Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label electrical stimulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label electrical stimulation. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

Early intervention with electrical stimulation reduces neural damage after stroke in non-human primates

 This means your competent? doctor and hospital will IMMEDIATELY GET HUMAN TESTING GOING! Oh no, they're incompetently DOING NOTHING!

Early intervention with electrical stimulation reduces neural damage after stroke in non-human primates


Abstract

For patients experiencing ischemic stroke, acute intervention offers the most critical therapeutic opportunity as it can reduce irreversible tissue injury and improve functional outcomes. However, currently available treatments within the acute window are highly limited and have strict patient selection criteria. Although emerging neuromodulation techniques have been proposed as a treatment for chronic stroke, acute stimulation is rarely studied due to concerns about exacerbating ischemia-induced electrical instability. Here, we demonstrate that acute cortical electrical stimulation, administered one hour post-stroke, provides neuroprotection in non-human primate brains. Using advanced electrophysiology and histology tools, we found that applying continuous theta burst electrical stimulation directly adjacent to the ischemic lesion significantly reduced neural activity in the surrounding tissue, as evidenced by lower electrocorticography signal power and c-Fos expression. This reduced depolarization was accompanied by decreases in neuroinflammation and infarct volume in the sensorimotor cortex. These findings suggest that acute electrical stimulation may serve as a safe and effective early intervention, offering a promising therapeutic strategy to improve outcomes in ischemic stroke.


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Electrical stimulation as a means for achieving recovery of function in stroke patients

It's been 13 years, has your stroke hospital done ONE DAMN THING with this? How long will you allow incompetency to last? Your stroke hospital president must think forever is the correct answer. So call your stroke hospital president and ream her/him out for not solving stroke.You obviously don't have a functioning stroke doctor or hospital.

 

Electrical stimulation as a means for achieving recovery of function in stroke patients

2009, NeuroRehabilitation
  Dejan B. Popovi´c a,b,∗
, Thomas Sinkjær c
and Mirjana B. Popovi´c a,b,d
a  Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
b Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia
c  Danish National Research Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
d  Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

. This review presents technologies used in and assesses the main clinical outcomes of electrical therapies designed to speed up and increase functional recovery in stroke patients. The review describes methods which interface peripheral systems (e.g., cyclic neural stimulation, stimulation triggered by electrical activity of muscles, therapeutic functional electrical stimulation) and transcranial brain stimulation with surface and implantable electrodes. Our conclusion from reviewing these data is that integration of electrical therapy into exercise-active movement mediated by electrical activation of peripheral and central sensory-motor mechanisms enhances motor re-learning following damage to the central nervous system. Motor re-learning is considered here as a set of processes associated with practice or experience that leads to long-term changes in the capability for movement. An important suggestion is that therapeutic effects are likely to be much more effective when treatment is applied in the acute, rather than in the chronic, phase of stroke.

Saturday, September 11, 2021

Function electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke

 And you really think there is any chance insurance will pay for these expensive interventions when you are chronic and long past being plateaued out of insurance? They talk improved NOT 100% recovery so massive amounts of research yet to do.

Function electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke

Abstract

Background

Novel stroke rehabilitation techniques that employ electrical stimulation (ES) and robotic technologies are effective in reducing upper limb impairments. ES is most effective when it is applied to support the patients’ voluntary effort; however, current systems fail to fully exploit this connection. This study builds on previous work using advanced ES controllers, and aims to investigate the feasibility of Stimulation Assistance through Iterative Learning (SAIL), a novel upper limb stroke rehabilitation system which utilises robotic support, ES, and voluntary effort.

Methods

Five hemiparetic, chronic stroke participants with impaired upper limb function attended 18, 1 hour intervention sessions. Participants completed virtual reality tracking tasks whereby they moved their impaired arm to follow a slowly moving sphere along a specified trajectory. To do this, the participants’ arm was supported by a robot. ES, mediated by advanced iterative learning control (ILC) algorithms, was applied to the triceps and anterior deltoid muscles. Each movement was repeated 6 times and ILC adjusted the amount of stimulation applied on each trial to improve accuracy and maximise voluntary effort. Participants completed clinical assessments (Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test) at baseline and post-intervention, as well as unassisted tracking tasks at the beginning and end of each intervention session. Data were analysed using t-tests and linear regression.

Results

From baseline to post-intervention, Fugl-Meyer scores improved, assisted and unassisted tracking performance improved, and the amount of ES required to assist tracking reduced.

Conclusions

The concept of minimising support from ES using ILC algorithms was demonstrated. The positive results are promising with respect to reducing upper limb impairments following stroke, however, a larger study is required to confirm this.

 

Sunday, December 1, 2019

Effects of Combining Electric Stimulation With Active Ankle Dorsiflexion While Standing on a Rocker Board: A Pilot Study for Subjects With Spastic Foot After Stroke

'Can' is not good enough. We need EXACT STROKE PROTOCOLS leading to recovery. 

Effects of Combining Electric Stimulation With Active Ankle Dorsiflexion While Standing on a Rocker Board: A Pilot Study for Subjects With Spastic Foot After Stroke

Ju-Shao Cheng, MS, Yea-Ru Yang, PhD, Shih-Jung Cheng, MD, Pei-Yi Lin, MS, Ray-Yau Wang, PhD, PT

ABSTRACT. 

