Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label chondroitinase ABC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chondroitinase ABC. Show all posts

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Experimental therapy could boost stroke recovery - spinal cord injection

Will need followup since this is in rats. Exactly whom is your doctor and stroke hospital collaborating with to get this to human clinical trials? It doesn't even has to be very fast, a month later. I like the term, second wave of recovery.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180201125949.htm
An experimental therapy being tested by University of Alberta scientists that targets the spinal cord may one day be key to spurring on enhanced recovery for stroke victims.
By injecting a drug called chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) into the spinal cord of rats 28 days after they suffered a stroke, researchers found they were able to enhance recovery by inducing amplified rewiring of circuits connecting the brain to the spinal cord. When they also combined the spinal therapy with rehabilitative training, recovery amplified further.
"This gives us real evidence that there are things we can do for people with a permanent physical disability -- such as paralysis or having difficulty controlling movements -- after a stroke," said Ian Winship, an associate professor of psychiatry at the U of A. "There is hope that eventually we might have a therapy that can help somebody with a deficit that is really affecting their quality of life, even years after the stroke."
"These are deficits that previously have been thought to be untreatable and people just learned to live with them," added Anna Wiersma, lead author of the study and a recent PhD graduate at the U of A's Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute. "The fact that these might not actually be untreatable and that we have an opportunity to help patients who are in the chronic stages of stroke is really exciting."
Stroke is the most common cause of adult disability in Canada. Currently more than 400,000 Canadians are living with the effects of stroke. The typical path of recovery involves intensive rehabilitation therapy. In the first few weeks following a stroke, patients experience gains as the brain rewires itself, but they will eventually plateau and rarely regain full capacity -- even with ongoing rehabilitation.
In the study, the scientists explored the impact of injecting ChABC into the spinal cord. The drug acts on components that surround the cells of the nervous system and prevent growth of new connections. It also removed the inhibition of growth, allowing for new connections between the unaffected motor areas in the brain and the spinal networks that control movement.
The researchers found that injecting ChABC a month after suffering a stroke and without rehabilitative training led to moderate improvements of sensorimotor deficits. When combining both spinal therapy and rehabilitative therapy, they found that their subjects recovered better and were able to perform some sensorimotor tasks at pre-stroke levels.
"The idea here is there is still something we can potentially do for people that would give them a second wave of recovery," said Winship. "That's pretty exciting because (rehabilitation efforts) have a ceiling effect. You can only achieve so much recovery. This drug could remove that ceiling."
The researchers acknowledge there are barriers to overcome before the work could be tested and applied in humans. The major drawback is that injected ChABC only extends a small distance and acts for a finite period of time -- both of which would be challenging in a human spinal cord, which is much larger than that of a rat. Time of recovery in a human is also much longer, meaning multiple injections would likely be needed, increasing the risk of infection or injury.
Winship and Wiersma speculate one solution may be to introduce the drug through another way than through injection. They believe using a viral vector could make cells genetically express ChABC instead of having it injected directly. The solution would allow for longer-lasting expression and greater spread within the spinal cord.
"The potential is there but at this point we need a lot more evidence that this is going to be something that is truly effective," said Winship. "This approach is still a long way from the clinic, but this gives us real evidence that there are things we can do for people with permanent disability after a stroke."
The research was funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation and Alberta Innovates. The study was published in the Journal of Neuroscience.
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Friday, November 17, 2017

At the Bench-Stroke Recovery: Inducing Spinal Plasticity Amplifies Benefits of Rehabilitative Training and Improves Stroke Recovery

Now we just need human followup. Is your stroke hospital so fucking incompetent that they will do nothing to advance this research to humans?
http://journals.lww.com/neurotodayonline/Fulltext/2017/11160/At_the_Bench_Stroke_Recovery__Inducing_Spinal.7.aspx
Kreimer, Susan
doi: 10.1097/01.NT.0000527322.43736.10
Features
Back to Top | Article Outline

ARTICLE IN BRIEF

In an animal model of stroke, researchers removed plasticity-inhibiting signals in the spinal cord (via intraspinal injections of the enzyme chondroitinase ABC), which augmented rewiring of circuits connecting the brain to the spinal cord, even weeks after stroke. The researchers proposed that this plasticity can be harnessed by rehabilitative training to significantly promote sensorimotor recovery.
A combination of spinal therapy and rehabilitative training resulted in improved recovery in rats, even 28 days after experimental stroke conditions were induced, according to a study published October 12 in The Journal of Neuroscience.
The investigators amplified spinal plasticity during chronic stroke in male rats via intraspinal injections of chondroitinase ABC (ChABC), an enzyme that has been found to remove plasticity-inhibiting signals in the brain. Injections into the contralesional grey matter of the cervical spinal cord administered 28 days after stroke resulted in significant sprouting of corticospinal axons originating in the peri-infarct cortex.
Without rehabilitative training, ChABC injection during chronic stroke led to moderate improvements of sensorimotor deficits, said Ian R. Winship, PhD, a study author and associate professor and director of the neurochemical research unit at the University of Alberta's department of psychiatry in Edmonton, Alberta in Canada. But combined with the spinal therapy, rehabilitative training during chronic stroke was much more effective.
“These data suggest that the permanent disability affecting millions of individuals living with the chronic effects of stroke may be treatable with spinal therapy and rehabilitation initiated even months or years after the stroke,” the study authors wrote. “Our data also emphasize that inducing a state of plasticity is not sufficient to induce recovery, and that combining such therapies with rehabilitative therapy is required for optimal recovery.”
After inducing initial ischemic injury in the rats via photothrombosis, investigators tested their hypothesis that promoting plasticity in the spinal cord during chronic stroke could spur advances in recovery from persistent sensorimotor impairment. Sprouting of spared corticospinal tract axons in the contralesional spinal cord has a major impact on sensorimotor recovery, they noted, but this structural plasticity is limited to the first few weeks after stroke.
“The major drawback of the current approach is that injection of the enzyme only extends a certain distance and acts for a finite period of time,” Dr. Winship said. “In a human, we need the enzyme to be active over a much larger region,” he said, because “the spinal cord is so much bigger in human than in a rat.”
“Our findings strongly suggest that such a treatment could reduce disability due to stroke. The next question is, what would actually be required to undertake this approach in humans?” Dr. Winship told Neurology Today.
He acknowledged that “probably a different delivery system would be required for humans. One solution may be to employ viral vectors, which present a way to genetically express the same enzyme in tissue rather than injecting it directly,” Dr. Winship said. “A viral delivery system would allow for longer expression and greater spread within the spinal cord, and therefore, could be safer and possibly effective in larger animals such as dogs as well as humans.”
“We can do very similar injection procedures without damaging the spinal cord, without inducing any kind of injury, but we would need a system like one of these vectors, if the drug is going to trying to strengthen the wiring between the brain and the spinal cord,” he said.

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Molecular control of brain plasticity and repair

How is your doctor enabling this post-stroke? 5 years is plenty of time to create a stroke protocol for this. Has your hospital created goals and objectives for neurologists to create stroke protocols within 6 months of research being released? Is your board of directors enforcing  adherence to results oriented goals? Does your hospital have any stroke related goals at all? 30 day deaths improved every year? Following Get With the Guidelines or Joint Commission certification are not valid because they are not results oriented.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660677

Abstract

Recovery of function after damage to the CNS is limited due to the absence of axon regeneration and relatively low levels of plasticity. Plasticity in the CNS can be reactivated in the adult CNS by treatment with chondroitinase ABC, which removes glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains from chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs). Plasticity in the adult CNS is restricted by perineuronal nets (PNNs) around many neuronal cell bodies and dendrites, which appear at the closure of critical periods and contain several inhibitory CSPGs. Formation of these structures and the turning off of plasticity is triggered by impulse activity in neurons. Expression of a link protein by neurons is the event that triggers the formation of PNNs. Treatment with chondroitinase removes PNNs and other inhibitory influences in the damaged spinal cord and promotes sprouting of new connections. However, promoting plasticity by itself does not necessarily bring back useful behavior; this only happens when useful connections are stabilized and inappropriate connections removed, driven by behavior. Thus after rodent spinal cord injury, combining a daily rehabilitation treatment for skilled paw function with chondroitinase produces much greater recovery than either treatment alone. The rehabilitation must be specific for the behavior that is to be enhanced because non-specific rehabilitation improves locomotor behavior but not skilled paw function. Plasticity-enhancing treatments may therefore open up a window of opportunity for successful rehabilitation.