Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drugs. Show all posts

Monday, May 3, 2021

Differences in outcomes following an intensive upper-limb rehabilitation program for patients with common central nervous system-acting drug prescriptions

Something for your doctor to consider.

Differences in outcomes following an intensive upper-limb rehabilitation program for patients with common central nervous system-acting drug prescriptions

First Published April 9, 2021 Research Article Find in PubMed 

Background: 

Difficulty using the upper-limb is a major barrier to independence for many patients post-stroke or brain injury. High dose rehabilitation can result in clinically significant improvements in function even years after the incident; however, there is still high variability in patient responsiveness to such interventions that cannot be explained by age, sex, or time since stroke.  

Methods: 

This retrospective study investigated whether patients prescribed certain classes of central nervous system-acting drugs—γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists, antiepileptics, and antidepressants—differed in their outcomes on the three-week intensive Queen Square Upper-Limb program. For 277 stroke or brain injury patients (167 male, median age 52 years (IQR: 21), median time since incident 20 months (IQR: 26)) upper-limb impairment and activity was assessed at admission to the program and at six months post-discharge, using the upper limb component of the Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test, and Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory. Drug prescriptions were obtained from primary care physicians at referral. Specification curve analysis was used to protect against selective reporting results and add robustness to the conclusions of this retrospective study. Results: Patients with GABA agonist prescriptions had significantly worse upper-limb scores at admission but no evidence for a significant difference in program-induced improvements was found. Additionally, no evidence of significant differences in patients with or without antiepileptic drug prescriptions on either admission to, or improvement on, the program was found in this study. Although no evidence was found for differences in admission scores, patients with antidepressant prescriptions experienced reduced improvement in upper-limb function, even when accounting for anxiety and depression scores.  

Conclusions: 

These results demonstrate that, when prescribed typically, there was no evidence that patients prescribed GABA agonists performed worse on this high-intensity rehabilitation program. Patients prescribed antidepressants, however, performed poorer than expected on the Queen Square Upper-Limb rehabilitation program. While the reasons for these differences are unclear, identifying these patients prior to admission may allow for better accommodation of differences in their rehabilitation needs.

 

Saturday, May 30, 2015

Smuggling Drugs into the Brain: An Overview of Ligands Targeting... (2015)

Whenever we do find drugs to deliver, we will need this.
Smuggling Drugs into the Brain: An Overview of Ligands Targeting... (2015)

Published inPharmaceutics, Vol. 6, No. 4, p.557-83. AuthorZuhorn, Inge; Georgieva, Julia V.; Hoekstra, Dick PublisherCenter for Liver, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (CLDM); Nanobiotechnology and Advanced Therapeutic Materials (NANOBIOMAT); Molecular Neuroscience and Ageing Research (MOLAR) Date2015 LanguageEnglish TypeArticle 

Abstract


The blood-brain barrier acts as a physical barrier that prevents free entry of blood-derived substances, including those intended for therapeutic applications. The development of molecular Trojan horses is a promising drug targeting technology that allows for non-invasive delivery of therapeutics into the brain. This concept relies on the application of natural or genetically engineered proteins or small peptides, capable of specifically ferrying a drug-payload that is either directly coupled or encapsulated in an appropriate nanocarrier, across the blood-brain barrier via receptor-mediated transcytosis. Specifically, in this process the nanocarrier-drug system ("Trojan horse complex") is transported transcellularly across the brain endothelium, from the blood to the brain interface, essentially trailed by a native receptor. Naturally, only certain properties would favor a receptor to serve as a transporter for nanocarriers, coated with appropriate ligands. Here we briefly discuss brain microvascular endothelial receptors that have been explored until now, highlighting molecular features that govern the efficiency of nanocarrier-mediated drug delivery into the brain. Publicationhttps://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/smuggling...

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Getting into your head: Gelatin nanoparticles could deliver drugs to the brain

Now if we just had a strategy to identify candidate drugs for this. Ask your neurologist whom the hell needs to be contacted to identify drugs for this purpose. If your neurologist doesn't know that call the hospital president and have that person relieved of duty for not knowing how to practice medicine. If WE don't start taking a hard line with our stroke medical staff they will never fix any of the problems in stroke. Heads need to start rolling. Ranting in full force today, the president of the WSO really needs to justify the incompetency of that organization.
http://news.illinois.edu/news/14/1223gelatin_hyungsoochoi_kyekyoonkim.html
Stroke victims could have more time to seek treatment that could reduce harmful effects on the brain, thanks to tiny blobs of gelatin that could deliver the medication to the brain noninvasively.

University of Illinois researchers and colleagues in South Korea, led by U. of I. electrical and computer engineering senior research scientist Hyungsoo Choi and professor Kyekyoon “Kevin” Kim, published details about the gelatin nanoparticles in the journal Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

The researchers found that gelatin nanoparticles could be laced with medications for delivery to the brain, and that they could extend the treatment window for when a drug could be effective. Gelatin is biocompatible, biodegradable, and classified as “Generally Recognized as Safe” by the Food and Drug Administration. Once administered, the gelatin nanoparticles target damaged brain tissue thanks to an abundance of gelatin-munching enzymes produced in injured regions.

The tiny gelatin particles have a huge benefit: They can be administered nasally, a noninvasive and direct route to the brain. This allows the drug to bypass the blood-brain barrier, a biological fence that prevents the vast majority of drugs from entering the brain through the bloodstream.
“Overcoming the difficulty of delivering therapeutic agents to specific regions of the brain presents a major challenge to treatment of most neurological disorders,” said Choi.  “However, if drug substances can be transferred along the olfactory nerve cells, they can bypass the blood-brain barrier and enter the brain directly.”

To test gelatin nanoparticles as a drug-delivery system, the researchers used the drug osteopontin (OPN), which in rats can help to reduce inflammation and prevent brain cell death if administered immediately after a stroke.

“It is crucial to treat ischemic strokes within three hours to improve the chances of recovery. However, a significant number of stroke victims don’t get to the hospital in time for the treatment,” Kim said.

By lacing gelatin nanoparticles with OPN, the researchers found that they could extend the treatment window in rats, so much so that treating a rat with nanoparticles six hours after a stroke showed the same efficacy rate as giving them OPN alone after one hour – 70 percent recovery of dead volume in the brain.

The researchers hope the gelatin nanoparticles, administered through the nasal cavity, can help deliver other drugs to more effectively treat a variety of brain injuries and neurological diseases.

“Gelatin nanoparticles are a delivery vehicle that could be used to deliver many therapeutics to the brain,” Choi said. “They will be most effective in delivering drugs that cannot cross the blood-brain barrier. In addition, they can be used for drugs of high toxicity or a short half-life.“

Both Choi and Kim are members of the Micro and Nano Technology Laboratory at the U. of I. Kim is also affiliated with the Neuroscience Program, the Institute for Genomic Biology, the Beckman Institute and the departments of bioengineering, of materials science and engineering, and of nuclear, plasma and radiological engineering at the U. of I.


Monday, October 27, 2014

What is the drug development landscape for Brain drugs?

This quote from

Is Big Pharma shying away from CNS drugs?
Because the brain remains so poorly understood, Big Pharma are having a bad time developing pharmaceuticals which act upon the central nervous system (CNS). After a number of very loud and painful CNS clinical trial failures in recent years, GSK, AstraZeneca and Novartis have announced total closures of neuroscience divisions globally. Meanwhile Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen and Merck have begun to significantly downsize CNS operations.
Few remain in the race. And who can blame them, when CNS drug development can cost billions more than any other therapeutic area, yet has a 45% higher chance of failure than drugs targeting other disorders?

With this as the landscape the only hope I can see is for a great stroke association to take charge, plan out a strategy and solicit funds to hire researchers to solve those specific problems identified in the strategy. 
Notably like:
the Michael J. Fox Foundation
Myelin Repair and the
Alzheimers Association 
I could easily see shilling for donors, asking if they want to donate to the stem cell line of research, or the glutamate poisoning line, or the excitotoxicity line, or their own choice(naming rights available).
Or do they want to support the boring press release line, - F.A.S.T, eat healthy, exercise, prevention, etc.

The existing focus of the ASA, NSA and WSO is not enough to solve any of the problems in stroke. New thinking is required and I doubt that will come from any of them.

Monday, August 4, 2014

African Plant May Be Possible Treatment for Aging Brain

Where does this fit in the strategy to solve stroke problems? ASA, NSA, WSO?  What is your considered opinion on this? You have hundreds, if not thousands of employees. Have them come up with an answer. I can't do everything until I get my minions.
http://www.biosciencetechnology.com/news/2014/08/african-plant-may-be-possible-treatment-aging-brain?
One paragraph here;
When Currais and Maher isolated different components of the plant, they found that the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects of the plant were mostly due to one molecule, called voacamine. The compound hasn’t yet been tested in animal models but its performance in the assays suggests that it may have pharmaceutical potential for treating Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s or stroke.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Sex matters: Drugs can affect sexes differently

And what is our stroke world doing to determine if any changes are needed for the drugs we use? (tPA, warfarin, aspirin, anti-depressants, baclofen, botox).
ANYTHING AT ALL?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sex-matters-drugs-can-affect-sexes-differently/

Monday, April 1, 2013

Off-Label Drug Use: What You Need to Know

You will need to study up on this if you want to insist on some of the items I pointed out here:
What I am going to insist I get after my next stroke
Botox is a good example. It was not approved for stroke spasticity until 2010, but even then only for arm/wrist/hand.  In 2006 I had it for leg and toe muscles also and was never told it was an off-label use.

http://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/features/off-label-drug-use-what-you-need-to-know

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Safety in pharmacological enhancement of stroke rehabilitation

Some drugs to avoid which your doctor had better know about.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23438654

Abstract

Pharmacological enhancement of neurorehabilitation is based on the concept of neuroplasticity. Agents with probably unfavourable effects on recovery (e.g. classical antiepileptic drugs, butyrophenones) should be avoided. The findings of experimental studies in animal models, investigations in healthy subjects and the findings of neurophysiological studies indicate that there is scope for benefit from pharmacological enhancement in stroke rehabilitation in the clinical setting - in addition to rehabilitative therapies. Randomized controlled clinical trials have shown benefit of pharmacological enhancement in stroke rehabilitation for some agents. Nevertheless, the clinical evidence regarding benefits of this treatment approach is still considered weak for the following reason: First, the beneficial findings of some studies were not confirmed by others. Second, several studies were limited by small patient populations and narrow inclusion criteria. Third, there were concerns regarding safety of some agents (i.e., piracetam, and amphetamines). Dopaminergic agents, Selective Serotonin-Reuptake-Inhibitors (SSRI) and acetylcholinesterase-inhibitors are promising candidates. Their safety and efficacy should be further investigated; ideally in - sufficiently powered - large randomized controlled trials.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Why drug discovery is so hard

A couple of interesting writeups on this. I wish I could be confident that drugs to stop the neuronal cascade of death will be found but as Dr. Michael Tymianski, of the Toronto Western Hospital Research Institute in Canada mentions 1000 drugs that showed promise in animal models failed in human trials. I have yet to find out why they failed and what has been learned from those failures.
I could care less about it being hard. A Great stroke association would gladly tackle this issue. But alas we have non-functional ones like the ASA, NSA and WSO. Please respond with your excuses, I will print them.
This is way too important to leave it to drug companies to figure out. We as survivors need to push researchers to explain what they have already done and ruled out and what their plans  look like to successfully come up with a neuroprotective drug.


1.A Broadside Against The Way We Do Things Now 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Traditional drug-discovery model ripe for reform

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

3.What are the main discovery issues facing drug discovery companies right now? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4.  Drug discovery in jeopardy

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5.  Drug Discovery  The Pending Crisis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6.  Future Directions in Drug Design & Discovery

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Major Issues and Trends in Drug Discovery and Development: India’s Emerging Role

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8.  The end of drug discovery?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9.   CNS Drug Discovery & Development 2012: Problems, Promises and Solutions

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 



Tuesday, July 24, 2012

New drug could treat Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis and brain injury

So get your researcher involved, So much to remember at the hospital for my next stroke since I'm sure my doctors won't have knowledge of these off-label  drugs.
But I can hope that Dr. Algorithm is on duty.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-07/nu-ndc072312.php

1-size-fits-all drug targets harmful brain inflammation in many diseases

CHICAGO --- A new class of drug developed at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine shows early promise of being a one-size-fits-all therapy for Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury by reducing inflammation in the brain.
Northwestern has recently been issued patents to cover this new drug class and has licensed the commercial development to a biotech company that has recently completed the first human Phase 1 clinical trial for the drug.
The drugs in this class target a particular type of brain inflammation, which is a common denominator in these neurological diseases and in traumatic brain injury and stroke. This brain inflammation, also called neuroinflammation, is increasingly believed to play a major role in the progressive damage characteristic of these chronic diseases and brain injuries.
By addressing brain inflammation, the new class of drugs -- represented by MW151 and MW189 -- offers an entirely different therapeutic approach to Alzheimer's than current ones being tested to prevent the development of beta amyloid plaques in the brain. The plaques are an indicator of the disease but not a proven cause.
A new preclinical study published today in the Journal of Neuroscience, reports that when one of the new Northwestern drugs is given to a mouse genetically engineered to develop Alzheimer's, it prevents the development of the full-blown disease. The study, from Northwestern's Feinberg School and the University of Kentucky, identifies the optimal therapeutic time window for administering the drug, which is taken orally and easily crosses the blood-brain barrier.
"This could become part of a collection of drugs you could use to prevent the development of Alzheimer's," said D. Martin Watterson, a professor of molecular pharmacology and biological chemistry at the Feinberg School, whose lab developed the drug. He is a coauthor of the study.
In previous animal studies, the same drug reduced the neurological damage caused by closed-head traumatic brain injury and inhibited the development of a multiple sclerosis-like disease. In these diseases as well as in Alzheimer's, the studies show the therapy time window is critical.
MW151 and MW189 work by preventing the damaging overproduction of brain proteins called proinflammatory cytokines. Scientists now believe overproduction of these proteins contributes to the development of many degenerative neurological diseases as well as to the neurological damage caused by traumatic brain injury and stroke.
When too many of the cytokines are produced, the synapses of the brain begin to misfire. Eventually the entire organization of the brain falls into disarray, like a computer failing. The neurons lose their connections with each other and can eventually die. The resulting damage in the cortex and hippocampus can compromise memory and decision-making.
"In Alzheimer's disease, many people now view the progression from mild cognitive impairment to full-blown Alzheimer's as an indication of malfunctioning synapses, the pathways that allow neurons to talk to each other," said Watterson, the John G. Searle Professor of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry. "And high levels of proinflammatory cytokines can contribute to synaptic malfunction."
Because this harmful inflammatory mechanism also appears to be a major player in other neurodegenerative disorders in addition to Alzheimer's, the class of drugs represented by MW151 might hold bright potential as co-therapies for Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, M.S. and the longer term complications of brain injury, Watterson said.
"We need more studies of therapeutic time windows in models of these other diseases so we can better plan future clinical trials," Watterson noted.
In the new study by Northwestern's Watterson and Linda Van Eldik, director of the University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, a mouse model of Alzheimer's received MW151 three times a week starting at six months of age, right at the time the proinflammatory cytokines began to rise. This would be the comparable stage when a human patient would begin to experience mild cognitive impairment.
When the mice brains were later evaluated at 11 months (at a time when disease pathology is usually present), cytokine levels in the mice receiving the drug were restored to normal levels and their synapses were functioning normally. The inflammatory cytokine levels of the mice not receiving the drug, however, were still at abnormally high levels, and the mice had misfiring synapses.
"The drug protected against the damage associated with learning and memory impairment," Van Eldik noted. "Giving this drug before Alzheimer's memory changes are at a late stage may be a promising future approach to therapy."
DRUG INHIBITS MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS DEVELOPMENT
In M.S., overproduction of the proinflammatory cytokines damage the central nervous system and the brain. The proteins directly or indirectly destroy the insulation or coverings of the nerve cells that transmit signals down the spinal cord. When the insulation is stripped, messages aren't properly conducted down the spinal cord.
When mice that were induced to develop an M.S.-like disease received MW151 orally, they did not develop disease as severe.
"We inhibited the development of the disease," said William Karpus, the Marie A. Fleming Research Professor of Pathology at the Feinberg School. "Now we need to learn if the drug can prevent relapses of M.S." That study is ongoing in mice and the results will determine whether a patient trial will be planned.
The only current oral drug treatment for M.S. acts at the level of the lymph nodes, Karpus said. Because the brain is the site of the inflammation and damage, a drug that works in the brain is an ideal therapy.
DRUG PROTECTS BRAIN AFTER TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
After a traumatic brain injury, the glia cells in the brain become hyperactive and release a continuous cascade of proinflammatory cytokines that -- in the long term -- can result in cognitive impairment and epilepsy. As a result of this hyperactivity, researchers believe the brain is more susceptible to serious damage following a second neurological injury.
In a study with mice, Mark Wainright, M.D., professor of pediatric neurology at Northwestern's Feinberg School and a physician at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, showed that when MW151 is given during an early therapeutic window three to six hours after the injury, it blocks glial activation and prevents the flood of proinflammatory cytokines after a traumatic brain injury.
"If you took a drug like this early on after traumatic brain injury or a even a stroke, you could possibly prevent the long-term complications of that injury including the risk of seizures, cognitive impairment and, perhaps, mental health issues," Wainwright said.
Stroke also causes inflammation in the brain that may also be linked to long-term complications including epilepsy and cognitive deficits. As in traumatic brain injury, this inflammatory response is part of the recovery mechanisms used by the brain, so the use of brief and focused treatments like MW151 could prevent the harmful effects of inflammation while allowing the protective effects to occur unimpeded.
In another study, Wainwright showed MW151, when given after a traumatic brain injury, prevented the increased risk of epileptic seizures.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Evidence-based guideline update: Pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults

You'll have to get the complete article from your doctor.
http://www.neurology.org/content/78/17/1337.abstract?sid=17cfe656-7ccc-48d4-b062-383e6522ce00

Abstract

Objective: To provide updated evidence-based recommendations for the preventive treatment of migraine headache. The clinical question addressed was: What pharmacologic therapies are proven effective for migraine prevention?
Methods: The authors analyzed published studies from June 1999 to May 2009 using a structured review process to classify the evidence relative to the efficacy of various medications available in the United States for migraine prevention.
Results and Recommendations: The author panel reviewed 284 abstracts, which ultimately yielded 29 Class I or Class II articles that are reviewed herein. Divalproex sodium, sodium valproate, topiramate, metoprolol, propranolol, and timolol are effective for migraine prevention and should be offered to patients with migraine to reduce migraine attack frequency and severity (Level A). Frovatriptan is effective for prevention of menstrual migraine (Level A). Lamotrigine is ineffective for migraine prevention (Level A).

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Drug Discovery Gets an Upgrade

So who is going to work on hyperacute drugs that stop the cascade of neuronal death? Stroke associations I expect you to step up to the plate or are you still waiting  for your prevention strategy to solve all the stroke problems?

James Baranski -NSA? Dr. Ralph Sacco ASA? Dr. Stephen Davis - WSO?


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304692804577281463426711158.html?mod=dist_smartbrief

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Promising New Compound For Treating Stroke

These researchers are after my heart following some of my ideas. Taking bets on how long before this gets approved in the US, I'll say 20 years.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/241951.php
Researchers at the University of Copenhagen have designed, produced and patented a new chemical compound for the possible treatment of brain damage caused by stroke. The compound binds 1,000 times more effectively to the target protein in the brain than the potential drug currently being tested on stroke victims. The results of biological tests have just been published in the renowned journal PNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America..

