Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label nerinetide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nerinetide. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide at Year 1 in Participants Enrolled in ESCAPE‐NEXT: A Multicenter, Double‐Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

 Wil your competent? doctor and hospital be DOING ANYTHING WITH THIS?

Do you prefer your doctor, hospital and board of director's incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING? Your choice; let them be incompetent or demand action!

Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide at Year 1 in Participants Enrolled in ESCAPE‐NEXT: A Multicenter, Double‐Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial


Abstract

Background

Nerinetide is a neuroprotective agent recently evaluated in the ESCAPE‐NEXT (Efficacy and Safety of Nerinetide in Participants With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy Excluding Thrombolysis) trial (NCT04462536), which was terminated after failing to meet its Day 90 primary end point; however, by that time, Year 1 follow‐up outcomes were already available for 513 participants.

Methods

The primary end point at Year 1 was functional independence, defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2, analyzed by logistic regression adjusted for treatment and baseline covariates. In a post hoc analysis, the interaction between early (<3 hours) versus late (3–12 hours) enrollment window and treatment effect was also tested and the results reported separately by enrollment window.

Results

A total of 513 of 850 participants had documented Year 1 outcomes before study termination, of whom 442 reached their scheduled Year 1 visit. In the nerinetide group, 110 (48.0%) of 229 participants achieved functional independence at Year 1 compared with 102 (47.9%) of 213 in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.74–1.71]; P=0.593). There was treatment effect modification by enrollment window (early versus late; Pinteraction=0.044). Among early window participants (n=163), 51 (52.6%) in the nerinetide group and 30 (45.5%) in placebo achieved functional independence (aOR, 2.80 [95% CI, 1.18–6.66], P=0.019) at Year 1. Additionally, the nerinetide group exhibited improved survival (aOR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.17–5.83], P=0.019). Conversely, no significant clinical benefit of nerinetide at Year 1 was observed among late window participants. Analyses on all 513 participants with documented Year 1 outcomes provided similar results.

Conclusions

Long‐term benefits of early administration of neuroprotection may emerge up to 1 year after stroke.

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Can Nerinetide Enhance Stroke Outcomes Without Thrombolysis?

 Ask your fuckingly incompetent? doctor why NOTHING has been done with this in the last 5+ years! No excuses are allowed! So you're contradicting this from February 2025?

  • nerinetide (12 posts to February 2020)
  • Can Nerinetide Enhance Stroke Outcomes Without Thrombolysis?

    OBJECTIVE

    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) nerinetide in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) without prior or concurrent IV thrombolysis (IVT).

    METHODS

    A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted through March 15, 2025, identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EVT plus nerinetide versus EVT plus placebo without IVT. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.4 with random-effects models, and heterogeneity was evaluated via chi-square and I2 statistics.

    RESULTS

    Three RCTs comprising 726 patients in the IV nerinetide group and 668 in the placebo group were included. Nerinetide did not significantly improve functional outcomes: 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: [0.71, 1.47], P = 0.92) and mRS 0-2 (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: [0.93, 1.22], P = 0.35). No significant differences were observed in 90-day mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: [0.60, 1.34], P = 0.59) or adverse events, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: [0.44, 1.45], P = 0.46).

    CONCLUSION

    Nerinetide administration during EVT in AIS patients without IVT did not significantly improve functional independence, survival, or safety outcomes compared to placebo. Although preclinical data supported neuroprotection, clinical benefits were not observed, highlighting the challenges in translating neuroprotective strategies into effective stroke therapies.

    Monday, October 20, 2025

    Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sovateltide in Patients With Acute Cerebral Ischemic Stroke -recruiting

     

    Your competent? doctor has been working on peptides for over a decade, right? Oh NO, INCOMPETENCE REIGNED AND NOTHING WAS DONE, CORRECT?

    Let's see EXACTLY HOW LONG AND IN WHAT YOUR DOCTOR IS INCOMPETENT!
  • peptide (16 posts to January 2012)
  • nerinetide (10 posts to February 2020)
  • Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial

     November 2024

    Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sovateltide in Patients With Acute Cerebral Ischemic Stroke

    ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT05691244
    SponsorPharmazz, Inc.
    Information Provided byAnil Gulati, MD, PhD
    Study Start (Actual)2025-07-24
    Primary Completion (Estimated) 2026-09
    Study Completion (Estimated)2026-11
    Enrollment (Estimated)514
    Study TypeInterventional
    Last Update Posted2025-10-16

    Study Overview

    Brief Summary

    Extensive research is being conducted in search of neuroprotective agents for possible use in the acute phase of stroke and agents that can be used for neurorepair in later stages of stroke. Several trials have been conducted and are in progress using different pharmacological agents, but none of the studies involve the stimulation of ETB receptors to treat cerebral ischemic stroke. Sovateltide (IRL-1620, PMZ-1620) has been effective in animal models of cerebral ischemic stroke. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study with 7 subjects. Clinical phase II and III results indicate that sovateltide is a novel, first-in-class, highly effective drug candidate for treating cerebral ischemic stroke. Safety and significant efficacy in improving the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Rankin scale (mRS), and Barthel index (BI) obtained in phase II and III studies in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke in India are convincing and encouraged us to investigate its safety and efficacy in cerebral ischemic stroke patients in the United States. Therefore, the plan is to conduct a phase III clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sovateltide therapy along with standard of care in patients of acute ischemic stroke.

    Friday, July 25, 2025

    Advances in clinical studies of peptide drugs in stroke disease

     Your competent? doctor has been working on peptides for over a decade, right? Oh NO, INCOMPETENCE REIGNED AND NOTHING WAS DONE, CORRECT?

    Let's see EXACTLY HOW LONG AND IN WHAT YOUR DOCTOR IS INCOMPETENT!
  • peptide (16 posts to January 2012)
  • nerinetide (10 posts to February 2020)
  • Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial

     November 2024

    Advances in clinical studies of peptide drugs in stroke disease


    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2025.167970Get rights and content

    Highlights

    • •
      Peptide drugs exhibit tremendous potential in stroke treatment, characterized by high specificity, and low toxicity.
    • •
      Multiple peptide drugs (such as CN-105, Nerinetide, and Sovateltide) show promising therapeutic prospects in clinical trials for stroke treatment.
    • •
      Peptide drugs still face challenges in stability, delivery, and bioavailability.
    • •
      Peptide drugs represent an innovative frontier in stroke treatment, offering potential new therapeutic options for patients.

    Abstract

    Stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability globally, with limited treatment options currently available. Fortunately, peptide drugs have emerged as promising candidates for treating central nervous system disorders, including stroke. They offer high specificity, low toxicity, and efficient blood-brain barrier penetration, demonstrating significant therapeutic potential. This review systematically introduces several promising peptide drugs, analyzing their mechanisms, therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials, and potential applications. It also addresses critical challenges in peptide drug development for stroke therapy, such as optimizing dosing strategies, enhancing stability, and improving delivery systems. The analysis of current clinical evidence suggests that peptide-based therapeutics represent a promising frontier in stroke treatment, potentially offering new therapeutic options for patients. This comprehensive review not only highlights the current status of peptide drug development but also provides insights into future directions for advancing stroke therapy.

    Introduction

    Stroke threatens human health and can lead to death and long-term disability [1]. The World Stroke Organization (WSO) stated that stroke is the second reason cause of death globally and the third reason cause of death and disability in its 2022 Global Stroke Fact Sheet [2]. And in 2019, the estimated global cost of stroke exceeded $891 billion, accounting for 1.12 % of the worldwide GDP [2]. The American Heart Association (AHA) also indicated that the prevalence of stroke in the United States is estimated to be 3.3 %, with approximately 9.4 million Americans aged 20 and older self-reporting a history of stroke in its 2023 Stroke Statistics Report [3]. One study suggests an additional 3.4 million adults aged 18 and older would have a stroke in the U.S. by 2030, an increase of 20.5 % from 2012 [2]. The mechanisms of neurological injury in stroke are complex, including cellular mitochondrial dysfunction [4], neuroinflammation [5], excitotoxicity [6], oxidative stress [7], and apoptosis [8]. Current stroke management strategies predominantly rely on time-sensitive interventional approaches, including intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT), and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). However, a critically narrow therapeutic window significantly constrains their clinical efficacy [9,10]. That means only a small fraction of stroke patients could get immediate treatment, while the overwhelming majority are precluded from these therapies. This clinical landscape shows the pressing necessity for the development of innovative neuroprotective strategies that can expand the therapeutic window. Consequently, the exploration of targeted neuroprotective agents has become a research priority to mitigate acute neurological damage and provide other effective programs for stroke treatment [11]. This review briefly introduces peptide drugs and summarizes the progress of clinical studies of peptide drugs as neuroprotective agents in stroke.

    Access through your organization

    Tuesday, March 11, 2025

    Research shows new drug helps to preserve brain cells for a time after stroke

     

    But all this earlier research! Didn't your competent? doctor DO ANYTHING WITH IT?

    Do you prefer your doctor incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING?

  • nerinetide (9 posts to February 2020)
  • Research shows new drug helps to preserve brain cells for a time after stroke

    University of Calgary-led international study shows promising results for neuroprotection by combining endovascular therapy with nerinetide

    ESCAPE Group
    ESCAPE Group Photo by Roth & Ramberg

    After 50 years of research and the testing of more than 1,000 drugs, there is new hope for preserving brain cells for a time after stroke. Treating acute ischemic stroke patients with an experimental neuroprotective drug, combined with a surgical procedure to remove the clot, improves outcomes as shown by clinical trial results published today in The Lancet.

    • Photo above: Many of the team members of the Calgary Stroke Program. Photo by Roth & Ramberg

    The multi-centre, double-blinded, randomized trial, led by a team at the University of Calgary's Cumming School of Medicine (CSM), Hotchkiss Brain Institute, and Alberta Health Services investigates the use of the neuroprotective drug nerinetide, developed by NoNO Inc, in two scenarios in the same trial. In one scenario, nerinetide is given to patients in addition to the clot-busting drug alteplase. In the second scenario, patients who were not suitable for alteplase received only nerinetide. Both groups of patients had concurrent endovascular treatment (EVT) to remove the clot.

    “Compared to placebo, almost 20 per cent more patients who received nerinetide along with endovascular treatment, but did not receive alteplase, recovered from a devastating stroke – a difference between paralysis and walking out of the hospital,” says Dr. Michael Hill, MD, a neurologist at Foothills Medical Centre (FMC) and professor in the departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology at the CSM. “In the patients who received both drugs, the alteplase negated the benefits of the nerinetide.”

    Hill says the study provides evidence of a biological pathway that protects brain cells from dying when they are deprived of blood flow. Nerinetide targets the final stage of the brain cell’s life by stopping the production of nitric oxide within the cell.

    “We really believe this is a new scientific observation,” says Hill. “There is evidence nerinetide promotes brain cell survival, offering neuroprotection until we can extract the clot. It opens the door to a new way of treating stroke.” 

    Images of patients’ brains from the study show the expected size of the damage from the stroke is sizeably reduced when nerinetide is administered and EVT is performed among patients not concurrently receiving alteplase.

    Potential for a new tool to promote stroke recovery

    “After so many studies investigating neuroprotective drugs failed, we are extremely excited by these results,” says Dr. Mayank Goyal, MD, PhD, a neuroradiologist at the FMC, and clinical professor in the Department of Radiology at the CSM. “While nerinetide is not approved for use yet, it shows the potential of a new tool to promote recovery from stroke.”

    Worldwide, 15 million people suffer a stroke each year — that’s one every nine minutes in Canada and every 90 seconds in the United States. The results can be devastating. Ischemic stroke, the most common, is caused by a clot in a blood vessel in the brain. The sudden loss of blood flow causes brain cells to die, which can permanently affect speech, vision, balance and movement.

    The international trial enrolled 1,105 patients between March 2017 and August 2019 at centres in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia — a global academic collaboration bringing together scientists, clinicians, funding agencies, and industry.

    Dr. Michael Hill, MD & Dr. Mayank Goyal, MD, PhD

    Dr. Michael Hill, MD, and Dr. Mayank Goyal, MD, PhD

    Riley Brandt, University of Calgary

    “The collaboration between NoNO Inc., the University of Calgary and investigators at 48 leading stroke hospitals around the world has shown how effective such an academic-industry partnership can be in running high-quality, foundational stroke trials that can lead to positive changes in clinical practice,” says Dr. Michael Tymianski, MD, PhD, and CEO of NoNO Inc., the inventor of nerinetide.

    The results in the current study, called the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial, build on the success of the ESCAPE trial, in which the Calgary Stroke Program proved that a clot retrieval procedure known as EVT can dramatically improve patient outcomes after an acute ischemic stroke. During the procedure, a catheter is inserted in the groin and guided through blood vessels into the brain. A tiny metal mesh device is used to grab the clot and pull it out. The current study investigates whether administering nerinetide in addition to clot retrieval improves the patient’s ability to recover.

    The study is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Alberta Innovates, and NoNO Inc.

    Dr. Hill is a member of the scientific advisory board for NoNO Inc. It is an unpaid position and he receives no financial benefit from the results.

    Led by the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Brain and Mental Health is one of six research strategies guiding the University of Calgary in its Eyes High strategic direction. The strategy provides a unifying direction for brain and mental health research at the university and positions researchers to unlock new discoveries and treatments for brain health in our community.

    Dr. Michael Hill, MD, is a neurologist at the Foothills Medical Centre and a professor in the Cumming School of Medicine’s departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Radiology, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences and a member of the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta and the O’Brien Institute for Public Health at the University of Calgary. 

    Dr. Mayank Goyal, MD, PhD, is a neuroradiologist at the Foothills Medical Centre, and EFW Radiology, a clinical professor in the Department of Radiology at the CSM and a member of the Hotchkiss Brain Institute at the University of Calgary. 

    Thursday, February 20, 2025

    Nerinetide shows promise in stroke treatment meta-analysis

     But all this earlier research! Didn't your competent? doctor DO ANYTHING WITH IT?

    Do you prefer your doctor incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING?

  • nerinetide (8 posts to February 2020)
  • Nerinetide shows promise in stroke treatment meta-analysis

    The Calgary Stroke Program, a joint University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services initiative at Foothills Medical Centre, has been involved with three papers published this week in The Lancet and Lancet Neurology-the ESCAPE-NEXT trial, the FRONTIER trial, and an individual patient-level meta-analysis across three trials. The studies, in collaboration with NoNO Inc., are focused on neuroprotection and ischemic stroke. While the primary trials were inconclusive, the meta-analysis reveals that the data provide important clues for future research into stroke treatment.

    Dr. Michael Hill, MD, is the lead investigator on the ESCAPE-NEXT trial together with Dr. Mayank Goyal, MD, PhD, and co-investigator on the other analyses, along with other members of the Calgary Stroke Program and teams from around the world. Hill explains more about the impact of strokes and how the findings in these three papers will help guide future research.

    What happens after an ischemic stroke?

    When an ischemic stroke occurs, affected parts of the brain are starved of blood flow and brain cells start to die immediately. Without blood bringing nutrients (glucose, oxygen), it has been estimated that 1.9 million neurons die per minute.

    This is why it is critical to immediately call an ambulance and be transported to a specialized stroke centre. The quicker a patient can get to a stroke team, the quicker an intervention can be introduced to minimize the damage. The effects of stroke can be life-altering on patients and their families, so preventing damage with early diagnosis and treatment is key.

    What is neuroprotection and how could it benefit patients?

    (Wrong terminology, neuroprotection gives no sense of urgency! Call it by its' correct name; the neuronal cascade of death! Sounds important to immediately get fixed, neuroprotection is a milquetoast term saying nothing!) 

    When you arrive in the emergency department, you may be treated with drugs that help dissolve the clot or, if the clot is in a large blood vessel, you may undergo endovascular therapy-where the clot is mechanically removed. Both treatments aim to restore blood flow (reperfusion) as soon as possible and they can be used individually or together varying by individual patient.

    A neuroprotective agent is an additional treatment that, if given early on, might mitigate damage to the brain while other treatments are being applied. Millions of neurons could be saved and patient outcomes after a stroke could be improved(Hundreds of millions to billions of neurons could be saved in the first week! At least use the right statistics!). The neuroprotective drug being studied in these trials is called nerinetide.

    Has neuroprotection been studied by University of Calgary researchers before?

    Neuroprotection is an important part of stroke research and has been studied by University of Calgary stroke researchers for years.

    The ESCAPE-NA1 trial in 2020 didn't find a statistically significant benefit of nerinetide but researchers discovered, after reviewing the data, that its effect was impacted by another drug in the trial-alteplase.

    In other words, there was an interaction, a negative interaction between the two drugs. In the 40 per cent of trial patients who did not get alteplase, there appeared to be quite a profound benefit."

    Dr. Michael Hill, University of Calgary

    So more research was necessary. What did the latest trials find?

    In ESCAPE-NEXT, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled study, patients who presented within 12 hours of stroke onset were given nerinetide before endovascular therapy. Primary outcomes were measured after 90 days and there was not a significant benefit to patients-sometimes called a "neutral" trial.

    "But once again, in the subset (of patients treated within) three hours," says Hill, "there was a benefit. So if you treat early, treat fast, open the arteries, give the drug nerinetide, you seem to get a benefit."

    In the FRONTIER trial, paramedics administered the neuroprotective agent, nerinetide, to patients with suspected ischemic stroke within three hours of symptom onset. The medication was given during transport and before arriving at the hospital where imaging could be done. Patients were treated quickly but there were many stroke "mimics" (conditions with stroke-like symptoms, but without an actual cerebrovascular event) included in the study -affecting the outcome and resulting in another neutral trial.

    Is there still hope for neuroprotection?

    The scientists dug into the data from three studies, ESCAPE-NA1, ESCAPE-NEXT and FRONTIER trials, and re-examined the results in a meta-analysis paper published this week in The Lancet Neurology.

    These trials included patients from 135 stroke centres in 13 countries (Canada, Australia, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States) who were treated within three hours of symptom onset. They also narrowed the patients included to those who were selected for reperfusion, either by thrombolysis (a clot-busting drug) or endovascular therapy.

    The analysis demonstrated that nerinetide had a clinically significant benefit to patients and showed that future trials with these new parameters were necessary.

    In fact, the ACT-42 trial is already underway-administering a neuroprotective agent within three hours of stroke onset to enrolled patients. And this trial will include the next generation of nerinetide.

    Source:
    Journal reference:

    Hill, M. D., et al. (2025) Efficacy and safety of nerinetide in acute ischaemic stroke in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy without previous thrombolysis (ESCAPE-NEXT): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00194-1.

    Monday, November 11, 2024

    Effects of Nerinetide on Behavioural Recovery of Experimental Stroke in the Rat

    You can have your competent? doctor summarize the 323 pages and provide you with the tidbits that will get you recovered.

    Your competent? doctor did do something with nerinetide a long time ago, RIGHT?

    Do you prefer your doctor incompetence NOT KNOWING OR NOT DOING?

  • nerinetide (7 posts to February 2020)
  •  Effects of Nerinetide on Behavioural Recovery of Experimental Stroke in the Rat


    by
    Beatrice Ballarin
    A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements
    for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    Institute of Medical Science
    University of Toronto
    Abstract
    Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in Canada and a significant financial burden on
    the healthcare system, yet no pharmaceutical intervention is available that has been proven to
    improve recovery. N-methyl-D- aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are known to play a substantive
    role in neural circuit rebuilding post-injury. Studies from acute stroke research suggested that
    interfering with the toxic GluN2B-subunit of NMDAR downstream signalling or enhancing the
    pro-survival GluN2A-subunit one is beneficial in promoting neuroprotection. Nerinetide has been
    shown to promote neuroprotection during acute ischemia, by interfering with nitric oxide (NO)
    production and the pro-death signalling cascade mediated by the GluN2B-subunit of the
    NMDARs. The purpose of this dissertation was to evaluate the role of nerinetide in promoting
    functional recovery and molecular changes when administered during the recovery phase after
    stroke. In this thesis, the effect of nerinetide in promoting functional recovery was tested in two
    different stroke models in rats. Results show that nerinetide promoted functional recovery only
    after cortical motor injury and was correlated with the upregulation of selected key pro-survival
    proteins (GluN2A, PSD-95, PI3K, AKT, ERK1/2, CREB, and S6). In particular, CREB has been
    found phosphorylated at 6 and 24 hours following the first dose of nerinetide in the cortical peri-
    infarct region and it is believed to play a key role in promoting functional recovery. 
    This thesis has contributed to the field of stroke research by applying nerinetide for the first time
    in a recovery setting and by highlighting a set of protein candidates that may have contributed to
    these recovery mechanisms. Future studies should investigate the role of CREB in connection with
    recovery mechanisms post-stroke and enhancement by the application of specific
    pharmacotherapies.