Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label Self-management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Self-management. Show all posts

Saturday, May 24, 2025

A randomized controlled trial of trans-theoretical model combined with empowerment education to enhance self-management behaviors in young and middle-aged stroke survivors

 A much simpler option is to deliver 100% recovery protocols. Your survivor will be so busy counting reps and looking forward to recovery that self management will occur automatically! Whatever this is is way too complicated for survivors to understand.

A randomized controlled trial of trans-theoretical model combined with empowerment education to enhance self-management behaviors in young and middle-aged stroke survivors

Abstract

Post-stroke self-management presents a challenge due to the multifaceted care(NOT RECOVERY!) needs and complex disabling consequences, hindering survivor engagement. This study aims to investigate the effects of a Trans-theoretical model-based Empowerment education on self-management behaviors, self-efficacy, and activities of daily living in young and middle-aged stroke survivors. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted, dividing participants into a control group receiving conventional health education and an intervention group receiving a Trans-theoretical model-based Empowerment education. Outcome data were collected at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess changes in self-management behaviors, self-efficacy, and activities of daily living. A total of 101 young and middle-aged stroke survivors participated in the study. No significant differences were found between the intervention methods of the two groups in improving self-management behaviors (F = 0.608, P = 0.438). However, significant differences were observed in self-management behavior scores at different intervention time points (F = 77.048, P < 0.001), with an interaction effect between the intervention method and time factors (F = 19.714, P < 0.001). Simple effects analysis indicated that the intervention group scored significantly better in self-management behaviors at all time points compared to baseline (P < 0.05). Significant between-group differences in self-efficacy were observed between pre- and post-intervention periods (F = 3.993, P = 0.05). Additionally, within-group differences in self-efficacy scores across intervention time points demonstrated statistically significant variations (F = 5.900, P < 0.001). Significant differences in Barthel Index scores were observed between pre- and post-intervention periods (F = 7.893, P < 0.006). Additionally, The Barthel Index scores at different time points within the two groups showed statistically significant variations (F = 14.977, P < 0.001). The Trans-theoretical model-based Empowerment education improved self-management behaviors, enhanced self-efficacy, and increased daily activity living in young and middle-aged stroke survivors. These findings provide valuable insights for developing personalized intervention strategies and improving stroke survivor care(NOT RECOVERY!) protocols.

Monday, October 28, 2024

Impact of Self-Controlled Practice on Motor Learning for Individuals With Post-Stroke Upper Limb Hemiparesis

 I consider this Self-controlled practice pretty much useless since there is nothing specific about what needs to be done to get recovered. You give survivors EXACT PROTOCOLS for recovery and they'll gladly do the millions of reps needed because they are looking forward to 100% recovery. Yeah, this is just a thesis, but the advisors incompetently didn't inform her of the flaws in her analysis.

Impact of Self-Controlled Practice on Motor Learning for Individuals With Post-Stroke Upper Limb Hemiparesis

Lauren Beth Winterbottom
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in
Teachers College, Columbia University
2024
© 2024

Lauren Beth Winterbottom
All Rights Reserved

Abstract


Lauren Beth Winterbottom
Upper limb (UL) impairments are common after stroke and can lead to loss of
independence and long-term disability. Motor learning interventions for individuals with stroke
can improve UL function and engagement in daily activities. Self-controlled practice (SCP)
involves allowing choice during motor skill practice and has been shown to improve motor
learning in healthy adults as well as individuals with Parkinson's disease. Additionally, SCP may
impact psychological outcomes, including intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and positive affect.
Although SCP has been incorporated into complex stroke rehabilitation interventions, little is
known about its specific impact on motor learning for individuals with stroke. The purpose of
this study is to investigate the effect of SCP on motor learning and psychological outcomes for
adults with chronic UL impairment after stroke.
Sixteen participants with chronic UL impairment due to stroke were paired and
randomized into two groups. All participants practiced a standardized motor task with both their
more affected and less affected hands for two consecutive days. During each day of practice,
participants completed 50 30-second trials (10 blocks of 5 trials each) with their more affected
hand and 20 30-second trials (10 blocks of 2 trials each) with their less affected hand. The
experimental group was given control over their practice schedule and chose the order they
practiced blocks of trials. Participants in the control group followed a pre-determined practice
schedule based on the choices made by the participant they were paired with in the experimental group. Outcome measures were assessed on Day 1 before practice (Pre-Test), Day 2 after
practice (Post-Test), and Day 3 (Follow-up). Motor learning outcomes included 24-hour
retention of the trained motor task and immediate (10-minute) and delayed (24-hour) transfer of
learning to an untrained motor task. Psychological outcomes including intrinsic motivation, self-
efficacy, and positive affect were also assessed.
Both groups demonstrated significant improvements from baseline on both the trained
task and the untrained task at the Day 3 follow-up assessment. There were no significant
between-group differences on any motor learning or psychological outcome measures. However,
there was a significant association between perceived choice that was assessed on Day 2
following practice and amount of change on the untrained transfer task at Day 3. This suggests
that perception of choice may be a relevant factor for motor learning after stroke. However, more
research with larger sample sizes is needed to further investigate this finding

Friday, April 26, 2024

A self-management program increases the dosage of inpatient rehabilitation by 26 minutes per day: a process evaluation

 For stroke 100% recovery, it is incredibly simple, your stroke medical 'professionals' provide EXACT 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS and your patient will not stop until 100% recovery is achieved! The RESPONSIBILITY is on the 'professionals' to do this, not dump everything onto survivors! If your stroke medical 'professionals' don't understand and do this; FIRE THEM!

A self-management program increases the dosage of inpatient rehabilitation by 26 minutes per day: a process evaluation

Received 29 Sep 2023, Accepted 01 Apr 2024, Published online: 16 Apr 2024

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the implementation of a self-management program, My Therapy, designed to increase inpatient rehabilitation therapy dosage via independent practice.

Materials and methods

A process evaluation of My Therapy for adult patients admitted for rehabilitation for any condition supervised by physiotherapists and occupational therapists across eight rehabilitation wards compared usual care. Outcomes included reach, dosage, fidelity and adaptation.

Results

The mean (SD) age of the process evaluation sample (n = 123) was 73 (11) years with a mean (SD) length of stay of 14.0 (6.6) days. The My Therapy program reached 68% of participants (n = 632/928), and resulted in an average increase in therapy dosage of 26 (95% CI 12 to 40) minutes/day of independent practice. All My Therapy audited programs (n = 28) included body function/structure impairment-based exercises, and half (n = 13/28) included activity/participation-based exercises. On average, participants completed programs 1.8 (SD 1.2) times/day, which were prescribed in accordance with the My Therapy criteria, demonstrating fidelity. There were no between-group differences in daily steps or standing time, however, My Therapy participants spent more time sitting (p ≤ 0.05). Implementation adaptations were minimal.

Conclusion

A self-management rehabilitation program was implemented with fidelity for two in three rehabilitation patients, resulting in increased therapy dosage with minimal adaptations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • The My Therapy self-management program was implemented with good reach (68% of participants received My Therapy) across four public and private inpatient rehabilitation services.

  • Under My Therapy conditions, the dosage of inpatient rehabilitation therapy participation increased by an average of 26 minutes per day, which will help close the evidence-practice gap between the current rehabilitation dosage of about 1-hour per day, and the recommended rehabilitation dosage of 3-hours per day.

  • My Therapy programs most frequently included impairment-based exercises that were completed in sitting, and did not increase time spent standing and walking.

  • Consideration should be given to prescribing My Therapy (content and dosage) at an optimal level to promote patient functional independence, while maintaining safety.

Introduction

Adult physical rehabilitation encompasses a range of services delivered through multidisciplinary teams, aiming to deliver person centred care using evidence based interventions and evaluating progression towards meaningful goals [Citation1]. Rehabilitation can be delivered within traditional bed-based settings in a hospital, as well as home-based services, whereby rehabilitation is delivered to patients within the community environment [Citation1–3]. There is evidence that rehabilitation outcomes are influenced by the amount of therapy the person receives [Citation4] and one way to increase dosage is to increase therapy staffing levels [Citation5]. However budgetary constraints often limit additional staffing resources, despite the known benefits and the ever increasing complexity of the inpatient rehabilitation cohort [Citation6]. Clinicians, health service managers, and policy makers need to think creatively of ways to increase the dosage of evidence-based therapy interventions to promote functional recovery during rehabilitation. One solution to the problem of providing a sufficient dosage of therapy is through patient therapy self-management, that is, re-directing some of the idle time rehabilitation patients have between supervised therapy sessions into meaningful self-directed therapy activities [Citation7].

An example of this is My Therapy, a consumer driven self-management program, that focuses on occupational therapy and physiotherapy exercises and tasks that can be completed outside of supervised therapy sessions [Citation8]. Pilot work has shown that My Therapy can increase rehabilitation therapy participation by up to 14 min per day [Citation8]. In 2021-22, the My Therapy intervention was evaluated via a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomised control trial conducted over eight wards at four health services (two public and two private). The trial included 2550 (control conditions, n = 1458; My Therapy conditions n = 1092) rehabilitation participants admitted to a rehabilitation ward, as well as, 788 geriatric evaluation and management participants (control conditions, n = 388; My Therapy conditions n = 400) admitted to a rehabilitation ward giving a total of 3,338 participants (unpublished data).

Process evaluations are increasingly being used alongside clinical and economic evaluations, to help understand the factors that may positively or negatively influence trial results [Citation9,Citation10]. Guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, process evaluations aim to: capture reach and determine the extent the intended population came into contact with the intervention; determine the dosage and quantity of intervention delivery; determine fidelity by understanding if the intervention was delivered as intended and how it was delivered; and determine if any adaptations were required to the intervention from what was planned [Citation10]. Process evaluations, can provide valuable insights into unexpected or unanticipated results (clinical or economic), and can provide a clear description of intervention implementation to allow the intervention to be scaled up or replicated elsewhere should desired results be achieved [Citation10]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach, dosage, fidelity and adaptations of the implementation of My Therapy into inpatient rehabilitation, as part of a larger stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

Methods

Context: My Therapy intervention

My Therapy is a “consumer driven, self-management program designed to increase the dosage of therapy participation during physical rehabilitation, through independent practice of exercise and activity, in addition to usual care” [Citation11]. Implementation was intended to be additional to usual care, and not as a substitution of supervised therapy. My Therapy was delivered by occupational therapists and physiotherapists on the ward through provision of a subset of therapy activities to be practised independently where safe and appropriate using an online exercise prescription program PTX (www.physiotherapyexercises.com). Discussion and input from the participants, alongside occupational therapy and physiotherapy collaboration, were key to developing the individualised My Therapy programs delivered in paper format. While a recommended goal of exercise/additional therapy dosage was set by prescribing therapists, the quantity and frequency to complete activities were at the participant’s discretion [Citation11]. My Therapy is based on four criteria/pillars: i) the provision of a written self-management program (delivered electronically or in paper format); (ii) ensuring programs are documented by the therapist in the medical record; (iii) providing a feedback mechanism between the patient and the therapist (such as an activity/exercise completion tick sheet); and (iv) ensuring programs are actively monitored and progressed, as clinically indicated [Citation12]. At a practical level, My Therapy was designed to be provided to all participants on the ward where deemed safe and appropriate by the treating occupational therapist or physiotherapist. Any additional items (such as weights) that were required for the participant to complete their program were provided for use on provision of the My Therapy program by the therapist. Recommendations were made to the participant by their treating therapist to complete the My Therapy program outside of structured therapy sessions with health professionals (e.g. occupational therapists and physiotherapists).

In the six weeks prior to cross over to My Therapy conditions, implementation preparation occurred. This allowed for education of the My Therapy intervention through formal verbal education to clinical staff, interactive group discussions to co-design local implementation strategies and provision of written explanatory materials for occupational therapy and physiotherapy staff. Other members of the rehabilitation team were engaged in the pre-implementation phase by raising awareness with their role when under My Therapy conditions, but this was limited to encouraging participants to complete their My Therapy programs and not to supervise the program. To support implementation at each of the four health services, there was regular collaboration between site co-ordinators at each of the sites through online meetings and email correspondence. This provided an opportunity for shared resources between participating sites and tailoring to meet local needs.

Study design and setting

This observational process evaluation study, completed alongside a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial, has been reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist [Citation13]. The process evaluation was conducted from April 2021 to April 2022. The protocol for the main clinical trial and the process evaluation have been previously published [Citation11,Citation12]. For this process evaluation, a quantitative dominant design was used. The evaluation was undertaken in eight rehabilitation wards across two public and two private Victorian health networks in Australia, with two of the public health wards located in the community (i.e., home-based wards). Multi-site ethics approval was received from Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (ID: 69610), followed by site specific approvals at each of the participating health services (Alfred Hospital, ID 758/20; Eastern Health, ID S21-004-69610; Cabrini Health, ID 11-04-03-21; Healthscope via La Trobe HREC, ID 758/20).