 Effects of combining electric stimulation with active ankle dorsiflexion while standing on a rocker board: a pilot study for subjects with spastic foot after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:505-12.Objective:
 To investigate the therapeutic effects of combining electric stimulation (ES) with active ankle dorsiflexion while standing on a rocker board in subjects with plantar flexor spasticity after stroke.
Design:
 Randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
 A rehabilitation medical center.
Participants:
 Subjects (N=15) with spastic foot after stroke.
Interventions:
 Subjects were randomly assigned to an experimental or a control group. The experimental group received ES of ankle dorsiflexors in concert with a motor training paradigm that required the subject to dorsiflex the ankles in response to a cue while standing on a rocker board. After 30minutes of this exercise, subjects received ambulation training focusing on ankle control for 15 minutes. The control group received general range of motion and strength exercises for 30minutes, followed by 15 minutes of ambulation training focusing on ankle control. Sessions occurred 3 times a week for 4weeks.
Main Outcome Measures:
 Dynamic spasticity of plantar-flexors, dorsiflexor muscle strength, balance performance, gait kinematics, and functional gait performance as assessed by the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile (EFAP) were used as out-come measurements.
Results:
 The experimental group demonstrated a greater decrease in dynamic ankle spasticity at a comfortable gait speed (P=.049), a greater improvement in spatial gait symmetry (P=.015), and a greater improvement in functional gait ability as indicated by the EFAP (P=.015) than the control group.
Conclusions:
 Our results suggest that repeated ES with volitional ankle movements can decrease dynamic ankle spasticity in subjects with stroke. Furthermore, such improvement parallels better gait symmetry and functional gait performance.
.015) than the control group.
Conclusions:
 Our results suggest that repeated ES with volitional ankle movements can decrease dynamic ankle spasticity in subjects with stroke. Furthermore, such improvement parallels better gait symmetry and functional gait performance.

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Electrical stimulation devices for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: Preliminary studies of physiological efficacy and user satisfaction

I wish they would just write a protocol on  which method of leg compressions is best. Maybe one of these: 6 and 7 years and nothing done. Your hospital is totally fucking incompetent.  Every single hospital should be disputing what I'm saying but they won't. They don't even know I exist criticizing their complete existence.

Leg compressions may enhance stroke recovery August 2012

Leg wraps raise hopes of saved lives after strokes May 2013 

Your doctor and hospital not knowing and implementing these easy interventions is the very pinnacle of incompetence.

 

Electrical stimulation devices for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: Preliminary studies of physiological efficacy and user satisfaction

Journal of Rehabilitation and Assitive Technologies Engineering , Volume 5 , Pgs. 1-7.

NARIC Accession Number: J81494.  What's this?
ISSN: 2055-6683.
Author(s): Badger, James; Taylor, Paul; Papworth, Neil; Swain, Ian.
Publication Year: 2018.
Number of Pages: 7.
Abstract: Study explored the effects of electrical stimulation and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on enhancing lower-limb venous return in healthy individuals and chronic stroke patients, and also evaluate patient and nurse satisfaction with electrical stimulation devices. Researchers investigated the effectiveness of two electrical stimulation devices, Geko (Firstkind Ltd, High Wycombe, UK) and Orthopaedic Microstim 2V2 (Odstock Medical Ltd, Salisbury, UK); and one IPC device: Huntleigh Flowstron Universal (Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd, Cardiff, UK). The three interventions were applied to 12 healthy volunteers and 5 chronic stroke patients. The devices were fitted sequentially, and Doppler ultrasound measurements were taken. Eight patients and nurses were also recruited for a separate usability evaluation. The electrical stimulation devices emulated the blood flow characteristics of IPC in both healthy and stroke participants provided that the intensity of electrical stimulation was sufficient. Patients and nurses also felt that the electrical stimulation devices were acceptable. Findings suggest that electrical stimulation may offer benefit as an alternative method for venous thromboembolism prevention in stroke survivors.

Friday, May 17, 2019

Firing Up the Neural Symphony

Scientists are racing to treat brain disabilities with electrical stimulation. Here’s a metaphor to help make sense of the progress.
Colored x-rays of a 61-year-old with Parkinson’s disease, showing the electrodes of a deep-brain stimulator. The science of brain stimulation is moving fast, but many puzzles remain.CreditZephyr/Science Source


Image
Colored x-rays of a 61-year-old with Parkinson’s disease, showing the electrodes of a deep-brain stimulator. The science of brain stimulation is moving fast, but many puzzles remain.CreditCreditZephyr/Science Source


The research on brain stimulation is advancing so quickly, and the findings are so puzzling, that a reader might feel tempted to simply pre-order a genius cap from Amazon, to make sense of it all later.
In just the past month, scientists reported enhancing the working memory of older people, using electric current passed through a skullcap, and restoring some cognitive function in a brain-damaged woman, using implanted electrodes. Most recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved a smartphone-size stimulator intended to alleviate attention-deficit problems by delivering electric current through a patch placed on the forehead.
Last year, another group of scientists announced that they, too, had created a brain implant that boosts memory storage. All the while, a do-it-yourself subculture continues to grow, of people who are experimenting with placing electrodes in their skulls or foreheads for brain “tuning.”
Predicting where all these efforts are headed, and how and when they might converge in a grand methodology, is an exercise in rank speculation. Neuro-stimulation covers too many different techniques, for various applications and of varying quality. About the only certainties are the usual ones: that a genius cap won’t arrive anytime soon, and that any brain-zapping gizmo that provides real benefit also is likely to come with risk.


Advertisement
Nevertheless, the field is worth watching because it hints at some elementary properties of brain function. Unlike psychiatric drugs, or psychotherapy, pulses of current can change people’s behavior very quickly, and reliably. Turn the current on and things happen; turn it off and the effect stops or tapers.
To begin to appreciate the latest science, it helps to have a working picture of the brain’s electrical system — a metaphor. Metaphors can be dicey when applied to the brain; they’re inherently inadequate by nature, and choosing one risks endorsing an intervention, including brain stimulation, with unknown risks.
An orchestra metaphor is a good place to start. A brain humming along well is a Mozart-like production, with many diverse, specialized neural instruments synchronizing with each other to create a sense of unity.
“In conducting, in each moment, you’re working to coordinate all instruments to play in the same tempo, with the same intensity,” said James Conlon, music director of the Los Angeles Opera and principal conductor of the RAI National Symphony Orchestra in Torino, in a phone interview. “I continually switch between listening, leading and following: back and forth and back, approving the sound, receiving or making adjustments.”
Brain scientists often liken brain function to a symphony. “If you watch an orchestra perform, once the performance starts, the cello player is looking at the person next to him, or her, not the conductor,” said Michael Gazzaniga, a psychologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara. “The same thing is likely happening in the brain. The question for me is, does the brain have a conductor.”



The crudest form of electrical intervention is electroconvulsive therapy, or E.C.T., which sends a seizure-inducing current through the brain, providing at least temporary relief to some people with severe depression. Doctors have used E.C.T. for nearly a century, although the treatment remains controversial for many patients. Metaphorically speaking, E.C.T. is akin to halting the orchestra’s 
performance and sending the musicians , from oboe to timpani, home to get some rest and come back tomorrow refreshed.
A more targeted form of electrical therapy, called deep brain stimulation, or D.B.S., has been used to manage conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. In D.B.S., an electrode is threaded into a specific area of the brain that is being disruptive; stimulating it, paradoxically, knocks out activity in that specific region.
If a particularly strong section is off-key, “it can affect the entire system, and the whole orchestra sounds off,” said Dr. Helen Mayberg, director of the Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics at Mt. Sinai’s medical school; she has developed D.B.S. strategies for severe depression. “You can think of it as firing everyone in that section” — sending the percussion home permanently — Dr. Mayberg said. “Precision is absolutely critical.”.
The recent brain-stimulation studies employ a technique distinct from either E.C.T. or D.B.S., but which still can be understood in terms of an orchestra. In one of the studies, scientists at Boston University found that they could improve working memory in older adults by optimizing what’s called rhythmic “coupling” between frontal and temporal cortex areas in a person’s brain.
In the brain, the activities of distant regions coordinate by means of low-frequency theta waves. The researchers used electric stimulation, delivered through a skullcap, to amplify these waves, enhancing coordination between the two brain regions and, in older adults, improving working memory.
“We think what we’re doing is essentially synchronizing these two separated areas,” said Robert M.G. Reinhart, a neuroscientist at Boston University and one of the authors of that study. In effect, the stimulation acts as an orchestra conductor, listening, synthesizing and leading.
In another recent study, a team of brain scientists found that they could blunt or reverse symptoms of fatigue, poor concentration and mental fogginess in a woman who had suffered a severe brain injury in a car accident 18 years earlier. They did so by providing steady current, during waking hours, through two electrodes implanted on either side of the thalamus, a deep brain region often described as a central switching center of the brain. Metaphorically, they turned up the volume — or, perhaps, they had the conductor clap her hands and fix a hard stare on the musicians.


Of course, a metaphor is just a metaphor, and only one step toward decoding the intimate mystery of consciousness. But in this age of technological onslaught, of ever higher-tech therapies and claims small and large, better to have some guide to the mind in mind than none at all.



Thursday, December 20, 2018

Variation of Finger Activation Patterns Post-stroke Through Non-invasive Nerve Stimulation

Way too many big words used to have any clue on how to explain this to therapists and doctors for our use.  I see no objective damage diagnosis that would point to which patients this would work on. Without that, this research is not repeatable and thus useless. 

Variation of Finger Activation Patterns Post-stroke Through Non-invasive Nerve Stimulationh

  • Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
Purpose: A transcutaneous proximal nerve stimulation technique utilizing an electrode grid along the nerve bundles has previously shown flexible activation of multiple fingers. This case study aimed to further demonstrate the ability of this novel stimulation technique to induce various finger grasp patterns in a stroke survivor.
Methods: An individual with chronic hemiplegia and severe hand impairment was recruited. Electrical stimulation was delivered to different pairs of an electrode grid along the ulnar and median nerves to selectively activate different finger flexor muscles, with an automated electrode switching method. The resultant individual isometric flexion forces and forearm flexor high-density electromyography (HDEMG) were acquired to evaluate the finger activation patterns. A medium and low level of overall activation were chosen to gauge the available finger patterns for both the contralateral and paretic hands. All the flexion forces were then clustered to categorize the different types of grasp patterns.
Results: Both the contralateral and paretic sides demonstrated various force clusters including single and multi-finger activation patterns. The contralateral hand showed finger activation patterns mainly centered on median nerve activation of the index, middle, and ring fingers. The paretic hand exhibited fewer total activation patterns, but still showed activation of all four fingers in some combination.
Conclusion: Our results show that electrical stimulation at multiple positions along the proximal nerve bundles can elicit a select variety of finger activation patterns even in a stroke survivor with minimal hand function. This system could be further implemented for better rehabilitative training to help induce functional grasp patterns or to help regain muscle mass.

Introduction

Following a stroke, a majority of individuals have paresis due to a loss of excitatory input and subsequent complications, such as disuse atrophy (1) and altered spinal organization (24). This loss of voluntary control of muscle activation often limits activities of daily living. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been widely utilized both in the clinic and in research settings to help restore atrophied muscle and lost functions (57). Electrical stimulation has been particularly successful with post-stroke survivors for functional recovery (810). Research in NMES also aims to restore functional activation of muscles, such as the restoration of hand grasps (11).
Traditionally, NMES uses large electrode pads, targeting the distal branches of the nerve, known as the motor point stimulation (12). Although stimulation of the motor point is straightforward methodologically, NMES is limited to localized muscle activation, which limits its functional efficacy and also leads to rapid muscle fatigue (13). Advances in NMES techniques to alleviate these issues involve various multi-electrode techniques, which can stimulate multiple small regions of the muscle to help distribute the current and potentially activate more muscle fibers (14, 15). Crema et al. has also demonstrated flexible activation of multiple fingers using a multi-electrode array across the forearm and hand (16). Other approaches to NMES involve stimulation of the nerve bundle prior to branching and innervating a muscle, which has shown to allow for a larger area of muscle activation and potentially reduce long-term fatigue effects (1719).
Recent developments have demonstrated the capabilities of an alternative non-invasive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation method targeting the ulnar and median nerves proximal to the elbow to flexibly activate individual and multiple fingers (20, 21). In addition, this technique shows the ability to delay the force decline (22, 23). A stimulation electrode grid placed along the two nerves allows us to activate different muscles or muscle portions to elicit varied desired movements, but manually switching between different electrode pairs is time-consuming. To shorten this process, an automated electrode pair searching method has been developed and tested on intact control subjects (24). This new method can further categorize the total available sets of finger activation patterns across the entire electrode grid, providing valuable information on electrode selection and the force generation capacity of stroke muscles. However, the efficiency of this method has not been tested on stroke survivors. Therefore, this case study recruited a control subject and a stroke survivor with severe weakness of the right arm, and evaluated the available finger activation patterns of the subjects. Our results showed varied activation of multiple fingers from both subjects. Further development of this stimulation technique can provide valuable alternatives to current rehabilitation for the restoration of hand movements.

Monday, November 26, 2018

Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results

Well then, write it up as a stroke protocol and distribute it around the world. Failure to do so should result in being boycotted from further research. Lack of actions should have consequences.

Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results 


First Published October 9, 2018 Research Article
The combination of motor imagery (MI) and afferent input with electrical stimulation (ES) enhances the excitability of the corticospinal tract compared with motor imagery alone or electrical stimulation alone. However, its therapeutic effect is unknown in patients with hemiparetic stroke. We performed a preliminary examination of the therapeutic effects of MI + ES on upper extremity (UE) motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
A total of 10 patients with chronic stroke demonstrating severe hemiparesis participated. The imagined task was extension of the affected finger. Peripheral nerve electrical stimulation was applied to the radial nerve at the spiral groove. MI + ES intervention was conducted for 10 days. UE motor function as assessed with the Fugl–Meyer assessment UE motor score (FMA-UE), the amount of the affected UE use in daily life as assessed with a Motor Activity Log (MAL-AOU), and the degree of hypertonia in flexor muscles as assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were evaluated before and after intervention. To assess the change in spinal neural circuits, reciprocal inhibition between forearm extensor and flexor muscles with the H reflex conditioning-test paradigm at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 0, 20, and 100 ms were measured before and after intervention.
UE motor function, the amount of the affected UE use, and muscle hypertonia in flexor muscles were significantly improved after MI + ES intervention (FMA-UE: p < 0.01, MAL-AOU: p < 0.01, MAS: p = 0.02). Neurophysiologically, the intervention induced restoration of reciprocal inhibition from the forearm extensor to the flexor muscles (ISI at 0 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 20 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 100 ms: p = 0.01).
MI + ES intervention was effective for improving UE motor function in patients with severe paralysis.

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Tickling the brain with electrical stimulation improves memory, study shows

You may want this, tickling sounds so benign. Is it anything like tickling rat whiskers to improve their stroke rehabilitation? 

