What fucking useless research! Predicting failure to recover DOES NOTHING FOR SURVIVORS! You're fired!
A prospective study of MRI biomarkers in the brain and lower limb muscles for prediction of lower limb motor recovery following stroke
- 1Department of Neuroradiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 2Stroke Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 3Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 4Department of Medical Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 5Department of Neuroscience, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
- 6Department of Stroke Medicine, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 7Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
The aim of this prospective observational longitudinal study was to explore and decipher the predictive value of prospective MRI biomarkers in the brain and lower limb muscles for 3-month lower limb motor recovery following stroke. In the brain, we measured the integrity of the corticospinal tract (fractional anisotropy/“FA”). In the muscles, we measured volume, fatty replacement (fat fraction analysis and proton spectroscopy) and oedema. Measurements were taken at two time points: (1) within 4 weeks of stroke (baseline measurement, clinical and imaging) and (2) 3 months following stroke (follow up measurement, clinical only). Clinical measurements consisted of assessments of functional ability and strength (Fugl-Meyer score, motor NIHSS, Functional Ambulation Category/“FAC”, and muscle dynamometry). Twenty-three patients completed imaging and clinical assessments at baseline and follow-up; five patients had partial imaging assessment. The results provided some evidence that damage to the corticospinal tract would result in less motor recovery: recovery of the Fugl-Meyer score and dynamometric ankle plantarflexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and knee extension correlated positively and significantly with fractional anisotropy (0.406–0.457; p = 0.034—p = 0.016). However, fractional anisotropy demonstrated a negative correlation with recovery of the Functional Ambulation Category (−0.359, p = 0.046). For the muscle imaging, significant inverse correlation was observed between vastus lateralis fat fraction vs. NIHSS recovery (−0.401, p = 0.04), and a strong positive correlation was observed between ratio of intra- to extra-myocellular lipid concentrations and the recovery of knee flexion (0.709, p = 0.007). This study supports previous literature indicating a positive correlation between the integrity of the corticospinal tract and motor recovery post-stroke, expanding the limited available literature describing this relationship specifically for the lower limb. However, recovery of functional ambulation behaved differently to other clinical recovery markers by demonstrating an inverse relationship with corticospinal tract integrity. The study also introduces some muscle imaging biomarkers as potentially valuable in the prediction of 3-month lower limb motor recovery following stroke.
More at link.
No comments:
Post a Comment