Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Iso-Oncotic Albumin Mitigates Brain and Kidney Injury in Experimental Focal Ischemic Stroke

This research is in rats but the human research is here:

The Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 1 Trial

 Did any protocol come from this? Ask your doctor, only 2013. 

The latest rat research here:

Iso-Oncotic Albumin Mitigates Brain and Kidney Injury in Experimental Focal Ischemic Stroke

Renata de S. Mendes1, Gloria Martins1, Milena V. Oliveira1, Nazareth N. Rocha1, Fernanda F. Cruz1, Mariana A. Antunes1, Soraia C. Abreu1, Adriana L. Silva1, Christina Takiya2, Pedro M. Pimentel-Coelho3, Chiara Robba4, Rosália Mendez-Otero3, Paolo Pelosi4,5, Patricia R. M. Rocco1,6 and Pedro L. Silva1,6*
  • 1Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 2Laboratory of Imunophysiology, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 3Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 4San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
  • 5Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
  • 6Rio de Janeiro Network on Neuroinflammation, Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Supporting Research in the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Background: There is widespread debate regarding the use of albumin in ischemic stroke. We tested the hypothesis that an iso-oncotic solution of albumin (5%), administered earlier after acute ischemic stroke (3 h), could provide neuroprotection without causing kidney damage, compared to a hyper-oncotic albumin (20%) and saline.

Objective: To compare the effects of saline, iso-oncotic albumin, and hyper-oncotic albumin, all titrated to similar hemodynamic targets, on the brain and kidney.

Methods: Ischemic stroke was induced in anesthetized male Wistar rats (n = 30; weight 437 ± 68 g) by thermocoagulation of pial blood vessels of the primary somatosensory, motor, and sensorimotor cortices. After 3 h, animals were anesthetized and randomly assigned (n = 8) to receive 0.9% NaCl (Saline), iso-oncotic albumin (5% ALB), and hyper-oncotic albumin (20% ALB), aiming to maintain hemodynamic stability (defined as distensibility index of inferior vena cava <25%, mean arterial pressure >80 mmHg). Rats were then ventilated using protective strategies for 2 h. Of these 30 animals, 6 were used as controls (focal ischemic stroke/no fluid).

Results: The total fluid volume infused was higher in the Saline group than in the 5% ALB and 20% ALB groups (mean ± SD, 4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.5 mL, p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). The total albumin volume infused (g/kg) was higher in the 20% ALB group than in the 5% ALB group (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Saline increased neurodegeneration (Fluoro-Jade C staining), brain inflammation in the penumbra (higher tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression), and blood-brain barrier damage (lower gene expressions of claudin-1 and zona occludens-1) compared to both iso-oncotic and hyper-oncotic albumins, whereas it reduced the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (a marker of neuroregeneration) compared only to iso-oncotic albumin. In the kidney, hyper-oncotic albumin led to greater damage as well as higher gene expressions of kidney injury molecule-1 and interleukin-6 than 5% ALB (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this model of focal ischemic stroke, only iso-oncotic albumin had a protective effect against brain and kidney damage. Fluid therapy thus requires careful analysis of impact not only on the brain but also on the kidney.

Introduction

In ischemic stroke, maintenance of appropriate systemic perfusion is an important therapeutic goal (1). Fluids are often administered to achieve hemodynamic targets; however, there are controversies regarding the effects of different types of fluids on brain as well as kidney function. Even though normal saline (NaCl 0.9%) has been recommended in ischemic stroke (2, 3), it may lead to distal organ damage in critically ill patients (46).

Experimental studies have shown that the administration of hyper-oncotic (25%) albumin may have neuroprotective effects on brain ischemia by reducing infarct volume and cerebral edema (7, 8). Nevertheless, the potential benefits of hyper-oncotic albumin have not been confirmed in clinical trials (9, 10). The ALIAS II trial, which compared hyper-oncotic albumin (25%) with an equivalent volume of isotonic saline infusion within 5 h after onset of clinical signs of acute ischemic stroke, was stopped prematurely for futility (9). Since then, hyper-oncotic albumin has not been recommended for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke (2, 3). Nevertheless, certain aspects that require special attention, such as: (1) the timing of albumin administration, which may be an important variable for which to control (11)—the earlier the intervention, the better the outcome might be; and (2) hyper-oncotic albumin may be associated with kidney damage proportional to its concentration, thus worsening prognosis (12, 13). Based on the foregoing, we tested the hypothesis that an iso-oncotic solution of albumin (5%), administered earlier after acute ischemic stroke (3 h), could provide neuroprotection without causing kidney damage, compared to a hyper-oncotic albumin (20%) and saline. Therefore, the effects of saline, 5% albumin, and 20% albumin were evaluated on neurodegeneration, blood-brain barrier permeability, as well as brain and kidney damage in experimental focal ischemic stroke.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment