Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label Peter Levine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Levine. Show all posts

Thursday, December 11, 2025

10 Things Brain Injury Survivors Wish You Understood About Their Recovery

A friend of mine tells me that she is sure I could recover my left hand if I tried.  I deflect the question when I really should have said there are only three people in the world I would listen to if they said it was possible. Two were former therapists that had strokes. Notice, not a single doctor makes the list.

Amy Elder of mycerebellarstrokerecovery

and Rebecca Dutton of Home After a Stroke 

and Peter Levine, a PTA and researcher of The Stroke Recovery Blog

Yes, I’ve tried that too: When well-intentioned advice hurts

The latest here:

10 Things Brain Injury Survivors Wish You Understood About Their Recovery


male brain injury survivor talking to his mom
Recovering from a brain injury can feel like entering a different world. Survivors often say the hardest part is not only healing physically and mentally, but also helping others understand what life looks like now. Friends and family usually want to be supportive, but many are unsure how to help or what their loved one is experiencing on a daily basis. If you’re trying to understand what someone is going through, this guide can help. Here are ten important things that brain injury survivors wish more people truly understood, along with insights and examples that reflect real challenges, emotions, and victories. 

1. “I’m Still Me, Even If I Seem Different”

A brain injury can affect personality, mood, memory, and communication. These changes can be confusing for both the survivor and the people around them. Still, survivors often want you to know that their identity has not disappeared. They may feel different, but they still carry the same values, interests, and sense of self.

Healing takes time, and certain abilities return at different stages. Instead of focusing on what seems “different,” try seeing the person you’ve always known. Support, patience, and familiar routines can help them feel grounded.

2. “Fatigue Isn’t Just Being Tired”

Post-brain injury fatigue is one of the most common and misunderstood symptoms. This type of exhaustion is not the same as staying up too late or skipping a cup of coffee. It can come on suddenly, without warning, and make even simple tasks feel overwhelming.

Because the brain is working harder to complete basic functions, energy drains quickly. Survivors often describe feeling wiped out after conversations, errands, or problem-solving. Rest is not optional during recovery. It is part of healing.

Understanding this helps reduce frustration for everyone involved. Offering breaks, limiting long activities, and respecting boundaries make a big difference.

3. “Cognitive Challenges Are Invisible but Very Real”

Many survivors look “fine” on the outside, which can make invisible symptoms harder for others to understand. Cognitive challenges can include:

  • Trouble concentrating
  • Memory lapses
  • Difficulty following conversations
  • Slower processing
  • Trouble staying organized

These symptoms can affect jobs, relationships, and daily routines. Someone may forget something you said five minutes ago or lose track of time without meaning to. It is not intentional.

Instead of assuming someone is careless or not paying attention, try using clear communication, writing things down, and giving extra time. These small changes create a more supportive environment.

4. “Sensory Overload Happens Quickly”

Busy places with bright lights, loud sounds, or lots of movement can be extremely overwhelming. Even familiar environments can cause discomfort when the brain has trouble filtering information.

Survivors may avoid restaurants, malls, or social events because those settings drain their energy or cause headaches. They may appear anxious or withdrawn, but often it is simply their brain trying to keep up.

Understanding sensory overload helps you support your loved one during outings. Offering quieter spaces, shorter visits, or flexible plans can prevent stress and help them feel more in control.

5. “Emotional Changes Are Not Personal”

A brain injury affects neural pathways responsible for controlling emotions. This can lead to mood swings, irritability, anxiety, sadness, or trouble expressing feelings appropriately.

These emotional changes often catch survivors off guard. They may feel frustrated with themselves and worry about how others see them. Loved ones sometimes take these reactions personally, but survivors want you to know that these shifts are part of the injury, not a reflection of how they feel about you.

Responding with compassion instead of judgment helps reduce shame and supports long-term recovery. Encouraging open communication can also help everyone navigate emotional changes together.

6. “Recovery Is Not Linear”

One day may be full of progress, while the next day feels like a setback. This can be discouraging and confusing. Survivors often wish more people understood that good days and tough days are both normal.

Healing takes time, and the brain rebuilds connections gradually. Progress might look slow, but each small step matters. Celebrating consistent effort, not just big milestones, helps survivors stay motivated and hopeful.

When setbacks happen, supportive language such as “You’re doing your best” or “Progress takes time” can help shift the focus back to long-term healing.

7. “I Need Patience More Than Anything”

Brain injury survivors often feel pressure to “get back to normal,” but recovery takes place at its own pace. They may struggle with things that used to be simple, such as following instructions, remembering appointments, or completing tasks.

Loved ones may unintentionally rush or push the survivor, especially when they look physically healthy. Survivors want to feel understood and supported, not hurried or judged.

Offering patience, giving extra time to complete tasks, and avoiding comments like “You used to do this easily” can help them feel respected and valued.

8. “Social Interactions Can Be Exhausting”

Conversations require memory, attention, processing, and emotional awareness. All of these skills may be affected after a brain injury. Survivors often feel worn out after social events, even when they enjoy spending time with friends and family.

They may:

  • Lose their train of thought
  • Struggle to follow group conversations
  • Need time to think before responding
  • Feel overwhelmed in crowds

This does not mean they want to be isolated. It simply means their brain is working harder behind the scenes.

Allowing breaks, choosing calm environments, and speaking at a steady pace can help survivors feel more comfortable and included.

9. “Independence Matters, Even When I Need Help”

Most brain injury survivors value independence, and needing help can feel frustrating or discouraging. They may want to do things on their own, even if it takes longer or requires adaptive tools. This helps them rebuild confidence and develop new skills.

Friends and family often step in quickly, hoping to speed things up or prevent mistakes. While this comes from a place of care, it can unintentionally reduce confidence.

Many survivors appreciate support, but they also want the chance to try. Asking questions like “Would you like help or do you want to try it first?” respects their independence while still offering assistance.

10. “My Recovery Doesn’t Have an Expiration Date”

A common misconception is that recovery stops after a certain point. Many survivors hear comments like “By now you should be back to normal” or “Isn’t this the best it will get?” These statements can be hurtful and untrue.

The brain continues to change, adapt, and strengthen far beyond the early stages. Progress can happen months, years, or even decades after an injury. Consistent practice, therapy, and daily activity can all spark improvement.

Survivors want loved ones to know that healing is ongoing. Encouragement, belief, and support can fuel their motivation and remind them that long-term growth is possible.

Why Understanding Matters

A brain injury affects every part of a survivor’s life, including physical function, emotions, relationships, and daily routines. When loved ones understand these challenges, it strengthens trust and reduces frustration on both sides. It also helps survivors feel supported during a life transition that can feel isolating at times.

Families and friends rarely intend to misunderstand. They simply may not know what the survivor is experiencing under the surface. Learning, listening, and staying open to new information helps create a more supportive environment.

Ways Brain Injury Survivors Can Advocate for Themselves

Survivors may also benefit from communicating their needs clearly. A few helpful strategies include:

  • Sharing a list of symptoms to help loved ones understand what daily life looks like
  • Using planners, apps, or memory tools to stay organized
  • Creating quiet spaces at home to recharge
  • Setting boundaries without guilt
  • Asking healthcare providers for clear explanations and written instructions
  • Exploring therapy, such as occupational therapy, cognitive therapy, or speech therapy

Self-advocacy helps survivors gain confidence while giving others concrete ways to help.

A Message to Brain Injury Survivors

If you are recovering from a brain injury, know that your feelings are valid. Healing can feel slow and complicated, but your progress is real, even on days when you cannot see it. You deserve support, understanding, and patience from the people around you.

You are not alone. Many survivors share the same frustrations, hopes, and challenges. Recovery is not a straight line, but every effort matters.

A Message to Loved Ones of Brain Injury Survivors

If you are supporting a survivor, your presence matters more than you realize. Compassionate understanding helps create a space where healing feels possible. Even small gestures, like offering extra time or listening without judgment, can change the entire tone of recovery.

Your encouragement, patience, and willingness to learn can make an enormous difference in their journey. If you begin feeling overwhelmed, consider joining a brain injury family support group to learn and be encouraged by others in similar situations.

Final Thoughts

Brain injury recovery can be complex, emotional, and full of unexpected twists. Survivors want the people in their lives to understand what they are experiencing, not out of pity, but out of respect and support. When friends and family recognize invisible challenges and respond with compassion, survivors feel more secure and less alone.

If you take only one thing from this article, let it be this: survivors are working hard every day. Your patience and understanding help them keep moving forward.We hope you enjoyed this article and subscribe to our newsletter for weekly articles just like this delivered straight to your inbox — subscribe here.