More than 140,000 people die each year from stroke in the United States. Stroke causes the brain to release large amounts of glutamate, an activating signal compound, all at once. This overactivates the receptors in the surrounding healthy tissue, causing the level of calcium in the cells to rise dramatically. This then kick-starts a toxic chain reaction causing cell death. Scientists believe that this process is the cause of the brain damage that occurs in the wake of a stroke. Therefore they are looking for compounds that can limit cell death:

"Research on animal models shows that the new compound we have designed and produced reduces the dead area in the brain after a stroke by 40 per cent. In addition, we can show that our compound is far more biologically effective than the potential drug currently being tested in clinical trials," explains Anders Bach, medicinal chemist and postdoc at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences.

Improving motor function in animals

A research project based at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences is the catalyst for the development of drugs to treat brain damage resulting from stroke. A new chemical compound has shown to be extremely potent, binding 1,000 times better than the potential drug currently under clinical development. Biological tests also indicate that the new compound shows high biological activity in animal models and is able to pass through the nearly impermeable blood-brain barrier, which is otherwise a fundamental challenge in clinical drug development.

"Our compound is able to pass through the blood-brain barrier, but also interesting is that it improves motor function in the animals that have been subject to stroke, for example, seen as increased grip strength in the paws of the mice," relates Anders Bach.

Alternative angle to drug development

Previously the development of drugs to combat brain damage resulting from stroke focused on blocking the receptors for signal compounds in the brain, such as glutamate. While this protected the receptor against the danger of overactivation, it unfortunately also influenced the normal vital functions of the receptor, causing unacceptable side effects.

Therefore in recent years there has been increased interest in an alternative strategy where the drug does not influence the receptor directly, but instead acts on the interactions between the receptor and the proteins in the cell. This is an important area of focus for the Chemical Biology research team at the University of Copenhagen:

"Our research is concentrated on disrupting the interaction between the so-called NMDA receptor and the intracellular protein PSD-95. Other scientists have shown interest in the same area - one group has developed a particularly interesting compound that is currently undergoing clinical development. However, we have reconsidered the design of the compounds in this area and come up with a new one that is more effective," states Anders Bach.

Detailed understanding of the molecular mechanism


In order to find compounds that can detach the PSD-95 protein from the NMDA receptor, one must have a method for measuring the extent to which the compounds bind to PSD-95.

"We have established a method - fluorescence polarisation - that has been very successful in helping us develop a number of potent compounds over a long period of time," recounts Anders Bach. He adds that scientists have committed many resources to finding out exactly how the compounds bind to PSD-95 - using for example sophisticated biophysical methods. This has resulted in detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that cause the high level of activity.

Anders Bach hopes that the new compound can form the basis for a new drug on the global market, but he emphasises that such a process is long and complicated:

"Although we are very satisfied with the new results in terms of the possible treatment of brain damage due to stroke, many things can go wrong in the long drug development process. So even though the compound binds effectively in laboratory studies and shows promising biological activity in animal models, we will still have many challenges to overcome," concludes Anders Bach.

The PSD-95 protein is also involved in chronic pain as well as Alzheimer 's disease - so the new compound may also prove interesting to examine in connection with other conditions.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Drug-delivery chip implant shows promise

We could easily use this with a monitoring device that checks your INR levels before releasing the next dose and wirelessly send results to your doctors office. This could be especially useful considering the dangers warfarin use has.
http://bostonglobe.com/business/2012/02/17/futuristic-implanted-chip-delivers-osteoporosis-drug-small-clinical-trial/nCe0o70slgKbxsVJIjO9jN/story.html

It sounds like science fiction: A doctor implants a device about the size of a domino just under the skin near a patient’s waistline. Over weeks, tiny sealed wells on a chip embedded on the device open one by one to release a potent drug on a schedule sent to it wirelessly.

But the futuristic scenario is real. Yesterday, scientists reported the first successful use of the novel technology in a small number of osteoporosis patients, 15 years after an MIT bioengineer was inspired by a television show about how computer chips are made.

“You could deliver many different medicines at once, a pharmacy on a chip,’’ said Robert Langer, who led the work. “You could do . . . remote control delivery, kind of like ‘Star Trek.’ ’’


The technology opens the door to a tantalizing array of possibilities: devices that could be programmed to release a drug by a doctor from afar, or implants that could automatically sense when a diabetic person’s blood sugar levels were dangerously low and release a drug. But the device, being developed by a small Waltham company, MicroCHIPS Inc., is still far from changing how the medicine goes down.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Neuroprotective and neurorestorative effects of thymosin β4 treatment initiated 6 hours after traumatic brain injury in rats Laboratory investigation

6 hours later this can be given. So what specifically is this helping with? Ischemic stroke has the cascade of death via glutamate poisoning, excitotoxicity, non-opening of cpilaries. The researchers should find out specifically what this drug is correcting. Further research needed in stroke survivors which will never occur; NO leadership!

Neuroprotective and neurorestorative effects of thymosin β4 treatment initiated 6 hours after traumatic brain injury in rats Laboratory investigation


Abstract

Object

Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) is a regenerative multifunctional peptide. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that Tβ4 treatment initiated 6 hours postinjury reduces brain damage and improves functional recovery in rats subjected to traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

Traumatic brain injury was induced by controlled cortical impact over the left parietal cortex in young adult male Wistar rats. The rats were randomly divided into the following groups: 1) saline group (n = 7); 2) 6 mg/kg Tβ4 group (n = 8); and 3) 30 mg/kg Tβ4 group (n = 8). Thymosin β4 or saline was administered intraperitoneally starting at 6 hours postinjury and again at 24 and 48 hours. An additional group of 6 animals underwent surgery without TBI (sham-injury group). Sensorimotor function and spatial learning were assessed using the modified Neurological Severity Score and the Morris water maze test, respectively. Animals were euthanized 35 days after injury, and brain sections were processed to assess lesion volume, hippocampal cell loss, cell proliferation, and neurogenesis after Tβ4 treatment.

Results

Compared with saline administration, Tβ4 treatment initiated 6 hours postinjury significantly improved sensorimotor functional recovery and spatial learning, reduced cortical lesion volume and hippocampal cell loss, and enhanced cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the injured hippocampus. The high dose of Tβ4 showed better beneficial effects compared with the low-dose treatment.

Conclusions

Thymosin β4 treatment initiated 6 hours postinjury provides both neuroprotection and neurorestoration after TBI, indicating that Tβ4 has promising therapeutic potential in patients with TBI. These data warrant further investigation of the optimal dose and therapeutic window of Tβ4 treatment for TBI and the associated underlying mechanisms.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Thrombin Activity Associated with Neuronal Damage during Acute Stage of Ischemic Stroke

A new hyperacute damage finding.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-02/cmc-ais013112.php
After ischemic stroke – the type caused by a clogged artery but with no bleeding into the brain – a normal protein that plays a positive role in blood clotting escapes intact arteries and seriously damages healthy brain cells. Scientists previously knew that thrombin leaked out during hemorrhagic strokes, and large amounts of the protein killed neurons. In new studies, researchers found thrombin in the brain after ischemic stroke; injecting a drug to counter the effects of thrombin improved stroke symptoms. Patrick D. Lyden, MD, chair of the Department of Neurology, the Carmen and Louis Warschaw Chair in Neurology at Cedars-Sinai and senior author of the poster presentation abstract, is available for interviews.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Stroke therapy in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM): prospects for drug discovery and development

I pretty much disagree with this, not having seen any drugs with proven usefulness.
13 years ago so if true something should be in use right now. The second link has a deconstruction of the validity of TCM in general.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165614798012760

Abstract

Brain injuries resulting from stroke are a major and increasing public health problem in both developed and developing countries worldwide. China's extensive experience in the use of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) in stroke therapy indicates that TCM preparations are effective(really!sources?), with few or no side-effects. There are more than 100 traditional medicines in use for stroke therapy in China. Some of their therapeutic effects in stroke have been confirmed by recent clinical studies. A large number of compounds have been isolated from TCMs and most of these resources have not yet been characterized for pharmacological purposes. Here, this article explains how TCM provides an extensive and knowledge-rich foundation for implementing a strategically focused pharmacological research programme aimed at the development of new drugs.

TCM Deconstructed here:

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/what-is-traditional-chinese-medicine/

Monday, January 23, 2012

An Energy Shot for the Brain -citicoline

I wrote about this earlier here:
http://oc1dean.blogspot.com/2011/10/introducing-ceraxon-first-only-oral.html
Now they're talking about more studies
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203806504577178970931093522.html
In some countries, citicoline is sold as a prescription drug to help regenerate the brain after a stroke. But efforts to gain Food and Drug Administration approval in U.S. were stymied when clinical trials found citicoline was no more effective than a placebo.

In October, citicoline hit the U.S. market in liquid form as a "medical food" called CerAxon for use in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Medical foods don't require FDA approval but their labels must be truthful and they can be subject to a post-market review, the FDA says. CerAxon, which is sold by Ferrer Group of Barcelona, comes in two daily doses of 1,000 milligrams each. It doesn't require a prescription, but is intended to be used under a doctor's direction, Ferrer says.

Doctors say a study of more than 2,000 people funded by Ferrer—the largest ever on citicoline for stroke—may provide definitive evidence. The results will be announced in May, Ferrer says.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Treatment of stroke with opiate antagonists — Effects of exogenous antagonists and dynorphin 1–13

Originally published
Neuropeptides
Volume 5, Issues 4-6, February 1985
So 27 years later have we learned anything new about this or are we still afraid of using these types of drugs for medical use?
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143417985900149

Abstract

We studied the effects of acute and long-term, continuous administration of six opioid compounds—naloxone, naltrexone, diprenorphine, leucine enkephalin, dynorphin 1–13, and dynorphin 3–13—on neurologic function, survival, and infarct size in a feline model of acute focal cerebral ischemia. Acutely, aaloxone, naltrexone, and diprenorphine significantly improved motor function over baseline scores; the other drugs and saline (control) had no effect. In the long-term condition, no substance administered significantly affected level of consciousness, sensory function, or pupillary reactions. Naloxone, naltrexone, and dynorphin 1–13 significantly prolonged survival (p<0.1); the other substances had no effect. Evaluations of cat brains postmortem showed that the infarcts involved the sensory and motor cortex, internal capsule, and caudate nucleus. Infarct size was unaltered by any treatment administered; results among groups were remarkably similar. In evaluations of opiate receptor binding characteristics, high-affinity binding of ekylketocyclozocine was significantly reduced in the right (occluded) side of the cortex. Dynorphin 1–13 given 8 h postocclusion but before sacrifice increased this binding affinity to the previous level in non-occluded cortex. The observed protective effect of dynorphin 1–13 warrants further investigation. Our results support the involvement of endogenous opioid peptides in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and suggest that, administered appropriately, opiate antagonists may be useful in the treatment of focal ischemic neurologic deficits.

So start carrying them in your ER daypack to give to your ER doctors.

Friday, December 23, 2011

JAMA Commentary Contends Vitamin Therapy Can Still Reduce Stroke

Ok, lets quit arguing and come to a consensus, lives are at stake.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/239580.php
A commentary by Dr. David Spence of The University of Western Ontario and Dr. Meir Stampfer of the Harvard School of Public Health in today's Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) argues that vitamin therapy still has a role to play in reducing stroke.

Vitamin B therapy was once widely used to lower homocysteine levels. Too much of this amino acid in the bloodstream was linked to increased risk of stroke and heart attack. But several randomized trials found lowering homocysteine levels with B vitamins did not result in a cardiovascular benefit. And a study by Dr. Spence, a scientist with the Robarts Research Institute at Western's Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, found Vitamin B therapy actually increased cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Dr. Spence says this commentary provides insights that overturn the widespread belief that "homocysteine is dead." He says two key issues have been overlooked in the interpretation of the clinical trials: the key role of vitamin B12, and the newly recognized role of renal failure.

"It is now clear that the large trials showing no benefit of vitamin therapy obscured the benefit of vitamin therapy because they lumped together patients with renal failure and those with good renal function. The vitamins are harmful in renal failure, and beneficial in patients with good renal function, and they cancel each other out," says Dr. Spence, the author of "How to Prevent Your Stroke." The authors also contend most of the trials did not use a high enough dose of vitamin B12.