Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 33,991 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Friday, July 24, 2026
BCKDK, A Novel Hypoxia-Responsive Kinase That Exacerbates Cerebral Ischemia Injury
Monday, July 13, 2026
Correlations of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index with the risk for early-onset post-stroke depression in patients with minor stroke: a prospective observational study
Why work on this rather than PREVENTING DEPRESSION WITH EXACT 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS?
Don't your mentors and senior researchers know the correct way to deal with problems? Prevent them!
Correlations of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index with the risk for early-onset post-stroke depression in patients with minor stroke: a prospective observational study
- W
Wei Zhao 1†
Mingzhu Deng 2†
Zhen Wang 1
Guohua He 1
Wei Xu 1
- T
Tieqiao Feng 1
- J
Jian Peng 1
Kangping Song 1
- L
Ling Xiao 1*
Fangyi Li 1*
1. Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, Hunan, China
2. Department of Neurology, The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
Abstract
Background:
Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of post-stroke depression (PSD). However, the relationship between novel systemic inflammatory indices-the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI)-and early-onset PSD remains inadequately explored.
Methods:
Early-onset PSD was diagnosed 2 weeks after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Depression severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17); patients with scores ≥7 were classified into the early-onset PSD group. Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to evaluate associations of SII and SIRI with HAMD-17 scores across all participants. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the independent associations of SII and SIRI with early-onset PSD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess the SII and SIRI capacity to differentiate early-onset PSD.
Results:
Of the 1,113 prospectively enrolled patients, 372 (33.42%) were diagnosed with early-onset PSD. HAMD-17 scores showed significant positive correlations with SII (r = 0.440, p < 0.001) and SIRI (r = 0.418, p < 0.001). Both SII (OR = 1.762, 95% CI: 1.261–1.946, p < 0.001) and SIRI (OR = 1.672, 95% CI: 1.348–1.932, p = 0.004) emerged as independent predictors of early-onset PSD. The areas under the curve (AUC) for SII, SIRI, and their combination were 0.767, 0.718, and 0.807, respectively.
Conclusion:
SII and SIRI may serve as independent risk factors for early-onset PSD. These indices offer potential utility for risk stratification and could inform prevention strategies and prognosis management in this patient population.
More at link
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Towards routine biomechanical data collection in stroke rehabilitation: a usability comparison of IMU and markerless motion capture systems for functional upper-limb assessments
'Assessments' DO NOTHING FOR RECOVERY! With no protocols based on the assessment; THIS WAS COMPLETELY FUCKING USELEESS! You're all fired! You, your mentors and senior researchers are obviously clueless on how to get survivors recovered! I'd suggest basket weaving for your mental capacity.
Towards routine biomechanical data collection in stroke rehabilitation: a usability comparison of IMU and markerless motion capture systems for functional upper-limb assessments
We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Abstract
Objective measurement of upper-limb movement quality based on biomechanical data collected in clinical routine has the potential to enable precision neurorehabilitation at scale. However, integrating biomechanical data collection into daily clinical workflows remains challenging. In this exploratory study, we evaluated the usability of two technologies for routine kinematic data collection: an IMU-based version of the instrumented Action Research Arm Test (iARAT-IMU) and a MMC markerless motion capture (MMC) system. First, five physiotherapists independently operated the iARAT-IMU across seven clinical routine assessment sessions at a rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland to quantify learning curves, setup times, and usability. Second, we conducted a preference study in which the same therapists used both, the IMU- and MMC-system, during a standardized drinking task and completed quantitative and qualitative usability assessments focusing on system preference and underlying reasons. Results show that therapists rapidly learned to operate the tablet application for scoring the iARAT; however, the IMU system added approximately 11 min of setup time and sometimes required assistance. In contrast, the MMC workflow required approximately 2 min of additional time - well within the 5-minute maximum indicated a priori by therapists as acceptable for clinical routine and received consistently higher usability ratings. Most therapists preferred this approach due to greater efficiency and reduced patient burden. These findings highlight important design considerations for future digital assessment tools and indicate that MMC systems may offer a more feasible pathway toward routine biomechanical data collection for upper-limb assessments in clinical neurorehabilitation.
Towards routine biomechanical data collection in stroke rehabilitation: a usability comparison of IMU and markerless motion capture systems for functional upper-limb assessments
'Assessments' DO NOTHING FOR RECOVERY! With no protocols based on the assessment; THIS WAS COMPLETELY FUCKING USELEESS! You're all fired! You, your mentors and senior researchers are obviously clueless on how to get survivors recovered! I'd suggest basket weaving for your mental capacity.
Towards routine biomechanical data collection in stroke rehabilitation: a usability comparison of IMU and markerless motion capture systems for functional upper-limb assessments
We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Abstract
Objective measurement of upper-limb movement quality based on biomechanical data collected in clinical routine has the potential to enable precision neurorehabilitation at scale. However, integrating biomechanical data collection into daily clinical workflows remains challenging. In this exploratory study, we evaluated the usability of two technologies for routine kinematic data collection: an IMU-based version of the instrumented Action Research Arm Test (iARAT-IMU) and a MMC markerless motion capture (MMC) system. First, five physiotherapists independently operated the iARAT-IMU across seven clinical routine assessment sessions at a rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland to quantify learning curves, setup times, and usability. Second, we conducted a preference study in which the same therapists used both, the IMU- and MMC-system, during a standardized drinking task and completed quantitative and qualitative usability assessments focusing on system preference and underlying reasons. Results show that therapists rapidly learned to operate the tablet application for scoring the iARAT; however, the IMU system added approximately 11 min of setup time and sometimes required assistance. In contrast, the MMC workflow required approximately 2 min of additional time - well within the 5-minute maximum indicated a priori by therapists as acceptable for clinical routine and received consistently higher usability ratings. Most therapists preferred this approach due to greater efficiency and reduced patient burden. These findings highlight important design considerations for future digital assessment tools and indicate that MMC systems may offer a more feasible pathway toward routine biomechanical data collection for upper-limb assessments in clinical neurorehabilitation.
Sunday, June 7, 2026
A Compact Wearable sEMG–FES System for Bilateral Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
No clue what this can do to get survivors recovered. A complete failure of the mentors and senior researchers to state EXACTLY what stroke research is for; TO GET SURVIVORS RECOVERED!
No protocols delivered or results discussed; so useless!
A Compact Wearable sEMG–FES System for Bilateral Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
Abstract:
Stroke-related upper limb motor impairment frequently leads to chronic muscle weakness and reduced functional mobility, significantly affecting patients’ independence and quality of life. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) combined with surface electromyography (sEMG) feedback has shown significant potential in promoting neuroplasticity and supporting motor recovery by reinforcing the association between voluntary intention and muscle activation. However, existing systems typically rely on multiple independent devices for signal acquisition, processing and stimulation. This fragmented architecture increases cost, size, latency and integration complexity. This work presents a new wearable hardware platform that integrates sEMG acquisition and FES delivery within a single compact module. The proposed solution embeds an ADS1299- based front-end for low-noise sEMG recording and a digitally controlled high-voltage stimulator, enabling simultaneous acquisition and stimulation in two muscle groups. The platform supports a bilateral closed-loop rehabilitation paradigm in which voluntary sEMG activity recorded from the dominant arm is used to drive FES delivered to the contralateral limb. In this study, a trigger-based control strategy is adopted, whereby stimulation is activated when the root mean square (RMS) of the processed sEMG signal exceeds an adaptive threshold, and preliminary experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed system for bilateral sEMG-driven FES applications in post-stroke rehabilitation.Friday, May 29, 2026
Endovascular Therapy for Medium-Vessel Occlusion Stroke — Narrowing the Target Population
Don't you know the goal is to leave no survivor behind AND provide EXACT 100% recovery protocols? Or did your mentors and senior researchers incompetently fail to tell you about survivor goals? NOT YOUR DOCTOR OR THERAPISTS GOALS!
Endovascular Therapy for Medium-Vessel Occlusion Stroke — Narrowing the Target Population
Abstract
Subscribe to access this content
Monday, May 25, 2026
Association between intracranial arterial stenosis severity and recurrent stroke risk in elderly ischemic stroke patients
Why do 'association' research instead of EXACTLY PREVENTING this problem from occurring? Your mentors and senior researchers incompetently didn't tell you that stroke research is supposed to solve survivors problems?
Association between intracranial arterial stenosis severity and recurrent stroke risk in elderly ischemic stroke patients
- Z
Zhen Tao 1
Hongwei Guo 2*
- Y
Yingying Liu 2
Jun-Bin Yin 2
Hu Huai Qiang 2
- H
Haowen Lu 2
1. No. 971 Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Navy, Qingdao, China
2. Department of Neurology, The 960(th) Hospital of Joint Logistics Support, PLA, Jinan, China
Abstract
Background and aim:
Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke in older adults and is associated with substantial risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events. Whether increasing ICAS severity confers incremental recurrence risk in medically treated elderly patients in routine clinical practice remains incompletely characterized. This study aimed to investigate the association between intracranial arterial stenosis severity and 12-month recurrent stroke risk in elderly patients with ischemic stroke.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective cohort study screened 614 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older who were admitted with acute ischemic stroke between January 2022 and December 2023. After predefined exclusions, 527 patients were included in the final analysis. Intracranial arterial stenosis was assessed using computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography and categorized as none-to-mild (<50%; including no stenosis), moderate (50–69%), or severe (≥70%) according to the highest-grade lesion. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke within 12 months. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate independent predictors of recurrence.
Results:
Among the 527 included patients, recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 86 (16.3%) during 12-month follow-up. Recurrence rates increased stepwise across stenosis categories, occurring in 18/214 (8.4%) patients with none-to-mild stenosis, 29/173 (16.8%) with moderate stenosis, and 39/140 (27.9%) with severe stenosis (p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, vascular risk factors, stroke subtype, baseline NIHSS score, and medication use, severe ICAS remained independently associated with recurrent stroke (adjusted OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.85–5.26, p < 0.001); moderate stenosis was also independently associated with recurrence (adjusted OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.04–3.69, p = 0.037).
Conclusion:
In elderly patients with ischemic stroke, greater intracranial arterial stenosis severity is independently associated with higher 12-month recurrence risk despite contemporary medical management. These findings support early vascular imaging and risk stratification in elderly patients with ischemic stroke.
