http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1545968317746783
Show all authors
Liesjet E. H. van Dokkum, PhD 12
, Emmanuelle le Bars, PhD 1
, Denis Mottet, PhD 3
,
1Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France2Charles Coulomb Laboratory, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
1Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
3EuroMov, of Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
Alain Bonafé, MD 1
, Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur, MD, PhD 1
, Isabelle Laffont, MD, PhD 13
...
1Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
1Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
1Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France3EuroMov, of Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
See all articles by this author
See all articles by this author
Search Google Scholar for this author
Article Information
Article first published online: December 24, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317746783
Liesjet E. H. van Dokkum, PhD 1, 2, Emmanuelle le Bars, PhD 1, Denis Mottet, PhD 3, Alain Bonafé, MD 1, Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur, MD, PhD 1, Isabelle Laffont, MD, PhD 1, 3
1Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
2Charles Coulomb Laboratory, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
3EuroMov, of Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
Corresponding Author: Liesjet E. H. van Dokkum, Montpellier University Hospital, I2FH Neuroradiology, Gui de Chauliac, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, 34295, France. Email: l-vandokkum@chu-montpellier. fr
Abstract
Background. Poststroke, the ipsilesional upper limb shows slight but substantial and long-term motor deficits.
Objective. To define brain activation patterns during a gross motor flexion/extension task of the ipsilesional elbow early poststroke before and after rehabilitation, in relation to the corresponding kinematic characteristics at each time point.
Method. Simultaneous analysis of kinematic features (amplitude, frequency, smoothness, and trajectory of movement) and of corresponding functional magnetic resonance imaging activations (block-design). A total of 21 persons with subacute initial severe stroke (Fugl-Meyer score <30/66) participated twice: within the first 2 months poststroke (V0) and after 6 weeks of rehabilitation (V1). Results at both time points were compared with activation patterns and kinematics of 13 healthy controls. Results. Compared with controls (a) movements of the ipsilesional upper-limb poststroke were smaller (V0 + V1) and less smooth (V0 + V1) and (b) participants poststroke showed additional recruitment of the contralesional middle temporal gyrus (V0) and rolandic opercularis involved in movement visualization (V0 + V1), whereas they lacked activation of the supramarginal gyrus (V0 + V1). Over time, participants poststroke showed an extended activation of the contralesional sensorimotor cortex at V0.
Conclusion. Movements of the ipsilesional upper limb within an initially severe stroke group were not only atypical in motor outcome, but seemed to be controlled differently. Together the observed changes pointed toward an overall disturbance of the bihemispheric motor network poststroke, marked by (a) a possible despecialization of the nondamaged hemisphere and (b) the employment of alternative control strategies to ensure optimal task execution.
Objective. To define brain activation patterns during a gross motor flexion/extension task of the ipsilesional elbow early poststroke before and after rehabilitation, in relation to the corresponding kinematic characteristics at each time point.
Method. Simultaneous analysis of kinematic features (amplitude, frequency, smoothness, and trajectory of movement) and of corresponding functional magnetic resonance imaging activations (block-design). A total of 21 persons with subacute initial severe stroke (Fugl-Meyer score <30/66) participated twice: within the first 2 months poststroke (V0) and after 6 weeks of rehabilitation (V1). Results at both time points were compared with activation patterns and kinematics of 13 healthy controls. Results. Compared with controls (a) movements of the ipsilesional upper-limb poststroke were smaller (V0 + V1) and less smooth (V0 + V1) and (b) participants poststroke showed additional recruitment of the contralesional middle temporal gyrus (V0) and rolandic opercularis involved in movement visualization (V0 + V1), whereas they lacked activation of the supramarginal gyrus (V0 + V1). Over time, participants poststroke showed an extended activation of the contralesional sensorimotor cortex at V0.
Conclusion. Movements of the ipsilesional upper limb within an initially severe stroke group were not only atypical in motor outcome, but seemed to be controlled differently. Together the observed changes pointed toward an overall disturbance of the bihemispheric motor network poststroke, marked by (a) a possible despecialization of the nondamaged hemisphere and (b) the employment of alternative control strategies to ensure optimal task execution.
No comments:
Post a Comment