Flint Rehab is leading the way in neuro-rehabilitation with products that are backed by research and clinically proven to help you recover more effectively from stroke, TBI, and SCI.

Trusted by over 300+ rehab facilities and 10,000+ home customers.

Thursday, September 5, 2024

Effects of ankle joint degree of freedom of knee–ankle–foot orthoses on loading patterns and triceps surae muscle activity on the paretic side in individuals with subacute severe hemiplegia: a retrospective study

 What are the protocols to get back to regular walking without the KAFO? If your doctor and therapists don't have any, you don't have a functioning stroke doctor, therapist or hospital! I don't know what it is but in my opinion it is not worth staying there for rehab!

I consider AFOs as preventing recovery of correct walking, they may get you mobile faster but do nothing for recovery!

I seriously believe that an AFO actually hinders recovery, you do no training of your dorsiflexion while wearing an AFO.  I went cold turkey on using one on a 21 day canoe trip in Canada and Alaska, 3 years after stroke. It forced me to immediately strengthen my ankle to keep it from rolling and get toe clearance. Didn't fall on that trip.  

Peter Levine does a much better explanation of prolonged AFO use;

AFO after stroke: Once its on there, its on there for life.

But you can't listen to anyone but your doctor. But does your doctor know anything EXACT about stroke recovery?

The latest here:

Effects of ankle joint degree of freedom of knee–ankle–foot orthoses on loading patterns and triceps surae muscle activity on the paretic side in individuals with subacute severe hemiplegia: a retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Individuals with subacute severe hemiplegia often undergo alternate gait training to overcome challenges in achieving walking independence. However, the ankle joint setting in a knee–ankle–foot orthosis (KAFO) depends on trunk function or paralysis stage for alternate gait training with a KAFO. The optimal degree of ankle joint freedom in a KAFO and the specific ankle joint conditions for effective rehabilitation remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of different degrees of freedom of the ankle joint on center-of-pressure (CoP) parameters and muscle activity on the paretic side using a KAFO and to investigate the recommended setting of ankle joint angle in a KAFO depending on physical function.

Methods

This study included 14 participants with subacute stroke (67.4 ± 13.3 years). The CoP parameters and muscle activity of the gastrocnemius lateralis (GCL) and soleus muscles were compared using a linear mixed model (LMM) under two ankle joint conditions in the KAFO: fixed at 0° and free ankle dorsiflexion. We confirmed the relationship between changes in CoP parameters or muscle activity under different conditions and physical functional characteristics such as the Fugl–Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity Synergy Score (FMAs) and Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) using LMM.

Results

Anterior–posterior displacement of CoP (AP_CoP) (p = 0.011) and muscle activity of the GCL (p = 0.043) increased in the free condition of ankle dorsiflexion compared with that in the fixed condition. The FMAs (p = 0.004) and TIS (p = 0.008) demonstrated a positive relationship with AP_CoP. A positive relationship was also found between TIS and the percentage of medial forefoot loading time in the CoP (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

For individuals with severe subacute hemiplegia, the ankle dorsiflexion induction in the KAFO, which did not impede the forward tilt of the shank, promotes anterior movement in the CoP and muscle activity of the GCL. This study suggests that adjusting the dorsiflexion mobility of the ankle joint in the KAFO according to improvement in physical function promotes loading of the CoP to the medial forefoot.

Background

Many individuals develop a gait disorder after a stroke. Despite recent advancements in rehabilitation science, 40% of individuals with hemiplegia who initially have difficulty in walking do not achieve walking independence, even 3 months after stroke onset [1]. Early and high-intensity gait training for individuals with subacute stroke has been reported to promote walking independence at 6 months after gait training [2]. Rehabilitation for individuals with hemiplegia aims to induce plastic changes in the central nervous system by inhibiting compensation from the nonparetic limb and increasing the frequency of using paretic limb. Orthotic treatment plays a vital role in facilitating repetitive movement of the paretic limb with a reduced degree of freedom. Currently, previous studies have reported the effectiveness of gait training on overground surfaces using a knee–ankle–foot orthosis (KAFO) for individuals with subacute severe hemiparesis [3, 4].

