Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label 'improvement'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'improvement'. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2026

γ-transcranial alternating current stimulation improves upper-limb motor function in stroke patients and modulates oscillatory imbalance: a pilot randomized controlled trial

 Have your competent? doctor and hospital initiate the research that changes this from 'improves' to DELIVERS RECOVERY! So, they are incompetent, since they can't or won't do that!

γ-transcranial alternating current stimulation improves upper-limb motor function in stroke patients and modulates oscillatory imbalance: a pilot randomized controlled trial

    We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

    Abstract

    Background

    Post-stroke cortical oscillatory activity is frequently disrupted, characterized by increased low-frequency oscillation and reduced high-frequency oscillation, which are associated with stroke severity and motor dysfunction. γ-tACS has the potential to entrain brain oscillations and enhance motor performance in healthy individuals, yet evidence in stroke patients is still limited.

    Methods

    This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study enrolled 42 patients with post-stroke upper-limb motor impairment. Participants were randomly assigned to either the γ-tACS group or the sham-tACS group. High-definition tACS was applied over the M1 hotspot (70 Hz, 2 mA peak-to-peak, 20 min/session) for 10 sessions, once daily, in addition to conventional rehabilitation. The primary outcome was the Fugl–Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary outcomes included the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and resting-state EEG measures, including spectral power, power-ratio indices, and functional connectivity.

    Results

    A total of 42 participants were included in this trial (γ-tACS, n = 21; sham-tACS, n = 21), and the baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. FMA-UE improved in both groups, but the improvement was greater in γ-tACS group (ΔFMA-UE = 4.64 ± 4.55, P = 0.039, 95%CI=[0.154, 5.799]), whereas between-group differences in MBI improvement were not significant. Baseline EEG showed ipsilesional–contralesional asymmetry, with higher delta power, lower alpha power and elevated delta alpha ratio (DAR), delta beta ratio (DBR), and (delta+theta)/(alpha+beta) ratio (DTABR) on the ipsilesional side. After treatment, γ-tACS reduced ipsilesional delta power and lowered DBR and DTABR. Greater reductions in delta power and DTABR were associated with greater improvement in FMA-UE. In addition, γ-tACS increased ipsilesional beta-band connectivity (FC3-C3 wPLI), and this increase was also associated with motor improvement.

    Conclusions

    Compared with sham-tACS, γ-tACS applied over the ipsilesional M1 improved upper-limb motor function in patients with stroke. These clinical improvements were accompanied by restored oscillatory balance and enhanced network connectivity. Quantitative EEG parameters may serve as useful biomarkers for tracking neurophysiological changes and treatment response during stroke recovery.

    Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300074898, date of registration: 2023/08/18).

    Thursday, June 18, 2026

    Researchers harness the body’s internal clock to improve stroke recovery

    So, this was a FAILURE since 'improve' is nowhere close to 100% recovery! Have all these people been fired yet? Are your doctors competent enough to get human testing going?

    Researchers harness the body’s internal clock to improve stroke recovery

    A new study from scientists at the University of Rochester Medicine suggests that reinforcing the body's natural daily rhythms to improve sleep could help the brain recover after a stroke, pointing to a potential new strategy to improve brain waste clearance and outcomes long after the initial injury.

    The research, which was published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, found that interventions designed to reinforce the body's natural circadian rhythms improved recovery in mouse models of stroke. The benefits were accompanied by improvements in the glymphatic system—the brain's waste-clearing network—and reductions in inflammatory molecules that can linger in the brain after a stroke.

    The findings build upon more than a decade of pioneering research led by URochester Medicine neuroscientist Maiken Nedergaard, MD, DMSc, whose laboratory discovered the glymphatic system in 2012. The system circulates cerebrospinal fluid through the brain, helping clear waste products and other debris. Subsequent research revealed that glymphatic activity is most robust during sleep and plays an important role in maintaining brain health.

    Building on that discovery, neuroscientist Lauren Hablitz, PhD, helped demonstrate that glymphatic activity is governed not only by sleep but also by circadian rhythms—the body's internal 24-hour clock. In a landmark 2020 study, Hablitz, Nedergaard, and colleagues showed that glymphatic function follows daily rhythms independent of sleep itself, helping establish a direct connection between the brain's waste-clearing system and circadian biology.

    Stroke as a Disorder of Timing

    "The discussion of stroke recovery really starts with the idea that stroke is not just a vascular event, but also a disorder of timing," said Hablitz, lead author of the new study.

    Researchers have long known that strokes follow predictable time-of-day patterns. They are more likely to occur in the morning hours and are often more severe near the end of the sleep period. At the same time, many stroke patients experience disrupted sleep-wake cycles after their injury, and those disruptions are associated with poorer recovery, depression, and lower quality of life.

    "That led us to ask a simple question," said Hablitz. "If timing is broken after a stroke, can we improve recovery by reinforcing the biological clock?"

    The Brain's Cleaning System

    Under healthy conditions, the glymphatic system moves cerebrospinal fluid along blood vessels and through brain tissue, delivering nutrients and helping remove waste products and inflammatory signals. Previous studies showed that glymphatic function becomes impaired after stroke, potentially limiting the brain's ability to clear harmful molecules that accumulate during recovery.

    Traditionally, stroke researchers have focused on distinguishing beneficial inflammation from harmful inflammation and finding ways to suppress the latter. Hablitz and her colleagues propose that impaired clearance may be part of the problem.

    "We think part of the problem may be a failure of cleaning," she said. "If the system responsible for clearing signaling molecules isn't working properly, everything builds up."

    In this model, stroke damages not only brain tissue but also the pathways that normally help clear inflammatory signals. As those molecules accumulate, they may contribute to ongoing injury and impaired recovery.

    Reinforcing the Clock

    To test whether restoring circadian rhythms could improve recovery, the researchers evaluated several interventions known to influence the body's internal clock, including timed light exposure, melatonin, a clock-targeting drug called KL001, and time-restricted feeding.

    The team first demonstrated that each intervention could enhance glymphatic function in healthy animals. They then tested the most promising approaches—KL001 and time-restricted feeding—in mouse models of stroke.

    Importantly, treatment began three days after stroke, well beyond the narrow treatment window for clot-busting drugs and other acute interventions. Despite the delay, the animals receiving either intervention showed improved motor recovery, smaller lesion volumes, enhanced glymphatic flow, and lower levels of inflammatory cytokines in the brain.

    "All of the cytokines moved in the same direction," Hablitz said. "That suggests we may not be targeting one specific inflammatory pathway. Instead, we may be helping the brain clear inflammatory signals more effectively."

    A Potentially Accessible Therapy

    Because the most promising intervention involved time-restricted feeding—a behavioral approach already being studied for obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other conditions—the findings could have practical implications for stroke rehabilitation.

    "One of the exciting aspects of this work is that we're studying interventions that could potentially be implemented not only in hospitals but also at home," Hablitz said.

    Looking Ahead

    The researchers caution that the findings are currently limited to animal models and that more work is needed to understand exactly how circadian rhythms, glymphatic function, and inflammation interact after stroke.

    Future studies will seek to determine whether improved glymphatic flow directly drives recovery and whether circadian-based interventions can be translated into clinical trials.

    More broadly, the work reflects a growing shift in neuroscience that views sleep, circadian rhythms, and fluid transport as fundamental drivers of brain health. By uncovering how the brain's internal clock influences the glymphatic system, researchers hope to identify new ways to enhance recovery not only after stroke, but also in other neurological disorders marked by inflammation and impaired waste clearance.

    "Understanding how circadian regulation shapes glymphatic clearance will help us develop more targeted therapies," said Hablitz. "Ultimately, our goal is to find ways to improve the brain's ability to clear waste, reduce inflammation, and recover after injury."

    Sunday, May 17, 2026

    HGMH pilot improves stroke recovery

     Still a massive failure since 'improves' IS NOT 100% RECOVERY!GET THERE! 

    HGMH pilot improves stroke recovery

    Hôpital Glengarry Memorial Hospital (HGMH) is piloting a new evidence-informed oral and denture care protocol for stroke patients, aimed at improving recovery and reducing complications.

    The initiative, developed by The Ottawa Hospital and supported through The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization (TOHAMO), is being implemented across HGMH’s inpatient medicine and rehabilitation units as part of a regional quality improvement effort.

    The Alexandria hospital is one of the only small hospitals participating in the pilot across Eastern Ontario. The hospital will provide meaningful feedback on what went well and what can be improved. The program will be evaluated over the coming months to assess its impact on patient outcomes and care practices, with the potential for broader implementation.

    “This work reflects the commitment of our teams to advancing evidence-informed care in a way that directly benefits patients,” said Robert Alldred-Hughes, President and CEO of HGMH. “By standardizing oral and denture care practices, we’re improving patient safety, supporting recovery, and ensuring care is delivered with dignity and consistency.”

    Many patients experience difficulty with swallowing and oral hygiene following a stroke. Without proper care, this can increase the risk of serious complications. The new protocol introduces routine oral assessments, standardized oral hygiene and denture care practices, and targeted staff education to support safe care for patients with swallowing challenges.

    “At the clinical level, this is about bringing best practice into everyday care,” said Rachel Romany, Vice President of Clinical Services and Chief Nursing Executive at HGMH. “Our teams are building the knowledge and confidence to deliver oral care safely and consistently, which has a direct impact on patient outcomes.”

    Implementation at HGMH has included staff eLearning, knowledge validation, and hands-on training. HGMH has supported three staff members to attend specialized training earlier this year with a dentist and a stroke speech-language pathologist from The Ottawa Hospital and are now supporting bedside education for frontline teams.

    “This initiative is a great example of how small, focused improvements can make a meaningful difference for patients,” said Lauren Hume, Manager of Ambulatory Care and Rehabilitation Services. “We’re strengthening how we support recovery by ensuring oral care is integrated into the overall plan of care, not treated as an afterthought.”

    Wednesday, February 18, 2026

    Targeted Inhibition of mGlu5 Receptors in the Contralesional Hemisphere Improves Functional Recovery After Stroke

     

     'Improve' IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH! You do realize survivors want 100% recovery? Or are you that blitheringly stupid you don't know that and aren't working on it?

    Will your incompetent? stroke medical 'professionals' fail to get human testing done?

    Do you prefer your doctor, hospital and board of director's incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING? Your choice; let them be incompetent or demand action!

    Targeted Inhibition of mGlu5 Receptors in the Contralesional Hemisphere Improves Functional Recovery After Stroke


    Federica MastroiacovoMSc https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7113-3754Serena NotartomasoPhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-9233Slovianka MoyanovaPhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-2168Amadeu LlebariaPhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-4827Xavier Gómez-SantacanaPhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-0494Domenico BucciMSc https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3239-2435Valeria BrunoMD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4231-0739Giuseppe BattagliaMD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-3417Karsten RuscherMD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7211-2499Adam Q. BauerPhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-3209Tadeusz WielochPhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-2520, and Ferdinando NicolettiMD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-443X ferdinando.nicoletti@uniroma1.itAuthor Info & Affiliations
    Metrics & Citations
  • Get Access
  • References
  • Figures
  • Share
  • Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

     Understanding circuit-level changes that either enhance or impair the brain’s capacity for recovery will inform the design of more specific, targeted interventions to enhance recovery from stroke. We previously reported that pharmacological blockade of mGlu5 (type-5 metabotropic glutamate) receptors improves recovery of sensorimotor function in rodent models of stroke, concomitant with restoration of functional connectivity in the sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the infarct. Here, we applied photopharmacology and light-activatable/deactivatable mGlu5 receptor negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) to localize when and where in the brain the recovery-enhancing effects occur from systemically administered mGlu5 receptor NAMs.

    METHODS:

    Stroke was induced in C57Bl/6 mice by permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. Mice were treated with either JF-NP-26 or alloswitch-1. JF-NP-26 is a caged derivative of the mGlu5 receptor NAM, raseglurant, inactive on its own, and can be activated by visible light of 405 nm. Alloswitch-1 is an active mGlu5 receptor NAM that can be inactivated by light of 405 nm and subsequently reactivated by light of 520 nm.

    RESULTS:

    Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion caused a sensorimotor deficit measured by 2 behavioral tests. Systemic administration of alloswitch-1 either 30 minutes or 48 hours after stroke enhanced recovery. This effect was rapidly abrogated when deactivating light was delivered to the contralateral somatosensory cortex and was subsequently restored by light-induced reactivation in the same region. No recovery-enhancing effects were observed when alloswitch-1 was activated or deactivated in the ipsilateral tissue. Specific light-induced activation of JF-NP-26 in the homotopic contralateral but not the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex enhanced functional recovery within 5 minutes after irradiation. None of the treatments changed infarct sizes.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    These findings demonstrate that the homotopic contralateral somatosensory cortex is a key site of action of systemic mGlu5 receptor NAMs in enhancing restorative processes important for recovery after stroke. Targeted, light-modulated drugs represent a potential future therapeutic strategy to enhance recovery of function after stroke.


    Graphical Abstract

    Get full access to this article

    Saturday, February 14, 2026

    Does IV tenecteplase before thrombectomy improve outcomes in LVO stroke?

     'Improve' IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH! You do realize survivors want 100% recovery? Or are you that blitheringly stupid you don't know that and aren't working on it?

    Does IV tenecteplase before thrombectomy improve outcomes in LVO stroke?

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

    The benefit of IV thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) compared with EVT alone has been shown to be limited and time dependent. Data on tenecteplase, its recommended alternative, are limited. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of IVT with tenecteplase plus mechanical thrombectomy (TNK + EVT) compared with EVT in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and determine whether its potential benefit decreases with treatment time.

    METHODS

    We conducted a retrospective pooled analysis of 2 nationwide, real-world registries of patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke within 4.5 hours of known symptom onset and with no contraindication to thrombolysis, treated with TNK + EVT (TETRIS) or EVT (ETIS). The efficacy outcome was the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, analyzed in ordinal and dichotomized (mRS score ≤2) approaches. We used propensity score-weighted logistic regression to assess associations between treatment groups and outcomes of interest.

    RESULTS

    Among 1,890 patients who were analyzed (TNK + EVT: n = 798; EVT: n = 1,092; median age 73 years [interquartile range 61-82]; 49.6% women), the median expected onset-to-thrombolysis time was 146 minutes [interquartile range 119-180]. More than half of patients (n = 1,063; 56.2%) were admitted first to a primary stroke center. All baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups after overlap weighting. Overall, TNK + EVT was associated with better 3-month functional outcome(NOT GOOD ENOUGH! You'll want 100% recovery when 

    you are the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke

     so you better start working on that now!)
     over the full mRS (weighted common odds ratio [OR] 1.53 [95% CI 1.29-1.82]; p < 0.001) and regarding functional independence (propensity score overlap weighting

    Wednesday, February 11, 2026

    First-In-Class Neuroprotective Agent Improves Stroke Outcomes

     

    (We will never get any urgency to solve stroke as long as we still call it neuroprotection rather than the neuronal cascade of death. Which term suggests urgency to lay people?) This has to be the third article on this I've seen in the last week. Will your incompetent? doctor and hospital DO ANYTHING AT ALL?

    'Improve outcomes' is NOT GOOD ENOUGH! Stroke survivors want 100% recovery, can't you get that through your thick heads?

    First-In-Class Neuroprotective Agent Improves Stroke Outcomes

    Intravenous loberamisal, a novel dual-target neuroprotectant, improved functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke, results of a phase 3 study showed.

    In addition, an exploratory element of the study showed the highly selective small-molecule agent also reduced poststroke depression and anxiety.

    “Loberamisal was associated with a 13% absolute increase in the proportion of patients achieving excellent functional outcomes(NOT 100% RECOVERY! So, still a failure! Damn it all, 100% recovery is the only goal and you're COMPLETELY FAILING!) at 90 days, with a favorable safety profile,” study investigator Shuya Li, MD, director of the Clinical Trial Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, toldMedscape Medical News.

    She said the findings bolster confidence in the novel agent’s efficacy and justify further neuroprotectant studies in patients with stoke.

    The findings were presented on February 6, 2026, at International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2026.

    First-In-Class Agent

    Reperfusion therapy is a key therapeutic approach for acute ischemic stroke. However, not all patients with stroke are eligible for the therapy due to the strict eligibility criteria including a narrow therapeutic time window.

    In addition, about 30% of patients who do receive reperfusion therapy fail to achieve an excellent functional outcome.(Only 10% fully recover! get your statistics right! That's a horrendous failure rate!)

