Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label neurofeedback. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neurofeedback. Show all posts

Thursday, April 16, 2026

A Smart Textile Biofeedback Training System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Co-Design Development and Evaluation Study

 I must be missing something, for persons like me, there are no signals sent down to the arm since dead brain doesn't send anything. How is this supposed to work?

A Smart Textile Biofeedback Training System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Co-Design Development and Evaluation Studyc v



A Smart Textile Biofeedback Training System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Co-Design Development and Evaluation Study


 Abstract

Background:An increasing number of rehabilitation technologies are being developed to support upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, with smart textile solutions for surface electromyography (sEMG) emerging as a promising approach. Early end-user involvement is crucial for developing user-friendly and clinically valid rehabilitation tools.

Objective:This study aims to refine and evaluate the prototype design and usability of a smart textile biofeedback system for self-administered upper limb training after stroke.

Methods:The training system includes a knitted smart textile sleeve with integrated electrodes over the forearm muscles, an sEMG unit, and tablet-based biofeedback software. An iterative co-design process was followed, including initial testing, demonstration sessions with end users (9 clinicians and 10 individuals with stroke), and a final evaluation of the co-design process. Participants’ experiences were gathered through semistructured interviews, analyzed using content analysis, and the User Experience Questionnaire. The co-design team included experts in stroke rehabilitation, textile engineering, biomedical engineering, software development, and human factors, as well as a research partner with lived experience after stroke.

Results:The perspectives of the end users and the expert team were collectively integrated into prototype refinements of the sleeve and training software to meet the needs of the intended target group. The experiences of end users formed 2 main categories: “This could be an exciting new training tool for stroke rehabilitation” and “The tool works well, but some changes could enhance independent training.” End users found the smart textile sleeve and biofeedback system easy to use and saw potential for integrating it into their training routines. Both end-user groups rated the system as attractive, stimulating, and novel.

Conclusions:The results of this study establish a necessary ground toward the development of a smart textile sEMG biofeedback system for self-administered upper limb training after stroke. Findings from the co-design process support the continued development and evaluation of the system as a self-administered upper limb training tool for individuals living with stroke.

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e77999

doi:10.2196/77999

Friday, January 24, 2025

Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training on kinetic gait in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial

 My left side low back pain is because the gluteus medius is overworked because my gait is off, no pushoff and my left foot angles 15 degrees to the left due to spasticity. None of which my doctors or therapists told me would occur and not do anything about it!

Comparison of cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training on kinetic gait in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial

Received 07 Aug 2024, Accepted 05 Jan 2025, Published online: 22 Jan 2025
 

Abstract

Purpose of the article

Walking disorders are a significant issue for patients with low back pain. The aim of clinical trials is to compare the effects of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) and neurofeedback training (NFBT) on gait kinetics in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) patients.

Materials and Methods

Sixty females with chronic non-specific low back pain were recruitment for clinical trials. They were randomly divided into experimental and one control groups (Each group 20 patients). The experimental group received the relevant interventions for eight weeks. The primary outcome was pain, kinesiophobia and disability. The secondary outcome was vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) parameters. Two-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA statistical method was used for data analysis.

Results

Within-group comparisons showed that neurofeedback training and cognitive functional therapy groups experienced significant improvement in pain intensity, disability and kinesiophobia after eight-week (p < 0.05). However, the cognitive functional therapy group improved the vertical ground reaction force parameters better than the neurofeedback training group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

cognitive functional therapy intervention had a greater effect on the vertical ground reaction force parameters. The reason for the greater effect of cognitive functional therapy intervention on vertical ground reaction force parameters can be partially explained due to the multimodal therapy used through cognitive exercises and motor control.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Cognitive functional therapy and neurofeedback training was shown to reduce pain intensity, disability, and kinesiophobia, Consequently improving vertical ground reaction force parameters in patients with Chronic non-specific low back pain.

  • Among the psychological interventions used, the cognitive functional therapy significantly showed more effectiveness in improving the vertical ground reaction force parameters of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

  • Our research may inform clinical decision-making and guide the development of therapeutic interventions for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Friday, October 4, 2024

Effectiveness of Neurofeedback Training in Poststroke Cognitive Impairment

 But you didn't answer the question. Did they recover the lost 5 cognitive years from your stroke? Do you even know that survivors want 100% recovery? Instead of presenting them with your tyranny of low expectations?

Effectiveness of Neurofeedback Training in Poststroke Cognitive Impairment

Authors

  • Dya Anggraeni
  • Muhammad Hasnawi Haddani
  • Sri Handayani
  • Rini Nindela
  • Yohanes Febrianto Neurology Departement, RSUP dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.11.3.296

Keywords:

Post-stroke cognitive impairment, neurofeedback training, quantitative electroencephalogram, MoCA-Ina

Abstract

Introduction

Poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), characterized by cognitive deficits occurring up to 3 months after stroke, poses a substantial burden because this condition can persist and get worse over time. There has been no recommended conventional cognitive rehabilitation method that has a significant effect on cognitive improvement. Neurofeedback training (NFT) based on quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG), emerges as a promising intervention for PSCI. However, research remains limited, necessitating further investigation into its effectiveness and clinical utility. 

Methods

 This study assesses the efficacy of NFT in eight PSCI patients over 10 sessions (30 min/session) across 2 weeks with protocol based on qEEG for each patient. 

Results

Significant improvements were observed in total MoCA-Ina scores (mean increase of 2.63 points), particularly in visuospatial/executive, naming, attention, language, delayed recall, and orientation domains. Wilcoxon test indicated a significant improvement (p = .019, effect size: −0, 828) post-NFT. Multivariate analysis revealed no confounding influence of demographic and clinical factors on cognitive improvement. 

Conclusion

 These findings highlight NFT’s potential as an adjunctive therapy in PSCI rehabilitation, warranting further investigation for efficacy of NFT in larger studies and explore its long-term effects on cognitive function and quality of life for PSCI patients.

Thursday, April 25, 2024

This Neuroscience-Backed Brain Training System Harnesses Neurofeedback to Help Reduce Stress & Improve Focus

 I have no clue about this, so ask your competent? doctor.

This Neuroscience-Backed Brain Training System Harnesses Neurofeedback to Help Reduce Stress & Improve Focus

If you told me even a year ago that brain mapping and neurofeedback techniques could be performed at home for under $500, I wouldn’t have believed you. And while I’m still skeptical of any wellness device or wearable that claims to “bring the clinic home” (or any variation of this trite marketing slogan), when I found out about Myndlift, a neuroscience-based brain mapping and training system, I was intrigued—my dad is a former neurobiologist, after all. While I haven’t tried the device yet myself (stay tuned!), the brand claims this headband is engineered to scan the brain and help improve focus, reduce stress, and improve sleep by providing users with neurofeedback without having to head to the doctor.

Myndlift Brain Mapping System

Of course, the neurofeedback system isn’t just a do-it-yourself and figure-it-out experience—Myndlift uses the Muse brain-sensing headband, along with online sessions with mental health practitioners to assess findings, and the brand’s neurofeedback app to help users “tune the brain to its optimal state,” with the help of professional. In fact, it wasn’t until 2023 that the brand’s technology was launched for at-home use. In 2019, Myndlift launched its multipart system for psychologists and psychotherapy clinicians to use the headband and app with patients in their offices or remotely. After several years of fine-tuning and feedback, it’s now approved for at-home use. If you’re looking for a way to improve your well-being by optimizing your brain function—and sans meds or substances—Myndlift neurofeedback system is worth checking out.

Friday, March 22, 2024

A usability study on mobile EMG-guided wrist extension training in subacute stroke patients-MyoGuide

 Can't tell from here if a difficult case of wrist spasticity was in the group.

A usability study on mobile EMG-guided wrist extension training in subacute stroke patients-MyoGuide

Abstract

Background

Effective stroke rehabilitation requires high-dose, repetitive-task training, especially during the early recovery phase. However, the usability of upper-limb rehabilitation technology in acute and subacute stroke survivors remains relatively unexplored. In this study, we introduce subacute stroke survivors to MyoGuide, a mobile training platform that employs surface electromyography (sEMG)-guided neurofeedback training that specifically targets wrist extension. Notably, the study emphasizes evaluating the platform’s usability within clinical contexts.

Methods

Seven subacute post-stroke patients (1 female, mean age 53.7 years, mean time post-stroke 58.9 days, mean duration per training session 48.9 min) and three therapists (one for eligibility screening, two for conducting training) participated in the study. Participants underwent ten days of supervised one-on-one wrist extension training with MyoGuide, which encompassed calibration, stability assessment, and dynamic tasks. All training records including the Level of Difficulty (LoD) and Stability Assessment Scores were recorded within the application. Usability was assessed through the System Usability Scale (SUS) and participants’ willingness to continue home-based training was gauged through a self-developed survey post-training. Therapists also documented the daily performance of participants and the extent of support required.

Results

The usability analysis yielded positive results, with a median SUS score of 82.5. Compared to the first session, participants significantly improved their performance at the final session as indicated by both the Stability Assessment Scores (p = 0.010, mean = 229.43, CI = [25.74–433.11]) and the LoD (p < 0.001; mean: 45.43, CI: [25.56–65.29]). The rate of progression differed based on the initial impairment levels of the patient. After training, participants expressed a keen interest in continuing home-based training. However, they also acknowledged challenges related to independently using the Myo armband and software.

Conclusions

This study introduces the MyoGuide training platform and demonstrates its usability in a clinical setting for stroke rehabilitation, with the assistance of a therapist. The findings support the potential of MyoGuide for wrist extension training in patients across a wide range of impairment levels. However, certain usability challenges, such as donning/doffing the armband and navigating the application, need to be addressed to enable independent MyoGuide training requiring only minimal supervision by a therapist.

Background

Stroke is the third leading cause of disability worldwide [1]. At least 50% of stroke survivors suffer from upper limb impairments that limit engagement in activities of daily living (ADLs) and reduce quality of life [2, 3]. There is a consensus that effective post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation benefits from high-dose repetitive-task training [4, 5]. Nonetheless, ensuring the delivery of sufficient training doses remains challenging, especially during the acute to subacute phases [6,7,8,9,10]. Additionally, it’s essential to emphasize the significant impact of treatment timing on post-stroke motor recovery. Research has shown that the optimal rehabilitation period occurs within the first 60 to 90 days following a stroke [11]. Furthermore, clinical trials on human subjects have consistently revealed that individuals receiving early intervention exhibit significantly better motor recovery outcomes compared to those who received delayed intervention [12,13,14]. Building on this understanding, recent studies [15, 16] also highlighted the potential of rehabilitation technologies in alleviating the burden of intensive and repetitive upper limb exercises for therapists. These technologies, facilitating high-dose upper limb rehabilitation during the early stages of stroke, even when the upper limb is still significantly weakened and unable to generate overt movement, may serve as a beneficial supplement to conventional treatment methods.

To address the unique challenges posed by post-stroke rehabilitation, various sensor-based technological solutions have been explored, such as the Leap Motion [17], Kinect [18, 19], and Myo armband [18, 20, 21]. While demonstrating promise in gesture recognition [22] and hand therapy with serious games [23, 24], the Leap Motion generally demands precise hand positioning and controlled lighting conditions [23, 25]. It is important to emphasize that the former may present practical challenges, particularly for individuals with highly impaired upper limbs, as they might encounter difficulty holding their shoulder and elbow in the necessary position for an extended duration. Kinect-based programs have also shown promise in upper limb rehabilitation [26,27,28]. However, they also exhibit technical limitations, including the complexity of use and dependence on the therapist’s assistance [19], along with challenges associated with occlusion [29], and reduced reliability for small movement amplitudes [29].

In this context, surface electromyography (sEMG) emerges as a versatile and promising avenue for post-stroke rehabilitation, alleviating users from strict positioning constraints and lighting considerations. Specifically, the integration of sEMG with the Myo armband introduces a wireless and highly portable dimension to upper limb rehabilitation. Furthermore, sEMG possesses the unique ability to detect movement intention in cases of upper limb paresis [30, 31]. Such capability is vital for stroke patients with limited active movement. The effectiveness of sEMG biofeedback has been demonstrated in prior studies, encompassing gait training [32, 33] and upper limb exercises, with notable advantages such as mitigating co-contraction patterns [34], achieving enhanced functional recovery outcomes compared to conventional therapy [35, 36], and receiving positive usability feedback from end-users [37]. The potential use of the Myo armband with gamified applications for upper limb rehabilitation is highlighted by recent studies in multiple sclerosis and stroke patients for hand/wrist rehabilitation [21, 38]. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that although the Myo armband is no longer on the market, alternatives continue to be available.

The usability of the Myo armband coupled with serious games has also been tested on both healthy participants [20] and health professionals [38]. However, its utility as a user-friendly tool in clinical settings for both stroke patients and healthcare professionals has not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, given the heterogeneity in the design of serious games, the generalizability of usability across different game types may be limited. To effectively pinpoint and address usability challenges, a rigorous and iterative evaluation process is required [39,40,41]. Previous studies have shown that inclusive participation of both patients and therapists has played a pivotal role in shaping the development of wearable exoskeletons [42, 43] and interactive game-based virtual reality systems [44].

Acknowledging this gap, our present research seeks to offer insights into the usability of the Myo armband integrated with a training platform specifically designed for post-stroke rehabilitation. In this study, we introduce ‘MyoGuide,’ a mobile platform with a serious game harnessing the benefits of sEMG-guided biofeedback training. Additionally, it incorporates a calibration feature to address the diverse nature of impairments observed among stroke patients. Our focus is on wrist extension training, a pivotal aspect for both activities of daily living (ADLs) [45, 46] and hand grasping actions [47, 48]. Additionally, wrist extension ability has been highlighted as a potential indicator of upper limb functional recovery [49].

In this study, our primary objective was to integrate usability assessments into the initial stages of MyoGuide’s development, targeting both stroke survivors and therapists. From stroke survivors, we aimed to gain insights into the overall usability of the training platform. From therapists, our goal was to assess whether MyoGuide serves as a tool that can be used in clinical settings. The overarching aim is to validate MyoGuide’s suitability for integration into clinical settings, particularly addressing challenges related to intensive and repetitive upper limb exercises.

More at link.

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

Motor Imagery-Based Neurofeedback in Physiotherapy Practice

 If this really works your doctor can find an EXACT PROTOCOL on this so you can benefit. If your doctor can't find that protocol, you don't have a functioning stroke doctor. RUN AWAY and find a better doctor. I expect my doctor to competently know how to get survivors recovered with NO guesswork!

Motor Imagery-Based Neurofeedback in Physiotherapy Practice

Written By

Shun Sawai, Shoya Fujikawa, Ryosuke Yamamoto and Hideki Nakano

Submitted: 02 July 2023 Reviewed: 15 January 2024 Published: 01 February 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004249


Monday, February 6, 2023

EEG-Neurofeedback as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for Cognitive Deficits in Patients with Dementia, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury

 Maybe there is something in here, ask your doctor.

EEG-Neurofeedback as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for Cognitive Deficits in Patients with Dementia, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury 

2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54621 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2023, 13(2), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020365
Received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 21 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of EEG in Neural Rehabilitation)

Abstract

Memory deficits are common in patients with dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease, but also in patients with other neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as brain injury, multiple sclerosis, ischemic stroke and schizophrenia. Memory loss affects patients’ functionality and, by extension, their quality of life. Non-invasive brain training methods, such as EEG neurofeedback, are used to address cognitive deficits and behavioral changes in dementia and other neurological disorders by training patients to alter their brain activity via operant activity. In this review paper, we analyze various protocols of EEG neurofeedback in memory rehabilitation in patients with dementia, multiple sclerosis, strokes and traumatic brain injury. The results from the studies show the effectiveness of the ΕΕG-NFB method in improving at least one cognitive domain, regardless of the number of sessions or the type of protocol applied. In future research, it is important to address methodological weaknesses in the application of the method, its long-term effects as well as ethical issues.

