Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label don't have a stroke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label don't have a stroke. Show all posts

Monday, July 7, 2025

CRISPR Delivers RNA to Repair Neurons Right Where It’s Needed

 This should trigger massive rejoicing in the stroke medical world. We can have our researchers directly repair our damaged neurons. But nothing will occur! THERE IS NO LEADERSHIP IN STROKE! You're screwed, so don't have a stroke is the only valid response. 

CRISPR Delivers RNA to Repair Neurons Right Where It’s Needed

Summary: Researchers have developed a new CRISPR-based technology that transports RNA to exact locations within neurons, where it can trigger repair and regrowth, offering hope for treating neurological diseases and injuries. Unlike traditional CRISPR tools that edit DNA, this system repurposes CRISPR-Cas13 to act like a “mailman,” carrying RNA to damaged sites using built-in molecular zip codes.

In lab tests, the technique, called CRISPR-TO, boosted neurite growth by up to 50% in just 24 hours, marking a major step forward in spatial RNA medicine. This breakthrough may enable safer, more effective RNA-based treatments for conditions like ALS, spinal cord injuries, and neurodegenerative disorders.

Key Facts:

  • CRISPR-TO System: Cas13 delivers RNA to precise neural sites using molecular zip codes.
  • Enhanced Regrowth: Promoted 50% greater neurite growth in injured neurons.
  • New Class of Medicine: Introduces “spatial RNA medicine” for targeted cellular repair.

Source: Stanford

When a neuron in our body gets damaged, segments of RNA produce proteins that can help repair the injury. But in neurological disorders such as ALS and spinal muscular atrophy, or following spinal cord injuries, the mechanisms for moving life-essential RNA to injured sites within the cell fail. As a result, RNA molecules can’t get to where they are needed and damage becomes permanent.

Researchers at Stanford have developed a technology for transporting RNA to specific locations within a neuron, where it can repair and even regrow parts of the cell.

This shows a neuron.
Typically, CRISPR is used to slice and edit genetic code, but in this case the researchers didn’t want to make any changes. Credit: Neuroscience News

Their work, supported by the National Institutes of Health, forms the foundation for a new class of therapeutics that the researchers are calling “spatial RNA medicine,” which they hope will lead to treatments for neurological diseases as well as traumatic injuries.

“For the first time, we’ve harnessed the power of CRISPR technology to create a precise spatial ‘zip code’ that delivers RNA molecules exactly where they’re needed within cells,” said Stanley Qi, an associate professor of bioengineering and senior author on the paper published May 21 in Nature.

“Imagine being able to specifically target damaged sites within a neuron, repairing them, and promoting their regrowth – this is what our technology achieves.”

A CRISPR-based mailman

In recent years, researchers have realized that the distribution of RNA within a cell – where specific molecules are located – may be just as important as what they are capable of doing.

An individual neuron can be over a meter long, and aging, injury, and mutations can all disrupt its ability to transport the tiny RNA over such a distance.

“Therapeutic RNA can’t help if it doesn’t get to where it’s needed,” Qi said. “We wanted to create a technology that could reliably move RNA to where it needs to function.”

Qi and his colleagues used a version of the gene-editing tool CRISPR, called CRISPR-Cas13, to target individual pieces of RNA (unlike the more widely known CRISPR-Cas9, which targets DNA).

Typically, CRISPR is used to slice and edit genetic code, but in this case the researchers didn’t want to make any changes. They simply wanted to move the existing RNA to a new place within the cell.

“Cas13 naturally acts like a pair of scissors, but we engineered it to act like a mailman instead,” Qi said.

“Then we can tell it to carry the RNA from one precise location to another.”

The researchers paired Cas13 with specific localization signals that act as addresses, instructing the Cas13 where to deliver the RNA. Each location within the cell has its own address molecule, so the researchers can direct the RNA to various locations by adding different molecules to the cell.

Qi and his colleagues used their technology, which they are calling CRISPR-TO, to screen dozens of pieces of RNA and see if any of them would help neurons to grow.

They added CRISPR-TO to mouse brain neurons in a petri dish, where it carried the RNA molecules to the tips of neurites – fingerlike protrusions that form synapses and connect to other neurons.

They found several promising candidates, including one RNA molecule that increased neurite growth by as much as 50% over a 24-hour period.

“We are discovering more RNA targets that could promote neurite outgrowth and regeneration,” said Mengting Han, a postdoctoral scholar in Qi’s lab and lead author on the paper.

“We’ve added a new tool to the CRISPR toolbox, using it to control RNA localization inside the cell. This has never been achieved before and, importantly, it opens new therapeutic directions for treating neurodegenerative diseases.”

Safer, more effective RNA medicine

The researchers are using CRISPR-TO to screen additional RNA molecules to determine which ones will be most effective at repairing injured neurons in the brains of mice, as well as in human neurons.

“We are at the beginning of understanding how spatial organization of RNA benefits brain repair,” Qi said.

“We hope our technology will help people figure out which RNAs will be the biggest players for better therapeutics.”

Currently, the researchers are using CRISPR-TO to move endogenous RNAs – RNA molecules that are naturally produced within the cell. But it could also be used to provide precise control over RNA-based medicines, making them both safer and more efficient, Qi said.

“This potential excites us tremendously,” Qi said.

“It’s not enough for a molecule to just be in the cell. We need it to be in the right location at the right time. With our precise, programmable technology, you can target any RNA in any type of cell and bring it to the site of need in the body.”

Funding: This work was funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Center for Research Resources, the Stanford School of Medicine Dean’s Postdoctoral Fellowship, and the American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship.

About this CRISPR and neuroscience research news

Author: Chloe Dionisio
Source: Stanford
Contact: Chloe Dionisio – Stanford
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
Clonal tracing with somatic epimutations reveals dynamics of blood ageing” by Stanley Qi et al. Nature

Thursday, July 18, 2024

Early Versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Ischemic Stroke in People With Atrial Fibrillation and Hemorrhagic Transformation: Prespecified Subanalysis of the Randomized Controlled ELAN Trial

Still nothing that will prevent hemorrhagic transformation! Shouldn't that be a research priority that our stroke leadership ensures occurs? But since stroke has NO leadership, nothing ever gets done. The answer is; DON'T HAVE A STROKE!

Early Versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Ischemic Stroke in People With Atrial Fibrillation and Hemorrhagic Transformation: Prespecified Subanalysis of the Randomized Controlled ELAN Trial

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Whether hemorrhagic transformation (HT) modifies the treatment effect of early compared with late initiation of direct oral anticoagulation in people with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unknown.

METHODS:

This is a post hoc analysis of the ELAN trial (Early Versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-Ischaemic Stroke Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the individual components, 30- and 90-day functional outcome. We estimated outcomes based on HT, subclassified as hemorrhagic infarction (HI) or parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) on prerandomization imaging (core laboratory rating) using adjusted risk differences between treatment arms.

RESULTS:

Overall, 247 of 1970 participants (12.5%) had HT (114 HI 1, 77 HI 2, 34 PH 1, 22 PH 2). For the primary outcome, the estimated adjusted risk difference (early versus late) was −2.2% (95% CI, −7.8% to 3.5%) in people with HT (HI: −4.7% [95% CI, −10.8% to 1.4%]; PH: 6.1% [95% CI, −8.5% to 20.6%]) and −0.9% (95% CI, −2.6% to 0.8%) in people without HT. Numbers of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were identical in people with and without HT. With early treatment, the estimated adjusted risk difference for poor 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 3–6) was 11.5% (95% CI, −0.8% to 23.8%) in participants with HT (HI: 7.4% [95% CI, −6.4% to 21.2%]; PH: 25.1% [95% CI, 0.2% to 50.0%]) and −2.6% (95% CI, −7.1% to 1.8%) in people without HT.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found no evidence of major treatment effect heterogeneity or safety concerns with early compared with late direct oral anticoagulation initiation in people with and without HT. However, early direct oral anticoagulation initiation may worsen functional outcomes in people with PH.

REGISTRATION:

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03148457.

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

Technology-related interventions to improve performance in activities of daily living for adults with stroke (2012–2019)

So in those 8 years nothing was accomplished in ADL stroke research to get survivors recovered! Good to know HOW FUCKING INCOMPETENT EVERYTHING IN STROKE IS!

The takeaway is; don't have a stroke!

 Technology-related interventions to improve performance in activities of daily living for adults with stroke (2012–2019)

American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT). Volume 77(Supplement 1), Pgs. 7710393020.

NARIC Accession Number: J93246. What's this?
Author(s): Goldberg, Carly, Winterbottom, Lauren, Geller, Daniel, Nilsen, Dawn M., Mahoney, Danielle, Gillen, Glen.
Publication Year: 2023.
Abstract: Article summarizes the findings from a systematic review of technology-related interventions to improve performance in activities of daily living (ADL) for adults with stroke, such as virtual reality/gaming, biofeedback, robotics, electrical stimulation, and telerehabilitation. Four systematic reviews and 16 randomized control trials met the criteria for inclusion and provided evidence for the effectiveness of technology interventions to improve ADL performance. Overall, evidence to support the use of technology-related interventions to improve ADL outcome after stroke is limited by the diverse nature of the interventions within this theme. In addition, within each of the themes, evidence was limited in that many studies demonstrated no statistical significance in favor of interventions.
Descriptor Terms: ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, BIOFEEDBACK, COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, DAILY LIVING, ELECTRICAL STIMULATION, INTERVENTION, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, REHABILITATION TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH REVIEWS, ROBOTICS, STROKE, TELEREHABILITATION.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Request Information.

Citation: Goldberg, Carly, Winterbottom, Lauren, Geller, Daniel, Nilsen, Dawn M., Mahoney, Danielle, Gillen, Glen. (2023.) Technology-related interventions to improve performance in activities of daily living for adults with stroke (2012–2019). American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT)., 77(Supplement 1), Pgs. 7710393020. Retrieved 1/30/2024, from REHABDATA database.

Sunday, July 24, 2022

Treatment of posterior circulation stroke: Acute management and secondary prevention

Obviously your solution is to not have this type of stroke. You wouldn't want to inconvenience your doctors into doing unproven interventions. 

Treatment of posterior circulation stroke: Acute management and secondary prevention

First Published June 28, 2022 Review Article Find in PubMed 

One-fifth of strokes occur in the territory of the posterior circulation, but their management, particularly acute reperfusion therapy and neurointervention procedures for secondary prevention, has received much less attention than similar interventions for the anterior circulation. In this review, we overview the treatment of posterior circulation stroke, including both interventions in the acute setting and secondary prevention. We focus on areas in which the management of posterior circulation stroke differs from that of stroke in general and highlight recent advances.

Effectiveness of acute revascularization of posterior circulation strokes remains in large parts unproven. Thrombolysis seems to have similar benefits and lower hemorrhage risks than in the anterior circulation. The recent ATTENTION and BAOCHE trials have demonstrated that thrombectomy benefits strokes with basilar artery occlusion, but its effect on other posterior occlusion sites remains uncertain. Ischemic and hemorrhagic space-occupying cerebellar strokes can benefit from decompressive craniectomy.

Secondary prevention of posterior circulation strokes includes aggressive treatment of cerebrovascular risk factors with both drugs and lifestyle interventions and short-term dual anti-platelet therapy. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data suggest basilar artery stenosis is better treated with medical therapy than stenting, which has a high peri-procedural risk. Limited data from RCTs in stenting for vertebral stenosis suggest that intracranial stenosis is currently best treated with medical therapy alone; the situation for extracranial stenosis is less clear where stenting for symptomatic stenosis is an option, particularly for recurrent symptoms; larger RCTs are required in this area.

Stroke is globally the second leading cause of death and the third cause of death and disability.1 One-fifth of strokes occur in the vertebrobasilar territory (also known as posterior) circulation.2 Diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) can be more challenging than anterior circulation syndromes, and widely used screening protocols such as the face-arm-speech test (FAST) are less sensitive.3 Optimal management of posterior circulation stroke, particularly acute reperfusion therapy and neurointervention procedures for secondary prevention, has received much less attention than similar interventions for the anterior circulation.3 However, recent research and ongoing studies are improving our understanding. In this review, we cover the treatment of posterior circulation stroke, covering both interventions in the acute setting and secondary prevention. We focus on areas in which management of posterior circulation stroke differs from that of stroke in general and highlight recent advances.

More at link.