Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Covid's Long-term Impact on Stroke Rehab Unveiled - Australia

 Why would you want to return to pre COVID levels? They were a complete failure at getting 100% recovered anyways! Your tyranny of low expectations is showing. Nothing will get better in stroke until survivors are in charge, so start scaling the walls. Or you could wait until these persons become the 1 in 4 per WHO that has a stroke : they'll want 100% recovery then and by then it will be too late.

Covid's Long-term Impact on Stroke Rehab Unveiled

A Stroke Foundation audit of Australian hospitals has highlighted the 'concerning' long-term impact of COVID-19 on inpatient stroke rehabilitation services.

Released today, the 2024 audit found that structures and resourcing at one in five audited services have still not returned to pre-pandemic levels, four years on.(And those levels were complete failures in getting to 100% recovery, weren't they?)

Stroke Foundation Chief Executive Officer, Dr Lisa Murphy, says this needs to change.

"Appropriate resourcing on inpatient rehabilitation wards is critical to delivering the best possible care(NOT RECOVERY!) to all survivors of stroke across Australia so they can make the best recovery possible after stroke."

The audit looked at various ways COVID-19 impacted rehabilitation services, such as: a relocation, or reduction, in the number of rehabilitation beds, changes in the format of ward rounds and redeployment of staff.

Of the hospitals audited, 60 per cent recorded a reduction in the number of rehabilitation beds, 96 per cent recorded staff shortages, and 63 per cent recorded staff being redeployed to other duties, at the time of the pandemic.

"The pandemic was hugely demanding and put a significant strain on Australia's health system. While this led to a rapid innovation in services such as use of telehealth. We cannot accept that there are still stroke rehabilitation services that have not yet returned to optimal resources. We should not have the continued crisis within the rehabilitation services that this data suggests," Dr Murphy said.

The report highlights areas of improvement and will inform conversations and recommendations to government and health care providers.

"This will allow us to set priorities for governments, health care administrators and health care professionals as we move forward in the post-pandemic era and strive for equitable access to appropriate, specialised and adequately resourced rehabilitation services for stroke."

"It is time to fill the critical gaps, view rehabilitation as an important next step in the patient's treatment journey and shift the focus from surviving to thriving."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.           

Friday, November 8, 2024

A longitudinal investigation of the determinants of stroke survivors’ utilisation of a healthy lifestyle for stroke rehabilitation in Australia

 But nothing here is a protocol, so absolutely useless for survivors. Damn it all, do your fucking job and write EXACT STROKE REHAB PROTOCOLS!

A longitudinal investigation of the determinants of stroke survivors’ utilisation of a healthy lifestyle for stroke rehabilitation in Australia

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the longitudinal predictors of lifestyle behaviours among stroke survivors in New South Wales, Australia. This longitudinal study utilised data from the baseline survey (2005–2009) and a sub-study survey (2017) of the 45 and Up Study. Physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and supplement use were included as dependent variables. Generalised estimating equation models were employed to assess the longitudinal association between the dependent variable and demographic and health status measures. The average age of the participants (n = 576) was 67 (SD = 9) years at baseline and 76 (SD = 9) years at the sub-study survey time, with 54.9% being male. The longitudinal analysis revealed that the likelihood of moderate/high physical activity significantly declined over time and was lower among participants with diabetes, but was higher among those with university education. The likelihood of smoking was significantly higher in females, moderate/high-risk alcohol consumers, and those with depression, but was lower among supplement users. The likelihood of moderate/high-risk alcohol consumption significantly declined with time, and was lower among females, but higher among smokers. The likelihood of supplement use significantly declined over time, but was higher among females and/or those with asthma. Our findings help illustrate that many stroke survivors may benefit from further support in adopting and maintaining a healthy lifestyle as part of their stroke management and long-term rehabilitation, which is crucial to optimising their quality of life and successful secondary stroke prevention.

Friday, October 11, 2024

National stroke report a call for action - Australia

 

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! YOU have to inform them this is completely WRONG!  Survivors want 100% RECOVERY STANDARDS NOT PREVENTION. This is non-negotiable! Screaming may be required!

National stroke report a call for action

             With the billion-dollar impact of stroke uncovered, and rates predicted to rise, experts(WELL, YOUR EXPERTS DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK IS NEEDED!) are calling for urgent investment into prevention.

Stretcher being out in to ambulance
One stroke occurred every 11 minutes in Australia last year, making up almost 46,000 new strokes.

For each person who had a stroke in 2023, their lifetime cost to the economy will total $350,000, and half of that cost will be created in the first year alone.
 
That is according to a new report from the Stroke Foundation, which reveals the full impact of stroke in Australia, detailing healthcare costs as well as savings from the implementation of prevention initiatives.
 
It harnesses a call to action to address stroke and its risk factors, to prevent incidences and associated costs of stroke incidences increasing.
 
In 2023, the report found that 45,785 Australians experienced a stroke, including 34,793 for the first time and 10,992 a recurrent stroke. This translates to one stroke every 11 minutes.
 
According to new data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, stroke was the nation’s third leading cause of death in 2023, up from fourth position the year before.
 
While stroke is often associated with older people, one in four first-ever strokes in 2023 occurred in people aged under 65 years, while one in 10 of those who experienced a recurrent stroke were in the same age bracket.
 
In partnership with Monash University, the Stroke Foundation report provides an evidence-base for healthcare organisations and governments to improve policy and investment in prevention, treatment, and recovery for survivors of stroke, their families and carers.
 
Professor Mark Morgan, Chair of RACGP Expert Committee – Quality Care, said the report adds weight to the RACGP’s advocacy for the health system to ‘take prevention seriously’.
 
‘This research is a salient reminder for GPs of the devastating impact of stroke on individuals,’ he told newsGP.
 
‘A good start would be to invest in patient rebates for regular comprehensive health assessments at all ages, rather than just once in middle age and every year from the age of 75.
 
‘These “birthday” health assessments would provide funding for the persons regular GP and their teams to apply all the screening, case finding and preventive recommendations from the Red Book.’
 
Currently there are an estimated 440,481 stroke survivors in Australia, made up of 244,756 males and 195,725 females.
 
Using the data on stroke incidences and expected population growth, the report estimates the number of stroke events will increase to almost 55,000 first-ever strokes and 17,000 recurrent strokes per year by 2050.
 
Stroke Foundation CEO Dr Lisa Murphy said the report shows there is ‘no time to waste’.
 
‘This projection is a worrying reality if we do not address the rising tide of modifiable stroke risk factors and improve stroke prevention for all Australians,’ she said.
 
‘The good news is, if we act now, we can ensure more Australians have better control of their blood pressure and other risk factors.’
 
Modifiable risk factors for stroke include hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, smoking, physical inactivity and being overweight.
 
While one in three Australian adults (6.8 million people) have hypertension – which is the number one risk factor for stroke – half (3.4 million) are unaware they have it.
 
Professor Morgan said for GPs, there are important roles to help reduce the impacts of stroke.
 
‘GPs can train their staff to appreciate the urgency of a “brain attack” to reduce delays in assessment and treatment,’ he said.
 
‘Practice Incentive Program data suggests only half of regular patients in the eligible population, now 45–79-year-olds, have recorded risk factors of diabetes status, smoking status, cholesterol, and blood pressure.
 
‘Computer decision support programs can identify people at high risk who would benefit from increased preventive treatments and monitoring.’
 
Professor Morgan added that GPs can also help to arrange ongoing rehabilitation and reducing risk factors in people who have already had a stroke.
 
Economic impacts are often ‘incurred well into the future’ due to the long-term effects of stroke, the report states, with these costs worn by the person who has the stroke, their carers, and the Government.
 
Lifetime costs for strokes that occurred in 2023 exceed $15 billion, with costs in the first year after stroke more than $7.7 billion.
 
Healthcare costs to government sit at $5.5 billion, costs related to unpaid care at $3.3 billion, and lost productivity costs $6.3 billion, which include in the workplace and at home, as well as the delivery of ‘informal care’.
 
The cost of stroke to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is more than $1.3 billion, or $143,000 per survivor of stroke, per year.
 
For strokes that occurred in 2023, healthcare costs included ambulance rides, short- and long-term hospital stays, and post-discharge from hospital, including medication, GP visits and other specialist services such as pathology, allied health and aged care.
 
However, the report highlights the potential cost savings that would come from initiatives to prevent stroke and ensure better recovery outcomes, including:

Primary care chronic disease management plans have also been shown to improve long-term recovery and survival of people who have a stroke.

Friday, October 4, 2024

No time to waste in improving Australias stroke care

 WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! YOU have to inform them this is completely WRONG!  Survivors want RECOVERY STANDARDS NOT 'CARE'. This is non-negotiable! Screaming may be required!

No time to waste in improving Australias stroke care

Stroke experts(They most assuredly are NOT EXPERTS) have welcomed the publication of a journal article that calls for a united approach to the country’s lagging stroke care standards.

It comes just days after a new report revealed the number of Australians having strokes is the greatest it has been in more than two decades.

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in Australia and a leading cause of disability. Despite this, Australia is falling behind its international counterparts when it comes to receiving lifesaving treatment.

When compared to other developed countries, the time it takes for an Australian stroke patient to receive clot busting drugs (known as door-to-needle time) is significantly longer. The longer stroke is left untreated, the more brain dies, and the lower the chances of survival and recovery.  

An accepted international door-to-needle target is within 60 minutes of a patient arriving in hospital. Currently, the median Australian door-to-needle time is 75 minutes, and only 27% of patients were treated within an hour of hospital arrival, that’s compared to 82% in Sweden, 75% in the United States and 61% in the United Kingdom. 

In August 2023, the country’s leading stroke organisations agreed upon bold new targets which aimed to provide Australians with access to the same world-leading stroke care available in many other developed countries.

Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation President, Professor Timothy Kleinig, said door-to-needle times and stroke unit admission percentages have not improved over the past six years.

“Australian stroke patients deserve better to improve their chance of survival and reduce their risk of disability after stroke,” Professor Kleinig said.

“Every person who has a stroke in Australia should be provided, where possible, with the opportunity to access both stroke unit care and reperfusion therapies. This is particularly true for Australians living in regional and remote Australia. These targets will go a long way in helping achieve that goal.”

A recent Stroke Foundation report revealed that by delivering on the 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets, not only would there be huge benefits to survivors of stroke in receiving better treatments, but it would also save the economy $26 million.

Stroke Foundation Chief Executive Officer, Dr Lisa Murphy, said a national commitment to addressing the treatment gaps is required.

“We need all levels of the health system and government, supported by ambulance and retrieval services, emergency and radiology departments, and medical and nursing staff to commit to delivering the National Stroke Targets by 2030,” Dr Murphy said.

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

30/60/90 National stroke targets and stroke unit access for all Australians: it's about time

A much easier explanation here: (All these targets are totally wrong, you will need to inform your stroke medical 'professionals' to go back and do the job correctly. You don't measure processes, you measure results, simple business 101 rules.)

Send me hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? Your patients need an explanation of why you aren't working on survivor requirements of 100% recovery protocols.

 

30/60/90 National Stroke Targets
By 2030
• National median endovascular clot retrieval door to puncture time
<30mins for transfers
• National median thrombolysis door to needle time <60mins(Way too slow! In this research in mice the needed time frame for tPA delivery is 3 minutes for full recovery.Electrical 'storms' and 'flash floods' drown the brain after a stroke If your hospital can't do that, what is their EXACT backup plan to get you 100% recovered? You better ask them that now instead of hoping they can 'wing it' when you need it!)
• National median door in door out time for endovascular clot retrieval <60mins
in metro hospitals*(Recanalization IS NOT THE GOAL! 100% RECOVERY IS! Are you even  measuring recovery?)
• National median endovascular clot retrieval door to puncture time <90mins for
primary presenters
• Certified stroke unit care provided to >90% of patients with primary stroke diagnosis(Well, hopefully the stroke survivors there are demanding a change from 'care' to 100% RECOVERY! You may need to fire a lot of dead wood there to get that accomplished. It'll be hard work but your children and grandchildren will appreciate it.)
*Where same-crew ambulance door-in and -out transfer is possible. Regional services retrieving via road should
aim for a DIDO time of 75 minutes (hospitals requiring aero-retrieval service are not included in this target).
These targets have been developed in consultation with leading Australian stroke
clinicians and researchers
, and are endorsed by the following organisations:(Notice survivors are not even included. Who the fuck had the absolute stupidity not to include them?)

The latest here:

30/60/90 National stroke targets and stroke unit access for all Australians: it's about time

Timothy J Kleinig and Lisa Murphy, For the 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets Taskforce
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52459
Published online: 25 September 2024



Stroke is the world's second‐leading cause of death and the third‐leading cause of death and disability. In Australia, stroke is the third most common cause of death and a leading cause of disability. As a result, stroke is costly to the health system, society and the individual.

Three acute stroke interventions have broadly applicable, significant, readily quantifiable health economic benefits: stroke unit care (for both ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage) and ischaemic stroke reperfusion therapies, thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). For every 17 patients treated in a stroke unit, one death or disabled outcome is prevented. The number needed to treat to prevent disability for thrombolysis under three hours is ten, and the EVT number needed to treat to prevent functional dependency is five. Expediting reperfusion therapies substantially magnifies treatment benefits; “saving a minute” gains an extra day of quality‐adjusted life following thrombolytic treatment, and an extra week following EVT.,

Australia's stroke performance languishes behind international peers

Despite Australia having a national acute stroke clinical care standard, a national stroke registry (www.auscr.com.au), several centres of excellence and population‐based reperfusion therapy rates comparable to other high income countries,, Australia compares poorly internationally in stroke unit admission percentages and speed of reperfusion treatment. In 2022, Australia's median door‐to‐needle (thrombolytic) time was 75 minutes. Only 27% of patients were treated within an hour of hospital arrival, compared with 82% in Sweden, 75% in the United States (US), and 61% in the United Kingdom (UK). In Sweden during 2022, 93% of patients with stroke were admitted to a stroke unit, compared with 75% in Australia. The US, from 2016 to 2019, reported median door‐arterial puncture times for non‐transferred EVT cases of 78 minutes versus 115 minutes in 2022 in Australia.

Concerningly, door‐to‐needle times and stroke unit admission percentages have not improved over the past six years (Box 1). Regional and remote Australians are most significantly affected by these treatment gaps., Because a higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians live in non‐metropolitan areas, improving national stroke performance is a critical Closing the Gap initiative. Given the poorer stroke outcomes associated with suboptimal stroke care, continued national inertia is unjustifiable.

Box 1

National stroke registry evidence of flatlining stroke unit access rates and intravenous thrombolytic treatment times

Genesis of the 30/60/90 national stroke targets

In 2023, national stroke leaders proposed that the “Championing Care”‐themed combined Smart Strokes/Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation annual conference should urgently tackle these shortcomings.

From February 2023, the largest and most harmful national performance gaps were identified, and improvement targets and timeframes were proposed (Supporting Information). Targets were iteratively developed from the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Acute Stroke Clinical Care Standard indicators against an informal matrix (Supporting Information, table 1), where the following criteria could be met:

  • broad applicability: targets needed to apply to a significant proportion of patients with stroke;
  • measurability: targets needed to be measurable within the current Australian stroke clinical registry;
  • quantifiability: the health economic benefit of meeting targets needed to be quantifiable through robust estimates of the associated disability‐adjusted life year benefit; and
  • improvability: targets needed to address areas of significant treatment variability, compared against high performing sites nationally and/or high performing nations internationally. Targets needed to be theoretically achievable by 2030.

Five clear standout areas for improvement were identified. Impactful targets reasonably achievable by 2030 were agreed, subsequently termed the “30/60/90 National Stroke Targets” (Box 2), incorporating certified stroke unit admission rates, rapid thrombolytic administration, rapid EVT, and rapid door‐in‐door‐out times for EVT‐eligible patients being transferred via road ambulance (Box 3). These targets were presented to a broad representative group at a pre‐conference workshop and unanimously endorsed by workshop attendees. The targets have since been ratified by every major Australian stroke‐interested organisation (Supporting Information).

Box 2

The 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets (Australia 2023)

Box 3

Idealised hyperacute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke pathways at comprehensive and primary stroke centres

During and following this workshop, we identified barriers to previous quality improvement efforts and facilitators for target progress (Box 4); many of which are counterparts. Key barriers included a previous lack of clearly articulated and prioritised targets and timeframes, lack of a national public‐facing competitive stroke data dashboard (as in the UK), our federated health system (with a complex mix of state and federal funding) and incomplete participation of hospitals nationally in transparent quality improvement initiatives. Facilitators include cohesive national stroke organisations, improving national telestroke coverage (both for acute and post‐acute care), a national stroke registry with recent development of national data dashboards, the recent national stroke unit certification initiative, recent refinement of the National Stroke System Framework and innovative pre‐hospital stroke technologies coordinated through the Australian Stroke Alliance.

Box 4

Counterpart barriers to and facilitators for improving national stroke performance

We do not need to reinvent the key granular acute “code stroke” time‐saving strategies, — many other countries have managed to improve their stroke care systems — we simply need to modify these proven strategies for the Australian context.

Key supporting initiatives

Most importantly, clinicians, health administrators and politicians need to commit to the key goals of stroke unit care for all, and expedited reperfusion treatment for eligible individuals. Three key initiatives need to then follow.

Stroke hospital mapping

All Australian hospitals should be identified as one of five potential stroke hospital categories, according to the 2023 Stroke Foundation National Acute Stroke Services Framework:

  • comprehensive stroke centre (CSC): a hospital providing 24/7 endovascular thrombectomy and neurosurgical services;
  • primary stroke centre (PSC): a hospital providing 24/7 thrombolysis and stroke unit care;
  • stroke capable regional general hospital (SCRGH): a hospital geographically distant from metropolitan centres, which provides 24/7 thrombolysis and stroke care approximating stroke unit care, but from which routine transfer to a large PSC or CSC is infeasible, due to distance;
  • telestroke thrombolysis centre (TTC): a hospital providing telestroke‐enabled thrombolysis, ideally 24/7, but not providing stroke unit care;
  • general hospital: a hospital that does not provide either thrombolysis or stroke unit care, but which should have protocols for patients presenting with stroke, to ensure rapid transfer to hospitals with thrombolysis and stroke unit care.

Ensuring access to stroke and stroke unit care, supported by stroke unit certification

Every person with stroke in Australia should be provided, where possible, with the opportunity to access both stroke unit care and reperfusion therapies, with the support of TTCs, general hospitals, ambulance services, retrieval services and telestroke capability. All current and potential CSCs, PSCs and SCRGHs should be supported by state and territory governments in meeting national stroke unit certification criteria and gaining certification, to ensure that optimal stroke unit care is being provided.

Implementing key reperfusion optimisation strategies at state and local levels

Each state stroke network (or equivalent) should identify state and hospital medical and stroke nursing leads to champion local strategies with proven impact. These strategies have been distilled in the 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets Action Plan, and include direct transfer of stroke patients from hospital arrival to the computed tomography (CT) room on the ambulance stretcher, using same‐crew and same‐stretcher transfer to a CSC if an EVT‐eligible large vessel occlusion stroke is identified. Thrombolytic agents should be administered as soon as the non‐contrast CT scan confirms eligibility in clear‐cut cases, and the EVT team contacted when large vessel occlusion is strongly suspected. Neuroimaging on arrival for transferred EVT cases should generally not be repeated, unless there have been protracted delays. And, perhaps most importantly, hospitals and stroke networks should acquire stroke metrics using standardised definitions, analyse results, be transparent about shortcomings, and plan improvements. It is acknowledged that smaller or more remote hospitals will be less able to reach national targets, and that larger well resourced centres will need to perform substantially better than the targets, to facilitate these national medians.

Monitoring national performance and fine‐tuning action plan strategies

The Australian Stroke Coalition will provide national support and will seek government or philanthropic support to adapt and optimise a “Get with the guidelines”, or similar, program. Approaches for funding will be grounded by a health economic analysis of benefits, should targets be met. State and national progress will be assessed at annual or biannual workshops, with lessons and strategies compared and shared. Performance will be incentivised by national achievement and improvement awards, and a national 30/60/90 stroke data dashboard through the national registry, where hospitals and states can compare their performance against their peers and the targets. It is hoped that national agreement on making the data dashboard consumer‐facing will be reached, to allow citizens with lived experience to also advocate for improvements.

Ancillary benefits

Reaching these targets is not an end, but a beginning. It is envisaged that the current targets will be Phase 1 of a sequence of national stroke targets. Achieving these targets will not only lead to improved stroke outcomes, but the streamlining and optimisation of acute stroke treatment pathways will greatly benefit Australian stroke professional training and research, across the continuum of stroke care. The mutual focus on a well articulated meaningful goal will increase team cohesion within hospitals, between professions, between states and between professional organisations.

Additionally, the optimised pre‐hospital pathways for acute stroke treatment will benefit the development of ultra‐early intracerebral haemorrhage pathways, and potentially pave the way for ultra‐early minimally invasive intracerebral haemorrhage surgery. Consumer‐facing national performance dashboards (if approved) may be adopted by other data‐driven specialties, such as cardiology (for acute coronary syndromes), trauma services and intensive care units. This target‐based, public‐facing, data‐driven approach, if broadly emulated, may serve as a key facilitator of nation‐wide “learning health systems”.

Conclusion

A concerted effort is required to improve substandard Australian stroke unit admission rates and reperfusion treatment speed. A national commitment to addressing these treatment gaps is required, at all levels of health systems and government, supported by ambulance and retrieval services, emergency and radiology departments, and the medical and nursing staff administering acute stroke treatments. Addressing these shortcomings will provide a platform for further stroke improvements, and, if successful, could serve as a template for quality improvement initiatives in other health areas.

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

Adelaide To Host World Leaders In Stroke Care

 This is absolutely fucking appalling! 'CARE' NOT RECOVERY OR RESULTS! This is why survivors need to be in charge; stroke medical 'professionals' are incompetent at solving stroke, they are not even trying!

Adelaide To Host World Leaders In Stroke Care

The world's brightest minds(Really? I bet you don't have survivors there!) in stroke prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, research and lived experience will converge at the Adelaide Convention Centre next week for a major international conference.

The Asia Pacific Stroke Conference, jointly hosted by the Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation and the Asia Pacific Stroke Organisation, will bring together leading experts and consumers in stroke to showcase research and share ideas that could improve the care of stroke patients worldwide.

Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation (ANZSO) President Professor Timothy Kleinig, who is also Conference Chair, said the event provides an exciting opportunity to showcase the latest innovations being made in stroke treatment and care, both in Australia and across the world.

"The theme of this year's conference is 'Transcending Borders' which aims to bridge borders between countries, research and implementation, pre-hospital care, medical neuro-interventional and surgical specialties, and between health professionals and those who use the services," Professor Kleinig said.

"We're thrilled to have the best stroke minds in Adelaide from across the world who are driving advancements in the treatment of stroke and challenging the norms to move forward with new and innovative treatments."

Some of the research being showcased at the event, which is expected to attract over 600 attendees, includes: advances in brain imaging in acute stroke, using virtual reality and video gaming as possible aids to stroke treatment, the benefits of physical activity and sleep on post-stroke fatigue, advancements in mental health supports for survivors of stroke and families, and new pathways to streamline hospital to rehabilitation care transition.

More than 40,000 Australians experience a stroke event every year, and nearly half a million survivors of stroke live in the community. Globally, around one in four people will experience a stroke in their lifetime. New data will be released at the conference on the cost of stroke to the Australian community and economy by Stroke Foundation.

Stroke Foundation Chief Executive Officer, Dr Lisa Murphy, said the conference provides an exciting opportunity for the stroke sector to share ideas and research that will change the game when it comes to stroke prevention, treatment and enhanced recovery.

"This is a huge opportunity to have Australasian leading stroke experts and innovators come together in Adelaide, share ideas, showcase the latest advancements in stroke care, and highlights the real-world impacts for survivors of stroke, their carers, families and the broader society," Dr Murphy said.

"We hope exciting new progress comes out of the conference and has a direct impact on the Australian health system."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.

Sunday, July 21, 2024

Stroke Survivors And Carers - You are Wanted! The Stroke Foundation is seeking your Lived Experience -Australia

Be completely honest; blast them for not having 100% recovery protocols in any open comment space available. They won't ask about your 100% recovery, so YOU are going to have to redirect their attention. And ask to be contacted for followup. You have to impress on them their complete incompetency!

 Stroke Survivors And Carers - You are Wanted! The Stroke Foundation is seeking your Lived Experience -Australia

Thursday, July 18, 2024

Sydney Hospitals Among Nations Best For Stroke Care

 Anytime I see 'care' in any stroke press release I know the stroke medical world is not willing to disclose actual results because they are so fucking bad, it wouldn't look good, so misdirection is used. Don't fall for that misdirection! By touting 'care' they are not telling you about results or recovery which survivors want! Survivors don't care about your 'care'; you FUCKING BLITHERING IDIOTS; they want 100% recovery! Why aren't you providing that?

Big fucking whoopee.

 

 But you tell us NOTHING ABOUT RESULTS. They remind us they 'care' about us multiple times but never tell us how many 100% recovered.  You have to ask yourself why they are hiding their incompetency by not disclosing recovery results.  ARE THEY THAT FUCKING BAD?


Three measurements will tell me if the stroke medical world is possibly not completely incompetent; DO YOU MEASURE ANYTHING?  I would start cleaning the hospitals by firing the board of directors, you can't let incompetency continue for years at a time.

There is no quality here if you don't measure the right things.

  1. tPA full recovery? Better than 12%?
  2. 30 day deaths? Better than competitors?
  3. rehab full recovery? Better than 10%?

 

You'll want to know results so call that hospital president(whomever that is) RESULTS are; tPA efficacy, 30 day deaths, 100% recovery. Because there is no point in going to that hospital if they are not willing to publish results.

In my opinion this partnership allows stroke hospitals to continue with their tyranny of low expectations and justify their complete failure to get survivors 100% recovered. Prove me wrong, I dare you in my stroke addled mind. If your stroke hospital goal is not 100% recovery you don't have a functioning stroke hospital.

 

All you ever get from hospitals are that they are following guidelines; these are way too static to be of any use. With thousands of pieces of stroke research yearly it would take a Ph.D. level research analyst to keep up, create protocols, and train the doctors and therapists in their use. 

If your stroke hospital doesn't have that, you don't have a well functioning stroke hospital, you have a dinosaur. 

Read up on the 'care' guidelines yourself. Survivors want RECOVERY not 'care'

“What's measured, improves.” So said management legend and author Peter F. Drucker 

The latest invalid chest thumping here:

Sydney Hospitals Among Nations Best For Stroke Care

Royal North Shore Hospital and Sydney Adventist Hospital (The San) have been recognised for their high standard of stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!), joining a list of only 19 Australian hospitals that have received official stroke unit certification from the Australian Stroke Coalition (ASC).

The ASC Stroke Unit Certification Program is encouraging hospitals to consistently meet a set of national criteria to deliver the best possible stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) to patients. This includes caring for all stroke patients on a single dedicated ward, providing specialist staffing, regular training, data monitoring and improvement, and patient involvement in decision making. 

The following hospitals have been commended for making the grade:

Royal North Shore Hospital (NSW)

Sydney Adventist Hospital (NSW)

Gosford Hospital (NSW)

Shoalhaven Hospital (NSW) 

Wagga Wagga Base Hospital (NSW)

Royal Melbourne Hospital (VIC)

Austin Health (VIC)

Northern Hospital (VIC)

Alfred Hospital (VIC) 

Echuca Hospital (VIC)

Box Hill Hospital (VIC)

St John of God Midland Public and Private Hospitals (WA) 

Royal Adelaide Hospital (SA) 

Launceston General Hospital (TAS) 

Townsville Hospital (QLD)

Logan Hospital (QLD)

Sunshine Coast University Hospital (QLD)

Gold Coast University Hospital (QLD)

Alice Springs Hospital (NT)

Stroke Foundation National Manager, Stroke Treatment, Kelvin Hill, says this will improve outcomes for patients. 

"Treatment on a dedicated stroke unit is proven to make the biggest overall difference of any intervention to patient outcomes following stroke, reducing the risks of both death and disability. Both Australian and international evidence suggests that rigorous stroke centre certification programs improve the quality of stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) and patient outcomes." 

The need for a certification system comes after Stroke Foundation's National Acute Services Audit 2024 found that not all Australian hospitals with a self-designated stroke unit meet the requirements for stroke unit care(NOT RECOVERY!). 

"This means some people with stroke are being provided suboptimal care(NOT RECOVERY!) which impacts their recovery and leads to poorer health outcomes. This is unfair. All Australian survivors of stroke deserve the best quality of care(NOT RECOVERY!) regardless of where they are hospitalised. There should be no postcode lottery." Mr Hill said.    

Participation in the program is voluntary and there is no penalty for hospitals that do not meet the criteria but Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation president, Professor Tim Kleinig, is optimistic that all Australian hospitals with self-designated stroke units will apply for certification over time. 

"This is an opportunity for all Australian hospitals treating patients with stroke to further enhance the already excellent work their stroke teams deliver. Quality stroke unit care(NOT RECOVERY!) is a human right and all Australians deserve nothing less. We must ensure everyone unfortunate enough to have a stroke has the best possible chance, not only of survival, but also a good post-stroke recovery." 

"I applaud these hospitals for taking the necessary steps in ensuring they meet and maintain a high quality of stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!). Along with the World Health Organization and World Stroke Organisation, we hope all hospitals providing stroke care(NOT RECOVERY!) will participate in the certification process." Professor Kleinig said. 

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.

Saturday, May 4, 2024

Australian Stroke Coalition 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets Action Plan

WHAT ABSOLUTE LAZY FUCKING BULLSHIT! You're not even trying for 100% recovery! Do you ever talk to survivors about their goals? YOU need to get involved and get this changed! They mention 'care' 18 times which survivors don't give a flying fuck about! THEY WANT RESULTS AND RECOVERY! I'd fire everyone involved!

 Australian Stroke Coalition 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets Action Plan

30/60/90 National Stroke Targets
By 2030
• National median endovascular clot retrieval door to puncture time
<30mins for transfers
• National median thrombolysis door to needle time <60mins
• National median door in door out time for endovascular clot retrieval <60mins
in metro hospitals*
• National median endovascular clot retrieval door to puncture time <90mins for
primary presenters
• Certified stroke unit care provided to >90% of patients with primary stroke diagnosis
*Where same-crew ambulance door-in and -out transfer is possible. Regional services retrieving via road should
aim for a DIDO time of 75 minutes (hospitals requiring aero-retrieval service are not included in this target).
These targets have been developed in consultation with leading Australian stroke
clinicians and researchers, and are endorsed by the following organisations:
1
306090 National Stroke Targets - Action Plan2
Introduction
The Australian Stroke Coalition (ASC) 30/60/90 National Stroke Targets focus on stroke
unit access 1 and expedited reperfusion therapies.2,3 These were identified as the acute
stroke Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), most likely, if optimised, to have the greatest
impact on patient outcomes. This document has distilled national and international 4 best
practice opinion and guidelines to assist stroke hospitals and state stroke networks in
meeting these targets.
1. Stroke Unit Access and National System Organisation
To ensure all patients have the ability to access stroke unit care and reperfusion
treatments, all hospitals in the country should be designated as one of these five stroke
hospital categories, according to the 2023 Stroke Foundation National Acute Stroke
Services Framework.5
1. Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC) - a hospital providing 24/7 endovascular therapy
(EVT) and neurosurgical services.
2. Primary Stroke Centre (PSC) - a hospital providing 24/7 thrombolysis and stroke unit care.
3. Stroke Capable Regional General Hospital (SCRGH) - a hospital geographically
distant from metropolitan centres which provides 24/7 thrombolysis and stroke care
approximating stroke unit care, but from which routine transfer to a large PSC or CSC is
infeasible, due to distance.
4. Telestroke Thrombolysis Centre (TTC) - a hospital providing telestroke-enabled
thrombolysis, ideally 24/7, but not providing stroke unit care.
5. General Hospital (GH) - a hospital which does not provide either thrombolysis or stroke
unit care, but which should have protocols for patients presenting with stroke, to ensure
rapid transfer to hospitals with thrombolysis and stroke unit care occurs.
We recommend the following actions, at Department of Health, Stroke Network and
Local Hospital Network levels, to ensure that every Australian with acute stroke is
provided with an opportunity to access certified stroke unit care:
1. Map every private and public hospital in Australia to determine whether they are
a current or potential CSC, PSC, SCRGH, TTC or GH.
2. Support current and potential CSCs, PSCs and SCRGHs in meeting Australian Stroke
Coalition stroke unit certification criteria and gaining certification.
3. Identify and support potential TTCs in joining State or Interstate telestroke networks.
4. Support GHs in developing triage and transfer protocols to ensure patients
presenting with stroke directly can access reperfusion and stroke unit care.
5. Work with ambulance and retrieval services to ensure all patients with potential
stroke are transferred to hospitals which can provide appropriate acute stroke care.
6. Provide each patient presenting with stroke to Australian TTCs and GHs with the
opportunity to access stroke unit care via a CSC, PSC or SCRGH.
7. Facilitate system-wide stroke data collection to monitor stroke hospitalisation
processes and outcomes.
306090 National Stroke Targets - Action Plan3
2. Reperfusion optimisation strategies
The American Heart Association (AHA) “Target: Stroke” initiative advocates the
adoption of key best practice strategies for expediting reperfusion therapies for acute
ischaemic stroke.6-9 These AHA strategies have been workshopped and modified slightly
for an Australian context by Australian stroke leaders.
While many strategies are common both to CSCs and other thrombolysing Centres
(PSCs, SCRGHs and TTCs), for clarity and ease of use, two versions of these Strategies
are provided.
a. Reperfusion optimisation strategies for PSCs, SCRGHs and TTCs
These strategies facilitate rapid assessment and neuroimaging of patients
with suspected stroke, and, if indicated, administration of thrombolytic
(+/- transfer out for EVT):
1. Systematic, coordinated ambulance bypass of all suspected stroke (following use
of validated stroke screening tools or stroke-capable ambulance assessment +/- ambulance-
based neuroimaging) to stroke-thrombolysis capable hospitals and severely affected
suspected stroke patients to endovascular-capable hospitals where locally indicated
(depending on local door to needle, door-in-door out times and transfer distance10-12
).
2. Ambulance code stroke team prenotification – (e.g., time last known well,
anticoagulant use, venous access etc). The code stroke team at a minimum includes CT
(or MR) radiographer staff, and medical and nursing stroke team members. Move towards
transmitting electronically reliable identifying data pre-arrival - in the interim, use
unknown patient protocols if patient cannot be identified and pre-registered pre-arrival.
3. Use of stroke toolkits (including medications commonly used during acute code stroke)
4. Rapid triage and direct transfer from ambulance to CT – acceptance of paramedic
observations as sufficient without requiring repetition during triage process, followed by
transfer directly from triage to CT on the same ambulance stretcher without off-loading,13
if deemed medically stable by ambulance, triage and clinical staff. The presence of
Advanced Life Support-trained staff is NOT required for otherwise stable stroke patients.
5. Attach timer or clock to chart, clip board, or bed. Acute ischaemic stroke care
including EVT requires an accurate, timely, coordinated and systematic evaluation of the
patient. A universal clock visible to the ED and stroke teams is an enabling tool for improving
the timeliness and quality of care and should be considered for recording critical stages.8
6. Pre-consent using verbal-only discussions about potential reperfusion therapy
(if informed consent not possible due to stroke deficits, emergency treatment provision
is acceptable if next of kin unreachable (reasonable to attempt for up to 5 minutes)).
7. Rapid acquisition of neuroimaging – pre-prepare and connect IV contrast prior to
patient arrival to CT. Following direct transfer on the ambulance stretcher, proceed swiftly
and directly to multi-modal neuroimaging (non-contrast CT (NCCT), arch to vertex CT
angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP)) unless known contrast allergy. Multimodal
imaging should be used for all stroke patients who meet an institutional threshold for clinical
stroke severity.14 Image interpretation and decision-making is supported by automated
CT perfusion analysis software.15 Multi-modal imaging should not delay administration of
thrombolytic or contact with the ENI (Endovascular Neuro-interventional) team. An arterial
phase CTA from the CTP can be manually sent to PACS to identify large vessel occlusion
(LVO) early, where feasible.
306090 National Stroke Targets - Action Plan4
8. Blood draw for rapid laboratory +/- point of care INR testing but proceed to
thrombolytic administration without awaiting results unless indicated by clinical or past
medical history.
9. Rapid access to and administration of thrombolytic – have immediately at hand prior to CT.
10. Swift imaging availability should be facilitated via IT services for the stroke consultant
within minutes of acquisition to enable prompt decision making in conjunction with onsite
personnel. Pre-notify the consultant decision-maker of the pending NCCT.
11. Administration of thrombolytic on the imaging table following non-contrast imaging,
where appropriate – supported by hospital policies to permit this.
12. Team-based approach – parallel workflows for clinical assessment, obtaining venous
access, ordering diagnostic tests and commencing treatment.
13. Streamlined door-in door-out protocols should be developed by all non-endovascular
capable hospitals receiving acute stroke patients to enable swift door-in-door-out times.
Consider commencing Endovascular Neurointervention (ENI) team notification as soon
as treatment-eligible LVO is probable (e.g. following a clear hyperdense MCA in LVO
syndrome patients). For metropolitan sites the same inbound ambulance crew should
be used for the outbound journey.10 For regional sites decision about the level of medical
escort required should be promptly made in conjunction with the stroke physician to
prevent unnecessary delay.
