With a little bit of followup we could determine if caffeine helps stroke fatigue. But we don't have enough brains anywhere in the stroke medical world trying to solve ANY of the problems in stroke.
My therapists were constantly asking me if I was tired from the exertions during therapy. Caffeine administration could possibly increase the amount of therapy achieved each day. My fatigue was never from muscle activity, it was total mental fatigue.
Caffeine ingestion attenuates fatigue-induced loss of muscle torque complexity
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | October 10, 2017
Pethick J, et al. - This study was performed to test the
speculation that caffeine administration would attenuate the
fatigue-induced loss of torque complexity. The current study showed that
the caffeine ingestion slowed the fatigue-induced loss of torque
complexity and increased the time to task failure during intermittent
isometric contractions, in all the probability through central
mechanisms.
Methods
- Total 11 healthy participants performed intermittent isometric contractions of the knee extensors to task failure at a target torque of 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), with a 60% duty factor (6 s contraction, 4 s rest), 1 hour after ingesting 6 mg[middle dot]kg-1 caffeine or a placebo.
- In this study, torque and surface EMG signals were sampled continuously.
- Complexity and fractal scaling of torque were evaluated utilizing approximate entropy (ApEn) and the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [alpha] scaling exponent.
- Global, central and peripheral fatigue were measured utilizing MVCs with femoral nerve stimulation.
Results
- They noticed caffeine ingestion increased endurance by 30 +/- 16% (mean +/- SD, P = 0.019).
- Complexity reduced in both trials (decreased ApEn, increased DFA [alpha]; both P < 0.01), as global, central and peripheral fatigue developed (all P < 0.01).
- Complexity reduced significantly more slowly following caffeine ingestion (ApEn, -0.04 +/- 0.02 vs. -0.06 +/- 0.01, P = 0.004; DFA [alpha], 0.03 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.04 +/- 0.03, P = 0.024), as did the rates of global (-18.2 +/- 14.1 vs. -23.0 +/- 17.4 N.m.min-1, P = 0.004) and central (-3.5 +/- 3.4 vs. -5.7 +/- 3.9 %[middle dot]min-1, P = 0.02) but not peripheral (-6.1 +/- 4.1 vs. -7.9 +/- 6.3 N.m.min-1, P = 0.06) fatigue.
No comments:
Post a Comment