Tickling the brain with electrical stimulation improves memory, study shows

By Susan Barber Lindquist
ROCHESTER, Minn. — Tickling the brain with low-intensity electrical stimulation in a specific area can improve verbal short-term memory. Mayo Clinic researchers report their findings in Brain.
The researchers found word recall was enhanced with stimulation of the brain’s lateral temporal cortex, the regions on the sides of the head by the temples and ears. Patients recalled more words from a previously viewed list when low-amplitude electrical stimulation was delivered to the brain. One patient reported that it was easier to picture the words in his mind for remembering.
“The most exciting finding of this research is that our memory for language information can be improved by directly stimulating this underexplored brain area,” says Michal Kucewicz, Ph.D., a Mayo Clinic researcher in the Department of Neurology and co-first author. Dr. Kucewicz compares the stimulation to “tickling” the brain.
Memory impairments are a prevalent, costly problem in many brain diseases. Medication and behavioral therapies have limited effectiveness in many cases. “While electrical stimulation of the brain is emerging as potential therapy for a wide range of neurological and psychiatric diseases, little is known about its effect on memory,” says Gregory Worrell, M.D., Ph.D., a Mayo Clinic neurologist and senior author of the article.
The Mayo researchers are part of a multicenter collaboration led by Michael Kahana, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. This collaboration includes seven academic medical centers.
“The next step for this project is to determine how to best apply electrical current in terms of the exact location within this area of the brain, timing and parameters of stimulation,” says Brent Berry, M.D., Ph.D., a Mayo Clinic researcher in the Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering and co-first author.
In this Brain paper, Drs. Kucewicz and Berry, and colleagues focused their study on four areas of the brain known to support memory for facts and events that can be consciously recalled.
The memory testing was done with patients undergoing evaluation for surgery to address seizures. These patients agreed to have their memory investigated using the electrodes implanted in their brains for surgical evaluation. It is common for people with epilepsy to have memory problems because the brain circuits that underlie memory function often are affected by epilepsy.
In the study, patients were instructed to read a list of words ─ one at a time ─ from a computer screen. Electrical stimulation was applied some of this time. Patients then attempted to freely recall the words in any order.
Among 22 patients, the researchers found enhanced memory performance in the four patients with stimulation of the lateral temporal cortex but not among those with the other brain regions stimulated.
“These findings may lead to new stimulation devices that treat deficits in memory and cognition,” says Jamie Van Gompel, M.D., a Mayo Clinic neurosurgeon specializing in brain sitmulation and an author in the study.
The authors note study limitations include pain and seizure medications that may affect patient performance, the hospital setting that may disrupt patients’ sleep and wake cycles, and the fact that epilepsy affects memory.
Additional authors of the study are Laura R. Miller, Mayo Clinic; Fatemeh Khadjevand, M.D., Mayo Clinic; Youssef Ezzyat, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania; Joel Stein, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania; Vaclav Kremen, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic and Czech Technical University; Benjamin Brinkmann, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic; Paul Wanda, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania; Michael Sperling, M.D., Jefferson University Hospitals; Richard Gorniak, M.D., Jefferson University Hospitals; Kathryn Davis, M.D., University of Pennsylvania; Barbara Jobst, M.D., Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Robert Gross, Ph.D., Emory University; Bradley Lega, Ph.D., University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Squire Stead, M.D., Ph.D., Mayo Clinic; and Daniel Rizzuto, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania.
The research was funded in part by Defense Advanced Research Project Agency’s Restoring Active Memory program.
###
About Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic is a nonprofit organization committed to clinical practice, education and research, providing expert, comprehensive care to everyone who needs healing. Learn more about Mayo Clinic. Visit the Mayo Clinic News Network.
Media contact:

Thursday, April 27, 2017

DARPA Wants to Hack Your Brain to Make You Learn Faster

A great stroke association would take the results from here and create a stroke protocol to get survivors 100% recovered. But since we have fucking failures of stroke associations instead this won't be occurring. You are on your own. 

