Diagnostic accuracy of large and medium vessel occlusions in acute stroke imaging by neurology residents and stroke fellows: A comparison of CT angiography alone and CT angiography with CT perfusion

So you did NOTHING to measure 100% recovery after this diagnosis? Good to know you don't give a crap about getting survivors recovered!

Diagnostic accuracy of large and medium vessel occlusions in acute stroke imaging by neurology residents and stroke fellows: A comparison of CT angiography alone and CT angiography with CT perfusion

Fawaz F Alotaibi https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4516-6527, Asma Alshahrani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-1843, […], and Fahad S Al-Ajlan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0501-479X falajlan97@kfshrc.edu.sa+17View all authors and affiliations

OnlineFirst

https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873231214218

• 
  

• • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Ethical approval
  • Informed consent
  • Declaration of conflicting interests
  • Funding
  • ORCID iDs
  • Footnote
  • References
• PDF / ePub
• • Cite article
  • Share options
  • Information, rights and permissions
  • Metrics and citations
  • Figures and tables

Abstract

Introduction:

Neurology senior residents and stroke fellows are first to clinically assess and interpret imaging studies of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of brain CT angiography (CTA) with and without CT perfusion (CTP) between neurology senior residents and stroke fellows.

Methods:

In this neuroimaging study, nine practitioners (four senior neurology residents (SNRs) and five stroke fellows (SFs)) clinically assessed and interpreted the imaging data of 50 cases (15 normal images, 21 large vessel occlusions (LVOs) and 14 medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) in two sessions, 1 week apart in comparison to final diagnosis of experienced neuroradiologist and experienced stroke neurologist consensus. Interrater agreement of CTA alone and CTA with CTP was quantified using kappa statistics, sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy.

Results:

Overall, arterial occlusions were correctly identified in 221/315 (70.1%) with CTA alone and in 266/315 (84.4%) with CTA and CTP (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of overall arterial occlusions detection with CTA alone was 94.2% (95% CI: 90.8%–96.6%) while with addition of CTP was 98% (95% CI: 95.6%–99.3%), The specificity of CTA alone was 74.7% (95% CI: 67.2%–81.3%) which increased with CTP to 84.4% (95% CI: 77.7%–89.8%). The likelihood of correct identification with CTA alone was 156/189 (82.54%) for LVOs and 65/126 (51.59%) for MeVOs. This increased to 169/189 (89.42%; p = 0.054) for LVOs and 97/126 (76.98%; p < 0.001) for MeVOs when the CTA images with CTP were viewed. There was good overall interrater agreement between readers when using CTA alone (k 0.71, 95% CI, 0.62–0.80) and almost perfect (k 0.85, 95% CI, 0.76–0.94) when CTP was added to the image for interpretation. CTA and CTP had a significantly lower median interquartile range (IQR) interpretation time than CTA alone (114 [IQR, 103–120] s vs 156 [IQR, 133–160] s, p < 0.001).

Discussion:

In cerebral arterial occlusions, the rate of LVO and MeVOs detections increases when adding CTP to CTA. The accuracy and time for diagnosing arterial occlusion can be significantly improved if CTP is added to CTA. As MeVOs are commonly missed by front-line neurology senior residents or stroke fellows, cases with significant deficits and no apparent arterial occlusions need to be reviewed with neuroradiological expertise.

Graphical abstract