Absolutely nothing in here is trying for 100% recovery, so not even listening to survivor requirements!
EVERYTHING IN STROKE IS A COMPLETE FUCKING FAILURE INCLUDING THE WSO!
Oops, I'm not playing by the polite rules of Dale Carnegie, 'How to Win Friends and Influence People'.
Telling supposedly smart stroke medical persons they know nothing about stroke is a no-no even if it is true.
Politeness will never solve anything in stroke. Yes, I'm a bomb thrower and proud of it. Someday a stroke 'leader' will try to ream me out for making them look bad by being truthful, I look forward to that day.
The latest crapola here:
Pragmatic solutions for the global burden of stroke
Published:April, 2024DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00039-5
The recent Commission by Valery L Feigin, Mayowa O Owolabi, and colleagues
effectively analyses the burden of stroke, but falls short in offering
pragmatic solutions for tangible improvements in outcomes. Additionally,
the recommendations lack the necessary assertiveness, particularly in
areas where evidence and recommendations are well established. The
Commission overlooks the crucial need for empowering local stroke
providers in advocating for shifts in knowledge, attitude, and policy at
regional and federal levels. Such advocacy is crucial to achieve
systemic changes in stroke care. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy has
revolutionised the treatment of stroke, transforming the field from a
state of nihilism into active therapy. This paradigm shift has led to
substantial advancements, such as the development of stroke units and
endovascular therapy. However, in low-income countries, intravenous
thrombolytic therapy remains inaccessible mainly due to prohibitive
costs.,
The Commission should have advocated more strongly for making
intravenous thrombolytic therapy freely available to all eligible
patients, considering its established cost-effectiveness for patients,
communities, and countries. Such a recommendation would help to enhance the entire stroke care continuum.
Additionally,
the Commission does not have a robust recommendation for developing and
maintaining emergency services and the establishment and certification
of stroke centres in low-income countries, such as the use of minimum
service standards, for instance, in Nepal.
The establishment and monitoring of advanced and essential stroke
centres, accessible by ambulance or helicopter even from remote areas,
need to be emphasised. There is a necessity for country-level task
forces to create online, multilingual living guidelines based on the
World Stroke Organization's core stroke guidelines. Furthermore,
implementing an affordable, secure electronic medical record system in
low-income countries, possibly using smartphone apps as personal health
records and educational tools, could be crucial for quality care and
data collection. The World Stroke Organization should lead the
development of awareness campaigns for stroke symptoms across countries
and in different languages. Finally, the Commission does not address the
urgent need for stroke-related workforce development in low-income
countries. It should have provided recommendations on enhancing
neurological and stroke education across various levels of medical
training and simplifying neurology residency programmes. Training
emergency physicians, family physicians, and other relevant specialists
as stroke providers could mitigate the severe shortage of neurologists
in these regions.
In summary, while
the Commission is a valuable analysis of the global stroke burden, more
actionable and assertive recommendations are needed to impact stroke
care and achieve health-related Sustainable Development Goals in
low-income countries.
We
declare no competing interests. During the preparation of this work, AK
used ChatGPT to proofread for grammatical errors. After using this
tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take
full responsibility for the content of the publication.
References
- 1.
Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization–Lancet Neurology Commission.
Lancet Neurol. 2023; 22: 1160-1206
No comments:
Post a Comment