DARPA Wants to Hack Your Brain to Make You Learn Faster


If the brain is just a bunch of wires and circuits, it stands to reason that those components can simply be re-wired in order to create a better, smarter us. At least, that’s the theory behind a new project from the military’s secretive DARPA research branch announced on Wednesday, which aims to enhance human cognitive ability by activating what’s known as “synaptic plasticity.”
Recent research has suggested that stimulating certain peripheral nerves—those that relay signals between the brain, the spinal cord and the rest of the body—can enhance a person’s ability to learn, by triggering the release of neurochemicals that reorganize connections in the brain. Through its new Targeted Neuroplasticity Training program, DARPA is is funding eight different research efforts that seek to enhance learning by targeting those nerves with electrical stimulation. The end goal is to translate those findings into real-world applications that boost military training regimens—allowing a soldier, to say, soak up a new language in months instead of years. Should DARPA figure out a way to do that, its efforts will likely go on to impact all of us.
“TNT aims to deliver new knowledge of the neural processes that regulate cognitive functions associated with learning,” Doug Weber, the program’s manager, told Gizmodo. In other words, DARPA wants to study the basic biology at work here, and eventually, design neurostimulation devices that exploit our biological wiring to enhance learning.
One DARPA-funded team, at Johns Hopkins University, will focus on speech and hearing. These researchers will be experimenting with vagal nerve stimulation, exploring whether this can accelerate learning a new language. Another team at the University of Florida will study how vagal nerve stimulation impacts perception, executive function, decision-making, and spatial navigation in rodents. Yet another at Arizona State University will stimulate the trigeminal nerve, and study how that impacts visual, sensory and motor functions of military volunteers studying intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, marksmanship and decision-making.
Already, there are plenty of products on the market that claim to offer cognitive, psychological, and physical performance enhancement. (Basketball’s Golden State Warrior’s, for one, are known to rely on brain-zapping for a purported edge in their game.) But there is little understanding of how these devices work—and many scientists suspect they don’t. The aim of the DARPA program is to settle this debate, testing the efficacy of both implanted and non-invasive devices to understand not only whether they actually work, but if so, how.
“We are starting with a bit of knowledge about how the peripheral nerves are wired, but relatively little knowledge about the effects of neurostimulation on their function,” Weber said.
If, it turns out, there is a sufficient link between neurostimulation and improvements in learning, the second phase of the program will work to design devices that enhance training in foreign language learning, image analysis, and spatial navigation tasks.
“Most computer analogies for the brain idea are bad,” said Michael Kilgard, the lead researcher on the University of Texas at Dallas project. “But there really are wires from point A to point B. When you cut those wires you lose function. But after they’re cut they can make new connections. We have technologies now that allow us to see those connections.”
Kilgard’s work has, until recently, focused on repairing damaged circuits. Areas of research like deep brain stimulation (which involves implanting a chip deep in the brain) and transcranial direct stimulation (which changes brain chemistry using non-invasive electrical stimulation) have seen some success in using electricity to correct faulty wiring to, say, help treat mental health conditions. Kilgard has had success using targeted plasticity therapy to treat PTSD.
“Our idea was, after brain injury how do you get better? What you really need is to rewire circuits,” he said. “This is the next logical step. If you can help recover function you’ve lost, can you increase the rate at which you learn new things?”
Eventually, he envisions a device that, for a few hundred bucks, will non-invasively allow anyone to pick up a language at an accelerated pace. Under the current grant, he hopes to in five years have a (likely much more expensive) version of that device ready for FDA approval.
But there are plenty of hurdles. For one, that any of this will even work is still little more than an educated guess.
“We are leveraging state-of-art tools for probing the molecular and cellular processes underlying these functions, but even the most advanced instrumentation is limited,” said Weber.
What’s more, the very premise of the research is likely to stoke fears that DARPA is creating a race of cognitively enhanced super soldiers. The agency has several other brain projects in the works, which seek to use implanted chips to treat mental illness as well as to restore memories and movement to battle-wounded soldiers. For now, the aim of the program is to just give our brain’s a little boost—allowing us to learn a new skill maybe, say, 30% faster than we would naturally. But even the use of brain stimulants like Ritalin or Modafinil readily available on today’s college campuses is controversial.
Critics argue that such enhancement defies human nature. Supporters say that seeking out enhancement is human nature. The new research makes this debate, on how far we as a society are willing to take human cognitive enhancement, all the more urgent.
“Issues related to safety, equal access to the technology, and freedom of choice are often the earliest topics considered when new, breakthrough technologies are created,” Weber said. “It’s important that we carefully consider the broader impact of this work.”

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Study establishes extent of human brain excited by specific dose of electricity

You'll have to ask your doctor to get the protocol for this.
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-12-extent-human-brain-specific-dose.html#

