otrherwise.

Magnetic nanoparticles could stop blood clot-caused strokes


High Burden of Brain Microbleed May Up tPA Bleeding Risk

Stroke patients with cerebral microbleeds had a twofold greater risk for intracerebral hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis (tPA), and bleeding risk increased by as much as 12-fold among patients with the highest (>10) microbleed burden, according to a meta-analysis.
The risk of symptomatic brain bleeds after treatment was found to be higher in patients with evidence of cerebral microbleeds compared with patients without cerebral microbleeds (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.21-4.61, P=0.01), reported Georgios Tsivgoulis, MD, of the University of Athens School of Medicine in Greece, and colleagues
Nine studies were included in the analysis, which showed high cerebral microbleed (CMB) burden, identified through MRI, to be a significant independent risk factor for symptomatic brain bleeds in stroke patients treated with tPA, they wrote in JAMA Neurology.
The findings suggest that pre-treatment MRI assessment of cerebral microbleed burden can serve as an independent predictor of brain bleeding risk in ischemic stroke patients receiving tPA, the authors wrote.
They added that the reliance on CT scans, and not MRI, for patient assessment in the stroke emergency care setting remains a significant challenge to identifying cerebral microbleed burden.
While cerebral microbleeds are considered an independent predictor of higher cerebral bleeding risk, earlier studies assessing their clinical impact on brain bleed risk in stroke patients treated with tPA have been mixed and many have not assessed the impact of cerebral microbleed burden, the researchers noted.
"The potential association of CMB presence with the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis remains controversial," they wrote.
In an effort to better understand the impact of a high cerebral microbleed burden detected by MRI scan prior to tPA treatment on symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk in the ischemic stroke setting, the researchers analyzed studies reporting intracerebral bleeding rates in ischemic stroke patients with known pre-tPA cerebral microbleed burden.
The meta-analysis, which included a total of 2,479 patients, confirmed a higher risk for symptomatic brain bleeds following treatment with tPA in patients with a cerebral microbleed burden of more than 10, compared with patients with zero to 10 cerebral microbleeds or one to 10 cerebral microbleeds on pretreatment MRI.
The authors also reported a higher risk for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after tPA treatment was detected in patients with high cerebral microbleed burden (>10) when compared with patients with zero to 10 cerebral microbleeds (RR 12.10, 95% CI 4.36-33.57, P<0.001) or one to 10 cerebral microbleeds (RR 7.01, 95% CI 3.20-15.38, P<0.001) on pretreatment MRI.
In an individual-patient data meta-analysis, high cerebral microbleed burden was associated with increased likelihood of symptomatic brain bleeding before (unadjusted odds ratio 31.06, 95% CI 7.12-135.44, P<0.001) and after (adjusted OR 18.17, 95% CI 2.39-138.22, P=0.005) adjusting for potential confounders.
A study limitation was the lack of data on brain bleed risk by cerebral microbleed count stratification in four of the nine studies included in the meta-analysis and lack of information on key baseline characteristics in three of the nine studies. There was also incomplete information on antithrombotic medications taken before hospital admission for stroke treatment.
Despite these limitations, the researchers concluded that cerebral microbleed burden should be considered in the stroke, pre-tPA risk stratification setting.
"The challenge remains in identifying CMB burden without MRI in the setting of acute ischemic stroke management where only a noncontrast computed tomography is standard of care," they stated.
In an accompanying editorial, Mark Fisher, MD, of the University of California Irvine School of Medicine, noted that cerebral microbleeds have been shown to be present in more than 20% of older people, while they are rare in younger populations.
"Cerebral microbleeds have received enormous attention in the literature," he wrote. "Nevertheless, the nature of the underlying lesion of cerebral microbleeds has proved elusive."
Fisher noted that despite the meta-analysis findings, the critical factor relevant to tPA treatment "appears to be not the microbleeds themselves, but the arteriolar injury contributing to micro hemorrhage development."
"The principal challenge for the clinician addressing microbleeds in acute ischemic stroke will be to distinguish primary from secondary microbleeds," he wrote. "It is the disseminated processes of primary microbleeds that create the substrate of the brain vulnerable to arteriolar ischemic necrosis and development of intracerebral hemorrhage. The more restricted process or prior ischemic injury producing secondary microbleeds will be of far less concern in this context. Ultimately, the number of cerebral microbleeds present will be less important than the nature of the process driving microbleed development."