14. Prompt data feedback should be provided to both hospital and ambulance staff.
Accurately measuring and tracking door to needle times and key time-markers along
this pathway allows the treating teams to identify areas for improvement and take
appropriate action. A data monitoring and feedback system (such as the Australian Stroke
Clinical Registry) creates a process for providing timely feedback and recommendations
for improvement on a case-by-case basis and in hospital aggregate. This system helps
identify specific preventable delays, devise strategies to overcome them, set targets,
and monitor progress on a case-by-case basis.7,8
306090 National Stroke Targets - Action Plan5
b. Reperfusion optimisation strategies for Comprehensive Stroke Centres
These strategies facilitate rapid assessment and neuroimaging of patients with
suspected stroke, and, if indicated, administration of thrombolytic and provision of EVT.
1. Systematic, coordinated ambulance bypass of all suspected stroke (following use of
validated stroke screening tools or stroke-capable ambulance assessment +/- ambulance-
based neuroimaging) to stroke-thrombolysis capable hospitals and severely affected
suspected stroke patients to endovascular-capable hospitals where locally indicated
(depending on local door to needle, door-in-door out times and transfer distance10-12
).
2. Ambulance code stroke team prenotification – (e.g., time last known well,
anticoagulant use, venous access etc). The code stroke team at a minimum includes
CT (or MR) radiographer staff, and medical and nursing stroke team members. Move
towards transmitting electronically reliable identifying data pre-arrival - in the interim, use
unknown patient protocols if patient cannot be identified and pre-registered pre-arrival.
3. Use of stroke toolkits (including medications commonly used during acute code stroke)
4. Rapid triage and direct transfer from ambulance to CT – acceptance of paramedic
observations as sufficient without requiring repetition during triage process, followed by
transfer directly from triage to CT on the same ambulance stretcher without off-loading,13
if deemed medically stable by ambulance, triage and clinical staff. The presence of
Advanced Life Support-trained staff is NOT required for otherwise stable stroke patients.
5. Attach timer or clock to chart, clip board, or bed. Acute ischaemic stroke care including
endovascular therapy requires an accurate, timely, coordinated and systematic evaluation
of the patient. A universal clock visible to the ED and stroke (+/- ENI) team is an enabling
tool for improving the timeliness and quality of care and should be considered for
recording critical stages.8
6. Pre-consent using verbal-only discussions about potential reperfusion therapy
(if informed consent not possible due to stroke deficits, emergency treatment provision
is acceptable if next of kin unreachable (reasonable to attempt for up to 5 minutes)).
7. Rapid acquisition of neuroimaging – pre-prepare and connect IV contrast prior
to patient arrival to CT. Following direct transfer on the ambulance stretcher, proceed
swiftly and directly to multi-modal neuroimaging (non-contrast CT, arch to vertex CT
angiography and CT perfusion) unless known contrast allergy. Multimodal imaging should
be used for all stroke patients who meet an institutional threshold for clinical stroke
severity.14 Image interpretation and decision making is supported by automated CT
perfusion analysis software.15 Multi-modal imaging should not delay administration
of thrombolytic or contact with the ENI team. An arterial phase CTA from the CTP can
be manually sent to PACS to identify large vessel occlusion (LVO) early, where feasible.
8. Blood draw for rapid laboratory +/- point of care INR testing but proceed to
thrombolytic administration without awaiting results unless indicated by clinical or past
medical history.
9. Rapid access to and administration of thrombolytic – have immediately at hand prior to CT.
10. Swift imaging availability should be facilitated via IT services for the stroke consultant
within minutes of acquisition to enable prompt decision making in conjunction with onsite
personnel. Pre-notify consultant decision-maker of pending NCCT.
11. Administration of thrombolytic on the imaging table following non-contrast imaging,
where appropriate – supported by hospital policies to permit this.
306090 National Stroke Targets - Action Plan6
12. Team-based approach – parallel workflows for clinical assessment, obtaining venous
access, ordering diagnostic tests and commencing treatment.
13. Prompt data feedback should be provided to both hospital and ambulance staff.
Accurately measuring and tracking door to needle times and key time-markers along
this pathway allows the treating teams to identify areas for improvement and take
appropriate action. A data monitoring and feedback system (such as the Australian Stroke
Clinical Registry) creates a process for providing timely feedback and recommendations
for improvement on a case-by-case basis and in hospital aggregate. This system helps
identify specific preventable delays, devise strategies to overcome them, set targets,
and monitor progress on a case-by-case basis.7,8
IN ADDITION: for CSCs these Endovascular Neurointervention-specific
strategies should be implemented:
1. Pre-notification and rapid activation of the ENI team: The ENI team should be
alerted immediately if a possible candidate for thrombectomy is identified based upon
a pre-specified clinical severity threshold, or non-contrast imaging suggesting a large
vessel occlusion. If a patient is being transferred for potential endovascular therapy,
the ENI team should receive pre-notification and an estimated time of arrival.16,17
2. Rapid availability of the ENI team: The hospital should have a policy in place
specifying the expected call-arrival times to the ENI suite (preferably ≤30 minutes)
that the ENI team on call (neurointerventionalist, radiologist, nurses) need to fulfill.18
3. Expedite transferred patients with known LVO directly from triage to the ENI Suite:
Guided by prespecified protocols, eligible stroke patients, transferred to the
thrombectomy-capable centre from a referral site, should routinely bypass the
Emergency department directly to the ENI suite.17 Exceptions may include patients with
cardiorespiratory instability requiring immediate stabilisation, and patients with significant
improvement to non-disabling symptoms, following long-distance (>3 hour) transfer.14
4. Transfer of patients with newly-identified LVO directly from neuroimaging to the
ENI Suite: Directly-presenting stroke patients eligible for endovascular therapy should be
directly transported from the CT/MR imaging suites to the ENI suite, if ready to receive
the patient, without returning to the Emergency Department.19
5. Endovascular therapy-ready ENI suite: policies and protocols should ensure the ENI
suite is, at all times, in an endovascular therapy-ready state. This includes standardised,
pre-prepared equipment tray/cart for endovascular therapy cases that includes all
necessary equipment for the case (e.g. BRISK: Brisk Recanalization Ischemic Stroke Kit,
with drapes, tubing, syringes, catheters, and devices). Noting that the first-line approach
might not always be possible, institutions should have an agreed routine first-line
endovascular technique (consensus between operators) so that there is less need
for nursing staff to vary equipment/tools based on the person on call.16,18
6. Team-based ENI approach: Parallel workflows by Emergency Department Team,
stroke team, and ENI team, including the neurointerventionalist, interventional
radiographer, anaesthetist and nursing staff, should be utilised to facilitate rapid
angiography and, when indicated, endovascular therapy.16-18,20
7. Anaesthesia access and protocols: Rapid anaesthetic support should be available. General
anaesthesia is not required in non-agitated compliant patients. If general anaesthesia is employed,
induction should be swift and done without allowing a drop in blood pressure (ideally to maintain
systolic blood pressure above 140mm Hg)21,22 while minimising any delay to procedure start. These
workflow recommendations should be tailored to meet the needs of individual institutions.18,23,24
8. Prompt ENI team data feedback: ENI performance metrics should be promptly shared with
appropriate staff utilising thrombolysis data feedback principles stated above.7,8,25

Conclusion

These strategies, if implemented,(Means you're leaving survivors disabled; NOT RECOVERED!) will lead to substantial improvements(So you're trying to normalize your failures?) in stroke unit
access and timely ischaemic stroke reperfusion. Strategies will be reviewed at annual
scientific meetings of the Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation (ANZSO), and
further refinements will provide additional assistance in meeting the 30/60/90 National
Stroke Targets, as well as forming a foundation for subsequent system improvements.