1. Introduction

Cognitive deficits, such as memory loss and attention disorders, are very common nowadays because of the aging world population and the numerous neurodegenerative diseases that lead to cognitive impairment. Until recently, the treatment of cognitive deficits was based exclusively on the administration of appropriate medication. However, a deeper understanding of the nature of cognitive deficits combined with advances in technology has led to the development of methods and techniques aimed at improving both cognitive deficits and non-cognitive conditions, in order to improve the quality of life not only for the patients but also for their families.
A popular method is cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive rehabilitation is a behavioral approach that aims to improve patients’ cognitive deficits, but also to provide assistance to both patients and their families in order to improve their daily lives. It can be carried out with paper and pencil exercises, but also with electronic programs, through which the patient practices various cognitive tasks [1].
Another method is neurofeedback (NFB). NFB is a biofeedback technique for training patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders to change brain activity through operant conditioning [2]. Through this method, the individual learns to enhance and inhibit specific electrophysiological parameters through the process of learning. Modification of the individual’s behavioral response is made possible through feedback and positive reinforcement [3]. EEG-NFB is investigated in patients with depression, post-traumatic stress, schizophrenia, addictions, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism and learning disabilities, and it is correlated with short- or long-term symptom relief.
Neurophysiological factors for NFB training are not clearly defined. It is considered that two types of neuroplasticity are involved: Hebbian plasticity and homeostatic plasticity. Reformation of the neural membrane and synaptic potentiation because of EEG amplitude are characteristics of Hebbian neuroplasticity, while homeostatic plasticity plays the opposite role, in order to stabilize the neuronal activity and limit the expression of the Hebbian type. In any case, the neuronal mechanisms have not been clearly investigated until now [4,5].
There are three types of EEG-NFB: 1. slow cortical potentials; 2. coherence training; and 3. frequency training. The third type of training is the most commonly used and is aimed at modifying the power ratio of frequency bands. The frequency bands are divided into 1. delta, 2. theta, 3. alpha, 4. beta and 5. gamma [6].
These frequencies are used to classify brain oscillations [7]. They are created by the coordinated activity of cells and thus make it possible to communicate between different brain regions in a way that allows the brain to utilize the information it receives and then synthesize it [3]. Additionally, brain oscillations are connected with specific cognitive functions. Theta oscillations are connected with encoding retrieval, while alpha bands are connected with attention. Alpha and gamma oscillations are capable of suppressing factors that can reduce concentration [8].
The most commonly used EEG-NFB protocols for the therapeutic management of cognitive deficits are: 1.EEG-theta/beta ratio; 2. Sensorimotor Rhythm (SMR) (12–15 Hz) [9]. In the first protocol, theta band power (ranging between 4 and 7 Hz) divided by beta band ratio (ranging between 13 and 30 Hz) shows cortical and sub-cortical brain interactions [10]. The second protocol, SMR, includes rhythm with a mean frequency of 10 Hz, and it is recorded over sensorimotor cortices in C3 and C4 [11].
The effectiveness of EEG-NFB in cognitive rehabilitation is still under investigation and is mainly evaluated through comparisons of patients’ cognitive performance before and after their training in various EEG protocols. A review of studies using EEG-NFB as a therapeutic tool for treating cognitive deficits in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), mild cognitive disorder (MCI), stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) is analyzed below. The novelty of our review lies in gathering findings on the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback as a therapeutic method in the aforementioned four neurological disorders. Recent studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the method, regardless of whether EEG-NFB is used as a clinical tool or a wearable device, are reviewed.

Contribution of Our Review

  • Review of recent EEG-NFB studies in dementia, multiple sclerosis, strokes and TBI.
  • Therapeutic effectiveness of EEG-NFB regardless of how it is applied (clinical use of EEG or wearable device).
     
    More at link.