Until now, no quantitative relationship between the level of electricity applied to the brain and the extent of neural activity generated has been plotted in humans.
Researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine have determined the amount of human brain tissue that is excited by a given dose of .
"We have, for the first time in humans, established a dose-response curve that applies to electrical stimulation rather than to drugs," said Josef Parvizi, MD, PhD, associate professor of neurology and neurological sciences.
The findings, described in a study published online Dec. 8 in Neuron, may guide the therapeutic application of electrical brain stimulation via surgically implanted, current-emitting devices.
Parvizi is the senior author of the study. The lead author is former Stanford postdoctoral scholar Jonathan Winawer, PhD, now an assistant professor of psychology at New York University.
Devices delivering defined therapeutic doses of electricity to structures within the brain are now in widespread commercial use for countering the tremors of Parkinson's disease and controlling seizures in epilepsy patients, and are approved for some patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Similar devices are undergoing clinical testing for other conditions, including depression and Tourette's syndrome.
"We often try to correct a problem occurring in some tiny part of the brain's complicated circuitry by administering a drug," said Parvizi. "However, instead of reaching the cells you want to target, much or most of the drug may wind up in the skin, bone, muscle, liver and elsewhere, not to mention brain cells you don't want to target." That can cause all kinds of side effects.
'Immense potential'
"Electrical brain stimulation, targeting only a specific malfunctioning brain circuit, has immense potential to change medical practice," Parvizi said. "But figuring out just how much current will be effective without recruiting unwanted brain circuitry and inducing side effects has been largely guesswork."
To get a more accurate picture, the new study focused on part of the brain's surface called the , one of the most well-studied regions of the human brain. Located in the back of the brain on the facing inner surfaces of that organ's two hemispheres, the primary is the first docking station for visual information from the retina.
Each nerve cell in the primary visual cortex receives its information from a fixed location in the retina and responds to an object observed at a given position in a person's visual field. The precision with which this correspondence has already been mapped out makes the primary visual cortex an ideal place to examine just how far the effects of a given electrical input propagate along the brain's surface.
Parvizi, who directs Stanford's Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, was taking care of four adult patients under his evaluation at Stanford Health Care to determine the point of origin of their recurring, drug-refractory epileptic seizures. In this procedure, a portion of the skull is temporarily removed and a grid of electrodes is placed on the brain's surface in order to record seizure activity and pinpoint the spot in the brain where it begins.
Each of these four patients' primary visual cortex, while perfectly healthy, was partially covered by the electrode grids.
Mapping phosphenes
Investigators showed them geometric forms moving across a computer screen while they stared at the center of the screen. Using brain-imaging techniques, the researchers mapped which areas of the participants' primary visual cortex these displays activated.
Once electrode grids were in place, the team used them to stimulate and to record activity in the participants' primary visual cortex. After each stimulation, they asked the participants to chart the location and size of the hallucinatory phenomena, or phosphenes, they experienced in their in response to electrical stimulation.
A phosphene is a visual sensation in the absence of light. Some phosphenes look like a flickering, fractured formation composed of small zigzagging lines of color dancing at a specific location in the field of vision. (For people prone to migraines, such apparitions often herald the onset of a painful headache.) Others may just be a burst of light or color. (People often "see" phosphenes when they rub their closed eyes.) It's long been known that activating the primary visual cortex by direct electrical stimulation can produce phosphenes, which persist for the duration of the stimulation and then vanish.
The investigators, always taking care to adhere to strict safety limits, pulsed electrical current from one or another electrode at varying frequencies, pulse widths, amplitudes and durations while the participants stared at the center of the computer screen. After each instance of stimulation, they were asked to draw on the computer screen, using its trackpad, the outline of the phosphene they saw in its perceived location. Then, using the imaging-derived maps of the individuals' primary visual cortexes they'd constructed earlier, the researchers were able to connect points on the observed phosphenes to corresponding points on participants' primary visual cortex, and to infer from phosphenes' sizes and locations just how much brain-surface area in that brain region had been excited by each electrode-delivered stimulation.
"The resulting dose-response relationship can be used now in clinical trials of electrical brain stimulation," Parvizi said.
Scientists have tried to establish this relationship in rodents, said Winawer. "But you can't easily extrapolate from rodent studies, both because our brains are quite different from theirs and because the recording and stimulating instruments used in rodent experiments are 1,000-fold different from those used in humans."
Nor have connections between the physiologically measureable outcome and perceptual outcome been previously mapped to any extent. (Animals can't report what they see.)
"Notably, we observed a clear correspondence between the amount of electricity applied and the size and intensity of the ensuing visual phenomena subjects reported experiencing," said Parvizi, who has long been fascinated by the question of how manipulating the brain's strictly material components alters subjective consciousness.
How well the dose-response relationship as measured at the cortical surface holds up in deep-brain structures remains to be further tested, he added.
More information: Jonathan Winawer et al. Linking Electrical Stimulation of Human Primary Visual Cortex, Size of Affected Cortical Area, Neuronal Responses, and Subjective Experience, Neuron (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.008
Journal reference: Neuron search and more info website
Provided by: Stanford University Medical Center search and more info website

Monday, November 14, 2016

Hand Function After Stroke Is Improved By Electrical Stimulation

Well fuck then just write up a godamned protocol on it and publish it worldwide. But you won't. This is where a lack of a complete database of all research and stroke protocols are failing stroke survivors and no one will do anything about that.

WAITING ONCE AGAIN FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.


http://www.doctortipster.com/36881-hand-function-stroke-improved-electrical-stiimulation.html
A new electrical stimulation remedy helped stroke survivors with hand weakness improve hand dexterity greater than an existing stimulation approach, in line with new studies in the American Heart Association’s journal Stroke.
Approximately 800,000 people within the United States of America have strokes every year, according to the American Heart Association. Stroke generally results in some paralysis or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can result in survivors having difficulties in executing function. A common remedy in stroke rehabilitation uses low tiers of electrical current to stimulate the paralyzed muscle groups to open the hand, enhance muscle power and likely repair hand function. Stimulation intensity, cycle timing, and repetitions are set by a therapist.

Electrical Stimulation

In the new experimental therapy discovered by researchers at the MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University and the Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center, sufferers manage the stimulation to their vulnerable hand by wearing a glove with sensors on the opposite, unaffected hand. When the affected person opens their unaffected hand, they receive a corresponding amount of stimulation that opens their susceptible stroke-affected hand. This places the affected person in control of their hand and permits them to participate in therapy with the help of electrical stimulation.
According to Jayme S. Knutson, Ph.D., senior author of the study and an assistant professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in Cleveland, Ohio, Based on positive findings from our previous studies, we sought to determine if the new glove-controlled hand stimulation therapy could be more effective than the common therapy in improving hand dexterity in patients who are more than six months past their stroke
Researchers enrolled 80 stroke survivors. For 12 weeks, half of the survivors received remedy using the new glove, and the remainder received the common remedy. Both groups used an electrical stimulator on their own at home for 10 hours every week, plus three hours per week training hand tasks with an occupational therapist in the lab. Hand feature was measured earlier and after remedy with a standard dexterity test that measured the number of blocks members can pick out up, elevate over a barrier and launch in some other place on a desk within a 60 second duration. They determined that sufferers who acquired the new therapy had extra improvement at the dexterity test (4.6 blocks) than the common institution (1.8 blocks). Patients who had greater improvements in hand dexterity following the new therapy have been much less than two years post-stroke and had at least a few finger movements when they started the study. These sufferers saw a development of 9.6 blocks on the dexterity test, compared to 4.1 blocks in the common group.
Sufferers without a finger movement additionally noticed upgrades in arm movement after the new remedy. At the end of treatment, 97 percent of the subjects who obtained the new therapy agreed that they might use their hand greatly than on the start of the study.
Due to the fact that the therapy is new and this was a single-site study, researchers do not know if similar outcomes may also be seen in other rehab centers. They plan to perform a multi-site study to verify their consequences, as well as measure quality of life enhancements for sufferers. And whilst the researchers speculate that the new remedy can be converting neural connections within the brain that manage hand dexterity, extra research is yet to prove what consequences it is able to have on the central nervous system.
The study additionally demonstrates that stroke sufferers can correctly use technology for self-administered therapy at home. According to Knutson, Home-based therapy is becoming increasingly important to offset increasing healthcare costs and to meet the need for high doses of therapy that are critical for attaining the best outcomes. The more therapy a patient can get the better potential outcome they will get.  Once again not getting to the root cause of these problems. Dead and damaged neurons which would be vastly lessened by stopping the neuronal cascade of death by these 5 causes in the first week.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Implanted neuroprosthesis for multi-joint control can improve mobility among stroke survivors

One at a time solutions for 10 million survivors a year. You have got to be fucking kidding me. 'Happy talk' for one person and the other 10 million should feel good about stroke progress.
'I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.'
http://www.news-medical.net/news/20160601/Implanted-neuroprosthesis-for-multi-joint-control-can-improve-mobility-among-stroke-survivors.aspx 

A surgically implanted neuroprosthesis—programmed to stimulate coordinated activity of hip, knee, and ankle muscles—has led to substantial improvement in walking speed and distance in a patient with limited mobility after a stroke, according to a single-patient study in the American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, the official journal of the Association of Academic Physiatrists. The journal is published by Wolters Kluwer.
"An implanted stimulation system for multi-joint control is a promising intervention to provide assistance to stroke survivors during daily walking," write Nathaniel S. Makowski, PhD, and colleagues of the Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center. With technical refinements and further research, such implanted neuroprosthesis systems might help to promote walking ability for at least some patients with post-stroke disability.
Initial Experience Shows 'Clinically Relevant Improvements in Gait'
The researchers report their experience with an implanted neuroprosthesis in a 64-year-old man with impaired motion and sensation of his left leg and foot after a hemorrhagic (bleeding) stroke. After thorough evaluation, he underwent surgery to place an implanted pulse generator and intramuscular stimulating electrodes in seven muscles of the hip, knee, and ankle.
Dr. Makowski and colleagues then created a customized electrical stimulation program to activate the muscles, with the goal of restoring a more natural gait pattern. The patient went through extensive training in the researchers' laboratory for several months after neuroprosthesis placement.
In a 'before-and-after' study design, the patient showed significant gains in walking speed and distance. Gait speed increased from 0.29 meters per second (m/s) before surgery, to 0.35 m/s after training but without muscle stimulation—a nonsignificant improvement.
But when muscle stimulation was turned on, gait speed increased dramatically: to 0.72 m/s. Detailed analysis of the patient's walking ability also showed evidence of a "more symmetrical and dynamic gait."
In addition, the patient was able to walk much farther. When first evaluated, he could walk only 76 meters before becoming fatigued. After training but without stimulation, he could walk about 300 meters (in 16 minutes). With stimulation, the patient's maximum walking distance increased to more than 1,400 meters (in 41 minutes) with stimulation. "Thus his walking distances increased by 370 percent with stimulation while walking nearly twice as fast," Dr. Makowski and colleagues write.
Even though the patient wasn't walking with stimulation outside the laboratory, his walking ability in daily life improved significantly. He went from "household-only" ambulation to increased walking outside in the neighborhood.
"The therapeutic effect is likely a result of muscle conditioning during stimulated exercise and gait training," according to the authors. "Persistent use of the device during walking may provide ongoing training that maintains both muscle conditioning and cardiovascular health."
While the results of this initial experience in a single patient are encouraging, the researchers emphasize that large-scale studies will be needed to demonstrate the wider applicability of a neuroprosthesis for multi-joint control. If the benefits are confirmed, Dr. Makowski and colleagues conclude, "Daily use of an implanted system could have significant clinical relevance to a portion of the stroke population."
Source:
Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins