Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 34,032 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain!trillions and trillions of neuronsthatDIEeach day because there areNOeffective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
So the research was incomplete, since nothing tells us how this gets us recovered. Further research needed that your doctors and hospital should initiate. NO EXCUSES!
Acute
stroke leads to the activation of myeloid cells. These cells express
adhesion molecules and transmigrate to the brain, thereby aggravating
injury. Chronically after stroke, repair processes, including
angiogenesis, are activated and enhance post-stroke recovery. Activated
myeloid cells express CD13, which facilitates their migration into the
site of injury. However, angiogenic blood vessels which play a role in
recovery also express CD13. Overall, the specific contribution of CD13
to acute and chronic stroke outcomes is unknown.
Methods
CD13
expression was estimated in both mice and humans after the ischemic
stroke. Young (8–12 weeks) male wild-type and global CD13 knockout (KO)
mice were used for this study. Mice underwent 60 min of middle cerebral
artery occlusion (MCAO) followed by reperfusion. For acute studies, the
mice were euthanized at either 24- or 72 h post-stroke. For chronic
studies, the Y-maze, Barnes maze, and the open field were performed on
day 7 and day 28 post-stroke. Mice were euthanized at day 30 post-stroke
and the brains were collected for assessment of inflammation, white
matter injury, tissue loss, and angiogenesis. Flow cytometry was
performed on days 3 and 7 post-stroke to quantify infiltrated monocytes
and neutrophils and CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling.
Results
Brain CD13 expression and infiltrated CD13+ monocytes and neutrophils increased acutely after the stroke. The brain CD13+lectin+
blood vessels increased on day 15 after the stroke. Similarly, an
increase in the percentage area CD13 was observed in human stroke
patients at the subacute time after stroke. Deletion of CD13 resulted in
reduced infarct volume and improved neurological recovery after acute
stroke. However, CD13KO mice had significantly worse memory deficits,
amplified gliosis, and white matter damage compared to wild-type animals
at chronic time points. CD13-deficient mice had an increased percentage
of CXCL12+cells but a reduced percentage of CXCR4+cells and decreased angiogenesis at day 30 post-stroke.
Conclusions
CD13
is involved in the trans-migration of monocytes and neutrophils after
stroke, and acutely, led to decreased infarct size and improved
behavioral outcomes. However, loss of CD13 led to reductions in
post-stroke angiogenesis by reducing CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling.
This would seem to be able to EXACTLY SPECIFY NEURONAL DEATH AT LEAST IN THE FIRST 48 HOURS. With that we could finally quantify the neurons killed off during the neuronal cascade of death. And with that we could beat over the head of stroke leadership that the neuronal cascade of death is worth preventing, because obviously nobody is listening to me.
Maybe your doctor will want you to create your own monocytes which means you will immediately post stroke be able to do sustained exercise. Which means 100% recovery within days. Now that is a BHAG(Big Hairy Audacious Goal, what is your doctor's plan to get there?
Diagnosis and
monitoring of primary brain tumours, brain metastasis and acute
ischaemic stroke all require invasive, burdensome and costly
diagnostics, frequently lacking adequate sensitivity, particularly
during disease monitoring. Monocytes are known to migrate to damaged
tissues, where they act as tissue macrophages, continuously scavenging,
phagocytizing and digesting apoptotic cells and other tissue debris. We
hypothesize that upon completion of their tissue-cleaning task, these
tissue macrophages might migrate via the lymph system to the
bloodstream, where they can be detected and evaluated for their
phagolysosomal contents. We discovered a blood monocyte subpopulation
carrying the brain-specific glial fibrillary acidic protein in glioma
patients and in patients with brain metastasis and evaluated the
diagnostic potential of this finding. Blood samples were collected in a
cross-sectional study before or during surgery from adult patients with
brain lesions suspected of glioma. Together with blood samples from
healthy controls, these samples were flowing cytometrically evaluated
for intracellular glial fibrillary acidic protein in monocyte subsets.
Acute ischaemic stroke patients were tested at multiple time points
after onset to evaluate the presence of glial fibrillary acidic
protein-carrying monocytes in other forms of brain tissue damage.
Clinical data were collected retrospectively. High-grade gliomas (N = 145), brain metastasis (N = 21) and large stroke patients (>100 cm3) (N = 3
versus 6; multiple time points) had significantly increased frequencies
of glial fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ monocytes compared to healthy
controls. Based on both a training and validation set, a cut-off value
of 0.6% glial fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ monocytes was established,
with 81% sensitivity (95% CI 75–87%) and 85% specificity (95% CI
80–90%) for brain lesion detection. Acute ischaemic strokes of
>100 cm3 reached >0.6% of glial fibrillary acidic
protein+CD16+ monocytes within the first 2–8 h after hospitalization and
subsided within 48 h. Glioblastoma patients with >20% glial
fibrillary acidic protein+CD16+ non-classical monocytes had a
significantly shorter median overall survival (8.1 versus 12.1 months).
Our results and the available literature, support the hypothesis of a
tissue-origin of these glial fibrillary acidic protein-carrying
monocytes. Blood monocytes carrying glial fibrillary acidic protein have
a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of brain lesions
and for glioblastoma patients with a decreased overall survival.
Furthermore, their very rapid response to acute tissue damage identifies
large areas of ischaemic tissue damage within 8 h after an ischaemic
event. These studies are the first to report the clinical applicability
for brain tissue damage detection through a minimally invasive
diagnostic method, based on blood monocytes and not serum markers, with
direct consequences for disease monitoring in future (therapeutic)
studies and clinical decision making in glioma and acute ischaemic
stroke patients.
Originally published27 Aug 2018Stroke. 2018;49:2261-2267
The central nervous system and the immune system are tightly interconnected through complex communicating networks.1
Immune cells are distributed in specific central nervous system
compartments. Microglia are the innate immune cells resident in the
brain parenchyma. Macrophages surround the blood vessels and also line
the leptomeninges and the choroid plexus together with dendritic cells
and lymphocytes, among other immune cells, where they play
immunosurveillance functions. Therefore, the immune system keeps a close
watch on brain function and reacts when brain homeostasis is lost
because of injuries or diseases. Sterile organ damage may turn immune
cells into harmful agents and for this reason they are regarded as
targets for therapeutic intervention in acute stroke.2
Stroke induces strong inflammatory reactions involving the local
production of cytokines, such as TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α) by
various brain cells, including human neurons,3
activation of glial and endothelial cells, blood-brain barrier damage,
and infiltration of different types of leukocytes after an orchestrated
time course.4
Given the variety of leukocyte subsets trafficking to the ischemic
brain tissue, this review will focus on neutrophils,
monocyte/macrophages, and T and NK (natural killer) lymphocytes. For
further information, the readers are addressed to previous reviews on
dendritic cells5 and B lymphocytes.6
The different immune cells are considered separately in the next
sections, but leukocyte infiltration surely comprises intercellular
crosstalks by mechanisms that are not entirely known.
Neutrophils
Neutrophils
are among the first cells attracted to the brain after ischemic stroke
where they are detected in the microvessels within the first hour7 and peak at 1 to 3 days.4,7,8
Neutrophils are short-lived innate immune cells containing different
types of granules with antimicrobial pro-oxidant and proteolytic enzymes
that can damage the tissues. Accordingly, neutrophils are regarded as
detrimental following compelling evidence associating these cells with
blood-brain barrier breakdown and brain injury.7,9 Also, higher blood neutrophil counts are associated with larger infarct volumes in acute ischemic stroke patients.10
Nevertheless, the pathogenic role of neutrophils in ischemic stroke is
still not conclusive. For instance, there are conflicting results in the
literature on the potential benefit of neutrophil depletion in
experimental ischemia models.9,11
Furthermore, we lack entire demonstration that neutrophils reach the
ischemic tissue before substantial neuronal death has occurred.11
Nonetheless, neutrophils can exert detrimental effects already from the
vessel wall. Adhesion of neutrophils to the inflamed endothelium after
ischemia/reperfusion is involved in the no-reflow phenomenon,
obstructing blood flow in precapillary arterioles, postcapillary
venules, and the capillary bed.7,12
In addition, neutrophils in the vessel lumen and at perivascular
locations can damage the blood-brain barrier by releasing proteolytic
enzymes and pro-oxidant molecules (Figure).9 Moreover, neutrophils can produce NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps) promoting clot formation.13 NETs can precipitate thrombotic events and impair tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator)-induced thrombolysis.14
In turn, thrombolysis may exacerbate detrimental effects of neutrophils
because tPA promotes neutrophil transmigration to the reperfused tissue
by proteolytic activation of plasmin and matrix metalloproteinases.15
These effects might contribute to explain why neutrophilia and high
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with the risk of
hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with tPA.16
After permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) in mice, we
observed the formation of intravascular NETs and found NETs in
perivascular locations and in the brain parenchyma.17
Figure.
Schematic representation of leukocyte infiltration to the ischemic
brain tissue. Neutrophils are attracted to the activated endothelium and
reach perivascular spaces after extravasation from intracerebral
venules and leptomeningeal vessels. Activated neutrophils are
prothrombotic and can damage the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The presence
of neutrophils in the brain parenchyma is observed only under certain
circumstances, but the conditions determining that neutrophils remain in
perivascular spaces or reach the parenchyma are still poorly defined.
Attracted by certain chemokines, immature proinflammatory monocytes
infiltrate the ischemic tissue where they mature to macrophages, acquire
signs of alternative polarization, and seem to be involved in tissue
repair. Current experimental evidence suggests that lymphocytes, in
particular T cells and γδ T cells, play detrimental roles in the acute
phase of stroke by promoting thromboinflammation and tissue damage.
Natural killer (NK) cells are attracted to the ischemic tissue, but
their function is not fully clear. RBC indicates red blood cells.There
is also some controversy on whether neutrophils actually reach the
ischemic brain parenchyma at all. An elegant study by Enzmann et al18
noticed the massive accumulation of neutrophils in perivascular spaces
surrounding venules within the ischemic tissue after
ischemia/reperfusion in mice. Most neutrophils remained perivascular,
and only a few were detected in the brain parenchyma.18
This is an important observation because it highlights that
perivascular spaces are a niche for neutrophils where they accumulate
after transient MCAo. We also detected neutrophils in perivascular
locations and leptomeningeal spaces in the mouse after permanent MCAo.17
These results suggest that, besides extravasating from intracerebral
venules, neutrophils extravasate from leptomeningeal vessels and migrate
from the subpial space along the vessels penetrating the cortex.17 However, our study17 and previous studies7
found neutrophils in the ischemic brain parenchyma using models of
permanent MCAo. Ischemic conditions involving severe endothelial damage,
vessel rupture, and microbleeds or hemorrhagic transformation, are
expected to facilitate the presence of neutrophils in the brain
parenchyma. Other conditions, such as high blood glucose, also promote
neutrophil infiltration.19 A recent study20
analyzed the postmortem brain of 16 ischemic stroke patients and
confirmed the presence of neutrophils in the leptomeninges and
perivascular spaces, but neutrophils were rare in the infarcted
parenchyma with the exception of 1 patient deceased 3 days after stroke
with no signs of infection. Interestingly, the time to death of this
series of patients was 1 day in 2 cases, 3 days in the case above
mentioned, and then times ranged from 8 days to 240 days poststroke.20
Neutrophils display a specific time-window of attraction to the damaged
tissues after acute injuries, and they have a short life in tissues.
Therefore, the time to death of ischemic stroke patients is critical to
look for the presence of neutrophils in the brain parenchyma. More
studies of human tissue within the first days poststroke are necessary
to understand under which conditions neutrophils might gain access to
the infarcted brain parenchyma.
Despite
many advances, there are aspects of neutrophil behavior in stroke that
are still difficult to interpret. For instance, neutrophils with
anti-inflammatory and repair phenotypes were found in the ischemic brain
tissue of experimental animals,21 neutrophils of ischemic stroke patients show a reduced oxidative burst and NET formation,22 and microglia surrounding blood vessels phagocyte neutrophils.23
The possibility that neutrophils were passive bystanders under some
circumstances but active players in others depending on specific
features of the ischemic lesion needs further consideration.
Monocyte/Macrophages
After
brain ischemia, microglia acquire a reactive morphology resembling
macrophages. Classically, immunohistochemical studies have described the
presence of reactive microglia/macrophages peaking at ≈4 days
postischemia in rats or mice, but it was not possible to distinguish
whether these cells derived from resident microglia or they infiltrated
from the periphery. Nowadays, flow cytometry, cell type-specific
fluorescent reporter mice, adoptive transfer of fluorescent cells,
generation of chimeras, and recently identified specific microglia
markers, allow differentiating resident reactive microglia from
infiltrating macrophages. Monocyte infiltration is detected within the
first 24 hours postischemia, peak at 4 days, and some of these cells
persist for weeks and acquire features of tissue macrophages. Immature
CCR2+Ly6Chi proinflammatory monocytes are the subset of monocytes first attracted to the ischemic brain tissue.24–26
These cells might be released by the bone marrow, but a study reported
that monocytes reaching the ischemic brain originate in the spleen.25
Infiltrating
macrophages were classically associated with inflammation and brain
damage after ischemic stroke. In mice, monocyte infiltration is largely
dependent on CCR2 (C-C motif chemokine receptor type 2), the receptor of
the chemokine CCL2 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 2), also known as MCP1
(monocyte chemoattractant protein 1). To investigate the role of
monocytes, several studies used CCR2-deficient mice or CCR2 inhibitors,
with the limitation that besides the subset of Ly6Chi monocytes other cells, like some T cells, also express CCR2. CCR2-deficiency reduced the ischemic brain lesions in mice.27 Challenging this view, CCR2 drug inhibitors exacerbated the brain lesion.28 Furthermore, anti-CCR2 blocking antibodies impaired spontaneous long-term functional recovery,29 depletion of monocytes/macrophages worsened the ischemic lesion,30 and infiltrating macrophages prevented hemorrhagic transformation of the ischemic lesion.24
By systemic injection of fluorescent monocytes after brain ischemia, we
observed fluorescent cells in the subpial space, and along the vessels
penetrating the cortex,26
supporting the view that a subset of infiltrating macrophages establish
persistent interactions with the blood vessels (Figure).
The
phenotype of activated macrophages depends on the environmental
stimuli. The M1 and M2 phenotypes are prototypical states of macrophage
polarization achieved in culture after exposure to certain cytokines.
The M1 phenotype is proinflammatory whereas the M2 phenotype promotes
resolution of inflammation and repair. Macrophages infiltrating the
ischemic tissue, including the Ly6Clo population and some of the Ly6Chi monocytes, acquire features of alternatively polarized M2 macrophages during the first week postischemia.26,28–30
Studies of human ischemic infarcts reported that macrophages initially
showed proinflammatory features that with lesion maturation transformed
into anti-inflammatory phenotypes.20
Interestingly, a study noticed that after ischemia in mice, the
expression of M2 markers increased within the first week but then
decreased, whereas proinflammatory markers persisted and predominated at
week 2, suggesting a long-lasting inflammatory status.31
The
factors that contribute to the time-dependent changes in macrophage
phenotypes in the ischemic brain tissue are not entirely identified.
Increased anaerobic glycolysis and activation of the hypoxia-inducible
factor-1 are associated with proinflammatory M1 phenotypes, whereas
energy production in M2 phenotypes rather relies on fatty acid
oxidation.32
In M1 activated macrophages, arginine metabolism occurs through
inducible nitric oxide synthase leading to generation of reactive oxygen
and nitrogen species that damage proteins, lipids, and DNA. In
contrast, M2 macrophages metabolize arginine through arginase-1
generating polyamines involved in cell division and collagen synthesis,
among other functions.32
However, under pathological conditions 1 single phenotypic feature may
not be sufficient to attribute any specific phenotype to the cells.
Likely, cellular metabolic adaptations to ischemia and reperfusion
together with the cytokine environment and phagocytic activity have an
impact on the phenotype and function of macrophages and microglia.
Lymphocytes
T Cells
Severe stroke reduces the numbers of lymphocytes in the circulation and lymphoid organs.33 In contrast, T-cell numbers increase in the ischemic brain within the first 24 hours and can persist for long times.4
During the first hours after ischemia/reperfusion, T cells facilitate
adhesion of platelets and leukocytes to the vascular endothelium34 causing a phenomenon called thromboinflammation35
by which molecular and cellular players in thrombosis and coagulation
promote proinflammatory pathways exacerbating the brain lesion.36
However, the interaction of T cells with platelets may also have
hemostatic effects preventing hemorrhagic transformation after severe
ischemic stroke.37 T cells are found in subpial and cortical vessels and infiltrating the ischemic lesion.38,39 In addition, the choroid plexus is a gateway for T cells migrating to the periphery of cortical infarction.40 Importantly, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells were detected in human ischemic infarcts.20 Also, ischemic stroke patients show increased frequency of CD4+CD28null cells in blood associated with stroke severity and serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines.41 CD4+CD28null
T cells are an interesting subset of T cells because they have enhanced
effector functions, are associated with senescent T cells, and expand
under inflammatory conditions.42 At later phases, CD4+ cells accumulate in the brain of mice peaking at day 14 and persisting at day 30 after ischemia/reperfusion.43
Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that antigen-mediated T-cell
responses take place in subacute or chronic stages after stroke and may
worsen stroke outcome.43–47
However, in central nervous system trauma, protective autoimmunity
mediated by T-cell responses is involved in promoting recovery.48
Overall, T cells seem to play innate functions and interact with
players in thrombosis and hemostasis in the acute phase of stroke,
whereas at later stages they exert adaptive functions that could affect
stroke outcome in the long term.
γδ T Cells
Subsets
of unconventional innate T cells with invariant T-cell receptor could
play a role in acute ischemic brain damage. Growing evidence supports
that γδ T cells are pathogenic in experimental brain
ischemia/reperfusion by secreting IL (interleukin)-17 and exacerbating
the inflammatory response.49–51 Moreover, IL-17A+ lymphocytes were detected in the postmortem brain of stroke patients.50 Interestingly, γδ T cells are abundant in the gut from where they seem to traffic to the leptomeninges after brain ischemia.52
T helper 17 cells (Th17) and γδ T cells increase in the blood of stroke
patients in association with increased levels of IL-17A, IL-23, IL-6,
and IL-1β.53
In spite of the fact that IL-17 producing cells are a small subset of
cells, they seem to play a prominent role in orchestrating the
inflammatory response in acute stroke and exacerbating the lesion
(Figure).
Regulatory Lymphocytes
Regulatory
lymphocytes exert immunomodulatory and immunosuppressor functions.
Several lines of evidence support beneficial effects of regulatory T
cells (Treg)54 and regulatory B cells55 in experimental brain ischemia. However, other studies found acute detrimental effects of Treg in brain ischemia/reperfusion56 as previously reviewed.57
Although the number of Treg found in the ischemic brain parenchyma
during the first days poststroke is low, Treg strongly accumulate in the
ischemic lesion 15 days poststroke where potentially they could inhibit
autoimmune responses.43
Increased apoptosis of Tregs, loss of Tregs in peripheral blood, and
impaired suppressive function of the remaining Treg population has been
reported in ischemic stroke patients.53,58,59
However, other studies reported upregulation of Tregs in stroke
patients in spite that decreased Treg function was observed,
particularly in female patients.60 Notably, an increased proportion of Treg cells was reported in the spleen of mice 4 days after transient MCAo.61
NK Cells
NK innate lymphocytes show a rapid and transient increase in the ischemic brain tissue.4,8 A study reported no benefits of depleting NK cells in permanent or transient MCAo.44 In contrast, another study suggested pathogenic actions of NK cells by promoting inflammation and neuronal cytotoxicity.62
This study reported infiltration of NK cells in the ischemic brain
tissue of humans and mice where NK cell numbers peaked as soon as 3
hours postischemia and then declined.62
Interestingly, the β2-nACh-R (nicotinic acetylcholine) receptor seems
to be involved in the NK cell decline observed in the ischemic tissue
from 3 hours postischemia.63
Induced-persistence of NK cells in the ischemic tissue achieved by
interfering with this cholinergic receptor did not modify lesion size
but increased systemic IFNγ (interferon γ), protected from bacterial
infection, and enhanced poststroke survival.63
More studies are needed to validate the putative capacity of brain
infiltrating NK cells to prevent poststroke infection, the role of
central acetylcholine in this process, as well as the suggested rapid
pathogenic effect of NK cells worsening the acute ischemic brain lesion.
Therapeutic Intervention
Strategies
designed to prevent negative actions of leukocytes have been taken to
the clinic in acute ischemic stroke patients but with no success to
date.64 Several studies with drugs blocking the action of neutrophils were investigated.11,64
As an example, the ASTIN trial (Acute Stroke Therapy by Inhibition of
Neutrophils) investigated a compound known as UK-279 276, a recombinant
neutrophil inhibitory factor that selectively binds the CD11b integrin
of macrophage-1 antigen (CD11b/CD18).65
The treatment did not improve recovery above placebo. This trial
followed encouraging results of a few preclinical studies with
UK-279 276 in experimental models of brain ischemia/reperfusion.66 However, only a fifth of patients in the ASTIN trial received tPA.65
Monocyte/macrophages
may acutely exacerbate the inflammatory responses, but experimental
studies have identified their involvement in resolution of inflammation,
vascular protection, and recovery of function,24,27–29
possibly linked to the phagocytic and vasculoprotective roles of these
cells. These protective actions of monocytes are in line with the
beneficial effects of administration of autologous bone marrow–derived
mononuclear cells (MNC) after experimental ischemic stroke.67
MNC contain myeloid and lymphoid cells, as well as hematopoietic and
mesenchymal stem cells. MNC administration 24 hours after MCAo improved
functional recovery, reduced lesion size and proinflammatory cytokines,
and enhanced vessel density and neurogenesis,68 and these benefits were long lasting.69
Furthermore, MNC reduced blood-brain barrier permeability and decreased
the severity of hemorrhagic transformation after tPA in an embolic
stroke model.70 However, MNC therapy did not improve outcome in hypertensive rats.71 MNC reach the periphery of brain infarction soon after administration,68
and then the cells seem to differentiate into smooth muscle cells and
endothelial cells, incorporate into vessel walls, and enhance the growth
of leptomeningeal anastomoses, the circle of Willis, and basilar
arteries.69
Phase I trials administering MNC to ischemic stroke patients have shown
safety, but the clinical efficacy of this cell therapy awaits
demonstration.72
Anti-inflammatory treatments, such as minocycline, have not been successful in the clinic.64 Experimental evidences, including a cross-laboratory preclinical study in mouse models of brain ischemia,73
support the therapeutic potential of the IL-1Ra (IL-1β receptor
antagonist). A recent clinical trial with subcutaneous administration of
IL-1Ra showed safety and reduction of plasma IL-6.74
However, the analysis excluded a major clinical benefit of the
treatment, and negative effects potentially attributable to interactions
of IL-1Ra with tPA became apparent.74
Experimental
studies support damaging effects of T lymphocytes in the acute phase of
stroke. Accordingly, fingolimod, a drug approved for
remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis that sequesters lymphocytes in
the lymph nodes preventing lymphocyte access to the inflamed tissues,
showed beneficial effects in preclinical studies and small clinical
trials in acute ischemic stroke patients, including patients receiving
thrombolysis.64
By acting on S1P1 (sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1), fingolimod
induces sustained lymphopenia, but current data do not show higher
incidence of poststroke infection in patients receiving fingolimod.
Fingolimod also acts on endothelial S1P1 receptor increasing vascular
barrier function that might contribute to the observed benefits of this
drug in ischemic stroke. Given that the benefits of fingolimod seem to
be mediated by S1P1, whereas certain side effects are dependent on other
S1P receptors, selective S1P1 agonists were studied in experimental
stroke showing reduced lesion size after ischemia/reperfusion in mice.75
In contrast to the benefits of blocking T-cell trafficking, systemic
administration of regulatory T lymphocytes in rodent models of ischemic
stroke reduced infarct size, ameliorated the neurological functions,76 and reduced hemorrhagic transformation after tPA.77
Leukocyte
recruitment to inflammatory sites is attenuated by blocking α4β1
integrin (VLA-4 [very late antigen-4]) with natalizumab, an antibody in
clinical use for multiple sclerosis treatment. Blockade of VLA-4 with
CD49d antibody was investigated in a multicentric preclinical study in
mice using 2 different models of cerebral ischemia.78
CD49d antibody attenuated leukocyte infiltration and reduced infarct
volume in small cortical lesions but not in large infarctions.
Natalizumab was investigated in ischemic stroke patients in the ACTION
trial (Effect of Natalizumab on Infarct Volume in Acute Ischemic
Stroke).79
Natalizumab did not meet the primary end point of the study, but
secondary and exploratory end points suggested improvement of clinical
outcomes,64,79
encouraging the second ACTION2 trial. This phase-IIb trial was recently
completed and the notes released by the sponsor (Biogen) state that
natalizumab did not improve clinical outcomes compared with placebo.
Final Remarks
Experimental
studies support detrimental effects of certain types of leukocytes in
acute ischemic stroke. However, to date, this knowledge has not been
translated into clinical treatments. No doubt immunomodulatory
interventions in the acute phase of stroke need fine-tuning and
long-term experimental studies to ensure that repair processes in
subacute and chronic phases are not disturbed and the neurological
deficits are attenuated. Cell therapies based on administration of
autologous MNC have shown promising results in preclinical studies by
promoting functional recovery, but clinical efficacy remains to be
demonstrated. Results of various experimental models of brain ischemia
suggest the possibility that the putative pathogenic contribution of
certain leukocytes to the acute ischemic lesion might differ depending
on lesion severity, regions affected, and degree of reperfusion.
Importantly, most of the studies described above were obtained in young
healthy male mice in spite of the fact that aging, sex, and
comorbidities influence the phenotype and function of immune cells.
Identification of the ischemic conditions where leukocytes might have a
meaningful contribution to the brain lesion, the relevant subsets of
leukocytes, and the time-window for intervention, requires more
investigation. Combining immunomodulatory strategies with reperfusion
therapies offer the opportunity to attenuate negative responses of the
immune system that might impair reperfusion at the microvascular bed or
trigger detrimental effects on the brain tissue.
Acknowledgments
I acknowledge relevant studies used to prepare this article that could not be cited because of word count restriction.
Sources of Funding
Supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (SAF2017-87459-R).
Disclosures
None.
Footnotes
Correspondence
to Anna M. Planas, PhD, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de
Barcelona (IIBB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
(CSIC), Rosselló 161, Planta 6, 08036-Barcelona, Spain. Email anna.planas@iibb.csic.es
Someplace in here a smart person could figure out what further research is needed to make something useful out of this. But since we don't have anyone in our stroke associations with two functioning neurons the answers will not be coming from there.
1Neuroscience Axis, CHU de Québec Research Center (CHUL), Québec City, QC, Canada
2Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, QC, Canada
Ischemic stroke accounts for the majority of stroke cases and
constitutes a major cause of death and disability in the industrialized
world. Inflammation has been reported to constitute a major component of
ischemic stroke pathobiology. In the acute phase of ischemic stroke,
microglia, the resident macrophages of the brain, are activated,
followed by several infiltration waves of different circulating immune
cells into the brain. Among these circulating immune cells, monocytes
have been shown to play a particularly important role. Following their
infiltration, monocytes differentiate into potent phagocytic cells, the
monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs), in the ischemic brain. Initially,
the presence of these cells was considered as marker of an exacerbated
inflammatory response that contributes to brain damage. However, the
recent reports are suggesting a more complex and multiphasic roles of
these cells in ischemic stroke pathobiology. Monocytes constitute a
heterogeneous group of cells, which comprises two major subsets in
rodent and three major subsets in human. In both species, two equivalent
subsets exist, the pro-inflammatory subset and the anti-inflammatory
subset. Recent data have demonstrated that ischemic stroke
differentially regulate monocyte subsets, which directly affect ischemic
stroke pathobiology and may have direct implications in ischemic stroke
therapies. Here, we review the recent findings that addressed the role
of different monocyte subsets in ischemic stroke pathobiology, and the
implications on therapies.
Introduction
Stroke is the third leading cause of death and the first
cause of disability in industrialized world. Ischemic stroke accounts
for the majority of stroke cases, whereas the remaining stroke cases are
hemorrhagic (Dirnagl et al., 1999).
Regional blood supply disruption initiates the ischemic cascade that
leads to neuronal death and rapid loss of neuronal function (Dirnagl et al., 1999).
The ischemic cascade is characterized by the activation of several
signaling pathways that compromise cell survival and function (Mehta et al., 2007).
Ischemic stroke triggers blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, thus
contributing to the secondary progression of ischemic injury by
increasing brain edema and exacerbating the inflammatory response in the
sub-acute phase (hours to days after ischemic stroke onset; Dirnagl et al., 1999; Fagan et al., 2004).
The severity of these early events reduces the capacity of neurons to
recover in the chronic phase (days to weeks after ischemic stroke
onset), thus significantly worsening stroke outcomes (Moskowitz et al., 2010).
Inflammation plays a central role in ischemic stroke pathobiology (Jin et al., 2010).
Following ischemic stroke, microglia, which are brain resident
macrophages, are activated and circulating immune cells, such as
monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes are recruited to injury site (Jin et al., 2010). Among these immune cells, monocytes that give rise to macrophages play a particularly important role (Chiba and Umegaki, 2013).
Initially, the presence of monocytes at the injury site has been
suggested to contribute to ischemic injury exacerbation in the acute
phase (minutes to hours after ischemic stroke onset; Chen et al., 2003).
However, the experimental approaches that aimed at depleting these
cells in ischemic stroke animal models worsened ischemic injury by
destabilizing brain microvasculature (Gliem et al., 2012).
These reports outline the complex and multifaceted role of monocytes in
ischemic stroke pathobiology. As such, this mini-review aims to
summarize and discuss the recent findings that addressed the role of
different monocyte subsets in ischemic stroke pathobiology, which may
have direct implication on stroke therapies.
From the Bristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (E.A., P.M.); and MultiMedica Research Institute, Milan, Italy (G.S.).
Correspondence to Paolo Madeddu, MD, Bristol Heart Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom. E-mail mdprm@bristol.ac.uk
Peripheral artery disease is caused by obstructing atherosclerotic plaques that critically reduce blood flow during exercise. The disease affects ≈4% of people >40 years and 15% to 20% of subjects above 65 years of age. Critical limb ischemia, the most severe manifestation of peripheral artery disease, describes patients with chronic ischemic rest pain, or patients with ischemic skin lesions, either ulcers or gangrene. It requires foot amputation in 25% of cases within 1 year from the diagnosis. Revascularization therapies are indicated in critical limb ischemia patients, but they are often ineffective or unfeasible; and in the latter case, the reported amputation and mortality rates exceed 50%. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.
See accompanying article on page 1862
Promotion of arteriogenesis, which refers to the enlargement and functionalization of preformed collateral arterioles, represents a promising therapeutic approach in critical limb ischemia patients. Several clinical studies have used the administration of growth factors (mostly basic fibroblast growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor, either as protein or gene therapy) or stem and progenitor cells.1 In addition, exercise rehabilitation programs have been shown to improve symptoms of claudication.2,3 Mechanistic understanding of how physical exercise increases collateral artery formation is inadequate.
The new study from Schirmer et al4 shows that voluntary training confers mice with an improved capacity to recover from operatively induced limb ischemia when compared with sedentary controls. The positive outcome is associated with homing of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-expressing mononuclear cells. The importance …
From the Departments of Medicine (M.C., A.J.L.), Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, and Human Genetics (A.J.L.),
University of California, Los Angeles.
Correspondence to Aldons J. Lusis, PhD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, A2-237 CHS, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail jlusis@mednet.ucla.edu
In the current issue of ATVB, Shang et al provide compelling evidence for the involvement of LIM domain binding 2 (LDB2) in the transendothelial migration
of monocytes in atherosclerosis.1 The article is also of interest because of the systems analyses that led to its identification as a strong candidate.
See accompanying article on page 2068
LDB2 was identified earlier as a key driver of atherosclerosis based on studies of gene expression profiles of tissues obtained
from patients.2
Using samples from the Stockholm Atherosclerosis Gene Expression
(STAGE) study, the authors profiled gene expression of 5
atherosclerosis-relevant tissues from 114
patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The tissues
collected were
distal internal mammary artery, wall of the
ascending aorta at the aortic root, anterior hepatic edge, skeletal
muscle, and
visceral fat. A total of 278 gene expression
profiles were used in a coupled 2-way clustering analysis3
to identify 60 gene subnetworks in these tissues. Two of the gene
clusters, one in atherosclerotic arterial wall (49 genes)
and the other in visceral fat (59 genes),
segregated the patients according to the extent of atherosclerosis as
measured by
quantitative coronary angiography. The authors
further validated their findings using expression data obtained from
carotid
lesions isolated from patients undergoing
carotid stenosis surgery. Clustering of data identified 8 gene
subnetworks in carotid
lesions, one of which segregated the patients
according to the extent of atherosclerosis as measured by
ultrasound-measured
intima-media thickness. This cluster
significantly overlapped with the 2 previously identified clusters from …
One of the key processes of inflammation is the
transmigration of circulating leukocytes across the endothelium. Among
the
leukocytes, neutrophils and monocytes are large
phagocytes that can respond quickly to infection or injury. On sensing
danger,
neutrophils and monocytes adhere to the
endothelium and transmigrate to the adjacent tissue via the coordinated
activities
of adhesion molecules, integrins, cytokines, and
chemokines.1 Once they
accumulate, these myeloid cells participate in a myriad of immune
inflammatory activities. The importance of this
event cannot be understated, especially because
the accumulation of leukocytes in tissue is a double-edged sword. On the
one
hand, coordinated leukocyte accumulation in
injured or infected sites is required for effective pathogen elimination
and tissue
healing. On the other hand, uncontrolled
accumulation is a defining feature of chronic diseases, such as
atherosclerosis.2 Understanding leukocyte migration is essential to understanding the immune system.
Article, see p 792
Neutrophils and monocytes do not
accumulate all at once. In a typical acute inflammatory response, there
is a well-defined
sequence: neutrophils accumulate first;
monocytes accumulate second. Among the monocytes, of which ≥2 subsets
circulate in
the mouse and human, there is yet another
sequence: inflammatory murine Ly-6Chigh monocytes accumulate first and reparative Ly-6Clow monocytes accumulate second.3 This temporal (neutrophil ––> Ly-6Chigh monocyte ––> Ly-6Clow
monocyte) hierarchy of accumulation is likely required for an effective
innate response. The subsets, which have overlapping
but also specialized functions, contribute
sequentially to processes that involve pathogen elimination,
efferocytosis, restoration
of tissue integrity,
Full text at link
Finally a better understanding of how plaque forms. I wonder if watermelon juice contains this stuff? http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/256585.php
LMU researchers led by Christian Weber have, for the first time, elucidated how cells that promote the development of atherosclerosis find their way to the blood vessel wall, where they stimulate the formation of obstructive deposits.
Atherosclerosis is one of the commonest causes of death in modern
societies. The condition is characterized by the build-up of fatty
deposits called atherosclerotic plaques on the inner surfaces of
arteries, which restrict, and may eventually cut off, blood flow. The
deposits can also be dislodged from their site of origin and may then
block major vessels in the heart or the brain, leading to
life-threatening myocardial infarction or stroke.
Monocytes, an important class of white blood cells, are known to
contribute significantly to the development of atherosclerosis. They are
actively recruited to atherosclerotic lesions, and promote plaque
development by sustaining a chronic inflammatory reaction.
Inhibition of monocyte recruitment therefore offers a way of
interrupting the build-up of plaques. However, one first needs to know
how the monocytes are actually localized to the vessel wall. Professor
Christian Weber and Dr. Maik Drechsler of the Institute for Prophylaxis
and Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease at LMU, in collaboration with
Oliver Söhnlein of LMU and a team at the Academic Medical Center in
Amsterdam, have now shown that the receptor molecules CCR1 and CCR5 are
crucially involved in the process by which monocytes are recruited to
the vessel wall. This process is made up of a sequence of distinct
steps, including adhesion of the endothelial cells that form the
arterial wall, and their subsequent transmigration into the bloodstream
by infiltration between neighboring endothelial cells, following
activation of the receptors by binding of their respective ligands.
The new findings correct a commonly held view of the precise function of
the CCR2 receptor in the recruitment of monocytes. "In contrast to what
has been assumed so far, this receptor does not mediate the
infiltration of monocytes into the vessel wall; instead, like another
chemokine receptor, CXCR2, it controls their mobilization from the bone
marrow into the bloodstream," says Oliver Söhnlein.
The receptor molecules CCR1 and CCR5 therefore present promising targets
for the development of novel approaches to the treatment of
atherosclerosis, using agents that inhibit their interaction with their
respective binding partners, either directly or indirectly. (EMBO Molecular Medicine)