Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label nursing home. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nursing home. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

New Stroke Rehab Certification Enhances Care at Nursing Homes

You fucking blithering idiots; survivors don't want 'care', they want recovery and results. This is why the AHA/ASA is worthless, they do nothing for survivors. Survivors want 100% recovery! GET THERE!

New Stroke Rehab Certification Enhances Care at Nursing Homes

American Heart Association

Stroke is a leading cause of serious long-term disability in the U.S. and approximately 795,000 people each year experience a new or recurrent stroke, according to the American Heart Association's 2023 statistical update. A new certification offered by the American Heart Association, the world's leading voluntary organization focused on heart and brain health for all, can help skilled nursing facilities support faster and more effective recovery from stroke through standardized coordination, adherence and implementation of evidence-based care.

The new Skilled Nursing Facility Stroke Rehabilitation Certification provides a framework for evaluating skilled nursing facilities against the American Heart Association's rigorous science-based requirements for stroke rehabilitation, including program management, patient and caregiver education and support, care coordination, clinical management and quality improvement.

"Participation in this certification benefits the patient and the facility by standardizing care practices," said Pamela Duncan, PhD, PT, FAPTA, FAHA, volunteer chair of the American Heart Association's Skilled Nursing Facility Stroke Rehabilitation Certification Oversight Workgroup. "When there are evidence-based processes during every phase of care, patients have the best opportunity for positive outcomes. This certification will help patients and their loved ones choose a facility that follows these important best practices."

As the Association celebrates 100 years of service in 2024, this new certification demonstrates its commitment to improving people's futures.

This certification was developed as the result of an initiative funded by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust to develop and implement American Heart Association Post-Acute Stroke Care Quality Standards program in rehabilitation facilities.

To be eligible for this certification, freestanding skilled nursing facilities or swing beds in critical access hospitals must be in the United States or a U.S. territory and implement a stroke rehabilitation program that uses a standardized method of delivering clinical care based on current evidence-based guidelines. Learn more about this certification and others at www.Heart.org/CertifiedCare.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause 30-Day Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With COVID-19

 Your doctor's responsibility is to make sure you are not impaired cognitively or physically so you have a lower chance of dying from COVID-19.

Your doctor needs EXACT STROKE PROTOCOLS to recover your lost 5 cognitive years from the stroke.

You are pretty much screwed on physically recovering since only 10% get to rehab full recovery

Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause 30-Day Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With COVID-19

JAMA Intern Med. Published online January 4, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7968
Key Points

Question  What patient characteristics are associated with 30-day all-cause mortality among symptomatic nursing home residents with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?

Findings  In this cohort study of 5256 US nursing home residents with COVID-19, increased age, male sex, and impaired cognitive and physical function were independent risk factors for all-cause 30-day mortality.

Meaning  This cohort study of 5256 nursing home residents suggests that several characteristics, including sociodemographic characteristics, symptoms, comorbidities, and physical and cognitive functional impairments, can facilitate risk stratification among nursing home residents with COVID-19.

Abstract

Importance  The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected nursing homes. Vulnerable nursing home residents are at high risk for adverse outcomes, but improved understanding is needed to identify risk factors for mortality among nursing home residents.

Objective  To identify risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality among US nursing home residents with COVID-19.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study was conducted at 351 US nursing homes among 5256 nursing home residents with COVID-19–related symptoms who had severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing between March 16 and September 15, 2020.

Exposures  Resident-level characteristics, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, symptoms, chronic conditions, and physical and cognitive function.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Death due to any cause within 30 days of the first positive SARS-CoV-2 test result.

