Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label drug discovery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drug discovery. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Machine Learning Algorithm Helps Search for New Drugs

WHOM in the stroke medical world will look at this and recognize the uses for stroke? Then bring that to the attention of stroke leadership and get the stroke strategy updated?  NOBODY BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM?

This indifference and laziness is why survivors need to be in charge.

 

Machine Learning Algorithm Helps Search for New Drugs 


Wed, 02/13/2019 - 1:30pm
by University of Cambridge
Researchers have designed a machine learning algorithm for drug discovery has shown to be twice as efficient as the industry standard, which could accelerate the process of developing new treatments for disease.
The researchers, led by the University of Cambridge, used their algorithm to identify four new molecules that activate a protein, which is thought to be relevant for symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia.
The results are reported in the journal PNAS.
A key problem in drug discovery is predicting whether a molecule will activate a particular physiological process. It's possible to build a statistical model by searching for chemical patterns shared among molecules known to activate that process, but the data to build these models is limited because experiments are costly and it is unclear which chemical patterns are statistically significant.
"Machine learning has made significant progress in areas such as computer vision where data is abundant," said Alpha Lee from Cambridge's Cavendish Laboratory, and the study's lead author. "The next frontier is scientific applications such as drug discovery, where the amount of data is relatively limited but we do have physical insights about the problem, and the question becomes how to marry data with fundamental chemistry and physics."
The algorithm developed by Lee and his colleagues, in collaboration with biopharmaceutical company Pfizer, uses mathematics to separate pharmacologically relevant chemical patterns from irrelevant ones.
Importantly, the algorithm looks at both molecules known to be active and molecules known to be inactive, and learns to recognise what parts of the molecules are important for drug action and what parts are not.
A mathematical principle known as random matrix theory gives predictions about the statistical properties of a random and noisy dataset, which is then compared against the statistics of chemical features of active/inactive molecules to distil which chemical patterns are truly important for binding as opposed to arising simply by chance.
This methodology allows the researchers to fish out important chemical patterns not only from molecules that are active, but also from molecules that are inactive—in other words, failed experiments can now be exploited with this technique.
The researchers built a model starting with 222 active molecules, and were able to computationally screen an additional six million molecules. From this, the researchers purchased and screened the 100 most relevant molecules. From these, they identified four new molecules that activate the CHRM1 receptor, a protein that may be relevant for Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia.
"The ability to fish out four active molecules from six million is like finding a needle in a haystack," said Lee. "A head-to-head comparison shows that our algorithm is twice as efficient as the industry standard."
Making complex organic molecules is a significant challenge in chemistry, and potential drugs abound in the space of yet-unmakeable molecules. The Cambridge researchers are currently developing algorithms that predict ways to synthesize complex organic molecules, as well as extending the machine learning methodology to materials discovery.

Thursday, December 20, 2012

HPS-2 THRIVE misses primary end point: No benefit of niacin/laropiprant

Two studies that now failed to show benefits of niacin. Question for your doctor.
http://www.theheart.org/article/1490635.do?utm_medium=email&utm_source=20121220_breaking&utm_campaign=newsletter

After nearly four years of follow-up, the combination of niacin with the antiflushing agent laropiprant did not significantly reduce the risk of the combination of coronary deaths, nonfatal MI, strokes, or coronary revascularizations compared with statin therapy, according to Merck, the sponsor of the HPS-2 THRIVE trial. In a press release announcing the results, Merck said the combination significantly increased the risk of nonfatal but serious side effects.
Merck announced it will no longer be taking the drug before the US Food and Drug Administration to gain approval. The combination of extended-release niacin and laropiprant, known as Tredaptive or Cordaptive, was approved by European regulators in 2008, but Merck is advising doctors from starting any new patients on the drug.
This is the second major setback for physicians hoping that niacin, a drug that raises HDL-cholesterol levels, might be used clinically to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. In May 2011, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-sponsored  Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL Cholesterol/High Triglyceride and Impact on Global Health Outcomes (AIM-HIGH) study, was halted early after showing no benefit of niacin when given in addition to statin therapy.


Why Merck's Niacin Failure Will Scare Drug Researchers

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Why drug discovery is so hard

A couple of interesting writeups on this. I wish I could be confident that drugs to stop the neuronal cascade of death will be found but as Dr. Michael Tymianski, of the Toronto Western Hospital Research Institute in Canada mentions 1000 drugs that showed promise in animal models failed in human trials. I have yet to find out why they failed and what has been learned from those failures.
I could care less about it being hard. A Great stroke association would gladly tackle this issue. But alas we have non-functional ones like the ASA, NSA and WSO. Please respond with your excuses, I will print them.
This is way too important to leave it to drug companies to figure out. We as survivors need to push researchers to explain what they have already done and ruled out and what their plans  look like to successfully come up with a neuroprotective drug.


1.A Broadside Against The Way We Do Things Now 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Traditional drug-discovery model ripe for reform

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

3.What are the main discovery issues facing drug discovery companies right now? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4.  Drug discovery in jeopardy

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5.  Drug Discovery  The Pending Crisis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6.  Future Directions in Drug Design & Discovery

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Major Issues and Trends in Drug Discovery and Development: India’s Emerging Role

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8.  The end of drug discovery?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9.   CNS Drug Discovery & Development 2012: Problems, Promises and Solutions

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------