Clinical Perspective
What Is New?
- Reviewing efficacy of aerobic programs for survivors of stroke similar in activity and dosing to cardiac rehabilitation in the United States provides a prerequisite knowledge base for considering application of cardiac rehabilitation after stroke.
- Results of the systematic review and meta‐analysis indicate aerobic programs similar in activity and dosing to cardiac rehabilitation programs in the United States are effective at increasing aerobic capacity for survivors of stroke regardless of mode of exercise, functional mobility, or time since stroke.
What Are the Clinical Implications?
- Providing cardiac rehabilitation for survivors of stroke may positively impact health status and mobility without creating new programs; further research is warranted.
Introduction
Mobility impairments and accompanying sedentary behaviors are major health concerns for many of the 6.6 million survivors of stroke in the United States.1 With a large number of survivors of stroke living with disability and facing a higher risk for stroke reoccurrence and other diseases, there is an increasing need for prevention and modification of risk factors.2 Physical activity (PA) and exercise can positively impact a survivor's overall health by reducing risk factors and improving physical function and quality of life.3, 4 In addition, survivors of stroke engaging in PA can reduce risk for all‐cause mortality and reduce 3‐year risk for recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death.5, 6 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines PA as “any bodily movement that is produced by the contraction of skeletal muscle and that substantially increases energy expenditure,” whereas exercise is a subset of PA “that involves planned, structured and repetitive bodily movement done to maintain or improve one or more components of physical fitness.”7, 8Many survivors of stroke receive rehabilitation care immediately after their stroke, which is focused primarily on recovery of function with limited or absent focus on aerobic fitness.9, 10 Patients are encouraged to continue with prescribed home exercise programs after discharge from rehabilitation, yet without support or guidance, most do not.11 This drop‐off of services contributes to failure of transition from rehabilitation patient to community PA participant.12 Survivors of stroke take less than half the daily steps of healthy counterparts and spend >78% of their time in sedentary behaviors, regardless of time since stroke.13, 14 Structured community exercise programs, such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR), can potentially reduce the deconditioning remaining after rehabilitation and improve habitual PA and exercise for survivors of stroke. Since 1994, the American Heart Association has recommended multidisciplinary CR programs as an integral part of recovery after cardiac events and for the tertiary prevention of cardiovascular disease. CR programs improve participants’ health through exercise and educational programs delivered by exercise physiologists and nurses, 2 to 3 times a week for 8 to 18 weeks with aerobic exercise for >30 minutes each visit.15 Currently, CR programs are offered only to individuals with specific cardiac diagnoses in the United States.16 Although survivors of stroke exhibit similar deficits in cardiovascular health, stroke is not among the covered diagnoses for CR services.16, 17 CR programs are generally widely available (in 2005, there were 2600 programs across the United States), with some variation across geographic areas.18
Several studies have tested the efficacy and feasibility of the multidisciplinary components of CR including aerobic exercise outside the United States, primarily in Canada.19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 However, international differences in frequency and duration make conclusions for US programs difficult. Although the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association support CR for survivors of stroke, there has not been support for widespread adoption or testing.
The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate aerobic exercise interventions for survivors of stroke that are similar in dosing and activity to CR programs in the United States to determine their efficacy for improving aerobic and walking capacity. Secondary aims include the following: (1) evaluating whether gains are sustained in follow‐up and (2) evaluating if type of exercise impacts the results.
