Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

A robot-aided visuomotor wrist training induces motor and proprioceptive learning that transfers to the untrained ipsilateral elbow

Useless for us since this was tested in healthy adults. It will never get tested in stroke survivors, there aren't two functioning neurons in our stroke medical 'professionals' to see this and recognize how it could help survivors. 

A robot-aided visuomotor wrist training induces motor and proprioceptive learning that transfers to the untrained ipsilateral elbow

Abstract

Background

Learning of a visuomotor task not only leads to changes in motor performance but also improves proprioceptive function of the trained joint/limb system. Such sensorimotor learning may show intra-joint transfer that is observable at a previously untrained degrees of freedom of the trained joint.

Objective

Here, we examined if and to what extent such learning transfers to neighboring joints of the same limb and whether such transfer is observable in the motor as well as in the proprioceptive domain. Documenting such intra-limb transfer of sensorimotor learning holds promise for the neurorehabilitation of an impaired joint by training the neighboring joints.

Methods

Using a robotic exoskeleton, 15 healthy young adults (18–35 years) underwent a visuomotor training that required them to make continuous, increasingly precise, small amplitude wrist movements. Wrist and elbow position sense just-noticeable‐difference (JND) thresholds and spatial movement accuracy error (MAE) at wrist and elbow in an untrained pointing task were assessed before and immediately after, as well as 24 h after training.

Results

First, all participants showed evidence of proprioceptive and motor learning in both trained and untrained joints. The mean JND threshold decreased significantly by 30% in trained wrist (M: 1.26° to 0.88°) and by 35% in untrained elbow (M: 1.96° to 1.28°). Second, mean MAE in untrained pointing task reduced by 20% in trained wrist and the untrained elbow. Third, after 24 h the gains in proprioceptive learning persisted at both joints, while transferred motor learning gains had decayed to such extent that they were no longer significant at the group level.

Conclusion

Our findings document that a one-time sensorimotor training induces rapid learning gains in proprioceptive acuity and untrained sensorimotor performance at the practiced joint. Importantly, these gains transfer almost fully to the neighboring, proximal joint/limb system.

Introduction

Within the context of motor learning, transfer of learning refers to how an acquired skill can be executed in a new context, a new workspace, or how a learnt motor pattern transfers from one effector system to another [1,2,3]. Of specific interest has been to determine what parameters influence such learning and, importantly, whether it transfers to other motor systems, such as between homologous muscle systems such as those controlling the left and right hand. There is evidence of inter- and intralimb transfer of motor learning [1, 4,5,6]. That is to say, untrained limb systems exhibit signs of motor learning without practice. Moreover, neuromotor systems adapt to unknown force fields [7, 8] and the learning of such new dynamics studies induces observable changes in the movement kinematics and kinetics of the untrained limb [9].

While there is solid evidence for motor learning transfer, the transfer of proprioceptive or somatosensory learning has received less attention. This is noteworthy given the fact that proprioceptive signals are essential for motor learning and that the major neural somatosensory and motor cortical areas have substantial reciprocal connections [10]. Moreover, there is solid evidence that proprioceptive and motor learning is bidirectional [11,12,13]. That is to say, gains in motor performance are associated with concurrent gains in proprioceptive function such as an increase in position sense acuity and vice versa [14].

With respect to the transfer of proprioceptive learning, recent work from our group documented that a short 45-min visuomotor training of the right wrist significantly reduced position sense thresholds in the trained wrist and that these gains in proprioceptive function transferred to the contralateral left wrist [15]. Interestingly, the position sense acuity of both wrists improved at nearly the same rate as their respective JND thresholds were reduced by approximately 30% at the end of training. Importantly, the time scale of memory consolidation differed for the transfer of proprioceptive and motor learning. The gains in proprioceptive acuity were measurable immediately after training and decayed quickly within 24 h, while a motor transfer was only observed 24 h past testing. In that study the fast decay of proprioceptive learning was likely owed to the short training period. A previous report [11] employing a robot-aided wrist visuomotor training over 5 days documented that consolidation of proprioceptive learning was observed over several days with improvements in position sense acuity still measurable up to 5 days after the last training.

The current study was designed to enhance our knowledge about the magnitude and extent of ipsilateral transfer of motor and proprioceptive learning. The term ipsilateral here refers to the transfer of learning to adjacent joints within the same limb that are controlled by different, non-homologous muscles. Using a robotic wrist exoskeleton, healthy adults learnt a visuomotor task that required them to make increasingly precise, small amplitude wrist movements. We then determined position sense thresholds of the wrist and the adjacent elbow to obtain a psychophysical marker of proprioceptive learning. In addition, participants performed a goal-directed pointing task that they had not practiced before and after training to assess to what extent motor learning had transferred from the wrist/hand to the elbow/forearm motor systems. Finally, we examined how well such learning retained after 24 h.

More at link.

No comments:

Post a Comment