Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label DNA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DNA. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Blood vessels and immune cells drive risk for Alzheimer’s and stroke

 How will your competent? doctor use this to prevent your next stroke and prevent Alzhimer? Oh, your doctor PLANS TO DO NOTHING? Like usual, and you haven't fired him/her yet?

Blood vessels and immune cells drive risk for Alzheimer’s and stroke

SAN FRANCISCO—July 28, 2025—The brain’s health depends on more than just its neurons. A complex network of blood vessels and immune cells acts as the brain’s dedicated guardians—controlling what enters, cleaning up waste, and protecting it from threats by forming the blood-brain barrier.

A new study from Gladstone Institutes and UC San Francisco (UCSF) reveals that many genetic risk factors for neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s and stroke exert their effects within these very guardian cells.

“When studying diseases affecting the brain, most research has focused on its resident neurons,” says Gladstone Investigator Andrew C. Yang, PhD, senior author of the new study. “I hope our findings lead to more interest in the cells forming the brain’s borders, which might actually take center stage in diseases like Alzheimer’s.”

The findings, published in Neuron, address a long-standing question about where genetic risk begins and suggest that vulnerabilities in the brain’s defense system may be a key trigger for disease.

Mapping the Brain’s Guardians

For years, large-scale genetic studies have linked dozens of DNA variants to a higher risk of neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or multiple sclerosis.

Yet, a major mystery has persisted: over 90% of these variants lie not in the genes themselves, but in the surrounding DNA that does not contain the code for making proteins, once dismissed as “junk DNA.” These regions act as complex dimmer switches, turning genes on or off.

Until now, scientists haven't had a full map of which switches control which genes or in which specific brain cells they operate, hindering the path from genetic discovery to new treatments.

A New Technology Finds Answers

The blood-brain barrier is the brain’s frontline defense—a cellular border made up of blood vessel cells, immune cells, and other supporting cells that meticulously controls access to the brain.

Yet, these important cells have been difficult to study, even using the field’s most powerful genetic techniques. To overcome this, the Gladstone team developed MultiVINE-seq, a technology that gently isolates the vascular and immune cells from postmortem human brain tissue.

This technology allowed the team, for the first time, to simultaneously map two layers of information: the gene activity and the "dimmer switch" settings—known as chromatin accessibility—within each cell. The scientists studied 30 brain samples from individuals with and without neurological disease, giving them a detailed look at how genetic risk variants function across all major brain cell types.

Working closely with Gladstone Investigators Ryan Corces, PhD, and Katie Pollard, PhD, lead authors Madigan Reid, PhD, and Shreya Menon integrated their single-cell atlas with large-scale genetic data from studies of Alzheimer’s, stroke, and other brain diseases. This revealed where disease-associated variants are active—and many were found to be active in vascular and immune cells rather than neurons.

“Before this, we knew these genetic variants increased disease risk, but we didn’t know where or how they acted in the context of brain barrier cell types,” Reid says. “Our study shows that many of the variants are actually functioning in blood vessels and immune cells in the brain.”

Different Diseases, Different Disruptions

One of the study’s most striking findings is that genetic risk variants affect the brain’s barrier system in fundamentally different ways, depending on the disease.

“We were surprised to see that the genetic drivers for stroke and Alzheimer's had such distinct effects, even though they both involve the brain’s blood vessels,” Reid says. “That tells us they involve really distinct mechanisms: structural weakening in stroke, and dysfunctional immune signaling in Alzheimer’s.”

In stroke, genetic variants primarily affected genes responsible for the structural integrity of blood vessels, potentially weakening the vessels’ physical structure. Whereas in Alzheimer’s, the variants amplified genes that regulate immune activity, suggesting that overactive inflammation—not structural weakness—is the key issue.

Among the Alzheimer’s-associated variants, one stood out. A common variant near the PTK2B gene, which is found in more than a third of the population, was most active in T cells, a type of immune cell. The variant enhances expression of the gene, which may promote T cell activation and entry into the brain, putting immune cells into overdrive. The team found these super-charged immune cells near amyloid plaques, the sticky protein buildups that mark Alzheimer’s.

“Scientists are debating the role of T cells and related components of the immune system in Alzheimer’s,” Yang says. “Here, we provide genetic evidence in humans that a common Alzheimer’s risk factor may work through T cells.”

Excitingly, PTK2B is a known “druggable” target, and therapies that inhibit its function are already in clinical trials for cancer. The new study opens a fresh avenue to investigate whether such drugs could be repurposed for Alzheimer's disease.

Location, Location, Location

The study’s findings on the brain’s “guardian” cells point to two new opportunities for protecting the brain.

Located at the critical interface between the brain and the body, the cells are continually influenced by lifestyle and environmental exposures, which could synergize with genetic predispositions to drive disease. Their location also makes them a promising target for future therapies, potentially allowing for drugs that can bolster the brain’s defenses from the “outside” without needing to cross the formidable blood-brain barrier.

"This work brings the brain's vascular and immune cells into the spotlight," Yang says. "Given their unique location and role in establishing the brain’s relationship with the body and outside world, our work could inform new, more accessible drug targets and lifestyle interventions to protect the brain from the outside in."

About the Study

The study, “Human brain vascular multi-omics elucidates disease risk associations,” was published in the journal Neuron on July 28, 2025.

In addition to Yang, Reid, Corces, and Pollard, the study’s other authors are Shreya Menon, Hao Liu, Haoyue Zhou, Zhirui Hu, Bella Ding, Zimo Zhang, Sophia Nelson, and Amanda Apolonio of Gladstone; Simon Frerich of UC San Francisco; Shahram Oveisgharan and David A. Bennett of Rush University Medical Center; and Martin Dichgans of LMU Munich.

The work was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R01NS128909-01), Alzheimer’s Association (ADSF-24-1345199-C, AARF-22-923641), BrightFocus Foundation (A2022027F), Cure Alzheimer's Fund, the Ludwig Family Foundation, the Dolby Family Fund, the Bakar Aging Research Institute, National Institute of Mental Health (R01- 503 MH123178), National Institute of Aging (P01-AG073082, U01-AG072573), The Leducq Foundation (22CVD01, BRENDA), the Joachim Herz Foundation, and the National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1-HG012076).

About Gladstone Institutes

Gladstone Institutes is an independent, nonprofit life science research organization that uses visionary science and technology to overcome disease. Established in 1979, it is located in the epicenter of biomedical and technological innovation, in the Mission Bay neighborhood of San Francisco. Gladstone has created a research model that disrupts how science is done, funds big ideas, and attracts the brightest minds.


Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Association of Coffee Consumption with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality in Three Large Prospective Cohorts

But did they consider those studies that have identified a single nugget of our DNA that seems to determine whether we process caffeine quickly or slowly? That, in turn, appears to have a large effect on whether coffee is good for your health. Studies starting from 2002, 2005, 2006, 2009 so failure to mention them is piss poor research, reflecting badly on the senior staff.

Association of Coffee Consumption with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality in Three Large Prospective Cohorts


  1. Frank B. Hu2*
+ Author Affiliations
  1. 1Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
  2. 2Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA & Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  3. 3Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
  4. 4Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/IdiPAZ, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
  5. 5Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA & National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore
  1. * Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 frank.hu@channing.harvard.edu

Abstract

Background—The association between consumption of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee and risk of mortality remains inconclusive.
Methods and Results—We examined the associations of consumption of total, caffeinated, and decaffeinated coffee with risk of subsequent total and cause-specific mortality among 74,890 women in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), 93,054 women in the NHS 2, and 40,557 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Coffee consumption was assessed at baseline using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. During 4,690,072 person-years of follow-up, 19,524 women and 12,432 men died. Consumption of total, caffeinated, and decaffeinated coffee were non-linearly associated with mortality. Compared to non-drinkers, coffee consumption one to five cups/d was associated with lower risk of mortality, while coffee consumption more than five cups/d was not associated with risk of mortality. However, when restricting to never smokers, compared to non-drinkers, the HRs of mortality were 0.94 (0.89 to 0.99) for ≤ 1 cup/d, 0.92 (0.87 to 0.97) for 1.1-3 cups/d, 0.85 (0.79 to 0.92) for 3.1-5 cups/d, and 0.88 (0.78 to 0.99) for > 5 cups/d (p for non-linearity = 0.32; p for trend < 0.001). Significant inverse associations were observed for caffeinated (p for trend < 0.001) and decaffeinated coffee (p for trend = 0.022). Significant inverse associations were observed between coffee consumption and deaths due to cardiovascular disease, neurological diseases, and suicide. No significant association between coffee consumption and total cancer mortality was found.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Jumping Genes in the Brain Ensure That Even Identical Twins Are Different

So lets identify some jumping genes that can reprogram themselves to take over and recreate functionality that was damaged/died during our strokes.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-makes-each-brain-unique
  • Genes we inherit and environmental factors both influence human behaviors. Scientists have recently discovered other underlying processes at work.
  • So-called jumping genes, segments of DNA that can copy and paste them­selves into new places in the genome, can alter the activity of full-length genes. Occasionally they will turn on neighboring genes in these locations. That activity occurs more in the brain than other areas, resulting in different traits and behaviors, even in closely related individuals.
  • These mobile genetic elements may also turn out to play a role in people’s disposition to psychiatric disorders.
  • Researchers are now beginning to investigate whether jumping genes help us adapt to rapidly changing environmental conditions.