Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label kept current in research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kept current in research. Show all posts

Saturday, February 14, 2026

Novel Arm Therapy May Shift Stroke Rehab Focus

 WOW! Proving once again that stroke medical 'professionals' don't keep current in research in their field. I'd fire everybody here for incompetence!

Exactly how is your competent? doctor using good side therapy to get you recovered! Oh, NOTHING AT ALL? Because doesn't even know about it? Incompetent for well over a decade!

  • good side therapy (27 posts to December 2012)
  • Novel Arm Therapy May Shift Stroke Rehab Focus


    Ipsilesional arm training improves motor function in chronic stroke survivors with severe paresis

    Published on Feb. 13, 2026

    A small randomized clinical trial found that targeted therapy of the ipsilesional, or 'good' arm, improved motor function, including control and speed, in chronic stroke survivors with severe contralesional arm weakness. This is the first study to use a rigorous design to investigate ipsilesional limb training in this population, challenging the traditional rehabilitation focus on the contralesional arm.

    Why it matters

    Individuals with severe contralesional paresis depend almost entirely on their ipsilesional arm for daily activities, yet these impairments remain amenable to improvement even years after a stroke. This study suggests that targeting the ipsilesional arm could lead to sustained motor improvements and more efficient activities of daily living for chronic stroke survivors with severe hemiparesis.

    The details

    The phase 2 randomized clinical trial included 53 participants with chronic stroke and severe contralesional arm weakness. The ipsilesional therapy group received virtual reality-based motor training and real-world dexterity exercises focused on speed, accuracy, and coordination. The contralesional therapy group received traditional approaches like proximal strength training and mirror therapy. At the first post-treatment assessment, the ipsilesional group completed a standardized dexterity test 5.87 seconds faster than the contralesional group, a 12% improvement from baseline. These gains were sustained at 3-week and 6-month follow-ups.

    • The study was published online on February 2, 2026 in JAMA Neurology.
    • Participants were assessed before the start and end of the 5-week, 15-session trial, as well as 3 weeks and 6 months after the trial concluded.

    The players

    Carolee Winstein

    Professor emerita and adjunct faculty, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, in Los Angeles, and study co-author.

    Robert Sainburg

    Dorothy F. and J. Lloyd Huck Distinguished Chair in Kinesiology and Neurology at Penn State in University Park, Pennsylvania, and study co-author.

    Got photos?Submit your photos here. ›

    What they’re saying

    “This is the first project to use a rigorous randomized clinical trial design to investigate the use of ipsilesional limb training — training the less-impaired arm — in chronic stroke survivors with severe paresis.”

    — Carolee Winstein, Professor emerita and adjunct faculty, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California (News release)

    “We're changing the function of the less-impaired hand so that their activities of daily living can be more efficient.”

    — Robert Sainburg, Dorothy F. and J. Lloyd Huck Distinguished Chair in Kinesiology and Neurology at Penn State (News release)

    What’s next

    Future research should explore integration of ipsilesional training with home-based practice and combined bilateral approaches that optimize recovery and independence.

    The takeaway

    This study suggests that targeting the ipsilesional, or 'good' arm, could lead to sustained motor improvements and more efficient daily activities for chronic stroke survivors with severe hemiparesis, challenging the traditional rehabilitation focus on the contralesional arm.

    Wednesday, September 9, 2020

    a Biomechanical comparison of Proportional electromyography control to Biological Torque control Using a Powered hip exoskeleton

     

    For your doctor to determine if this could help you. That does assume your doctor and stroke hospital are keeping up with research.

    a Biomechanical comparison of Proportional electromyography control to Biological Torque control Using a Powered hip exoskeleton


     
    June 2017 | Volume 5 | Article 37
    1ORIGINAL RESEARCH
    published: 30 June 2017doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00037Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology | www.frontiersin.org
     Edited by:
     Jan Veneman, Tecnalia, Spain
     Reviewed by:
    Laurent Simon, New Jersey Institute of Technology, United States Fausto Antonio Panizzolo, Harvard University, United States
    *Correspondence:
     Aaron J. Young  aaron.young@me.gatech.edu
    Specialty section:
    This article was submitted to Bionics and Biomimetics,  a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
     Received:
     08 July 2016
     Accepted:
     06 June 2017
     Published:
     30 June 2017
    Citation:
    Young AJ, Gannon H and Ferris DP (2017) A Biomechanical Comparison of Proportional Electromyography Control to Biological Torque Control Using a Powered Hip Exoskeleton. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 5:37. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00037
     A Biomechanical Comparison of Proportional Electromyography Control to Biological Torque Control Using a Powered Hip Exoskeleton
     Aaron J. Young 1*, 
    Hannah Gannon 2 
    and Daniel P. Ferris  2,3
    1  Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States,
     2  Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States,
    3  School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan,  Ann Arbor, MI, United States
    Background:
     Despite a large increase in robotic exoskeleton research, there are few studies that have examined human performance with different control strategies on the same exoskeleton device. Direct comparison studies are needed to determine how users respond to different types of control. The purpose of this study was to compare user performance using a robotic hip exoskeleton with two different controllers: a controller that targeted a biological hip torque profile and a proportional myoelectric controller.
    Methods:
     We tested both control approaches on 10 able-bodied subjects using a pneu-matically powered hip exoskeleton. The state machine controller targeted a biological hip torque profile. The myoelectric controller used electromyography (EMG) of lower limb muscles to produce a proportional control signal for the hip exoskeleton. Each subject performed two 30-min exoskeleton walking trials (1.0 m/s) using each controller and a 10-min trial with the exoskeleton unpowered. During each trial, we measured subjects’ metabolic cost of walking, lower limb EMG profiles, and joint kinematics and kinetics (torques and powers) using a force treadmill and motion capture.
    Results:
     Compared to unassisted walking in the exoskeleton, myoelectric control significantly reduced metabolic cost by 13% (p= 0.005) and biological hip torque control reduced metabolic cost by 7% (p=0.261). Subjects reduced muscle activity relative to the unpowered condition for a greater number of lower limb muscles using myoelectric control compared to the biological hip torque control. More subjects subjectively preferred the myoelectric controller to the biological hip torque control.
    Conclusion:
     Myoelectric control had more advantages (metabolic cost and muscle activity reduction) compared to a controller that targeted a biological torque profile for walking with a robotic hip exoskeleton. However, these results were obtained with a single exoskeleton device with specific control configurations while level walking at a single speed. Further testing on different exoskeleton hardware and with more varied experimental protocols, such as testing over multiple types of terrain, is needed to fully elucidate the potential benefits of myoelectric control for exoskeleton technology.

    Sunday, September 2, 2018

    What is the backlist in stroke?

    With hundreds/thousands of stroke research each year it is almost impossible to keep up. But do we even know what needs to be solved from past research? I'd have to say NO, there is absolutely NO strategy in stroke anyplace. Because we don't even know what problem we are solving, ALL stroke research is just spinning its wheels, pretty much totally worthless.
    Seth Godin discusses backlist here:

    A good day for the backlist 

    “What’s new?”
    That’s a fine approach to staying up to date on a situation or field where you are well-informed.(That's the first problem in stroke, NO ONE seems to be well informed. See all the cases where previous research was obviously not known about and not discussed as to how new research refuted old research.)After all, if you notice what’s new and incorporate it with what you know, you’ll remain well informed. This is the thesis behind Slack and even email.
    The small town police chief has been to every house, met every resident. Hearing about the changes in town are enough for her to stay on top of her job.
    The deluge of information being created in every corner of the world, though, means that it’s really unlikely that we’re actually well-informed. Knowing what’s new isn’t sufficient to keep us informed.
    It’s possible that you’ve heard every single recorded performance of the Grateful Dead, or read all of Isaac Asimov or understand the nuances in the tax code. But it’s unlikely. And so, if you’re busy checking to see what’s new on the last Sunday of summer in the northern hemisphere, perhaps it makes sense to set the breaking news aside and take a look at the backlist instead.



    Wednesday, August 8, 2018

    A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke

    And just why the fuck was this research needed when this from 2010 already proved it worked? God the absolute stupidity in the stroke medical world is universe class stupidity. Write up stroke protocols and get them distributed worldwide and this waste of time could be prevented.

    Patients Gain Limb Movement Years After Stroke April 2010

     

    A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke

    First Published April 21, 2014 Research Article





    Electroencephalography (EEG)–based motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has the potential to restore motor function by inducing activity-dependent brain plasticity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an EEG-based MI BCI system coupled with MIT-Manus shoulder-elbow robotic feedback (BCI-Manus) for subjects with chronic stroke with upper-limb hemiparesis. In this single-blind, randomized trial, 26 hemiplegic subjects (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke [FMMA] score, 4-40; 16 men; mean age, 51.4 years; mean stroke duration, 297.4 days), prescreened with the ability to use the MI BCI, were randomly allocated to BCI-Manus or Manus therapy, lasting 18 hours over 4 weeks. Efficacy was measured using upper-extremity FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 12. ElEG data from subjects allocated to BCI-Manus were quantified using the revised brain symmetry index (rBSI) and analyzed for correlation with the improvements in FMMA score. Eleven and 15 subjects underwent BCI-Manus and Manus therapy, respectively. One subject in the Manus group dropped out. Mean total FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 12 weeks improved for both groups: 26.3 ± 10.3, 27.4 ± 12.0, 30.8 ± 13.8, and 31.5 ± 13.5 for BCI-Manus and 26.6 ± 18.9, 29.9 ± 20.6, 32.9 ± 21.4, and 33.9 ± 20.2 for Manus, with no intergroup differences (P = .51). More subjects attained further gains in FMMA scores at week 12 from BCI-Manus (7 of 11 [63.6%]) than Manus (5 of 14 [35.7%]). A negative correlation was found between the rBSI and FMMA score improvement (P = .044). BCI-Manus therapy was well tolerated and not associated with adverse events. In conclusion, BCI-Manus therapy is effective and safe for arm rehabilitation after severe poststroke hemiparesis. Motor gains were comparable to those attained with intensive robotic therapy (1,040 repetitions/session) despite reduced arm exercise repetitions using EEG-based MI-triggered robotic feedback (136 repetitions/session). The correlation of rBSI with motor improvements suggests that the rBSI can be used as a prognostic measure for BCI-based stroke rehabilitation.

