Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label cTBS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cTBS. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Continuous theta-burst stimulation enhances and sustains neurogenesis following ischemic stroke

 

Damn it all, write up a fucking protocol so it can be critiqued and refined or improved upon.  Because we have no one writing protocols no one knows what else is going on in other areas of the world. As a result stroke survivors are badly served. A great stroke association president would be knocking heads over this lack of professionalism.  And yet our fucking failures of stroke associations  do nothing to solve this problem. DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!

Continuous theta-burst stimulation enhances and sustains neurogenesis following ischemic stroke

Abstract

Rationale: Previous work has indicated that continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), a modality of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), may provide neuroprotection and improve neurological function after stroke by preserving the blood-brain barrier, altering glial polarization phenotypes, and supporting peri-infarct angiogenesis. The present study was performed to examine whether cTBS, a noninvasive neurostimulation technique, promotes neurogenesis in a photothrombotic (PT) stroke rat model and contributes to functional recovery.

Methods: Beginning 3 h or 1 week after the induction of PT stroke, once-daily 5-min cTBS treatments were applied to the infarcted hemisphere for 6 days. Samples were collected 6 days, 22 days, and 35 days after PT stroke. Fluorescent labeling, Western blotting, and behavioral tests were performed accordingly.

Results: We found that cTBS therapy significantly expanded the pool of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and newly generated immature neurons in the cortical peri-infarct region after PT stroke. Likewise, the amount of DCX-positive immature neurons in the peri-infarct area was markedly elevated by cTBS. Application of cTBS strikingly diminished the PT-induced loss of NPCs and newly-formed neurons. In addition, the amount of newly generated mature neurons in the peri-infarct zone was significantly promoted by cTBS. Intriguingly, cTBS reduced reactive gliogenesis significantly while promoting oligodendrogenesis and preserving myelination. Mechanistic studies uncovered that cTBS upregulated brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2). Finally, cTBS-treated animals displayed improved motor functions. To be noted, temozolomide (TMZ), a drug that has been previously used to suppress neurogenesis, could reverse the beneficial effects of cTBS.

Conclusions: Our findings provide new insight into the mechanism by which cTBS promotes functional recovery from stroke. We demonstrated that cTBS effectively enhances and sustains neurogenesis after PT stroke. Both early and delayed cTBS treatment could improve the survival of newly generated neurons and functional recovery, and inhibition of neurogenesis could reverse these therapeutic benefits. Mechanistically, cTBS was effective in upregulating the release of neurotrophic factors, protecting NPC and immature neurons, as well as suppressing excessive gliogenesis.

Keywords: Ischemic stroke, Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), Neurogenesis, Functional recovery, Neurotrophic factors

Introduction

Stroke, the cessation or reduction of blood flow to a part of the brain, is a pressing public health issue in the United States, affecting nearly 800,000 people every year . This disease takes a drastic toll on patients; ~150,000 people died from a stroke in 2018 alone, and 50% of survivors developed some form of chronic disability , . Ischemic stroke is the most common form of stroke, accounting for 87% of cases, and occurs when a cerebral blood vessel is occluded, usually from a clot. Unfortunately, effective treatment options for stroke are currently limited to mechanical thrombectomy and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) . However, both of these treatment strategies must be applied within a short time window to save brain tissue within the core infarct, 4.5 hours for tPA and 6 hours for mechanical thrombectomy . As a result, only a few patients will benefit from these treatment interventions, and the functional recovery of survivors is usually limited. Indeed, even if reperfusion means such as intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy are applied, the 90-day good prognosis rate (mRS score 0-2) of patients is only about 50%, with a high recurrence rate of related symptoms. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop new treatment strategies that can effectively reduce disability rates and facilitate functional recovery.

The process of post-stroke neuronal cell death is not immediate, however. While the tissue at the infarct site is lost due to necrotic cell death within four hours of stroke, neurons in the surrounding tissue, called the penumbra or peri-infarct region, slowly die over the next few days through the process of programmed neuronal cell death . Thus, if the peri-infarct tissue could be preserved or restored, neurological outcomes for patients could be improved. Therefore, therapies promoting endogenous repair mechanisms are highly sought after and are the goal of extensive biomedical research.

Once thought to be a phenomenon limited to early development, adult neurogenesis has since been well-established as occurring in response to ischemic brain injury -. Shortly after cerebral ischemia, neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from the subventricular zone (SVZ) and the subgranular zone (SGZ) begin proliferating and migrating to the peri-infarct area . Once there, they begin to differentiate and attempt to incorporate themselves into the neuronal architecture. Unfortunately, the harsh post-stroke neuronal microenvironment takes a toll on NPCs and newly formed neurons, killing most of them long-term , . The hostile milieu present after stroke is mediated, in part, by activated astroglial cells .

Activated astrocytes release inflammatory factors that can, in the early phase, stimulate a neurogenic response. However, a chronic neuroinflammatory response creates toxic microenvironmental conditions that are harmful to new neurons -. However, astroglia can release anti-inflammatory factors and trophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) that are critical for supporting new neurons and oligodendrocyte progenitors as they attempt to repair the peri-infarct site , , , . Thus, one key to neural repair may be noninvasive treatments like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that target different components that contribute to the neuronal microenvironment .

Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) is a modality of TMS that has shown many beneficial actions in the context of stroke and other brain injury models . In TMS, a strong magnetic field is applied to a specific brain region to induce a current that can either stimulate or suppress local activity . This noninvasive therapy is currently used in the clinic for treatment-resistant depression and is praised for its efficacy and minimal adverse effects . In our previous work, we applied cTBS to the photothrombotic stroke model in rats, which uses a photochemical reaction to generate a core infarct surrounded by a rim of salvageable peri-infarct tissue , . We found that cTBS preserved neuronal survival and functional outcomes by ameliorating the hostile post-stroke microenvironment. Furthermore, astroglial and microglial phenotype polarization was shifted from the damaging proinflammatory states to a beneficial anti-inflammatory phenotype in cTBS-treated rats. In addition, cTBS stimulated angiogenesis in the peri-infarct region, which is spatiotemporally coupled with neurogenesis , . Therefore, we conducted the current study to investigate if cTBS can stimulate and support neurogenesis after experimental stroke and determine whether this is supported by trophic factor release.

More at link.

Saturday, September 8, 2018

Comparison of neuroplastic response to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in subacute stroke

Big words, so useless in using this to communicate with your medical staff. No clear statement of what was accomplished and could be used in stroke rehab.

The Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale has no objective distinction for changes in ability and thus would be useless as a measurement tool. 


Comparison of neuroplastic response to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in subacute stroke

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Volume 99(5) , Pgs. 862-872, 872.e1.

NARIC Accession Number: J79097.  What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Nicolo, Pierre; Magnin, Cecile; Pedrazzini, Elena; Plomp, Gijs; Mottaz, Anais; Schnider, Armin; Guggisberg, Adrian G..
Publication Year: 2018.
Number of Pages: 12.
Abstract: Study investigated the effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) on neural network connectivity and motor recovery in individuals with subacute stroke. Forty-one subjects with stroke were randomly assigned to neuronavigated cTBS, cathodal tDCS, or sham transcranial magnetic stimulation/sham tDCS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1). Each subject completed 9 stimulation sessions over 3 weeks, combined with physical therapy. Brain function was assessed with directed and nondirected functional connectivity based on high-density electroencephalography before and after stimulation sessions. The primary clinical outcome measure was the change in slope of the multifaceted motor score composed of the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment score, Box and Block test score, 9-Hole Peg Test score, and Jamar dynamometer results between the baseline period and the treatment time. Neither stimulation treatment enhanced clinical motor gains. Cathodal tDCS and cTBS induced different neural effects. Only cTBS was able to reduce transcallosal influences from the contralesional to the ipsilesional M1 during rest. Conversely, tDCS enhanced perilesional beta-band oscillation coherence compared with cTBS and sham groups. Correlation analyses indicated that the modulation of interhemispheric driving and perilesional beta-band connectivity were not independent mediators for functional recovery across all patients. However, exploratory subgroup analyses suggest that the enhancement of perilesional beta-band connectivity through tDCS might have more robust clinical gains if started within the first 4 weeks after stroke. The inhibition of the contralesional M1 or the reduction of interhemispheric interactions was not clinically useful in this heterogeneous group of subjects with subacute stroke. An early modulation of perilesional oscillation coherence seems to be a more promising strategy for brain stimulation interventions.
Descriptor Terms: BRAIN, DEXTERITY, ELECTRICAL STIMULATION, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, LIMBS, MOTOR SKILLS, PHYSICAL THERAPY, STROKE.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Not available from NARIC.

Citation: Nicolo, Pierre, Magnin, Cecile, Pedrazzini, Elena, Plomp, Gijs, Mottaz, Anais, Schnider, Armin, Guggisberg, Adrian G.. (2018). Comparison of neuroplastic response to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in subacute stroke.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 99(5), Pgs. 862-872, 872.e1. Retrieved 9/8/2018, from REHABDATA database.

Friday, June 10, 2016

Combining Robotic Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Severe Upper Limb-Impaired Chronic Stroke Patients

Damn it all, write up a fucking protocol so it can be critiqued and refined or improved upon.  Because we have no one writing protocols no one knows what else is going on in other areas of the world. As a result stroke survivors are badly served. A great stroke association president would be knocking heads over this lack of professionalism.  And yet our fucking failures of stroke associations  do nothing to solve this problem. DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!

Combining Robotic Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Severe Upper Limb-Impaired Chronic Stroke Patients

Vincenzo Di Lazzaro1,2*, Fioravante Capone1,2, Giovanni Di Pino1,2, Giovanni Pellegrino1, Lucia Florio1, Loredana Zollo3, Davide Simonetti3, Federico Ranieri1,2, Nicoletta Brunelli1,2, Marzia Corbetto1,2, Sandra Miccinilli4, Marco Bravi4, Stefano Milighetti4, Eugenio Guglielmelli3 and Silvia Sterzi4
  • 1Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
  • 2Fondazione Alberto Sordi - Research Institute for Ageing, Rome, Italy
  • 3Unit of Biomedical Robotics and Biomicrosystems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
  • 4Unit of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
Previous studies suggested that both robot-assisted rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation can produce a slight improvement in severe chronic stroke patients. It is still unknown whether their combination can produce synergistic and more consistent improvements. Safety and efficacy of this combination has been assessed within a proof-of-principle, double-blinded, semi-randomized, sham-controlled trial. Inhibitory continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) was delivered on the affected hemisphere, in order to improve the response to the following robot-assisted therapy via a homeostatic increase of learning capacity. Twenty severe upper limb-impaired chronic stroke patients were randomized to robot-assisted therapy associated with real or sham cTBS, delivered for 10 working days. Eight real and nine sham patients completed the study. Change in Fugl-Meyer was chosen as primary outcome, while changes in several quantitative indicators of motor performance extracted by the robot as secondary outcomes. The treatment was well-tolerated by the patients and there were no adverse events. All patients achieved a small, but significant, Fugl-Meyer improvement (about 5%). The difference between the real and the sham cTBS groups was not significant. Among several secondary end points, only the Success Rate (percentage of targets reached by the patient) improved more in the real than in the sham cTBS group. This study shows that a short intensive robot-assisted rehabilitation produces a slight improvement in severe upper-limb impaired, even years after the stroke. The association with homeostatic metaplasticity-promoting non-invasive brain stimulation does not augment the clinical gain in patients with severe stroke.

Introduction

Severe upper limb impairment in chronic stroke patients does not respond to standard rehabilitation strategies; for this reason there is the need of new treatments that might be effective in patients with drastically limited residual movement capacity. In patients with moderate to severe upper-limb impairment, a slight improvement have been reported using robot-assisted rehabilitative treatment, even years after a stroke (Lo et al., 2010). Another innovative approach for the enhancement of motor recovery is represented by non-invasive human brain stimulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). These techniques can induce long-lasting changes in the excitability of central motor circuits via long-term potentiation/depression (LTP/LTD)-like phenomena (Di Pino et al., 2014b). A recent study reported a mild motor improvement after 10 sessions of rTMS in a group of severe chronic stroke patients (Demirtas-Tatlidedea et al., 2015).
Aim of present study was to explore whether the combination of these two approaches might enhance their positive effects on motor recovery. To the end of assessing safety and potential efficacy of the combination of robot-assisted rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation in a group of chronic stroke patients with severe upper limb impairment, we designed a proof-of-principle double blinded semi-randomized sham-controlled trial. We used continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a robust form of inhibitory rTMS inducing LTD-like changes lasting for about 1 h [8]. The choice of employing cTBS on the affected hemisphere was based on the findings of our recent study, which suggested that this inhibitory protocol can improve the response to physical therapy (Di Lazzaro et al., 2013). Moreover, rTMS protocols suppressing cortical excitability have been shown to strongly facilitate motor learning in normal subjects (Jung and Ziemann, 2009). Jung and Ziemann suggested that such enhancement might involve the phenomenon of “homeostatic” plasticity, which can be induced in the human brain using a variety of brain stimulation protocols (Karabanov et al., 2015). Considering the close link between LTP and mammalian learning and memory (Malenka and Bear, 2004), an enhancement of learning after LTD induction might appear a paradox. However, the experimental studies by Rioult-Pedotti et al. demonstrated the existence of a homeostatic balance between learning and the induction of LTP/LTD (Rioult-Pedotti et al., 2000), thus showing that the ease of producing synaptic LTP/LTD depends on the prior history of neural activity. In the context of stroke, this predicts that by delivering a rTMS protocol that induces LTD-like effects on the stroke-affected hemisphere before performing rehabilitation, would luckily result in better relearning (Di Pino et al., 2014a).