Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label fall prevention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fall prevention. Show all posts

Friday, September 25, 2026

Non-invasive stimulation techniques for fall prevention and balance control: an overview of reviews and meta-analyses

 What is your doctors' EXACT FALL PREVENTION PROTOCOL?  

Oh NO; doesn't have one; THAT'S PURE INCOMPETENCE! 

Dumping that on therapists is not allowed, the doctor is responsible for getting you 100% recovered. And s/he  COMPLETELY FAILED AT THAT, RIGHT? 

Non-invasive stimulation techniques for fall prevention and balance control: an overview of reviews and meta-analyses

    We’re sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. All legal disclaimers apply.

    Abstract

    Background

    Older adults and individuals with neurological disorders often experience balance impairments, which increase their risk of falling and compromise their functional independence. Numerous studies and systematic reviews have investigated the use of non-invasive stimulation techniques for fall prevention and balance control across various populations and device types.

    Objective

    To conduct an overview of systematic reviews assessing the efficacy of non-invasive stimulation techniques for fall prevention and balance control improvement in different target populations.

    Methods

    The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420251023003). A systematic search was conducted for systematic reviews published up to March 2025. Reviews evaluating the efficacy of non-invasive stimulation techniques (i.e., non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), and mechanical stimulation) on fall prevention or balance control in older adults or individuals with neurological disorders were included. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included reviews. Overall and subgroup meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect size measure.

    Results

    We identified 21 systematic reviews. Three reviews (including one with a meta-analysis) were excluded from qualitative synthesis due to “low/critical low” quality. The remaining 18 reviews were included in the qualitative analysis, encompassing 328 original studies, which involved 11,692 participants. Of these, 13 reviews were included in the quantitative synthesis, of which 12 were pooled in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that non-invasive stimulation techniques had a moderate effect on improving balance control (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.34–0.52; = 8%, p = 0.366). Funnel plot inspection and Egger’s test (p = 0.267) indicated no evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analyses showed no statistically significant differences: by type of balance outcome (static vs. dynamic, p = 0.777), non-invasive stimulation techniques (p = 0.857), or target population (individuals with stroke or Parkinson’s disease, p = 0.750).

    (Without even mentioning what the hell non-invasive interventions are; TOTALLY FUCKING USELESS! Don't your mentors and senior researchers have any clue how to do research?)

    Conclusions

    Non-invasive stimulation techniques may serve as a moderately effective(NOT GOOD ENOUGH!) therapeutic strategy for improving balance control, with potential functional benefits. The quality of evidence was moderate for NIBS but low for NMES and GVS. However, their clinical relevance should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness in fall prevention remains to be established due to limited available evidence.

    Saturday, September 12, 2026

    Electrical bioimpedance spectral markers distinguish balance ability in older adults without provoking fall risk

     After your competent? doctor tests this on you, are there any exact fall prevention protocols given? 

    NO? So, PURE INCOMPETENCE THEN! 

    And you haven't gotten them fired yet? I'd completely fail this single leg test on my left leg.

    Electrical bioimpedance spectral markers distinguish balance ability in older adults without provoking fall risk

      Abstract

      Background

      Balance assessment in older adults is central to fall-risk evaluation and rehabilitation planning, yet widely used clinical tests such as the single-leg stance require postures most likely to provoke a fall. A method capturing neuromuscular contributions to postural control during safer, static postures would meaningfully advance clinical and home-based assessment.

      Method

      We investigated whether electrical 

        Abstract

        Background

        Balance assessment in older adults is central to fall-risk evaluation and rehabilitation planning, yet widely used clinical tests such as the single-leg stance require postures most likely to provoke a fall. A method capturing neuromuscular contributions to postural control during safer, static postures would meaningfully advance clinical and home-based assessment.

        Method

        We investigated whether electrical bioimpedance (EBI) recorded over the extensor digitorum longus (EDL), a muscle contributing to fine ankle-level postural adjustments, carries spectral signatures reflecting balance ability without provocative testing. Twenty-eight community-dwelling adults aged 60 to 74 years were stratified into two balance-ability groups by single-leg-stance performance, and EBI was recorded using a tetrapolar configuration during sitting, stable standing, and tandem standing. After standardized preprocessing, signals were analyzed in the time and frequency domains using spectral and time-frequency decomposition with peak-band and transient-event detection. From 61 candidate features, a non-redundant primary set of 25 was retained through predefined reduction rules and correlation screening. Between-group differences were evaluated using activity-adjusted, feature-wise generalized estimating equations, validated by participant-level permutation testing, with multiple-comparison control across the retained feature set.

        Results

        Physiologically meaningful spectral power was concentrated within 0–10 Hz across all three postures. After activity adjustment, two frequency-domain features remained significant under false discovery rate correction and one survived Bonferroni correction. Participants with better balance exhibited stronger oscillatory organization of the EBI signal, reflected in greater power concentration within identifiable spectral peaks and a greater peak count, whereas participants with poorer balance showed a less peak-dominated, more broadband profile with larger and more irregular low-frequency amplitude fluctuations.

        Conclusion

        Low-frequency spectral features of muscle EBI, recorded during safe static postures, distinguish balance ability in older adults and reveal differences in the temporal organization of distal postural-control activity. These findings support EBI-derived spectral markers as candidate muscle-level biomarkers of balance-control quality, offering a path toward safer, sensor-based assessment that does not require older adults to adopt postures associated with increased fall risk. The approach is well suited to integration with rehabilitation monitoring and could complement existing clinical balance evaluations in both supervised and unsupervised settings. (EBI) recorded over the extensor digitorum longus (EDL), a muscle contributing to fine ankle-level postural adjustments, carries spectral signatures reflecting balance ability without provocative testing. Twenty-eight community-dwelling adults aged 60 to 74 years were stratified into two balance-ability groups by single-leg-stance performance, and EBI was recorded using a tetrapolar configuration during sitting, stable standing, and tandem standing. After standardized preprocessing, signals were analyzed in the time and frequency domains using spectral and time-frequency decomposition with peak-band and transient-event detection. From 61 candidate features, a non-redundant primary set of 25 was retained through predefined reduction rules and correlation screening. Between-group differences were evaluated using activity-adjusted, feature-wise generalized estimating equations, validated by participant-level permutation testing, with multiple-comparison control across the retained feature set.

        Results

        Physiologically meaningful spectral power was concentrated within 0–10 Hz across all three postures. After activity adjustment, two frequency-domain features remained significant under false discovery rate correction and one survived Bonferroni correction. Participants with better balance exhibited stronger oscillatory organization of the EBI signal, reflected in greater power concentration within identifiable spectral peaks and a greater peak count, whereas participants with poorer balance showed a less peak-dominated, more broadband profile with larger and more irregular low-frequency amplitude fluctuations.

        Conclusion

        Low-frequency spectral features of muscle EBI, recorded during safe static postures, distinguish balance ability in older adults and reveal differences in the temporal organization of distal postural-control activity. These findings support EBI-derived spectral markers as candidate muscle-level biomarkers of balance-control quality, offering a path toward safer, sensor-based assessment that does not require older adults to adopt postures associated with increased fall risk. The approach is well suited to integration with rehabilitation monitoring and could complement existing clinical balance evaluations in both supervised and unsupervised settings.

        Tuesday, September 8, 2026

        At 57, these are the exercises I’m doing to prevent falls in later life

         

        I can't jump at all, not even an inch off the floor, which is bizarre since my left leg still has massive power! Demand your competent? doctor give you EXACT PROTOCOLS to accomplish this!

        At 57, these are the exercises I’m doing to prevent falls in later life

        I’m bounding across the gym, springing as far as I can with every great leap. Then I’m dashing up and down, sprinting as fast as I can. Why am I flinging myself around the room at 57, as if my life depends on it? Because, in a way, it does. I want to reduce my risk of a fall in my 80s.

        Most of us know that we should strength train to ward off age-related muscle loss. Yet there is another physical ability that drains away with the years, and it’s even more critical than muscle strength in preventing falls and fractures in later life – power. Power requires strength but relates to how fast you can move.

        It’s crucial because the faster you can right yourself if you trip over the cat, the less likely you are to fall flat and crack a hip. Jon Roberts, technical director at Evolution Longevity clubs, says: “Power’s all about speed of reaction.” He adds: “With falls, as you lose your balance – how quickly can you react to that loss of balance? That’s what prevents falls.”

        Power is the reason why, in midlife, my fitness regime includes not just slow, controlled muscle-building exercises, like deadlifts, but also speedy, springy movements that require sudden bursts of force.

        Related video: Fitness program helps folks stay strong after 50 (FOX 13 Tampa Bay) 

        “The difference between a strength exercise versus a power exercise is that for power, you’re using less weight, but using speed as your added resistance,” says Roberts.

        Jumping in midlife could prevent a broken hip

         I learnt the critical importance of power two years ago, at 55, when a private bone scan at Evolution revealed I had osteoporosis. Two years on, my power moves – part of three-times-weekly targeted strength training sessions with an Evolution PT – have significantly increased my bone density. “Power creates torsion on the bones,” says Jon Roberts. “Powerful movement puts a force on the bones which can help strengthen them.” But along with stronger bones, I can now sprint for the bus with a solid chance of staying upright if I trip. Sarcopenia makes headlines, yet evidence shows that motor power capacity reduces faster with age than muscle strength, and that this loss of power is more strongly associated with reduced function and age-related decline. Scientists are taking note, and the aptly named Dr Geoffrey Power, associate professor at the Neuromechanical Performance Research Laboratory at the University of Guelph in Canada, was a keynote speaker at the third international annual seminar on “powerpenia” in Brazil earlier this year. “It’s something that people should really be paying attention to,” he says. “We notice losses in power – loss of strength and slowed movements – occurring before we have the loss of muscle. It’s proposed as an earlier biomarker of impaired function in ageing.” Happily, there’s a lot you can do at home to boost your power and avoid frailty and falls in later life. 

        How to tell if your muscles are powerful enough

        When I started training, I hadn’t done any fast, explosive movement such as sprinting, tennis or jumping for decades. I didn’t notice I was losing power because all my activities – swimming, yoga, slow runs – were careful and deliberate. But there can be subtle signs. Dr Power says that tripping more often can indicate declining power. Plus, “You can notice gait speed slowing. Fear of falling starts to come into play. Really slowed movement is the strongest indicator that maybe muscles are not generating as much power as they used to.”

        To gauge your power, try the jump test, says Jon Roberts. You’ll need some Post-it notes. “You stand, arm extended, and stick the Post-it on the wall.” Then, he says, “bend from the knees into a squat movement and jump as high as you can. Keep your arm fully extended and stick a new Post-it note at the highest point you can reach.”

        Jump test: measure how high you can jump by comparing the height of two Post-it marks on a wall.

        (Not possible at all, I can't jump!)

        You’re measuring the height difference between the first and second mark, and, if someone can time you, reaction speed. “That relates to how powerful you are. That’s the ultimate test.” For men aged 50-59, a jump height of 33-39cm is in the “acceptable range”. For women aged 50-59, it’s 24-28cm. Whereas 50cm is considered “high power” in men aged 40 and over, and 40cm is “high power” in women of the same age.

        Jumping 90cm or higher? You’re “elite” (or an NBA player).

        Leg power doesn’t just prevent falls, it’s also good for your brain

        Roberts cites a study, Kicking Back Cognitive Ageing, published in the journal Gerontology in 2016 by scientists at King’s College London. Over 10 years, they tracked 324 healthy female twins, aged 55 on average. At the start, each had her leg power measured via a single, explosive push against a pedal, “as if performing an emergency stop in a car”. Researchers found that women with more leg power when the study began showed less decline in memory and mental processing speed over the following 10 years. Roberts says: “Leg power was the most consistent predictor of how well the brain aged.”

        What I do – and why

        There’s one snag with power moves – you can’t just jump straight in and start doing them, or you risk injury. I didn’t attempt kettlebell swings or medicine ball throws until I’d become fitter and stronger. “You need to strengthen the muscles, the tendons, you need to have coordination and improve function,” says Dr Power. “Then individuals can do power-type training. This involves increasing movement speed, and starting to focus on the idea of explosive contractions – or ‘rate of force’ development.”

        My training sessions include lunges, squats, lateral pulldowns and bench presses, progressively increasing the weights I work with. This has built stronger bones, increased my muscle mass and strength, and, as Dr Power notes, such work “ultimately increases power as well.”

        But to turbocharge power, I do the following moves:

        Five ways to test and build power

        1. Visualise your power move

        Just thinking about doing an exercise fast can improve function. It’s called “ballistic intent”. Tell yourself, “‘I’m going to do this squat, and in my head now, I’m planning that it’s going to be an explosive movement,’” says Dr Power. “That in and of itself can improve the rate of force development.”

        2. Kettlebell swing

        Kettlebell swing, using explosive hip power to drive the weight to chest height.

        (If I get mine down to 5lbs. I can do this.)

        Stand with your feet slightly wider than shoulder-width apart. Place the kettlebell on the floor a short distance in front of your feet. Hinge at your hips, with your knees bent and back flat. Brace your core and upper body. Grasp the kettlebell handle, lift it off the floor and use the power of your glutes to snap your hips forward until you’re upright, swinging the kettlebell to chest height. “This is a power exercise as it requires speed and acceleration to make the kettlebell move,” says Jon Roberts.

        3. The 10m sprint

        10m sprint: time yourself over 10m to assess your power and speed, with faster times indicating better power

        (Can't run at all, spasticity prevents the left foot from being straight and has no free swinging lower leg!)

        Mark out a 10m strip. Time yourself to sprint that 10m distance. For men over 50, an acceptable time is 1.85-2 seconds, and for women, 1.95-2.1 seconds. For men, sprinting 10m in 1.70-1.85 seconds is a marker of good power. For women, it’s 1.80-1.95 seconds. Keep practising to improve power.

        4. Single-leg sit-to-stand

        Single-leg sit-to-stand: test your leg strength and stability by rising from a chair on one leg.

        (Impossible, can't keep the left leg raised when trying the right leg. And the left leg doesn't have enough power and control to do this.)

        Sit on a chair that’s slightly higher than knee height. Place one foot on the floor, keep the other raised, place your hands on your hips, brace your core and go from sitting to standing. Do as many quality (non-shaky!) repetitions as you can before changing legs. Ten to 14 reps in 30 seconds is a good score.

        5. Standing medicine ball throw

        Standing medicine ball throw to build explosive upper-body power

        (Absolutely impossible, my fucking failures of doctors and therapists never cured my spasticity so I could flatten my left hand)

        Stand with your feet hip-width apart. Hold a 2kg medicine ball at your chest with your hands on each side of the ball. (Goal Attack vibes.) Throw the ball away from you, as far as you can, and have a partner mark its landing point. Normal power for women over 50 would be a distance of 3.5-4.5m. For men aged 50 and over, throwing a 3kg ball 6-9m indicates good athletic power. “The weight of the ball is important for the test protocol,” says Roberts. “However, regularly throwing a ball as far as you can in a chest throw position is good training.”

        Recommended

        I'm 76 and stronger than ever. This is how I turned my life around

        Read more

        Wednesday, July 15, 2026

        Multimodal assessment of balance dysfunction in older adults: from classification to clustering-based functional pattern identification

         You really do stupidly think 'assessments' are useful? They aren't EXACT FALL PREVENTION PROTCOLS, ARE THEY? And you didn't create any protocols for fall prevention based on this, did you? You're fired!

        Multimodal assessment of balance dysfunction in older adults: from classification to clustering-based functional pattern identification

          We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

          Abstract

          Background

          Balance dysfunction in older adults is a major risk factor for falls. Conventional subjective scales and single-modality measures may not adequately capture the integrated motor, cortical, and cognitive processes underlying postural control. Using a multimodal feature set, this study aimed to develop an interpretable framework for dysfunction-related classification and for exploring heterogeneity in balance-related functional patterns.

          Methods

          A total of 81 community-dwelling older adults (≥ 60 years old) were recruited and divided into balance dysfunction group (n = 38, BBS ≤ 45) and healthy control group (n = 43, BBS > 45) according to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). During six stance tasks, center of pressure (COP) trajectories, lower-limb surface electromyography (sEMG), and cortical activation measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were synchronously recorded. Group × task effects were tested using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Multimodal features were then used for supervised classification (XGBoost) and for clustering-based exploration of heterogeneity within dysfunction-related multimodal profiles using K-means clustering.

          Results

          Under more challenging postural conditions, the dysfunction group showed larger anteroposterior COP oscillation range, velocity, and area. Muscle activation patterns showed lower rectus femoris contribution together with higher biceps femoris and gastrocnemius activation under selected task conditions, accompanied by altered muscle synergy organization. fNIRS revealed greater activation in premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and prefrontal cortex regions in the dysfunction group. In classification, XGBoost achieved the best overall performance among the tested models, with 83.56% accuracy. Clustering analysis further identified three functional patterns with graded differences in BBS and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, suggesting heterogeneity in dysfunction-related multimodal profiles.

          Conclusion

          Balance dysfunction in older adults is associated with a neuro-muscular-cognitive profile involving impaired postural control, altered lower-limb muscle recruitment, and increased cortical activation under more demanding task conditions. The proposed multimodal framework provides an interpretable approach for classification and for exploring heterogeneity in dysfunction-related functional patterns. Further validation in larger cohorts and simplified sensor configurations will be needed to support broader practical application.

          Friday, June 19, 2026

          FRAC-Stroke Score Reliably Predicts Fracture Risk in Stroke Populations

           Ask your competent? doctor for the EXACT FALL PREVENTION PROTOCOL  so this doesn't happen! Oh no, incompetence reigns, there is none!

          FRAC-Stroke Score Reliably Predicts Fracture Risk in Stroke Populations  

          Sunday, June 7, 2026

          How long should you be able to hold a wall sit? Test your fitness level and see how you compare

           Ask your therapist if this would help in your balance recovery and fall prevention.

          How long should you be able to hold a wall sit? Test your fitness level and see how you compare

          • Most people can hold a wall sit for 30–60 seconds, while trained athletes may sustain the position for several minutes.
          • Wall sits build lower-body endurance, stability, and isometric strength through sustained muscle contraction without movement.
          • Improving wall sit performance comes from consistent practice, proper form, and strengthening the quads, glutes, and core.

          In the world of lower-body exercises, the wall sit often falls by the wayside, overlooked for other staples like deadlifts and squats. One reason may be that it looks too easy. If you really want to work your muscles, simply holding a squat position and staying still isn’t going to do much, right?


          Not exactly. The wall sit is actually much harder than it looks—and it can be a great, equipment-free way to test your lower-body fitness. Here’s what you need to know.

          What a Wall Sit Measures

          A wall sit is an isometric exercise, meaning there’s no movement involved. Your muscles are under constant contraction—known as the concentric phase—which keeps you steady so you can hold your position.

          This makes it different from other common exercises, which have both concentric and eccentric phases that produce the movement. Take a regular squat, for example: As you lower down, your muscles lengthen in the eccentric phase; then, they shorten in the concentric phase to push you back up.

          That constant contraction is what makes the wall sit deceptively difficult, Evan Williams, CSCS, strength and conditioning coach for the Milwaukee Bucks, told Health. “Because it’s an isometric exercise, the muscles have little chance to relax, which leads to faster fatigue,” he said. “On top of that, the quads have to produce a significant amount of force just to maintain the position against gravity.” 

          The combo of that continuous time under tension, plus the partial restriction in blood flow that can happen during sustained holds, “creates the intense burn people feel,” said Williams.

          But the wall sit isn’t just about muscle fatigue. It’s also an important measure of various fitness factors. “A wall sit measures isometric strength, muscular endurance, and lower-body stability,” said Williams.

          This has important carryover outside of the gym, too. “In everyday life, things like carrying objects, climbing stairs, or even standing for long periods all require a certain level of lower-body endurance and stability,” said Williams. So by boosting your performance in the wall sit, you may be able to perform daily activities more easily.

          How Long Should You Be Able to Hold a Wall Sit?

          There’s not a ton of standardized data on how long you should be able to hold a wall sit. One 2025 study had 739 adults complete a 12-week strength and aerobic fitness program, and measured their wall sit performance both before and after as one of their data points. On average, people held the wall sit for 47 seconds before starting the fitness program; they increased their hold duration to 65 seconds after the 12 weeks.

          “This lines up well with someone moving from a beginner level into more of an intermediate range,” said Williams.

          Related video: How Long You Should Be Able to Stand on One Leg, Depending on Your Age (The Hearty Soul)
          lltica+How Many Push Ups should you be able to do? Amount sorted by age

        • Cassidy Thompson/Cassidy ThompsonHow to master the L-sit | Calisthenics exercises & challenge
          I Army Fitness Test?
        • 20:30
        • Additionally, the following ranges can be a useful benchmark based on Williams’s experience training individuals:

          • Beginner: 30–45 seconds 
          • Average: 45–60 seconds 
          • Above average: 60–90 seconds
          • Advanced: 90 seconds–2 minutes
          • Athlete/high fitness: 2–4+ minutes

          Still, there are lots of factors that can go into how long you can hold a wall sit, so performance should be viewed as just one piece of the puzzle rather than a strict standard, said Williams. Factors that can influence wall sit performance include bodyweight, training background, age, and sex, as well as small differences in positioning.

          How To Do a Proper Wall Sit

          Wall sits provide a glimpse into your muscular endurance, isometric strength, and lower-body stability. “More specifically, it shows how well someone can maintain proper body positioning under load over time,” Williams said.

          Here are the steps to doing a proper wall sit:

          1. Stand with your back against a wall. Walk your feet out, roughly 1–2 feet away from the wall, keeping them shoulder-width apart.
          2. Slide down the wall slowly, bending your knees, and stopping when your thighs are about parallel to the floor. Your knees should be stacked over your ankles, not pushed past your toes.
          3. Hold your position, keeping your back flat against the wall, core engaged, and weight evenly distributed through both feet. Don't forget to breathe.
          4. Stand back up by pushing through your heels and sliding up the wall.

          Wall sits seem simple, but there are a number of form mistakes Williams commonly sees with his clients. The first has to do with positioning: Your thighs should be parallel to the floor with knees bent at 90 degrees. “People are usually either too high, which makes it easier, or too low, which can add unnecessary stress,” he said.

          Many people also lose contact with the wall during the duration of the exercise, but your head, shoulders, and hips should stay against it the entire time. Your chest should stay up, ribs down, and core engaged to help maintain a strong position as well. 

          Knees collapsing inward is another big mistake. “As fatigue sets in, you’ll also often see the knees start to cave inward, which usually means the quads are getting tired and the glutes aren’t stabilizing well enough,” said Williams.

          Finally, many people forget to breathe. “A lot of people tend to hold their breath, which actually makes the exercise harder and increases fatigue,” said Williams. “It’s better to focus on slow, controlled breathing—inhale through the nose for about three to four seconds and exhale through the mouth for four to six seconds. This helps keep oxygen flowing, keeps heart rate more controlled, and allows the muscles to work longer.”

          Tips to Improve Your Wall Sit Time

          If you want to get better at wall sits, you should include them regularly in your workout routine. A good rule of thumb is two to three times per week, at two to three sets each time. If you're a beginner, see how long you can comfortably hold a wall sit the first time, and then continually try to match or beat that time.

          Wall sits “can be used either as part of a warm-up to activate the lower body or at the end of a workout to build muscular endurance,” said Williams. You can also add a challenge to the wall sit with a few progressions: Try a kickstand or single-leg variation, or add load by holding a dumbbell or a weight plate while you do the traditional version.

          But a huge part of getting better at wall sits is strengthening the muscles involved in them—mainly, your quads and glutes. “Squat and split squat variations help build quad strength, hip thrusts and band work improve glute and hip stability, and core exercises like planks and dead bugs help maintain positioning under fatigue,” Williams said. “At the end of the day, getting better at wall sits comes down to improving strength, endurance, and the ability to maintain good form as fatigue sets in.” 

          Read the original article on Health