    BCI systems, using noninvasive EEG-based BCI technologies, are able to provide alternative channels using brain signals to support communication and control of assistive devices for subjects with severe motor disabilities.1,2 Noninvasive BCI systems, based on sensorimotor rhythms, were able to achieve movement restoration in single patients with spinal cord lesions and chronic stroke for reaching and grasping.3-5 There is now sufficient evidence that MI, the mental rehearsal of physical movement tasks, when combined with physical therapy leads to enhanced motor outcomes for stroke survivors and may represent a new approach to functional recovery after stroke.6,7
    Because MI is usually concealed within patients, EEG-based BCI can provide online measures of MI as neurofeedback to aid motor task execution.8,9 An example is the modulation of sensorimotor rhythms, which are oscillations in the EEG occurring in the alpha (8 to12 Hz) and beta (18 to 26 Hz) bands. Modulation of these frequency bands is similarly observed during actual, as well as mentally rehearsed, or imagined movements. Another example is distinct phenomena such as event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS), which are detectable on EEG during MI in healthy subjects.4,10-13 Recent studies have also revealed that ERD and ERS can be enhanced using BCI with proprioceptive feedback14 or haptic feedback by closing the sensorimotor loop.15
    There are currently a few clinical studies or protocols investigating the effects of noninvasive BCI on patients with chronic stroke.16,17 Tan et al18 described successful BCI-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation of wrist and finger extensors in 4 of 6 stroke survivors with moderate to severe degrees of hand motor paresis. Because of long latency periods to trigger 1 BCI-activated neuromuscular electrical stimulation (42 seconds), fatigue was evident after about 1 hour of BCI practice. Do et al19 described a BCI functional electrical system to trigger foot dorsiflexion in healthy subjects. Buch et al20 described 6 of 8 patients >1 year after stroke with severe finger extensor paralysis, who successfully learned to operate a magnetoencephalography (MEG)–based BCI device linked to a hand-opening and hand-closing orthotic system. Kaiser et al21 measured the ERD or ERS in 29 patients with stroke and found that higher impairment was related to stronger ERD in the unaffected hemisphere, and higher spasticity was related to stronger ERD in the affected hemisphere.21 However, these studies did not show clinical efficacy measurement on motor functions as a result of BCI-based intervention.
    A case study of MEG-based BCI followed by EEG-based BCI combined with physiotherapy found significant clinical outcomes in FMMA scores (+84%).22 Positive results on functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging in that case study suggested possible short-term BCI-induced cortical and ipsilesional corticospinal tract neuroplasticity. Mihara et al23 recently presented the results of a randomized controlled trial in 10 stroke patients who received near-infrared spectroscopy–based BCI with visual feedback, compared with 10 who received near-infrared spectroscopy–based BCI with irrelevant feedback. Compared with the sham group, the patients who received BCI visual feedback showed significantly greater motor improvements, measured using the FMMA score. In addition, Ramos-Murguialday et al24 recently presented the results of a randomized controlled trial of 16 patients with chronic stroke who received BCI with hand and arm orthotic feedback, compared with 14 who received random orthotic feedback not linked to BCI. Both groups received physiotherapy after the intervention. Patients who received BCI orthotic feedback showed significantly greater motor improvements, measured by combined hand and modified arm FMMA scores.
    Hence, preliminary studies suggest that EEG-based MI BCI may be used to objectively assess the performance of MI to restore motor function.
    Rationale
    Because current BCI neurofeedback systems require pairing with effectors to complete the sensorimotor feedback loop for stroke, we sought to compare the effects of EEG-based BCI with robotic feedback versus manual robotic training using the commercially available MIT-Manus robot, here termed the BCI-Manus system (Interactive Motion Technologies USA, Watertown, MA). This device was chosen for its positive results in hemiplegic stroke and ability to safely deliver high-intensity repetitive training in a supported environment with reduced effort.25
    The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of BCI-Manus compared with Manus therapy for subjects with chronic stroke with upper-limb hemiparesis. We describe the setup of an integrated BCI-Manus system and a randomized controlled trial comparing the BCI-Manus system with the Manus robot for moderate to severe chronic poststroke upper-limb hemiparesis.
    More at link

    Monday, August 6, 2018

    The Value of Exercise Rehabilitation Program Accompanied by Experiential Music for Recovery of Cognitive and Motor Skills in Stroke Patients

    Just why the fuck was this research done? You haven't kept up with previous research in your field? You're that fucking incompetent?

    43 posts on music therapy.  Back to Oct. 2014

    74 posts on music  Back to March 2011

    The Value of Exercise Rehabilitation Program Accompanied by Experiential Music for Recovery of Cognitive and Motor Skills in Stroke Patients 







    Abstract

    Background

    The aim of this study was to systematically assess the effects of exercise rehabilitation program accompanied by experiential music for clinical recovery.
    Methods
    This was a prospective randomized study with 65 stroke survivor patients. All cases underwent a neuropsychological assessment first as a prescreening test, during the admission at the Rehabilitation center (baseline), and 6 months poststroke. All patients received standard treatment for stroke in terms of medical care and rehabilitation. Additionally, all patients were separated into 2 Groups: a music Group (daily listening to experiential/traditional music), and a control Group (CG) with no experiential/traditional music therapy (standard care only). Computed tomography perfusion and full neurological examination including GCS were assessment. As Recovery was defined the improvement of cognitive and motor skills of the limb in the affected site, with an increase of muscle strength at least by 1/5 and with emotional progress.

    Results

    Statistically significant differences were found between the Group CG and the rest of the patients in respect of Lesion size (P = .001) and CBF in affected area (P = .001). Μultivariate analysis revealed that only Group and Lesion size were independent predictors for Recovery (odd ratio [OR][95%confidence interval]) .11(.001-.133) and .798(.668-.954) respectively.

    Conclusion

    The findings of this study suggest that the music-based exercise program has a positive effect on mood profile in stroke patients and Recovery rate is higher when exercise rehabilitation program was accompanied by an enriched sound environment with experiential music.