The four study components aligned with the study aims are: i) capture reach and determine the extent the intended population came into contact with the intervention; ii) determine the dosage and quantity of intervention delivery, including the amount of supervised therapy participation as part of usual care, and My Therapy program content, mapped to the International Classification of Function (ICF) [Citation14]; iii) determine fidelity (patient adherence as well as therapist engagement) by understanding if the intervention was delivered as intended, how it was delivered and physical activity levels in sitting, standing and stepping; and iv) determine if any adaptations were required to the intervention from what was planned (Appendix A, Supplementary Material) [Citation11,Citation12].

All participants included in this process evaluation were subgroups of the participants included in the stepped wedge cluster randomised trial (

). The first group (group 1), recruited to evaluate program reach, included a subgroup of participants admitted in each block of the main trial (n = 3,338). The second group (group 2) recruited for the evaluation of dosage and fidelity were recruited over three time points (month 1/block 1 (April 2021), 6/block 5 (September 2021) and 12/block 9 (March 2022) of the 12-month/block 9 clinical trial), and were a subgroup of group 1. The third group (group 3) recruited for a detailed evaluation of dosage were a subgroup of participants from group 2. The fourth group (group 4) recruited for a detailed evaluation of fidelity were a subgroup of participants from group 2.

Figure 1. Participant flow.

Figure 1. Participant flow.

Group 1 (reach) included all eight participating rehabilitation wards in the clinical trial, capturing all admitted participants including but not limited to diagnoses, such as orthopaedic, neurological, reconditioning, and respiratory, with and without a cognitive impairment. For group 2 (dosage and fidelity), the aim was to recruit a consecutive sample of 120 participants already consented to the main clinical trial, meeting the eligibility criteria of being over 18 years, admitted for rehabilitation for any reason and having access to Medicare (Australian universal health care program). Participants in group 2 (dosage and fidelity), met the additional eligibility criteria of not having a cognitive impairment (limiting ability to complete data collection tools) and being English speaking. Participants were approached by a member of the research team, their involvement in the study explained and written consent was gained. For groups 3 (dosage) and 4 (fidelity), convenience sampling was used from participants already recruited in group 2 with group 3 only including participants with a My Therapy program. Participants under control conditions receiving usual care only were included in groups 1 (reach), 2 (dosage and fidelity) and 4 (fidelity).

Outcomes

Data were collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) electronic data capture tools, that were hosted at Monash University and managed by Helix [Citation15,Citation16].

For this process evaluation, independent groups of participants were classified as receiving usual care (during control blocks of the stepped wedge cluster randomised trial, termed control conditions) or receiving My Therapy plus usual care (during intervention blocks of the stepped wedge cluster randomised trial, termed intervention conditions). If participants completed a self-management program under the control conditions this has been called a “self-management program”; if participants completed a self-management program under the intervention conditions this has been called a “My Therapy program” with both self-management and My Therapy programs needing to meet the four My Therapy criteria/pillars [Citation12]. It was recognised that some participants may not agree to participate in a My Therapy program or be unable to be provided a program, for example, due to safety considerations. However, the intention was that every patient on the ward would be assessed for a My Therapy program during the intervention blocks, and if appropriate, be provided with a program.

Reach: Data collection was completed on eight participating wards across the four health services over nine time points (once every six-weeks midway through each block during the 12-month clinical trial by site co-ordinators/associate investigators). To understand the reach of a self-management program under control and intervention conditions, medical files were audited to determine whether a self-management program had been prescribed, supplemented with discussion with treating therapists (group 1 (reach)). My Therapy was only considered to have been implemented when all four My Therapy criteria/pillars were fulfilled. On a single day, the ward audit was completed for the participating ward, capturing all admitted participants. Within the ward audit, there were no exclusion criteria applied, thereby capturing all participants on the ward. Individual participants were not able to be identified within the ward audit. Data were uploaded by the site co-ordinator to a customised form on REDCap that was blinded to the researcher. An apriori target for reach was not set. While a 100% reach would be ideal considering the whole of ward approach, researchers recognised this may not always be achievable, and note that the My Therapy feasibility study achieved a 72% reach [Citation8].

Dosage and fidelity were measured over three time points (month 1/Block 1 (April 2021), 6/Block 5 (September 2021) and 12/Block 9 (March 2022) of the 12-month clinical trial). Participants were classified as receiving usual care (control conditions) or receiving My Therapy plus usual care (intervention conditions).

  • Dosage: Group 2 (dosage and fidelity) participants, were audited using the therapy timetable by capturing the scheduled and completed duration of occupational therapy and physiotherapy sessions and delivery mode. The audit of the therapy timetable was completed by a researcher. If provided a My Therapy program, participants completed a daily written activity log capturing time spent and the number of times and the number of activities/exercises completed, as well as the recommended amounts from the therapist. The audit was completed midway through each block.

  • Fidelity: Group 2 (dosage and fidelity) participants with a My Therapy program, the activity log described above captured My Therapy patient adherence to the prescribed program by recording the recommended amount and the number of activities and amounts actually completed. For participants with a My Therapy program, all My Therapy programs provided across the seven-day data collection period were audited to capture therapist My Therapy engagement (occupational therapy and physiotherapy prescription and frequency of review of the program). The audit was completed midway through each block.

  • Dosage: The My Therapy programs of group 3 (dosage) participants was audited capturing the focus of the exercise/activities recommended (classified as an exercise) to address: i) body function/structure impairment tasks (e.g. strengthening exercises); or ii) activity/participation based tasks which were considered the practice of functional activities repetitively (e.g. task specific training [Citation17] such as walking or dressing practice) according to the ICF [Citation14]; who recommended the activities/exercises (i.e. occupational therapy or physiotherapy) and the position in which the activities were to be completed (i.e. standing, sitting, lying). The audit was completed midway through each block.

  • Fidelity: Group 4 (fidelity) participants under control and intervention conditions, wore activity monitors capturing physical activity levels in sitting, standing and stepping. Participants were asked to wear an accelerometer-based activity monitor (activPAL, PAL Technologies Limited). Participants were asked to wear monitors for 24 hours per day over seven consecutive days. Monitors were placed on the anterior middle thigh in a zip lock bag, placed on a small piece of gauze to protect the skin and covered by a waterproof dressing

Evaluation of adaptations: The adaptations log was based on the service profile audit completed on each of the participating wards which captured any major deviations to planned implementation (once every six-weeks at the start of each block, capturing information for the previous block, Appendix A, Supplementary Material).

More at link.

Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Theory-based self-management interventions for community-dwelling stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHY, WHY, WHY? Why should there be any self management? Survivors expect that their therapists and doctors have created EXACT 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS. And all survivors have to do is follow them to get recovered.


 Theory-based self-management interventions for community-dwelling stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , Volume 76(4) , Pgs. 7604205010.

NARIC Accession Number: J89979.  What's this?
ISSN: 0272-9490.
Author(s): Lau, Stephen C. L.; Judycki, Stephanie; Mix, Mikayla; DePaul, Olivia; Tomazin, Rachel; Hardi, Angela; Wong, Alex W. K.; Baum, Carolyn.
Publication Year: 2022.
Number of Pages: 12.
Abstract: 
 This review examined what theories and behavior change techniques (BCTs) have been applied in stroke self-management interventions; investigated the extent to which these interventions encourage implementation of behavior changes; and appraised their effectiveness to enhance self-efficacy, quality of life, and functional independence. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to May 26, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that: involved community-dwelling adult stroke survivors, assessed the effectiveness of self-management interventions, and explicitly mentioned the use of theory in the development of the intervention. A total of 3,049 studies were screened; 13 RCTs were retained for systematic review, 8 of which were included for meta-analysis. The use of theory and BCTs were assessed using the Theory Coding Scheme and the BCT taxonomy v1, respectively. The predominant theory and BCT categories were Social Cognitive Theory (7 studies) and goals and planning (12 studies), respectively. Significant and small effect sizes were found for self-efficacy (0.27) and functional independence (0.19). Theory-based self-management interventions have the potential to enhance stroke outcomes. Systematic reporting on the use of theory and BCTs is recommended to enhance clarity and facilitate evaluations of future interventions. This review supports and guides occupational therapy practitioners to use theory-based self-management intervention as a routine part of stroke rehabilitation to improve stroke survivors' experience in the community.
Descriptor Terms: INTERVENTION, LITERATURE REVIEWS, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, PHILOSOPHY, SELF CARE, STROKE.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.

Citation: Lau, Stephen C. L., Judycki, Stephanie, Mix, Mikayla, DePaul, Olivia, Tomazin, Rachel, Hardi, Angela, Wong, Alex W. K., Baum, Carolyn. (2022). Theory-based self-management interventions for community-dwelling stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , 76(4), Pgs. 7604205010. Retrieved 10/25/2022, from REHABDATA database.

Saturday, October 1, 2022

The use of self-management strategies for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review

WHY, WHY, WHY? Why should there be any self management? Survivors expect that their therapists and doctors have created EXACT 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS. And all survivors have to do is follow them to get recovered.

The use of self-management strategies for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review


Received 30 Jun 2022, Accepted 18 Sep 2022, Published online: 27 Sep 2022
 

Introduction

Self-management is generally considered a dynamic and collaborative process by individuals and caregivers to manage a chronic condition. Self-management has recently emerged as a promising strategy for stroke rehabilitation. This scoping review aims to examine and summarize self-management strategies utilized by stroke survivors for stroke rehabilitation.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, and ProQuest were searched for articles published between January 2010 and December 2021. Studies were selected if they were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal, utilized a non-experimental research design, and focused on adult stroke survivors. All relevant information from the included articles was extracted in a systematic way using a pre-developed data extraction form. Two authors performed data extraction and quality evaluation independently. All issues were resolved through discussion among the authors.

Results

We narratively summarized the findings of 15 quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, including a total of 1,494 stroke survivors. The stroke survivors used a range of self-management strategies for their stroke rehabilitation, including domains related to lifestyle, social support, communication, knowledge and information, and goal-setting. Gender, age, stroke-related disability, fatigue, self-management education, social support, and communication with others were found to be associated with self-management use in stroke rehabilitation.

Conclusions

This scoping review provides an important overview on stroke survivors’ use of self-management strategies and their experience. Their use of self-management strategies is complicated and multifaceted, comprising several domains and involving a diverse range of approaches and personal experiences. However, we identified several gaps in the literature and more research is required.

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review.

I don't understand and thus would never be able to tell my staff what needs to be done. 

Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review.

Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine , Volume 7(3) , Pgs. 139-148.

NARIC Accession Number: J87400.  What's this?
ISSN: 2095-882X.
Author(s): Ruksakulpiwat, Suebsarn ; Zhou, Wendie.
Publication Year: 2021.
Number of Pages: 10.
Abstract: Study systematically identified and analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management interventions for adults with stroke. A scoping review on stroke and self-management interventions was conducted based on the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus Full Text, Medline Plus Full Text, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to July 2020 to identify relevant studies. Fifty-four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The most popular study design is comparing a self-management intervention to usual care or waitlist control condition. Physical activity is the most common intervention topic, and interventions were mainly delivered face to face. Most interventions were located in inpatient and multiple settings. Interventions were conducted by various providers, with nurses the most common provider group. Symptom management was the most frequently reported outcome domain that improved. Self-management interventions benefit the symptom management of stroke patients a lot. The reasonable time for intervention is at least 6 to 12 months. Multifarious intervention topics, delivery formats, and providers are adopted mostly to meet the multiple needs of this population. Physical activity was the most popular topic currently. Studies comparing the effect of different types of self-management interventions are required in the future.
Descriptor Terms: INTERVENTION, LITERATURE REVIEWS, OUTCOMES, SELF CARE, STROKE.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095882X21000220?via%3Dihub.

Citation: Ruksakulpiwat, Suebsarn , Zhou, Wendie. (2021). Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review.  Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine , 7(3), Pgs. 139-148. Retrieved 11/24/2021, from REHABDATA database.
 

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Effects of a Goal-Oriented Intervention on Self-Management Behaviors and Self-Perceived Burden After Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

 Since everyone's goal is 100% recovery, EXACTLY HOW IS THIS GOING TO GET THEM THERE?

Effects of a Goal-Oriented Intervention on Self-Management Behaviors and Self-Perceived Burden After Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Yu Chen1†, Yuanyuan Wei2†, Hongjuan Lang1, Ting Xiao1, Yan Hua1, Lu Li3, Jing Wang1, Hongxia Guo4*‡ and Chunping Ni1*‡
  • 1School of Nursing, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
  • 2Leshan Retired Cadre Sanatorium, Leshan, China
  • 3College of Basic Medicne, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
  • 4West China School of Nursing/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Background: Stroke generates significant health and social burdens. Self-management has potential importance for supporting individuals in coping and continuing to progress after stroke. However, there is a lack of targeted programs to enhance self-management and reduce self-perceived burden (SPB) following stroke.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of a goal-oriented intervention on self-management behaviors and SPB among patients after acute stroke.

Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial with a 4-weeks intervention. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 48) or control group (n = 48). The intervention and control groups received eight sessions of goal-oriented self-management intervention based on Pender's health promotion model and control care, respectively. Self-management behaviors and SPB were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Results: After the 1-month follow-up, there were significant differences in the total self-management behaviors score and the scores of six of the self-management dimensions, excluding diet management, between the intervention group and the control group (t = −7.891– −2.815; p ≤ 0.006). Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed a significant decrease in the physical burden, emotional burden, and total SPB scores (t = 2.102–2.071; p = 0.015–0.041). The economic burden score was not significantly different between the two groups (t = 1.707; p = 0.091).

Conclusion: The goal-oriented intervention based on Pender's health promotion model can effectively improve self-management behaviors and reduce physical and emotional SPB among stroke survivors.

Introduction

Globally, stroke was the third leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and the second leading cause of death worldwide in 2017 (1, 2). In the United States, someone has a stroke approximately every 40 s, and someone dies of stroke every 4 min, and 50–70% of stroke survivors suffer from chronic neurological or cognitive impairment (3). The overall burden of stroke, including health, economic, and social costs, has been increasing for individuals, families, and national healthcare systems (1, 4). Stroke-related healthcare costs were estimated at $73.3 billion in 2010 (3). For stroke survivors, especially those with disabilities, receiving care imposes a high level of self-perceived burden (SPB). SPB is defined as “empathic concern engendered from the impact on others of one's illness and care needs, resulting in guilt, distress, feelings of responsibility, and diminished sense of self” (5). The study of Ren et al. showed that 65.8% of inpatients with stroke had SPB (6). SPB has negative influences on patients' rehabilitation and quality of life (7, 8). The mortality of recurrent stroke is higher than that of first-ever stroke (9–11). The negative impact of SPB will further increase the risk of stroke recurrence. Hence, stroke survivors' reduction in SPB should be considered equally important as other measures in their rehabilitation and the prevention of stroke recurrence.

Self-management has been advocated as one of the key strategies that enables individuals to reduce the risk of subsequent stroke, practice new healthy behaviors, and improve quality of life following stroke (12–14). At the national and international levels, self-management education programs have been recognized as an important approach to addressing the burden of chronic disease and helping individuals manage their condition more effectively (15, 16). However, evidence from six studies showed that self-management programs were not superior to other programs in terms of their effects in the domains of locus of control, activities of daily living, medication adherence, participation, or mood (17). In China, many stroke patients lack disease and rehabilitation management behaviors. There is little knowledge about the prevention of stroke recurrence, reduction in complications, and rehabilitation exercise (18). Individuals' capacity and support for self-management affect their stroke self-management (19). Currently, targeted programs to enhance self-management behaviors and reduce SPB following acute stroke are lacking.

Successful interventions for patients with chronic diseases should pay attention to health-promoting lifestyles and their influencing factors (20). Pender's health promotion model emphasizes assisting people in changing their lifestyles and moving toward a state of optimal health (21). Goal-oriented instructions were proven to be effective in increasing the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation (22). While previous studies have assessed health behavior modification after stroke, no randomized controlled trials have been developed to test the effectiveness and feasibility of an intervention combined with a self-management goal and Pender's model. Thus, the current study designed a goal-oriented self-management intervention based on Pender's health promotion model for stroke patients. Telephone follow-up intervention has been found to be effective in improving health behaviors among many chronic disease patients, such as hypertensive patients for cardiovascular disease risk reduction (23) and diabetes patients for self-care activities (24). In this study, the telephone follow-up intervention was delivered early after acute stroke. The main aim was to test whether the program could improve self-management behaviors and reduce the SPB of stroke patients in the first month after discharge.

More at link.

 

Friday, February 23, 2018

Stroke survivors and carers feel marginalized due to lack of support from primary care

This is so easy to explain, stroke professionals provide NO concrete ways to recover, NO protocols, NOTHING but guidelines.

Stroke survivors and carers feel marginalized due to lack of support from primary care

A systematic review of studies focused on stroke survivors' and carers' experiences of primary care and community healthcare services has found that they feel abandoned because they have become marginalized by services and do not have the knowledge or skills to re-engage.
The study, by researchers at the University of Cambridge, suggests that primary care and community healthcare interventions which focus on improving active follow-up and information provision to patients and caregivers, especially in the first year after stroke, could help improve patient self-management and increase stroke-specific health literacy.
Globally, stroke is the second leading cause of death. Stroke-related disability burden is on the rise with a 12% increase worldwide since 1990, and contributes to the large economic burden of stroke due to healthcare use, informal care and the loss of productivity. The annual cost of stroke, including health care cost, medicines and missed days of work, is estimated at $33 billion in the USA and £8.9 billion in the UK.
Primary care could play an important role in the care of stroke survivors and their caregivers, supporting access to community services and facilitating transfer back to specialist services when new problems emerge. It could also help provide training, and identify and address health needs of caregivers. However, the feeling of abandonment that people with stroke experience following hospital discharge suggests this role is not being fulfilled.
To better understand the possible reasons behind this feeling of abandonment, a team at Cambridge's Department of Public Health and Primary Care carried out a systematic review of qualitative evidence in the field. In total, they analyzed 51 studies (encompassing 566 stroke survivors and 593 caregivers). Their results are published today in the journal PLOS ONE.
The analysis found an unaddressed need for continued support in a quarter of studies. Survivors and caregivers felt frustrated and dissatisfied with a lack of proactive follow-up either from primary care, the hospital, or allied healthcare professionals. This led to feelings of dissatisfaction, uncertainty, that a stroke survivor was "forgotten and written off" and that their general practice did not care about them.
Lack of support for caregivers was reported in more than one in five studies (22%), even though they felt healthcare professionals assumed that they would provide the majority of care needed. They felt ill prepared and pressured to "become experts" in caring for stroke survivors. In addition, both survivors and caregivers felt emotional support was lacking, even though they are at risk of anxiety and depression.
Long waiting times for assessment and rehabilitation and little or no help from social services left survivors feeling "left in the lurch". Caregivers felt that access to rehabilitation was not provided early enough, causing survivors to "go backwards".
More than two out of five (41%) of studies highlighted gaps in information provision. Opportunities for support could be missed due to the lack of knowledge of what services were available. The lack of information about local services and how to find them was confusing and prevented access. Many caregivers and survivors had to find out information by themselves from the internet, friends and other caregivers. When information was provided, it was often inconsistent and covered only some services.
A quarter (23%) of the studies highlighted inadequate information on stroke, its consequences, and recovery. Information presented too early after stroke disempowered stroke survivors and caregivers, leading to feelings of confusion, fear and powerlessness. Survivors and caregivers wanted specific information on the significance of post-stroke symptoms and how to manage them. Lack of information led to unrealistic expectations of "getting back to normal", leading to disappointment and tensions between the survivor and caregiver.
Ineffective communication between survivors, caregivers and healthcare services as well as within healthcare services resulted in feelings of frustration and having "to battle the system". Gaps in the transfer of knowledge within the healthcare system and the use of medical jargon sometimes caused confusion and were construed as indifference to survivors' needs.
"Patients and caregivers would benefit from active follow up and information provision about stroke that is tailored to their specific needs, which change over time," says Professor Jonathan Mant, who led the study. "People take active efforts to find information for themselves, but navigating and appraising it can be challenging. What is needed is trustworthy information written in an accessible language and format, which could support better self-management."
The study found that that many stroke survivors and caregivers felt marginalized due to the misalignment between how healthcare access in primary care is organized and survivors' and caregivers' competencies. For example, individuals felt that in order to access services they needed an awareness of what services are available, plus the ability to communicate effectively with healthcare professionals. This situation can be compounded by cognitive, speech and language problems that can further affect a patient's ability to negotiate healthcare access.
"Stroke survivors and their caregivers can feel abandoned because they struggle to access the appropriate health services, leading to marginalization," says Dr Lisa Lim, one of the study authors. "This arises because of a number of factors, including lack of continuity of care, limited and delayed access to community services, and inadequate information about stroke, recovery and healthcare services.
"We need mechanisms to encourage better communication and collaboration between generalist services, which tend to provide the longer term care after stroke, and specialist services, which provide the care in the immediate phase post-stroke."
The researchers argue that providing support from healthcare professionals within the first year after stroke would increase patients' ability to self-manage their chronic condition. This can be achieved by providing timely and targeted information about stroke, available resources, and by regular follow-ups to foster supporting long-term relationships with healthcare professionals.(This is a useless suggestion, it assumes managing your stroke disabilities rather than curing them)
"Giving the right information at the right time will help stroke survivors and their caregivers become more self-reliant over time and better able to self-manage living with stroke," adds Dr Lim.
The team identified two key areas of improvement to address patients' and caregivers' marginalization: increasing stroke-specific health literacy by targeted and timely information provision, and improving continuity of care and providing better access to community healthcare services.