Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label 'perspective'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'perspective'. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke

We don't need lazy perspectives. We need EXACT STROKE PROTOCOLS DELIVERING RESULTS. When the hell will you get there? 

Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke


Abstract

Background

Wearable activity monitors that track step count can increase the wearer’s physical activity and motivation but are infrequently designed for the slower gait speed and compensatory patterns after stroke. New and available technology may allow for the design of stroke-specific wearable monitoring devices, capable of detecting more than just step counts, which may enhance how rehabilitation is delivered. The objective of this study was to identify important considerations in the development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology for rehabilitation, from the perspective of physical therapists and individuals with stroke.

Methods

A qualitative research design with focus groups was used to collect data. Five focus groups were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using content analysis to generate overarching categories representing the stakeholder considerations for the development of stroke-specific wearable monitor technology for the lower extremity.

Results

A total of 17 physical therapists took part in four focus group discussions and three individuals with stroke participated in the fifth focus group. Our analysis identified four main categories for consideration: 1) ‘Variability’ described the heterogeneity of patient presentation, therapy approaches, and therapeutic goals that are taken into account for stroke rehabilitation; 2) ‘Context of use’ described the different settings and purposes for which stakeholders could foresee employing stroke-specific wearable technology; 3) ‘Crucial design features’ identified the measures, functions, and device characteristics that should be considered for incorporation into prospective technology to enhance uptake; and 4) ‘Barriers to adopting technology’ highlighted challenges, including personal attitudes and design flaws, that may limit the integration of current and future wearable monitoring technology into clinical practice.

Conclusions

The findings from this qualitative study suggest that the development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology is viewed positively by physical therapists and individuals with stroke. While a single, specific device or function may not accommodate all the variable needs of therapists and their clients, it was agreed that wearable monitoring technology could enhance how physical therapists assess and treat their clients. Future wearable devices should be developed in consideration of the highlighted design features and potential barriers for uptake.

Background

Individuals with stroke commonly face mobility limitations, beginning at stroke onset [1] and continuing past discharge into the community [2], and demonstrate a range of gait deviations due to altered motor control and resulting compensatory movement patterns [3]. Improving walking quality and quantity is a major focus of therapy [4], as doing so can improve mobility, fitness, quality of life, and prevent secondary complications [5, 6]. One avenue to target walking for individuals with stroke may be to utilize wearable monitoring technology, as previous research has shown that application of an activity monitor can improve user self-efficacy and physical activity levels in various patient populations including older adults, breast cancer survivors, and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [7,8,9,10,11]. Additionally, wearable monitors have been increasingly utilized by therapists and researchers to assess various outcomes relating to exercise and physical activity, [12, 13] within therapy and between visits, to ensure exercise targets are met [14].
The majority of currently available wearable monitoring technology has not been developed specifically for stroke-related impairments and movement patterns. For example, consumer activity monitors are often limited by a minimum walking speed or movement amplitude in order to provide accurate and reliable feedback [15, 16]. Research efforts have attempted to adapt available wearable monitoring technology to meet the needs of individuals with stroke with increasing accuracy, from simple solutions such as wearing hip-situated fitness trackers at the ankle [17, 18], to developing software algorithms to analyze captured data to recognize movements patterns specific to stroke [19,20,21]. The advances in wearable monitoring have reached a point at which designing stroke-specific wearable monitoring technology is a realistic priority to assess outcome and enhance rehabilitation interventions [22].
Much of the efforts to design stroke-specific wearable monitoring technology has so far focused on the hemiparetic upper limb [23,24,25,26]. This is unsurprising, as many individuals with stroke report long-term upper limb deficits or disability [27], and upper limb recovery has been identified as a top research priority from the perspective of individuals with stroke and their health professionals [28]. Conversely, limited efforts have been made in applying sensing technology to design stroke-specific wearable monitors for the hemiparetic lower limb. Research has shown that accelerometry can be reliable and valid in measuring physical activity after stroke [29], and new technologies to quantify foot pressure, leg motion, and muscle activity are being shown to be applicable to stroke [30, 31]. Thus, there is a gap in wearable monitoring technology for individuals with stroke, between what can be designed to improve rehabilitation of the lower extremity and what is currently available.
In order to develop devices that fill this niche, it is important to involve end-users in the development process from the onset to ensure initial efforts are relevant to the individuals who will ultimately use them, [32, 33] which inevitably are individuals with stroke and their physical therapists. This user-centered design approach is optimal for identifying relevant factors and technical aspects that should inform design choices [32, 33]. Thus, the objective of the current study was to identify important considerations in the future development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology for rehabilitation, from the perspective of physical therapists and individuals with stroke.

Methods

This study involved focus groups mainly with physical therapists who work closely with individuals with stroke. Focus groups were chosen as they are able to rapidly generate information on collective views [34], which may be useful in the initial phase of research and development (e.g., of interventions, questionnaires, technology) [35]. A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized in order to gain rich description from physical therapist experience and perceptions [36]. The final focus group was conducted with individuals with stroke. All participants provided written informed consent and were offered a small honorarium for their time to participate.


More at link. 

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Neurophysiology of Robot-Mediated Training and Therapy: A Perspective for Future Use in Clinical Populations

'Perspective' is totally useless and does absolutely nothing to get survivors 100% recovered.  The mentors and senor researchers who allowed this crapola need to be fired.  Survivors need to be in charge, this just proves once again that the current leadership is incompetent. 

Neurophysiology of Robot-Mediated Training and Therapy: A Perspective for Future Use in Clinical Populations


Duncan L.Turner
1,2
*,Ander Ramos-Murguialday
3,4
, Niels Birbaumer
3,5
, Ulrich Hoffmann
4
and Andreas Luft
6
1
Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of East London, London, UK
2
Lewin Stroke Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
3
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, MEG Center, University ofTubingen,Tubingen, Germany
4
Health Division,Tecnalia Research & Innovation, San Sebastian, Spain
5
Ospedale San Camillo, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico,Venezia Lido, Italy
6
Clinical Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Edited by:
Cuntai Guan, Institute for InfocommResearch, Singapore
Reviewed by:
Kenji Kansaku, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, JapanRoberto Colombo, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Italy
*Correspondence:
Duncan L.Turner, Neurorehabilitation Unit, School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London,  Stratford, London E15 4LZ,UK e-mail:  d.l.turner@uel.ac.uk
The recovery of functional movements following injury to the central nervous system (CNS)is multifaceted and is accompanied by processes occurring in the injured and noninjured hemispheres of the brain or above/below a spinal cord lesion.The changes in the CNS are the consequence of functional and structural processes collectively termed neuroplasticity and these may occur spontaneously and/or be induced by movement practice. The neurophysiological mechanisms underlying such brain plasticity may take different forms indifferent types of injury, for example stroke vs. spinal cord injury (SCI). Recovery of movement can be enhanced by intensive, repetitive, variable, and rewarding motor practice.To this end, robots that enable or facilitate repetitive movements have been developed to assist recovery and rehabilitation.  Here, we suggest that some elements of robot mediated training such as assistance and perturbation may have the potential to enhance neuroplasticity. Together the elemental components for developing integrated robot mediated training protocols may form part of a neurorehabilitation framework alongside those methods already employed by therapists. Robots could thus open up a wider choice of options for delivering movement rehabilitation grounded on the principles underpinning neuroplasticity in the human CNS.