    To improve outcomes, the investigators are developing neuroprotective therapies that could help address a significant unmet medical need in China, where approximately 3.94 million new stroke cases occur each year and ischemic stroke accounts for 72% of cases.

    Stroke researchers have been investigating postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) inhibitors that disrupt the NMDAR/PSD-95/nNOS complex. These agents have shown promise in mitigating ischemic brain injury and exerting neuroprotective effects, particularly when administered within 3 hours of symptom onset.

    While other groups are exploring PSD-95 inhibition in stroke, Li’s group is focusing on loberamisal, a first-in-class agent that not only inhibits PSD-95 but also enhances alpha2-gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor activity.

    Preclinical studies showed that loberamisal reduced neuronal excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation while also exerting antidepressant and anxiolytic effects.

    Early Promise

    A recent phase 2 study published in Stroke and Vascular Neurology showed that compared with placebo, loberamisal administered once daily for 10 days at doses of 20 mg, 40 mg, or 60 mg had a comparable safety profile and demonstrated signals of efficacy. The 40 mg dose was associated with the most favorable outcomes.

    The current study enrolled 997 adults with ischemic stroke across 32 centers. The median age was approximately 63 years, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 8, and the median time from symptom onset to treatment initiation was 25 hours. Participants were ineligible for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

    Participants were assigned within 48 hours of suspected stroke onset to receive either placebo or 40 mg of intravenous loberamisal. The drug was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once daily for 10 consecutive days.

    Investigators and participants were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days.

    Study results showed that 69.7% of patients in the loberamisal group achieved the primary outcome compared with 56.3% of those in the placebo group (risk ratio [RR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.36; risk difference, 13.28).

    Secondary analyses supported the primary findings. A sliding dichotomy analysis of the mRS at 90 days showed results consistent with the primary outcome (adjusted RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.42).

    Reduced Depression and Anxiety

    The overall distribution of mRS scores at 90 days favored loberamisal. However, there were no significant between-group differences in NIHSS score changes at 10 or 30 days or in 90-day Barthel Index scores.

    An exploratory outcome assessed poststroke depression and anxiety using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), respectively. Depression affects an estimated 30% of patients with stroke and anxiety approximately 25%, and both are strongly associated with poorer functional recovery after stroke.

    Results showed significant reductions in the risk for severe depression (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94 for MADRS ≥ 22 at 90 days) and anxiety (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99 for HAM-A ≥ 21 at 90 days) in the loberamisal group compared with placebo.

    Overall safety profiles were comparable between groups, with lower rates of serious adverse events (8.6% vs 10.7%) and all-cause mortality (1.2% vs 2.0%) in the treatment group.

    Li said her team is considering a larger follow-up study in broader patient populations, potentially including those who have undergone EVT.

    In the current trial, a relatively small proportion of patients received intravenous thrombolysis (approximately 17%), and patients undergoing EVT were excluded. In addition, the study population was limited to patients in China.

    A ‘Big Win’

    Commenting for Medscape Medical News, ISC Chair Lauren Sansing, MD, professor of neurology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, described the excellent functional outcomes as encouraging and noted that the findings represent “one of the first big wins in the neuroprotection space.”

    Sansing emphasized that a 48-hour treatment window could make loberamisal accessible to a much broader patient population, noting that a large proportion of patients with stroke globally present within the first 2 days.

    She noted that although the trial was large, it was conducted exclusively at centers in China and emphasized that additional data from more geographically diverse populations will be important before broader clinical adoption.

    ISC Vice Chair Bijoy Menon, MD, a neurologist in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, also commented on the findings. He noted that the trial was not designed to enroll patients in the hyperacute phase of stroke, but rather those who were not candidates for thrombectomy or thrombolysis.

    Menon, who has been involved in research on the PSD-95 inhibitor nerinetide, said the results are significant, describing the study as the first large trial to demonstrate a positive signal in the neuroprotection and neurorecovery space.

    This study was funded by NeuroDawn Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Li, Menon, and Sansing reported having no relevant disclosures.

    Saturday, February 7, 2026

    Scientific statement focused on post-stroke spasticity urges early diagnosis, intervention for improved recovery

     What a pile of shit. Survivors want SPASTICITY CURED! Comeuppance is going to be a bitch when you are the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke? Then you just might want 100% recovery. Survivors don't want your fucking 'improvement' or 'care' about spasticity; THEY WANT IT CURED! And somehow you don't understand that REQUIREMENT!

    Scientific statement focused on post-stroke spasticity urges early diagnosis, intervention for improved recovery




    Spectrum of motor dysfunction in poststroke spasticity. Spasticity is narrowly defined as velocity-dependent hyperactivity after rapid muscle movement. The full syndrome of interacting deficits in patients with stroke includes impaired voluntary muscle control, involuntary muscle overactivation at rest (hypertonia) or with movement (hyperreflexia), and passive tissue remodeling. Credit: Stroke (2026). DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000515

    For many stroke survivors, recovery is derailed by painful muscle stiffness and involuntary spasms that limit movement, independence, and quality of life. Often viewed as an unavoidable consequence of stroke, this condition—known as post-stroke spasticity—may instead represent a missed opportunity for earlier, more effective care(NOT RECOVERY!).

    A new scientific statement focused on post-stroke spasticity urges a shift in how post-stroke spasticity is recognized and treated, emphasizing early diagnosis, timely intervention, and innovative therapies to reduce long-term disability and improve recovery after stroke. Two researchers at UT Health San Antonio led the statement writing group for the American Heart Association.

    The work is published in the journal Stroke.

    Post-stroke spasticity causes abnormal muscle tightness and involuntary spasms that can interfere with walking, arm use, daily activities, and participation in rehabilitation. It affects an estimated 30% to 80% of stroke survivors, contributing to higher health care costs, increased caregiver burden, and preventable complications, such as pain, joint contractures, and loss of mobility.

    "I see patients every week whose recovery is limited not by the stroke itself, but by muscle stiffness and spasms that were never addressed early," said Sujani Bandela, MD, a neurologist at UT Health San Antonio, the academic health center of The University of Texas at San Antonio. She also is vice chair of the Neural Repair and Rehabilitation Section at the American Academy of Neurology, first author of the Heart Association's scientific statement and vice chair of its writing group.

    "When spasticity is recognized and treated sooner, we often have a real opportunity to preserve movement, reduce pain, and help patients stay engaged in their rehabilitation," added Bandela.

    The heart association's scientific statement highlights growing evidence that earlier recognition—often within the first three months after a stroke—combined with coordinated rehabilitation and medical therapies may improve functional outcomes and reduce long-term disability. Yet many patients experience delayed diagnosis or receive little or no rehabilitation support, particularly in rural areas and communities with fewer resources.

    "Advances in neuroscience, rehabilitation, and technology are giving us new tools to intervene earlier and more effectively after stroke," said senior author of the statement and chair of its writing group, Mark P. Goldberg, MD, professor of neurology and Edward B. LeWinn M.D. Memorial Chair at UT Health San Antonio, and chair-elect of the heart association's Rehabilitation and Recovery Committee within the Stroke Council.

    "This scientific statement reflects the growing evidence that earlier, targeted approaches to spasticity could meaningfully improve long-term outcomes for stroke survivors."

    The statement advises:

    • Greater awareness among patients, caregivers, and health care professionals
    • Proactive monitoring of patients at high risk of developing spasticity
    • Coordinated, multidisciplinary care(NOT RECOVERY!) including rehabilitation and medical therapy
    • Innovative care(NOT RECOVERY!) models, including telehealth, to improve access to specialized care(NOT RECOVERY!)

    Access to specialized stroke rehabilitation remains limited in many parts of South Texas and other regions with fewer resources, contributing to persistent gaps in post-stroke recovery. Researchers note that expanding early spasticity care(NOT RECOVERY!) could help reduce long-term disability and improve quality of life for stroke survivors across the region.

    "Stroke survivorship is increasing, but recovery is not equal for everyone," Goldberg said. "Improving early access to spasticity care(NOT RECOVERY!) is an important step toward better short- and long-term stroke recovery for all patients."

    Goldberg is scheduled to present the statement at the association's International Stroke Conference 2026 in New Orleans on Friday, Feb. 6. Bandela is scheduled to present a course session with a group on spasticity and different case presentations.

    Publication details

    Sujani Bandela et al, Early Recognition and Intervention for Poststroke Spasticity: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, Stroke (2026). DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000515