Results  The study included 5256 nursing home residents (3185 women [61%]; median age, 79 years [interquartile range, 69-88 years]; and 3741 White residents [71%], 909 Black residents [17%], and 586 individuals of other races/ethnicities [11%]) with COVID-19. Compared with residents aged 75 to 79 years, the odds of death were 1.46 (95% CI, 1.14-1.86) times higher for residents aged 80 to 84 years, 1.59 (95% CI, 1.25-2.03) times higher for residents aged 85 to 89 years, and 2.14 (95% CI, 1.70-2.69) times higher for residents aged 90 years or older. Women had lower risk for 30-day mortality than men (odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.80]). Two comorbidities were associated with mortality: diabetes (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05-1.40]) and chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.33 [95%, 1.11-1.61]). Fever (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.41-1.96]), shortness of breath (OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 2.00-3.16]), tachycardia (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.04-1.64]), and hypoxia (OR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.68-2.50]) were also associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Compared with cognitively intact residents, the odds of death among residents with moderate cognitive impairment were 2.09 (95% CI, 1.68-2.59) times higher, and the odds of death among residents with severe cognitive impairment were 2.79 (95% CI, 2.14-3.66) times higher. Compared with residents with no or limited impairment in physical function, the odds of death among residents with moderate impairment were 1.49 (95% CI, 1.18-1.88) times higher, and the odds of death among residents with severe impairment were 1.64 (95% CI, 1.30-2.08) times higher.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this cohort study of US nursing home residents with COVID-19, increased age, male sex, and impaired cognitive and physical function were independently associated with mortality. Understanding these risk factors can aid in the development of clinical prediction models of mortality in this population.

 

Saturday, April 6, 2019

Prevalence of upper-limb spasticity and its impact on care among nursing home residents with prior stroke

Yes, we already know spasticity is bad and prevalent. You are not helping any bit here by not providing any protocols or solutions to address the spasticity.  Do you believe like Dr. William M. Landau that spasticity does not need to be treated?  I think his opinion is completely wrong and should be laughed out of existence. There is no survivor that I know of that thinks spasticity is not worth treating.


Spasticity After Stroke: Why Bother?Aug. 2004 

The latest here:

Prevalence of upper-limb spasticity and its impact on care among nursing home residents with prior stroke

Received 21 Aug 2018, Accepted 30 Nov 2018, Published online: 31 Mar 2019
Purpose: Post-stroke spasticity can impair motor function and may cause pain, limb deformity, contracture, and difficulties with limb care. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and burden of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity among nursing home residents.
Materials and methods: A multisite, cross-sectional study was conducted across three nursing home facilities. Participants included residents with a confirmed diagnosis of stroke, and nursing staff involved in their care. Residents were assessed using the Tardieu Scale, passive range-of-motion, Abbey Pain scale, Modified Rankin Scale and observation of limb position and skin condition. Nursing staff completed the Arm Activity Measure (ArmA).
Results: 264 individuals were screened, 51 had a diagnosis of stroke (19.3%), and 23 consented to participate. 16 participants (70%) demonstrated upper-limb spasticity of at least one joint, median Tardieu score 2 [IQR 2–3]. Pain scores and nurse-rated passive ArmA were significantly higher for patients with spasticity compared to those without (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Greater spasticity correlated with higher pain (rs =0.44) and ArmA scores (rs =0.71).
Conclusions: A high proportion (70%) of nursing home residents with stroke demonstrated upper-limb spasticity, associated with pain and passive care difficulties. These data suggest there is an unmet need for spasticity management(Wrong, it needs to be cured. You are just being lazy by suggesting management, knowing nothing exists. YOU have to create a solution.  GET CRACKING.)  among nursing-home residents.
  • Implications for rehabilitation
  • Upper-limb spasticity is prevalent among nursing home residents with prior stroke; here, observed in 70% of cases.
  • Spasticity was associated with increased pain and more difficult passive limb care in this population.
  • There is an unmet need for spasticity management among nursing home residents with prior stroke.
  • Efforts should be made to improve access to multidisciplinary spasticity treatment for this vulnerable patient population.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was received from the Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Australasian College of Physicians via an AFRM Fellows Ipsen Research Development Grant.

Thursday, August 16, 2018

Induced Disability in Nursing Home Patients: A Controlled Trial

You'll have to hope your doctor isn't encouraging 'learned helplessness' or  infantilization . You should be hearing that stroke recovery will likely be the hardest thing you will ever have to do. Everything post-stroke is hard, you'll have to suck it up and just accomplish what you need to do regardless of difficulty. Failure only happens when you don't try again. 
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1982.tb02839.x
First published: June 1982
Cited by: 71
Supported in part by grant No. 7362 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and by grant No. MH 32946 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Abstract

Many performance deficits observed in institutionalized elderly patients may be the result of social and environmental factors rather than disease or the aging process. To test this hypothesis, 72 nursing home residents (mean age, 78 years) were randomly assigned to three groups for training in completion of a simple psychomotor task. In four training sessions, members of Group I (“helped”) were given extensive assistance in completing the task; members of Group II (“encouraged only”) were given verbal encouragement but minimal assistance; members of Group III (“no contact”) received no training sessions and served as controls. All subjects were tested on proficiency in completion of the task (a simple jigsaw puzzle) before and after the intervention period. Completeness of performance by Group II improved during the study, but that of Group I deteriorated significantly (P = 0.04 between groups) to a level even below that of the control group (P = 0.03). Similar differences were found in speed of performance, with Group II performing best, Group I performing worst (P = 0.05), and the control group performing intermediately. Perception of task difficulty was greater (P = 0.02) and self‐confidence was less (P = 0.06) for Group I than for Group II. The psychosocial environment of long‐term facilities can have important effects on the competence of elderly patients. Excessive infantilization of residents and overly intrusive help in self‐care beyond clinical requirements can lead to “learned helplessness,” with further disability.

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

AHCA refutes recommendations that most stroke patients should skip nursing homes

This would be so simple to resolve. Publish stroke recovery and protocol efficacy statistics for each institution. But that won't occur unless YOU start screaming for it. Otherwise you get the useless statements that they follow Get With the Guidelines or are Joint Commission certified. Make them prove their results.
http://www.mcknights.com/news/ahca-refutes-recommendations-that-most-stroke-patients-should-skip-nursing-homes/article/498293/
Long-term care's largest provider group is firing back over a “frustrating” recommendation that the majority of stroke patients should be treated in an inpatient rehabilitation facility rather than a nursing home.
The recommendations, released earlier this month by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, stated that stroke patients should receive care in an inpatient rehabilitation facility “whenever possible,” unless they have a health condition that would require more skilled nursing care.
Those recommendations only focused on the “minimum capabilities” of nursing homes, and failed to take into account facilities that focus on rehabilitation and demonstrate positive outcomes for stroke patients, Dan Ciolek, associate vice president of therapy advocacy for the American Health Care Association, told McKnight's.
“Some SNFs have focused on rehab care and have changed what they do, and may be able to do it at the level of an IRF,” Ciolek said. “The underlying thing is that the assumption that people can't get better going to a nursing home needs to be stopped.
Providers who do offer increased levels of therapy should focus on showing evidence of how many stroke patients they treat, how many of them return home with improved function and other evidence of positive outcomes. That evidence can help set nursing facilities apart, and show stroke patients and hospitals which local providers can give the best services for their needs, Ciolek noted.
“It's frustrating that the perception is that level of care can't be provided,” he said.
Despite the outcry from providers, the intention of the recommendations wasn't to dispute the value of skilled nursing care, Joel Stein, M.D., co-chairman of the stroke guidelines committee, told McKnight's.
“All of the studies [used in the recommendation] rather consistently found that outcomes for stroke patients are better in acute-level rehabilitation than in skilled nursing rehabilitation,” Stein said. “I would certainly not dispute the value of SNF care, the guidelines were not intended for that.”
Skilled nursing care isn't a “bad thing” for the “right” stroke patients, although the guidelines focus on patients who qualify for and have access to acute rehabilitation, Stein added. He also acknowledged that some skilled nursing facilities can provide as much therapy as an inpatient rehabilitation facility.
The AHA/ASA recommendations may still cause doubts among patients who do go to nursing homes for care after a stroke, and push people to “ignore” the facilities' therapy qualifications, Ciolek noted.
“The great majority of people that have strokes do get IRF care but not all do,” he said. “People that end up going to a SNF for care shouldn't feel like they're getting secondary, lower-level care.”
The quality of care provided by skilled nursing facilities is one of several hot-button issues AHCA members are expected to tackle during today's Congressional briefing.


Monday, May 23, 2016

In-patient rehab recommended over nursing homes for stroke rehab

Well what do you expect? The ASA would recommend in-patient because their constituency(doctors and therapists) would have more employment this way.
http://newsroom.heart.org/news/in-patient-rehab-recommended-over-nursing-homes-for-stroke-rehab
Statement Highlights
  • The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has issued its first guidelines on adult stroke rehabilitation calling for intensive, multidisciplinary treatment.
  • Before leaving the hospital, patients and caregivers should receive a formal falls-prevention program to prevent accidents at home.
  • Whenever possible, initial rehabilitation should take place in an inpatient rehabilitation facility rather than a nursing home.
Embargoed until 3 p.m. CT / 4 p.m. ET Wednesday, May 4, 2016
DALLAS, May 4, 2016 — For the first time, guidelines have been developed by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association for rehabilitation after a stroke.
“Previous guidelines have focused on the medical issues involved in the initial management of stroke, but many people survive a stroke with some level of disability. There is increasing evidence that rehabilitation can have a big impact on the survivors’ quality of life, so the time is right to review the evidence in this complex field and highlight effective and important aspects of rehabilitation,” said Carolee J. Winstein, Ph.D., P.T., lead author of the new scientific statement published in the American Heart Association journal Stroke.
Whenever possible, the American Stroke Association strongly recommends that stroke patients be treated at an in-patient rehabilitation facility rather than a skilled nursing facility. While in an in-patient rehabilitation facility, a patient participates in at least three hours of rehabilitation(a pathetic amount of time) a day from physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists. Nurses are continuously available and doctors typically visit daily. An in-patient rehabilitation facility may be a free-standing facility or a separate unit of a hospital.
“If the hospital suggests sending your loved one to a skilled nursing facility after a stroke, advocate for the patient to go to an in-patient rehabilitation facility instead – unless there is a good reason not to – such as being medically unable to participate in rehab. There is considerable evidence that patients benefit from the team approach in a facility that understands the importance of rehabilitation during the early period after a stroke,” said Winstein, who is a professor of biokinesiology and physical therapy at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, California.
Caregivers should also insist that a stroke survivor not be discharged from the hospital until they have participated in a structured program on preventing falls. This includes education about changes to make the home safer (such as removing throw rugs and improving lighting), minimizing the fall risk resulting from the side effects of medication, and safely using assistive devices such as wheelchairs, walkers and canes.
“This recommendation will probably change medical practice. Even the top stroke centers may not have a formal falls-prevention program, but it is very important because a high percentage of patients end up falling after a stroke,” Winstein said.
Other recommendations include:
  • Intense mobility-task training after stroke for all survivors with walking limitations to relearn activities such as climbing stairs.
  • Individually tailored exercise program so survivors can safely continue to improve their cardiovascular fitness through the proper exercise and physical activity after formal rehabilitation is complete.
  • An enriched environment (which might include a computer, books, music and virtual reality games) to increase engagement and cognitive activities during rehabilitation. There is not yet enough research to determine whether specific promising new techniques, such as activity monitors and virtual reality games, are effective at helping patients.
  • Speech therapy for those with difficulty speaking following a stroke.
  • Eye exercises for survivors with difficulty focusing on near objects.
  • Balance training program for survivors with poor balance, or who are at risk for falls.
“For a person to fulfill their full potential after stroke, there needs to be a coordinated effort and ongoing communication between a team of professionals as well as the patient, family and caregivers,” Winstein said.
The new scientific statement is the eighth set of stroke guidelines from the American Stroke Association, completing the association’s recommendations for the continuum of care for stroke patients and their families.
Co-authors are Joel Stein, M.D., vice-chair; Ross Arena, Ph.D., P.T.; Barbara Bates, M.D., M.B.A.; Leora R. Cherney, Ph.D.; Steven C. Cramer, M.D.; Frank Deruyter, Ph.D.; Janice J. Eng, Ph.D., B.Sc.; Beth Fisher, Ph.D., P.T.; Richard L. Harvey, M.D.; Catherine E. Lang, Ph.D., P.T.; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, B.Sc.; M.Sc.P.T., Ph.D.; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, Ph.D., O.T.R.; Sue Pugh, M.S.N., R.N., C.N.S.-B.C.; Mathew J. Reeves, Ph.D., D.V.M.; Lorie G. Richards, Ph.D., O.T.R./L.; William Stiers, Ph.D., A.B.P.P. (R.P.); Richard D. Zorowitz, M.D.; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Author disclosures are on the manuscript.
Additional Resources:
###
The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association receives funding mostly from individuals. Foundations and corporations donate as well, and fund specific programs and events. Strict policies are enforced to prevent these relationships from influencing the association’s science content. Financial information for the American Heart Association, including a list of contributions from pharmaceutical companies and device manufacturers, is available at www.heart.org/corporatefunding.
For Media Inquiries: (214) 706-1173
Darcy Spitz: (212) 878-5940; Darcy.Spitz@heart.org
Julie Del Barto (national broadcast): (214) 706-1330; julie.delbarto@heart.org
For Public Inquiries: (800)-AHA-USA1 (242-8721)
heart.org and strokeassociation.org