Generating a gait rhythm with sensory input is important as a gait strategy for individuals with subacute severe hemiparesis and those having difficulty in achieving walking independence. The transition from stance to swing is controlled by muscle spindles in the hip flexor muscles and group Ib afferents from the Golgi tendon organs in the ankle extensor muscles [5]. Alternate gait training is provided to induce ankle dorsiflexion and hip extension in gait, which a KAFO assists. Abe et al. demonstrated that alternate gait training overground with a KAFO in the subacute phase led to earlier improvements in Functional Independence Measure gait scores [4], suggesting providing information on hip extension under load may induce increased muscle activity in the lower limbs on the paretic side. However, muscle activity in the lower limb on the paretic side during alternate gait training with a KAFO has not yet been confirmed.

Additionally, the center-of-pressure (CoP) on the paretic side is an important indicator of gait ability in hemiplegia. Choi et al. reported that greater anterior–posterior displacement of the CoP (AP_CoP) in the subacute phase improved walking independence in individuals with hemiplegia [6]. In addition, Echigoya et al. reported a positive relationship between Fugl–Meyer Assessment scores and walking speed [7]. Therefore, AP_CoP serves as a marker of functional impairment and activity limitation. Development of strategies to promote an increase in the AP_CoP may lead to the acquisition of independent walking ability in individuals with subacute stroke. However, few studies have focused on CoP during assisted gait using a KAFO in individuals with subacute stroke. A previous study reported that the CoP path moved from the heel to the medial forefoot and hallux in healthy participants [8]. Thus, we believe that medial forefoot loading is crucial for gait in individuals with stroke, as well as for increased AP_CoP.

Limiting the degree of freedom in the ankle joint with an ankle–foot orthosis for individuals with chronic hemiplegia has been shown to increase the ankle dorsiflexion angle during the stance phase [9] and to decrease braking forces during the initial double support, resulting in improved gait speed [10]. However, Mulroy et al. reported that, compared to the free ankle dorsiflexion condition, limitation of the ankle dorsiflexion angle results in decreased muscle activity of the soleus (SOL) during the stance phase in individuals with chronic stroke [11]. Therefore, adjusting the degree of freedom in the ankle joint according to the degree of functional recovery is crucial. In addition, improvements in gait ability in individuals with subacute stroke have been associated with physical function, which reduces limb motor function and trunk control [12, 13]. However, the specific ankle joint conditions for a KAFO according to physical function remain unclear.

First, this study aimed to examine the effects of different degrees of freedom in the ankle joint on CoP parameters and muscle activity on the paretic side using a KAFO for individuals with severe hemiplegia. Second, we aimed to determine the relationship between CoP parameters, muscle activity, and physical function according to different settings of ankle joint angles in a KAFO. We hypothesized that CoP parameters and muscle activity in the triceps surae would improve under ankle dorsiflexion induction in a KAFO, as it does not impede the forward tilt of the shank during terminal stance. Moreover, adjusting ankle joint function based on individual physical function may be necessary, as previous studies suggest that motor impairment and trunk control impairment after stroke are closely associated with poor mobility performance and gait instability [14, 15].

More at link.

Friday, May 10, 2024

Effects of ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance on the quasi-joint stiffness of the ankle joint and spatial asymmetry during gait in patients with hemiparesis

 I consider AFOs as preventing recovery of correct walking, they may get you mobile faster but do nothing for recovery!

I seriously believe that an AFO actually hinders recovery, you do no training of your dorsiflexion while wearing an AFO.  I went cold turkey on using one on a 21 day canoe trip in Canada and Alaska, 3 years after stroke. It forced me to immediately strengthen my ankle to keep it from rolling and get toe clearance. Didn't fall on that trip.  

Peter Levine does a much better explanation of prolonged AFO use;

AFO after stroke: Once its on there, its on there for life.

But you can't listen to anyone but your doctor. But does your doctor know anything EXACT about stroke recovery?

The latest here:

 

Effects of ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance on the quasi-joint stiffness of the ankle joint and spatial asymmetry during gait in patients with hemiparesis

Highlights

  • •
    Ankle joint stiffness during gait in post-stroke patients is increased by orthotics.
  • •
    Increased ankle joint stiffness does not improve ankle power generation.
  • •
    Step length asymmetry improves even if paretic ankle power generation does not.

Abstract

Background

Reduced ankle quasi-joint stiffness affects propulsion in the paretic side of patients with hemiparesis, contributing to gait asymmetry. We investigated whether the use of an ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance to compensate for reduced stiffness would increase quasi-joint stiffness and spatiotemporal symmetry in patients with hemiparesis.

Methods

Seventeen patients walked along a 7-m walkway in both ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance and control (i.e., ankle-foot orthosis) conditions. Dorsiflexion resistance by spring and cam was set to increase linearly from zero-degree ankle dorsiflexion. Gait data were analyzed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system.

Findings

Ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance significantly increased the quasi-joint stiffness in the early and middle stance phase (P = 0.028 and 0.040). Furthermore, although ankle power generation in the ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance condition was significantly lower than in the control condition (P = 0.003), step length symmetry significantly increased in the ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance condition (P = 0.016). There was no significant difference in swing time ratio between conditions.

Interpretation

Applying dorsiflexion resistance in the paretic stance phase increased quasi-joint stiffness but did not lead to an increase in ankle power generation. On the other hand, applying dorsiflexion resistance also resulted in a more symmetrical step length, even though the ankle joint power generation on the paretic side did not increase as expected. Future research should explore whether modifying the magnitude and timing of dorsiflexion resistance, considering the biomechanical characteristics of each patients' ankle joint during gait, enhances ankle joint power generation.

Sunday, July 11, 2021

Effects of Mirror Therapy on Motor and Sensory Recovery in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

 With this and Peter Levine's podcast, I'll have to try this. It has only been 8 years, is it available in your stroke hospital or are they completely fucking incompetent?

Mirror Therapy by Debra Battistella and Peter Levine

Effects of Mirror Therapy on Motor and Sensory Recovery in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

 

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effects of mirror therapy (MT) versus control treatment (CT) on movement performance, motor control, sensory recovery, and performance of activities of daily living in people with chronic stroke.

Design

Single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Four hospitals.

Participants

Outpatients with chronic stroke (N=33) with mild to moderate motor impairment.

Interventions

The MT group (n=16) received upper extremity training involving repetitive bimanual, symmetrical movement practice, in which the individual moves the affected limb while watching the reflective illusion of the unaffected limb's movements from a mirror. The CT group received task-oriented upper extremity training. The intensity for both groups was 1.5 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks.

Main Outcome Measurements

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment; kinematic variables, including reaction time, normalized movement time, normalized total displacement, joint recruitment, and maximum shoulder-elbow cross-correlation; the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment; the Motor Activity Log; and the ABILHAND questionnaire.

Results

The MT group performed better in the overall (P=.01) and distal part (P=.04) Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores and demonstrated shorter reaction time (P=.04), shorter normalized total displacement (P=.04), and greater maximum shoulder-elbow cross-correlation (P=.03). The Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment temperature scores improved significantly more in the MT group than in the CT group. No significant differences on the Motor Activity Log and the ABILHAND questionnaire were found immediately after MT or at follow-up.

Conclusions

The application of MT after stroke might result in beneficial effects on movement performance, motor control, and temperature sense, but may not translate into daily functions in the population with chronic stroke.

 

Wednesday, July 7, 2021

Are Muscle Synergies Useful for Stroke Rehabilitation?

Maybe something here?

Peter Levine has these four blog posts on synergy, so you can compare and use the best.  

I need to work on this yet since I still have some synergies, except that life and fun gets in the way of rehab. Happiness is the goal of life per Rupert Spira and therapy does not provide me with happiness. So for right now living life takes precedence.

How to Overcome Synergistic Movement After Stroke (When One Movement Leads to Many) from Flint Rehab

 The latest here:

Are Muscle Synergies Useful for Stroke Rehabilitation?

Highlights

•

Muscle synergy analyses capture changes in neuromuscular coordination post-stroke.

•

Synergies are a useful tool to assess motor impairments and rehabilitation efficacy.

•

Synergy-based rehabilitation would be an effective way to induce true recovery.

•

Simulation models help design objective synergy-based rehabilitation intervention.

•

Robotics: a beneficial way to apply the model-guided, synergy-based rehabilitation.

Abstract

Modular organization of human movement has been studied for several decades using muscle synergy analysis. Whether the reduction in control dimensionality calculated by muscle synergy analysis is of neural origin or only a mathematical construct remains controversial. Nonetheless, sufficient empirical evidence exists to support the potential utility of muscle synergy analysis for assessing and treating motor impairment. This paper reviews recent advances in the use of muscle synergy analysis to assess post-stroke motor impairment, assess stroke rehabilitation effectiveness, and design stroke rehabilitation approaches. Synergy-based rehabilitation strategies that attempt to correct impaired neuromuscular coordination have emerged only recently. Expansion of this promising area will likely require integration of muscle synergy concepts, patient-specific neuromusculoskeletal models, and rehabilitation robotics to identify optimal synergy changes and implement effective post-stroke training protocols that induce them.

View full text

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Effect of long-term use of ankle-foot orthoses on tibialis anterior muscle electromyography in patients with sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial

I would disagree with the conclusion. Long term use of an AFO will affect your muscle recovering its intended function.  Use it or lose it as your doctor will tell you. 

Peter Levine does a much better explanation of prolonged AFO use;

AFO after stroke: Once its on there, its on there for life.

But you can't listen to anyone but your doctor. 

The latest here:

Effect of long-term use of ankle-foot orthoses on tibialis anterior muscle electromyography in patients with sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (formerly the Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) , Volume 51(1) , Pgs. 11-17.

NARIC Accession Number: J81525.  What's this?
ISSN: 1650-1977.
Author(s): Nikamp, Corien; Buurke, Jaap; Schaake, Leendert; van der Palen, Job; Rietman, Johan; Hermens, Hermie.
Publication Year: 2019.
Number of Pages: 7.
Abstract: Study examined the effects of long-term use of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) after stroke and whether early or later provision of AFOs affects muscle activity. Twenty-six subjects with unilateral hemiparetic stroke were assigned randomly to either early (at inclusion; week 1) or delayed (8 weeks later; week 9) provision of AFOs. Tibialis anterior electromyography was measured with and without AFOS in weeks 1, 9, 17 and 26. In a single measurement, use of an AFO significantly reduced the activity levels of the tibialis anterior muscle during the swing phase compared with walking without an AFO. During the 26-week follow-up, no changes were found in tibialis anterior muscle activity in the swing phase without an AFO, both within-groups and between-groups. After 26 weeks, no differences were found in tibialis anterior muscle activity between both groups in the swing phase, with or without AFOs. This study found that AFO use reduced muscle activity levels compared with walking without an AFO within 1 measurement. However, long-term use of an AFO for a period of 26 weeks did not affect muscle activity. Early or delayed provision of ankle-foot orthoses did not affect the findings. This study did not find any negative effects on activity of the tibialis anterior muscle with long-term use of an AFO early after stroke. The results indicate that there is no need to fear negative consequences on tibialis anterior-activity because of long-term AFO-use (early) after stroke.
Descriptor Terms: ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, EARLY INTERVENTION, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, LIMBS, MUSCLES, ORTHOTICS, OUTCOMES, STROKE.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/abstract/10.2340/16501977-2498.

Citation: Nikamp, Corien, Buurke, Jaap, Schaake, Leendert, van der Palen, Job, Rietman, Johan, Hermens, Hermie. (2019). Effect of long-term use of ankle-foot orthoses on tibialis anterior muscle electromyography in patients with sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (formerly the Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) , 51(1), Pgs. 11-17. Retrieved 9/17/2019, from REHABDATA database.
 

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

How to Overcome Synergistic Movement After Stroke (When One Movement Leads to Many) from Flint Rehab

Peter Levine has these four blog posts on synergy, so you can compare and use the best.  

I need to work on this yet since I still have some synergies, except that life and fun gets in the way of rehab. Happiness is the goal of life per Rupert Spira and therapy does not provide me with happiness. So for right now living life takes precedence.

How to Overcome Synergistic Movement After Stroke (When One Movement Leads to Many) from Flint Rehab

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Having More Daughters Independently Predicts Home Discharge in Stroke Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation Ward

You better plan for this decades in advance. Thanks for pointing this out Peter. 

Having More Daughters Independently Predicts Home Discharge in Stroke Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation Ward


Open Access funded by Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
Under a Creative Commons license

Summary

Background

The predictors for failure of home discharge after post-acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation need investigation.

Methods

With this retrospective case-control study conducted in a stroke rehabilitation unit in one tertiary hospital, data of 297 eligible stroke patients regarding patient demographics, family information, disease and function were collected. The primary outcome was failure of home discharge.

Results

One hundred and eighteen of 297 stroke patients (mean age 63 years, 37% women) failed to discharge home, including 109 admitted to rehabilitation hospitals and 9 to long-term care facilities. An inverse trend existed between numbers of daughters and the risk of failure of home discharge: having three or more daughters significantly lowers the risks for poor discharge destination (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23, 95% confidence interval, 0.07–0.72; test for trend, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Having more daughters independently predicts home discharge after post-acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation.