Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label discuss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discuss. Show all posts

Monday, August 26, 2019

Potential Immunotherapeutic Targets on Myeloid Cells for Neurovascular Repair After Ischemic Stroke

What fucking laziness. 'Discuss' NOT PROVIDE PROTCOLS TO RECOVER!  We'll never get anywhere in stroke with mentors and senior researchers that allow this crapola to go on.  My god, we need to fire a lot of people.

Potential Immunotherapeutic Targets on Myeloid Cells for Neurovascular Repair After Ischemic Stroke


Ziyu Zhu1†, Li Zheng1†, Yan Li1, Tingting Huang1, Yu-Chieh Chao1, Lijun Pan2, Hui Zhu1, Yanhua Zhao1, Weifeng Yu1* and Peiying Li1*
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
Neurological deficits and cognitive dysfunctions caused by acute ischemic stroke pose enormous burden to the stroke families and the communities. Restoration of the normal function of the neurovascular unit following ischemic stroke is critical for improving neurological recovery and cognitive functions after stroke. Recent evidence suggests that the myeloid cells including both the resident microglia and infiltrating monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils are highly plastic in response to the environmental cues. They intimately interact with multiple components of the neurovascular unit in response to the alarmins, danger associated pattern molecules (DAMPs) and other signals released from the ischemic brain. The aim of this review is to discuss the reciprocal interactions between the myeloid cells and the ischemic neurovascular unit during the late repair phase of cerebral ischemic stroke. We also summarize potential immunotherapeutic targets on myeloid cells and new therapeutic approaches targeting myeloid cells, such as cell transplantation, mitochondrial dynamic and extracellular vesicles-based therapy et al to enhance neurovascular repair for better stroke recovery.

Introduction

The neurovascular unit (NVU) is composed by neurons, endothelial cells, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, astrocytes, microglia and extracellular matrix components. It maintains brain homeostasis of the brain (Banks et al., 2018; Morrison and Filosa, 2019). All the components of NVU interact with each other to maintain the neuronal milieu that is required for proper neuronal functioning by balancing energy, preserving the integrity of the blood brain barrier (BBB), releasing neurotrophic factors, uptake and recycling of neurotransmitters and et al. (Halassa et al., 2007; Charveriat et al., 2017). In response to cerebral ischemic stroke, the integrity of the BBB compromises leading to leakage of harmful blood components into the CNS, immune cell infiltration, and aberrant transport and clearance of molecules. All these changes contribute to the dysfunction of the NVU which is associated with long term neurological impairments (Fisher and Saver, 2015; Villaseñor et al., 2017). The reconstruction of NVU and the remodeling of neuronal circuitry turns out as an essential player in long-term neurological recovery after stroke (Gurer et al., 2009; Lake et al., 2017). However, the repair of NVU is a complex process involving clearing of neuronal debris, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, establishing the new neuronal circuitry, controlling neuroinflammation and et al. (Lake et al., 2017; Zhao Z. et al., 2017), thus it remains as a big challenge to promote the NVU repair after ischemic brain injury.
After ischemic stroke, both glial cells and peripheral immune cells can be activated by a variety of mechanisms, including neuronal “help me” signals, like lipocalin-2 (Xing et al., 2014; Blochet et al., 2018), interleukin 4 (IL-4) (Zhao et al., 2015), and a complex mixture of extracellular proteins functioning as damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), S100B and et al. (Chamorro et al., 2012; Fu et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018b). Notably, myeloid immune cells are gaining increasing attention due to their unique function in anti-inflammation, clearing cellular debris and promoting neuronal plasticity (Iadecola and Anrather, 2011; Shichita et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Zhao S. C. et al., 2017; Wang X. et al., 2018).
Myeloid cells are blood cells that arise from a large heterogeneous multipotent stem cell population, the hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) lineage (Kondo et al., 1997; Akashi et al., 2000) which resides in the bone marrow and possess the ability to give rise to diverse cell types in the immune system and the blood, including granulocytes, monocytes, erythrocytes and platelets (Paul et al., 2015). Some myeloid populations can develop directly from yolk sac progenitors without apparent bone marrow intermediates, such as tissue resident macrophages (Kondo et al., 1997; Akashi et al., 2000; Shibata and Suzuki, 2017). Although peripheral monocyte-derived macrophages and microglia can both be developed from the same yolk sac progenitors, they should not be considered as one cellular population in the injured brain (Greenhalgh et al., 2018). After injury, monocyte-derived macrophages can enter the brain and directly communicate with microglia and suppress the microglia-mediated phagocytosis and inflammation after spinal cord injury (Greenhalgh et al., 2018). In the central nervous system (CNS), the main tissue resident macrophages including perivascular macrophages (PVM), meningeal macrophages (MM), and choroid plexus macrophages (CPM) (Henning et al., 2009) and microglia migrate into the CNS during early neural development depending on transcription factor Pu.1 and Irf8 (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007; Kierdorf et al., 2013).
In the recent decades, microglia and monocytes/macrophages are intensively studied in the context of cerebral ischemic brain injury (Hu et al., 2012; Garcia-Culebras et al., 2018), with compelling evidence emerging, thus we mainly focused on these cells in this review. After cerebral ischemia, both residential microglia and macrophages can be activated within 24 h and the infiltration of monocyte-derived macrophages and activation of microglia peaks within 3–4 days after stroke onset (Lalancette-Hebert et al., 2007; Gelderblom et al., 2009; Wattananit et al., 2016). Polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs) are another myeloid cell population that can infiltrate into the ischemic brain and affect ischemic brain injury (Frijns and Kappelle, 2002). These innate immune cells play important roles in determining the ischemic infarcts. For example, PMNs release matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) which degrades the BBB and exacerbates ischemic brain injury (Li et al., 2013a) and tissue-plasminogen activator related hemorrhagic transformation (Mao et al., 2017). Selective microglia elimination disturbed neuronal calcium responses, increased calcium overload and increased the incidence of spreading depolarization, thus significantly increased the infarct size by 60% (Szalay et al., 2016). Depletion of monocyte/macrophages in cerebral ischemic stroke reduced hemorrhagic infarct transformation or reduced brain injury in monocyte/macrophage depleted stroke mice (Gliem et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2016). However, there’s also a recent study showed no impact on stroke outcome with monocyte/macrophages depleted (Schmidt et al., 2017).
Recent researches have highlighted that the impact of these myeloid cells on the ischemic brain injury largely depend on different phenotypes at different stages of stroke (Kurisu et al., 2018). As it’s well-known that microglia and macrophages can be divided into different phenotypes depending on their functions on the inflammatory responses (Mantovani et al., 2013; Guruswamy and ElAli, 2017). Classically-activated (M1) microglia/macrophages usually secret pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin 23 (IL-23), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 12 (IL-12) and et al. (Mills et al., 2000; Guruswamy and ElAli, 2017; Li et al., 2017), while alternatively activated (M2) microglia/macrophages are characterized by their production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) (Gordon and Taylor, 2005; Guruswamy and ElAli, 2017) and they can be polarized with IL-4 via a signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6)-dependent pathway (Stein et al., 1992; Gao et al., 2015). Recent studies further identified more specific subpopulation of M2 microglia/macrophages, such as M2a, M2b, M2c, and Mox (Hu et al., 2015). Importantly, the phenotypes and functions of these cells are highly dynamic after ischemic injury (Tsuyama et al., 2018). Likewise, PMNs may also have different phenotypes in different stages after ischemic stroke, a pro-inflammatory so called N1 and an anti-inflammatory N2 phenotype (Fridlender et al., 2009).
However, the terminology of microglial/macrophage polarization was questioned and believed to hinder research progress (Ransohoff, 2016). There are far more phenotypes of microglia/macrophages than M1/M2, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis specific microglia (Chiu et al., 2013), phagocytic monocyte-derived macrophages (Yamasaki et al., 2014), immunosuppressive CD11c+ microglia and et al. (Kan et al., 2015). There are also cases that microglia/macrophage may concurrently display both pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes (Morganti et al., 2016). In addition, transcriptomics and genomic studies reveal that the function of microglia are versatile beyond immune responses, such as synaptic modulation and neurotrophic support (Wes et al., 2016). Single-cell RNA-sequencing gene profiling showed that macrophages in traumatic brain injury are not comprised of distinctly polarized cell subsets, instead, these macrophages are uniquely and broadly activated (Kim et al., 2016). Therefore, it is not rigorous to classify microglia/macrophages imprudently into M1/M2 classifications (Ransohoff, 2016).
Recently, compelling evidence is suggesting the role of the distinct “healing” myeloid cells during the restoration of NVU after stroke, including phagocytosis of damaged neuronal debris, promoting neurogenesis and angiogenesis, re-establishment of the neuronal circuitry, improving white matter repair and et al. during different phases after stroke (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org Figure 1. The involvement of myeloid immune cells during the NVU repair after cerebral ischemic stroke. In the acute phase of ischemic stroke, the damaged associated signals from the ischemic brain activate resident and peripheral myeloid immune cells, such as microglia, peripheral mono/macrophages and neutrophils. These cells penetrate into the CNS through the disrupted BBB from 1 day after stroke, peaking at 2–3 days and may last for several weeks. The phagocytic function of myeloid cells enables them to remove tissue debris in both acute and repair stages. During the recovery phase after stroke, myeloid cells with strong plasticity could differentiate into different phenotypes and release several neurovascular nutritional factors, which may enhance neurovascular regeneration and remodeling up to weeks and months after stroke. NVU, neurovascular unit; CNS, central nervous system; BBB, blood brain barrier; NSC, neural stem cells.
In this review, we will summarize the distinct functions of different subsets of myeloid cells during the “repair” of NVU discuss the identified mechanisms underlying their restoration of the NVU after stroke.

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

LATERAL: LVAD implant reduces risk for stroke

For discussion with your doctor. 

LATERAL: LVAD implant reduces risk for stroke

Medtronic announced that clinical trial data for its left ventricular assist device showed that 95% of recipients were free from disabling stroke after 2 years of follow-up.
The findings of the LATERAL trial, which evaluated the use of the system (HeartWare HVAD, Medtronic) in patients who had the device implanted via thoracotomy, were presented at the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs conference in San Francisco, the company stated in a press release.
“Remembering my earliest experiences with the very first HVAD system implant in [a] patient more than 15 years ago, I’ve seen both the significant benefits and also the risks for patients who receive a ventricular assist device. These new data are impressive,” Georg Wieselthaler, MD, the director of the heart transplant and mechanical circulatory support programs at the University of California, San Francisco, and a LATERAL trial investigator, said in the release. “Many of us have dedicated our lives’ work to improving this therapy, including minimizing adverse events.”
Research from the trial found that adverse events were more likely to occur during the first 30 days after implant, with a decline in bleeding (1.53 vs. 0.51 events per patient-year; P < .001) and in arrhythmias (3.22 vs. 0.26 events per patient-year; P < .001), according to the release. There was also a decline in strokes at 30 to 180 days (0.51 vs. 0.12 events per patient-year; P = .01), according to the release.
Overall, adverse event rates were meaningfully reduced 1 to 6 months after implant, according to the release.
Late risk for stroke was “very low,” with total stroke occurring at only 0.05 events per patient-year in years 1 and 2 after implant, the release stated. Previously published data from the LATERAL trial showed survival at 87% after 2 years.
The heart system is available in 56 countries and has the “broadest base of clinical evidence of any centrifugal-flow LVAD,” with more than 2,000 clinical trial patients and 18,000 worldwide implants, according to the release.
“These data give us more comprehensive information showing low adverse event and stroke rates for end-stage heart failure patients who receive the HVAD system,” Rob Kowal, MD, PhD, chief medical officer and vice president of medical affairs in the cardiac rhythm and heart failure division at Medtronic, said in the release.
Reference:
Weiselthaler G, et al. Cardiac 1: The Future of MCS. Presented at: American Society for Artificial Internal Organs Annual Conference; June 26-29, 2019; San Francisco.

Saturday, February 10, 2018

Movement goals encoded within the cortex and muscle synergies to reduce redundancy pre and post-stroke. The relevance for gait rehabilitation and the prescription of walking-aids. A literature review and scholarly discussion

Stop with the fuckingly lazy scholarly discussion and write up protocols that get survivors recovered. Are you that fucking lazy and stupid about what needs to be done to help survivors?  Or do you like hearing yourself talk and do nothing?
Movement goals encoded within the cortex and muscle synergies to reduce redundancy pre and post-stroke. The relevance for gait rehabilitation and the prescription of walking-aids. A literature review and scholarly discussion

ABSTRACT
Current knowledge of neural and neuromuscular processes controlling gait and movement as well as an understanding of how these mechanisms change following stroke is an important basis for the development of effective rehabilitation interventions. To support the translation of findings from basic research into useful treatments in clinical practice, up-to-date neuroscience should be presented in forms accessible to all members of the multidisciplinary team. In this review we discuss aspects of cortical control of gait and movement, muscle synergies as a way of translating cortical commands into specific muscle activity and as an efficient means of reducing neural and musculoskeletal redundancy. We discuss how these mechanisms change following stroke, potential consequences for gait rehabilitation, and the prescription and use of walking-aids as well as areas requiring further research.

Introduction

An up-to-date knowledge of neural and neuromuscular processes controlling movement as well as an understanding of how these mechanisms change following stroke is an important basis for developing effective rehabilitation interventions. This approach has been advocated and implemented by many physiotherapy researchers over the past three decades leading to the routine implementation of science based interventions such as high repetition, task-oriented training, constraint-induced movement therapy, and biofeedback (Carr and Shepherd, 1987 Carr JH, Shepherd RB 1987 A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke, Aspen Publishers, UK. [Google Scholar]; Clark and Patten, 2013 Clark DJ, Patten C 2013 Eccentric versus concentric resistance training to enhance neuromuscular activation and walking speed following stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 27: 335344.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; Dean and Shepherd, 1997 Dean CM, Shepherd RB 1997 Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 28: 722728.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; Lee, Kilbreath, and Refshauge, 2005 Lee MJ, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM 2005 Movement detection at the ankle following stroke is poor. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 51: 1924.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; Lord, Wade, and Halligan, 1998 Lord SE, Wade DT, Halligan PW 1998 A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation 12: 477486.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; Shepherd and Carr, 1994 Shepherd RB, Carr J 1994 Reflections on physiotherapy and the emerging science of movement rehabilitation. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 40: 3947.[Crossref], [Google Scholar]; Shumway-Cook and Woollacott, 1995 Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH 1995 Motor Control: theory and Practical Applications, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London. [Google Scholar]; Veerbeek et al., 2014 Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G 2014 What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9: e87987.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]). Despite these developments, numerous aspects of clinical practice remain based on low level evidence or expert opinion (Kollen et al., 2009 Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B, Wheatley-Smith L, Scheper M, Buurke JH, Halfens J, Geurts AC, Kwakkel G 2009 The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke 40: e89e97.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; Lennon, 2003 Lennon S 2003 Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey. Disability and Rehabilitation 25: 455461.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; States, Pappas, and Salem, 2009 States RA, Pappas E, Salem Y 2009 Overground physical therapy gait training for chronic stroke patients with mobility deficits. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3: CD006075.[PubMed], [Google Scholar]; Veerbeek et al., 2014 Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G 2014 What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9: e87987.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]). Walking aids for example, including canes and rollators, although often widely used for long periods, have been only sparsely investigated regarding long-term impact on neural and neuromuscular mechanisms. Information from basic science and the potential relevance for walking aid prescription is not routinely considered. To date, research has mainly studied the immediate effects on kinetic, kinematic, or physiological outcomes in cross-sectional studies (Jeong, Jeong, Myong, and Koo, 2015 Jeong YG, Jeong YJ, Myong JP, Koo JW 2015 Which type of cane is the most efficient, based on oxygen consumption and balance capacity. In Chronic Stroke Patients? Gait and Posture 41: 493498.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]; Polese et al., 2012 Polese JC, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nascimento LR, Faria CD, Kirkwood RN, Laurentino GC, Ada L 2012 The effects of walking sticks on gait kinematics and kinetics with chronic stroke survivors. Clinical Biomechanics 27: 131137.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]).
Movement has been described as the result of interactions between: the person (with their individual physical and mental characteristics); and the task or movement goal the person is attempting to achieve and the environment (including the perpetual force of gravity) within which the movement is occurring (Shumway-Cook and Woollacott, 2007 Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH 2007 Motor Control. Translating Research into Clinical Practice, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London. [Google Scholar]). In this article we discuss research finding related to the neuromuscular control of movement which illustrate these points on a neuroscientific basis.
We examine research findings regarding: 1) cortical involvement in movement and gait control; 2) “muscle synergies” which according to a large body of evidence are the means by which cortical commands are converted into muscle actions; and 3) We discuss how these mechanisms change post stroke and possible consequences for rehabilitation and the use of walking-aids.

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Improving neurorepair in stroke brain through endogenous neurogenesis-enhancing drugs


Who gives a fuck about discussing and reviewing possible drugs you lazy fucking idiots. We need protocols and translational efforts that actually get survivors to 100% recovery. Don't just sit on your fucking ass and discuss, trillions of neurons are dying every second.
I guess you are on your own to get the research and hire researchers to solve the problem. No one else is going to do it.  I guess everyone in stroke takes their cues from our fucking failures of stroke associations doing 'All talk and no action' or 'All hat and no cattle'.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28447573

Abstract

Stroke induces not only cell death but also neurorepair. De novo neurogenesis has been found in the subventricular zone(SVZ) of adult mammalian brain days after stroke. Most of these newly generated cells die shortly after the insult. Recent studies have shown that pharmacological manipulation can improve the survival of endogenous neuroprogenitor cells and neural regeneration in stroke rats. As these drugs target the endogenous reparative processes which occur days after stroke, they may provide a prolonged window for stroke therapy. Here, we discuss endogenous neurogenesis-enhancing drugs, and review the general status of stroke therapeutics in evaluating the field of pharmacotherapy for stroke.
PMID:
28447573
DOI:
10.3727/096368917X695650