Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, May 17, 2021

The core/penumbra model: implications for acute stroke treatment and patient selection in 2021

 The implication I get from this is that you are still allowing billions of neurons to die for each patient because you are doing nothing to stop the 5 causes of the neuronal cascade of death in the first week. 

You've had thousands of failed neuroprotection trials because rodents don't have the same physiology as humans.


Drugs That Work In Mice Often Fail When Tried In People

The latest here:

The core/penumbra model: implications for acute stroke treatment and patient selection in 2021

First published: 15 May 2021

This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi:10.1111/ene.14916

Abstract

Despite major advances in prevention, ischemic stroke remains one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. After centuries of nihilism and decades of failed neuroprotection trials, the discovery initially in non‐human primates and subsequently in man, that ischemic brain tissue termed the ischemic penumbra can be salvaged from infarction up to and perhaps beyond 24hrs after stroke onset has underpinned the development of highly efficient reperfusion therapies, namely intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy, which have revolutionized the management of the acute stroke patient. Animal experiments have documented that how long the penumbra can survive depends not only on time elapsed since arterial occlusion (‘Time is brain’), but also on how severely perfusion is reduced. Novel imaging techniques allowing to map the penumbra and the already irreversibly damaged core in the individual subject have documented that the time‐course of core growth at the expense of the penumbra widely differs from patient to patient, and hence that individual physiology should be considered in addition to time since stroke onset for decision‐making. This concept has been implemented to optimize patient selection in pivotal trials of reperfusion therapies beyond 3hr after stroke onset, and is now routinely applied in clinical practice, using computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The notion that in order to be both efficient and harmless, treatment should be tailored to each patient’s physiological characteristics represents a radical move towards precision medicine.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment