Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label interoception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interoception. Show all posts

Friday, March 20, 2026

How the aging gastrointestinal tract drives age-related cognitive decline

Described a problem, offered NO EXACT solution! Useless! You're fired! Human testing required; are your incompetent? stroke medical 'professionals' up to that task?

How the aging gastrointestinal tract drives age-related cognitive decline

We become forgetful as we age. This is often seen as a universal truth, but in fact it is far from universal: some people remain incredibly sharp at 100 years old, while others experience memory loss starting in middle age. 

While it seems logical that age-related cognitive decline would be blamed on brain aging and degeneration (which, like anything in the brain, is notoriously hard to treat), there's some evidence that processes elsewhere in the body influence the brain's ability to form memories. In particular, neuronal pathways that sense the status of other organs in the body can influence cognitive functions in the brain. Other studies have shown that our gut microbiome affects learning, memory, and behavior. But what we don't yet understand is how these connections work – the specific molecules, microbes, and gut-brain communication involved – and whether we can use that knowledge to prevent or reverse age-related memory loss.

In our new work published today in Nature, we discovered that the aging gastrointestinal tract produces specific molecules that blunt the activity of a key gut-brain neuronal pathway, leading to age-related cognitive decline in mice. 


Interoception: how our brain senses what's going on in our body

Our five senses – sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch – are known collectively as exteroception, and they decline with age. What's much less understood, and what our lab is particularly interested in, is interoception: how our brains subconsciously perceive the state of our peripheral organs to regulate physiological processes. The vagus nerve is a major source of interoceptive information, connecting many major organs like the heart, intestine, lungs, and liver to the brain. 

In this study, we discovered that intestine-to-brain signaling through the vagus nerve protects mice against age-related cognitive decline. In fact, stimulating specific gut sensory neurons that feed into the vagus nerve was capable of restoring youthful cognitive function in old mice. A key finding of this work, then, is that our interoceptive senses also decline with age, similar to exteroceptive senses like sight and hearing. But what is causing this decline? And what is the equivalent of eyeglasses or hearing aids to restore interoceptive function?

What do bacteria have to do with it?

Our gut microbiome composition – the types of microbes, their relative abundance, and therefore the types of metabolic processes happening in our intestines – shifts as we age. To assess whether these changes might affect cognitive decline, we used several strategies to introduce the microbiome from old mice into young mice and measured their performance in cognitive and memory tasks. Young mice with old microbiomes did poorly on these tests, just like their old counterparts. But depleting their microbiomes using antibiotics reversed the effect, enabling the mice to regain youthful levels of cognitive function. What was really surprising to us was that germ-free mice that do not have a microbiome show slowed cognitive decline with age, compared to normal mice with typically aging microbiomes. All of this evidence supports the idea that some component or byproduct of the aged microbiome drives the process of memory loss.

We narrowed this down to a possible bacterial culprit called Parabacteroides goldsteinii, though we suspect that other age-associated microbes may contribute too. The key activity of this microbe that drives the cognitive decline process is its production of molecules called medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs). High levels of MCFAs accumulate with age, due to the increasing abundance of producers like P. goldsteinii, and activate gut-resident myeloid immune cells to produce inflammatory signaling molecules. One of these signaling molecules in particular, IL-1β, impaired the function of vagal sensory neurons. Our experiments allowed us to trace the effects of MCFAs from the producing gut microbes, through intestinal immune cells and their secreted cytokines, into sensory neurons and up the vagus nerve, into the hippocampus of the brain where memories are formed. 

So what can we do about this?

Encouragingly, several of our experiments suggest that mice already experiencing cognitive decline can be rescued to a more youthful cognitive state by various interventions. Microbiome depletion by antibiotic treatment reversed cognitive decline, though this is not a viable treatment strategy long-term. In a more targeted approach, we used a bacteriophage – a bacterial virus that affects the activity of P. goldsteinii – and showed that it lowered MCFA levels and improved memory. 

A more realistic intervention might be to target the vagus nerve itself to prevent or reverse its functional decline in old age. We stimulated the vagus nerve by treating mice with the gut hormone CCK or with GLP-1 receptor agonists (drugs similar to Ozempic), both of which reversed the age-related memory deficits. 

Importantly, these findings prove that what we have traditionally thought of as "brain aging" can actually be controlled and even reversed by processes happening elsewhere in the body – including those that are relatively straightforward to manipulate with drugs or other existing treatments. 

Questions for future work

Our study was exclusively done in mice, which means that we don't yet know if this process happens in humans. We are working on new projects to address this question, and we hope that other scientists and clinicians will be inspired by this paper to explore its potential relevance to humans too. 

There are, however, a few pieces of evidence out there that suggest we may be on the right track. In patients with severe epilepsy or those recovering from a stroke, one possible treatment is vagus nerve stimulation using implanted devices that deliver mild electrical pulses. Interestingly, people undergoing this procedure have reported cognitive improvements, hinting at the possibility that human vagus nerve activity can also counteract memory loss.

It is also possible that other biological processes, such as chronic inflammation or infection, could contribute to vagus nerve dysfunction through similar pathways. Future work will be necessary to figure out whether stimulating the vagus nerve could offer any improvement of the cognitive effects in those patients. We are also very interested to see whether this process is involved in more severe forms of age-related cognitive decline, such as neurodegeneration and dementia. 

Source:
Journal reference:

Cox, T. O., et al. (2026). Intestinal interoceptive dysfunction drives age-associated cognitive decline. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10191-6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10191-6

Friday, February 4, 2022

Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

No clue.

Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0006

Abstract

Interoception is a complex process encompassing multiple dimensions, such as accuracy, learning and awareness. Here, we examined whether each of those dimensions relies on specialized neural regions distributed throughout the vast interoceptive network. To this end, we obtained relevant measures of cardiac interoception in healthy subjects and patients offering contrastive lesion models of neurodegeneration and focal brain damage: behavioural variant fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and fronto-insular stroke. Neural correlates of the three dimensions were examined through structural and functional resting-state imaging, and online measurements of the heart-evoked potential (HEP). The three patient groups presented deficits in interoceptive accuracy, associated with insular damage, connectivity alterations and abnormal HEP modulations. Interoceptive learning was differentially impaired in AD patients, evidencing a key role of memory networks in this skill. Interoceptive awareness results showed that bvFTD and AD patients overestimated their performance; this pattern was related to abnormalities in anterior regions and associated networks sub-serving metacognitive processes, and probably linked to well-established insight deficits in dementia. Our findings indicate how damage to specific hubs in a broad fronto-temporo-insular network differentially compromises interoceptive dimensions, and how such disturbances affect widespread connections beyond those critical hubs. This is the first study in which a multiple lesion model reveals fine-grained alterations of body sensing, offering new theoretical insights into neuroanatomical foundations of interoceptive dimensions.

This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health’.

1. Introduction

Interoception is the ability to sense autonomic changes via viscero-cortical pathways [1,2]. While research on this domain has greatly illuminated normal [3] and pathological [4,5] processes, it has not fully exploited the possibilities of the lesion model approach, which allows establishing direct connections between brain lesions and behaviour [6,7]. By including two contrastive lesion models, such as focal stroke and early neurodegeneration [8,9], we aim to reveal critical links between affected brain regions and interoceptive performance. To this end, we measured behavioural, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological correlates of cardiac interoception in patients with behavioural variant fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD, a condition with early compromise of fronto-insular-temporal structures), early stage Alzheimer's disease (AD, which includes posterior and temporal atrophy), and fronto-insular stroke (FIS). Such conditions may offer novel insights into interoception, because relevant evidence is scant in neurological disorders, and null in dementias.

Cardiac interoception tasks, which assess sensing of one's own heartbeats [5,10,11], offer robust evidence on three relevant dimensions: accuracy (behavioural precision in tracking cardiac signals [3]), learning (improvement of behavioural accuracy after feedback [11]), and awareness (metacognitive processes underlying confidence about one's own performance [3]). These dimensions rely on distributed networks critically engaging the insular cortex (IC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the somatosensory cortex (SC) [2,12], while interactions between interoceptive and high-level functions are mediated by IC projections to the ACC, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), the amygdala and the hippocampus (HP) [3,4,11,13–18].

First, as shown in structural and functional studies on interoceptive accuracy, task precision and online performance are associated with IC, ACC and SC hubs [12]. Additionally, the heart-evoked potential (HEP) is a cortical marker of cardiac monitoring which is modulated by attention to one's own heartbeats (expressed by a negative deflection that peaks in a 200–500 ms window after the R-wave) [19,20], and is mainly originated in the IC and the ACC [1,2,12]. HEP modulation amplitude is larger in subjects with high interoceptive accuracy [11,19,21,22] and could be enhanced by training [23]. In addition, the HEP is attenuated in neuropsychiatric patients [20] and such an alteration is associated with interoceptive deficits [5,17,18]. Moreover, phasic signals from individual heartbeats are related to memory circuits [24]. As all such mechanisms are to some extent compromised in our three patient groups, we hypothesized they would all present impairments in interoceptive accuracy and associated cortical measures.

Second, regarding interoceptive learning, cortical and intracranial recordings show that post-feedback behavioural improvements are associated with activity modulations in the IC and the frontal cortex [11]. However, whole-brain neuroimaging analyses may reveal other regions related to impairments in this dimension. Specifically, the crucial role of the HP, adjacent temporal structures and frontal cortices in memory and learning [25] suggests that such a skill should be distinctively compromised in AD patients, as reported in many other domains.

Finally, interoceptive awareness has been associated with the ACC, IC, prefrontal cortex (PFC, Brodmann area 10 (BA10) [26,27]) and OFC [28,29]. Although this metacognitive dimension has not been examined in neurological populations, impaired awareness and diminished insight are core features of dementia [30,31]. Thus, we predicted that bvFTD and AD would be worse than controls at estimating self-performance.

Previous evidence aligns with the notion of brain hubs as a biologically costly anatomical structure, which supports higher communication rates and information processing [32]. Given the elevated metabolic rate and centrality of hubs, damage to them could disrupt important functional networks, causing both general deficits in cognitive functions and specific brain disorders [32,33]. The differential compromise of hubs in our samples (temporal and posterior in AD, fronto-insular, in FIS, and fronto-temporal in bvFTD) offers a unique opportunity to dissociate brain networks within interoception.

In sum, for interoceptive accuracy, bvFTD and FIS are expected to perform worse than controls due to damage of critical interoceptive regions; instead, for AD, we predicted that performance would depend on the extent of atrophy of the IC and other subsidiary areas that could support this process (e.g. HP). Interoceptive learning should be impaired only in AD as a result of degeneration of the HP and adjacent temporal structures. Damage to these regions, together with frontal-related areas (OFC) that play a key role in learning and memory processes, could distinctively compromise this dimension. Regarding interoceptive awareness, we hypothesized that both patient groups with dementia would estimate self-performance worse than controls as a result of reduced insight and impaired metacognition, mainly associated with fronto-temporal damage. Finally, we expected the disruption of interoceptive networks to extend beyond critical areas, also compromising relevant long-range connections. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the structural, functional and dynamical brain signatures of interoceptive dimensions by comparing differential lesion models of neurodegeneration and focal stroke.

More at link.

 

Friday, February 12, 2021

Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

 You'll have to ask your doctor EXACTLY what here will get you recovered.

Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0006

Abstract

Interoception is a complex process encompassing multiple dimensions, such as accuracy, learning and awareness. Here, we examined whether each of those dimensions relies on specialized neural regions distributed throughout the vast interoceptive network. To this end, we obtained relevant measures of cardiac interoception in healthy subjects and patients offering contrastive lesion models of neurodegeneration and focal brain damage: behavioural variant fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and fronto-insular stroke. Neural correlates of the three dimensions were examined through structural and functional resting-state imaging, and online measurements of the heart-evoked potential (HEP). The three patient groups presented deficits in interoceptive accuracy, associated with insular damage, connectivity alterations and abnormal HEP modulations. Interoceptive learning was differentially impaired in AD patients, evidencing a key role of memory networks in this skill. Interoceptive awareness results showed that bvFTD and AD patients overestimated their performance; this pattern was related to abnormalities in anterior regions and associated networks sub-serving metacognitive processes, and probably linked to well-established insight deficits in dementia. Our findings indicate how damage to specific hubs in a broad fronto-temporo-insular network differentially compromises interoceptive dimensions, and how such disturbances affect widespread connections beyond those critical hubs. This is the first study in which a multiple lesion model reveals fine-grained alterations of body sensing, offering new theoretical insights into neuroanatomical foundations of interoceptive dimensions.

This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health’.

1. Introduction

Interoception is the ability to sense autonomic changes via viscero-cortical pathways [1,2]. While research on this domain has greatly illuminated normal [3] and pathological [4,5] processes, it has not fully exploited the possibilities of the lesion model approach, which allows establishing direct connections between brain lesions and behaviour [6,7]. By including two contrastive lesion models, such as focal stroke and early neurodegeneration [8,9], we aim to reveal critical links between affected brain regions and interoceptive performance. To this end, we measured behavioural, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological correlates of cardiac interoception in patients with behavioural variant fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD, a condition with early compromise of fronto-insular-temporal structures), early stage Alzheimer's disease (AD, which includes posterior and temporal atrophy), and fronto-insular stroke (FIS). Such conditions may offer novel insights into interoception, because relevant evidence is scant in neurological disorders, and null in dementias.

Cardiac interoception tasks, which assess sensing of one's own heartbeats [5,10,11], offer robust evidence on three relevant dimensions: accuracy (behavioural precision in tracking cardiac signals [3]), learning (improvement of behavioural accuracy after feedback [11]), and awareness (metacognitive processes underlying confidence about one's own performance [3]). These dimensions rely on distributed networks critically engaging the insular cortex (IC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the somatosensory cortex (SC) [2,12], while interactions between interoceptive and high-level functions are mediated by IC projections to the ACC, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), the amygdala and the hippocampus (HP) [3,4,11,13–18].

First, as shown in structural and functional studies on interoceptive accuracy, task precision and online performance are associated with IC, ACC and SC hubs [12]. Additionally, the heart-evoked potential (HEP) is a cortical marker of cardiac monitoring which is modulated by attention to one's own heartbeats (expressed by a negative deflection that peaks in a 200–500 ms window after the R-wave) [19,20], and is mainly originated in the IC and the ACC [1,2,12]. HEP modulation amplitude is larger in subjects with high interoceptive accuracy [11,19,21,22] and could be enhanced by training [23]. In addition, the HEP is attenuated in neuropsychiatric patients [20] and such an alteration is associated with interoceptive deficits [5,17,18]. Moreover, phasic signals from individual heartbeats are related to memory circuits [24]. As all such mechanisms are to some extent compromised in our three patient groups, we hypothesized they would all present impairments in interoceptive accuracy and associated cortical measures.

Second, regarding interoceptive learning, cortical and intracranial recordings show that post-feedback behavioural improvements are associated with activity modulations in the IC and the frontal cortex [11]. However, whole-brain neuroimaging analyses may reveal other regions related to impairments in this dimension. Specifically, the crucial role of the HP, adjacent temporal structures and frontal cortices in memory and learning [25] suggests that such a skill should be distinctively compromised in AD patients, as reported in many other domains.

Finally, interoceptive awareness has been associated with the ACC, IC, prefrontal cortex (PFC, Brodmann area 10 (BA10) [26,27]) and OFC [28,29]. Although this metacognitive dimension has not been examined in neurological populations, impaired awareness and diminished insight are core features of dementia [30,31]. Thus, we predicted that bvFTD and AD would be worse than controls at estimating self-performance.

Previous evidence aligns with the notion of brain hubs as a biologically costly anatomical structure, which supports higher communication rates and information processing [32]. Given the elevated metabolic rate and centrality of hubs, damage to them could disrupt important functional networks, causing both general deficits in cognitive functions and specific brain disorders [32,33]. The differential compromise of hubs in our samples (temporal and posterior in AD, fronto-insular, in FIS, and fronto-temporal in bv FTD) offers a unique opportunity to dissociate brain networks within interoception.

In sum, for interoceptive accuracy, bvFTD and FIS are expected to perform worse than controls due to damage of critical interoceptive regions; instead, for AD, we predicted that performance would depend on the extent of atrophy of the IC and other subsidiary areas that could support this process (e.g. HP). Interoceptive learning should be impaired only in AD as a result of degeneration of the HP and adjacent temporal structures. Damage to these regions, together with frontal-related areas (OFC) that play a key role in learning and memory processes, could distinctively compromise this dimension. Regarding interoceptive awareness, we hypothesized that both patient groups with dementia would estimate self-performance worse than controls as a result of reduced insight and impaired metacognition, mainly associated with fronto-temporal damage. Finally, we expected the disruption of interoceptive networks to extend beyond critical areas, also compromising relevant long-range connections. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the structural, functional and dynamical brain signatures of interoceptive dimensions by comparing differential lesion models of neurodegeneration and focal stroke.

More at link.

 

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

No fucking clue what interoception is so go ask your doctor.
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/371/1708/20160006.abstract

Indira García-Cordero, Lucas Sedeño, Laura de la Fuente, Andrea Slachevsky, Gonzalo Forno, Francisco Klein, Patricia Lillo, Jesica Ferrari, Clara Rodriguez, Julian Bustin, Teresa Torralva, Sandra Baez, Adrian Yoris, Sol Esteves, Margherita Melloni, Paula Salamone, David Huepe, Facundo Manes, Adolfo M. García, Agustín Ibañez

Abstract

Interoception is a complex process encompassing multiple dimensions, such as accuracy, learning and awareness. Here, we examined whether each of those dimensions relies on specialized neural regions distributed throughout the vast interoceptive network. To this end, we obtained relevant measures of cardiac interoception in healthy subjects and patients offering contrastive lesion models of neurodegeneration and focal brain damage: behavioural variant fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and fronto-insular stroke. Neural correlates of the three dimensions were examined through structural and functional resting-state imaging, and online measurements of the heart-evoked potential (HEP). The three patient groups presented deficits in interoceptive accuracy, associated with insular damage, connectivity alterations and abnormal HEP modulations. Interoceptive learning was differentially impaired in AD patients, evidencing a key role of memory networks in this skill. Interoceptive awareness results showed that bvFTD and AD patients overestimated their performance; this pattern was related to abnormalities in anterior regions and associated networks sub-serving metacognitive processes, and probably linked to well-established insight deficits in dementia. Our findings indicate how damage to specific hubs in a broad fronto-temporo-insular network differentially compromises interoceptive dimensions, and how such disturbances affect widespread connections beyond those critical hubs. This is the first study in which a multiple lesion model reveals fine-grained alterations of body sensing, offering new theoretical insights into neuroanatomical foundations of interoceptive dimensions.
This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health’.

Friday, March 6, 2015

Can Extreme Resilience Be Taught?

You are going to need extreme resilience to recover from your stroke.  What is your doctor doing to make absolutely sure you have the resilience necessary to recover? No protocols at all for that? That is a fireable offense. You had better hope your insula is not damaged or that your doctor knows the exact protocol to repair it.

Can Extreme Resilience Be Taught?

You’re struggling up a hill halfway through a ten-mile race. Your breathing is ragged, and your footfalls seem heavy. You lurch toward the water station, grab a cup, and gulp it down. Back in the middle of the pack, you feel strengthened and pick up the pace.
Your decision to lope over to the water station relied on your interoceptive sense—the ability to sense your internal state. When you talk to your physician about a nagging pain or discomfort, you are also acting on information passing through your brain’s interoceptive system. Facing a major mental and physical challenge, however, requires you to do more. You need to match your internal sensations with an assessment of what the environment will demand of you. Do you need to slow down to summit the hill, or can you power through to the next water station?
A group from the University of California at San Diego and the Naval Health Research Center theorizes that the extra edge that allows certain people to perform particularly well in stressful situations may come not from a physiological advantage but from differences in the brain. To explore this question, they tested a group of Navy SEALs, adventure racers, and Marines, all of whom have learned to triumph over physical challenges without succumbing to stress. “Navy SEALs don’t all share a prototypical body type—they’re all different,” Nate Thom, a stress physiologist at the Naval Health Research Center, says. Nonetheless, they share a certain amount of resilience.
Specifically, they surmised that individuals who shine in tough circumstances may benefit from highly attuned interoception, which then informs the decision-making areas of the brain. Interoception is thought to rely heavily on the insula, a small brain area that plays an important role in self-awareness and emotional experiences.
To test their theory, the researchers first compared 11 Navy SEALs and 10 age- and education-matched healthy controls. Both groups were assessed on their ability to read happy and fearful faces. As the scientists had expected, the SEALs showed increased right insula activity across all emotional categories as compared with the healthy control subjects. They also were slightly slower to detect emotions, which may either be a fluke or may reflect the importance of accurately identifying an individual’s facial expression on the battlefield: it could be vital to detecting whether a setting is dangerous or safe.
In a second study, adventure racers—the type who sprint, paddle, and climb their way through wilderness endurance challenges—were subjected to the same emotion recognition task. They also underwent a breathing restriction task, which feels vaguely like suffocation and is intended to induce mild stress. The adventure racers also showed increased activity in the right insula in the emotion recognition task and less engagement of the region during the restriction test than controls, suggesting a lower stress response.
The results, presented in a poster session at the Society for Neuroscience, are the first two stages in a study that will compare SEALS with Marines and also assess the effectiveness of mindfulness training, which has been shown to improve interoceptive awareness. Staying in touch with both your insides and your outsides, it seems, may give you an added boost when you need it most.